Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Academic and Research Vice-rector

Activities guide and evaluation rubric

1. General description of the course

Faculty or Escuela de Ciencias Básicas, Tecnología e

Academic Unit Ingeniería
Academic Level Professional
Academic Field Disciplinar training
Course Name Diseño de Sistemas
Course Code 301309
Course Type Theoretical Can be yes ☒ No ☐
enabled
Number of Credits 2

2. Description of the activity

Number
Type of the
Individual ☐ Collaborative ☒ of 6
activity:
weeks
Unit
Intermediate:Unit
Moment of
Initial ☐ II - System ☒ Final ☐
evaluation:
Design and
Development
Delivery Environment of the
Evaluative score of the
activity: Monitoring and Evaluation
activity: 175
Environment
Starting date of the activity: Deadline of the activity:
October 18, 2018 November 29, 2018
● Identifies the various factors to be taken into account in designing
an information system, processes and generating results.
● The student identifies and implements the features and elements of
design entries and subcontrols, data validation, design source and
data capture documents for input, in addition to the features and
elements of design products, product types and how to present
information.

Topics to develop:
● User interface desing
● Based design patterns
● Webapps design

Steps, phases of the learning strategy to develop

 Analysis of the situation.
 Conceptualization

1. Enunciate the principles of design that "give the user control".

2. Enunciate design principles "reduce the need for storage by the
user".
3. Enunciate principles of design to "make consistent interface."
4. Indicate how to screen layouts with the definition of major and
minor items on the menu for the information system.
5. Develop multiple screen layouts with defining issues of primary and
secondary menu for the information system.
6. Describe the focus of tools to help the user to make design pattern
analysis.
7. Give some examples that illustrate why the variability of response
time becomes important.
8. Develop an approach that integrates automatically error messages
and tools to help the user. That is, the system will automatically
recognize the type of error and give a help window with suggestions
to correct it. Perform a reasonably complete software design that
takes into account the data structures and algorithms.
9. Discuss the three "parts" of a design pattern and a concrete
example of each in a software campodistinto
10. What is the difference between a non-generative and one
generative pattern?
11. How do they differ architectural patterns of component patterns?
12. What's structure and how it differs from a pattern? What is a
language and how it differs from a pattern?
13. Find five repositories patterns and present the brief description of
the types of patterns containing each.
14. Find three repositories UI patterns. Select one each repository and
a brief description of it.
15. Attributes indicate the quality of webapps. Select three that you
think are most important and construct an argument to explain why
it should be emphasized each during the design work webapps.
16. The reader is a designer webapps Future Learning Corporation,
 distance learning company. Try to implement a "learning engine"
that allows internet-based deliver course content to students. The
Learning Engine provides the basic infrastructure to deliver
learning content on any topic (content designers will prepare the
appropriate). Develop the design of a prototype interface for motor
learning.
17. What is the difference between architecture and content of a
webapp?
18. Use UML to develop three or four representations of the design of
content objects that would be encountered when designing the
"motor learning" described in Problem 13.4.
19. What is the difference between the navigation syntax and
semantics of this?
20. Write a short text on a hypermedia design method than MDHOO

 Knowledge Environment
Environment
 Collaborative Learning Environment
for the
 Monitoring and Evaluation Environment
development
Individual:
It should be carried out:
1. Distributed among the small group, the solution
of points 1 to 20 described in activities to
develop.
2. Note: You must deliver the solution of the points
in full. Having no involvement of any member of
the small group, you must redeploy the solution
of the questions.
Products to
Collaborative:
deliver by
 Consolidate the contributions of the members of
student
the small group.
 Each member must give its endorsement to the
consolidated document before uploading it to the
indicated space.
 Deliver to the monitoring and evaluation
environment in the space corresponding to STEP
3, a PDF document containing:
o Cover page
o Introduction
 o Goals
o Solution of proposed points
o Conclusions
The name of the document is: name CW_Code
Couerse_## (Example: CW_301309_00).
The document must be delivered with APA style
http://www.apastyle.org/
Weighting: 35% of the total rating (175 pts.)

General guidelines for the collaborative work

In the development of collaborative work by
students requires some key elements that lead to an
academic exercise, responsible and effective.
For this to be achieved it is necessary that among
others with the steps outlined in the document entitled
"Guidelines of the curriculum in the UNAD / Aspects of
collaborative work and accompanying teacher" (Abbey,
Sailing, Montero & Vargas, 2014, pp. 16-18):
Recognition of stakeholders: At the beginning of
each evaluative activity the student will make its
Planning of recognition as an stakeholder of the group, presenting
activities for their strengths and exposing the channels of
the communication to be effective interaction.
development
of Assignment of roles: Each member of the group
collaborative will assume one of the roles listed, which will be
work functionally during the implementation of the
collaborative work. It is suggested to rotate roles in
each of the activities, tending to a comprehensive
training of all participants in the group.
Planning of the academic activities: planning of
the activities becomes a key element for the
achievement of the task. The group will undertake a
work plan for the development of academic activity, on
the basis of the analytical reflection of the agenda of
activities, the guide and rubric assessment. Carried out
the required readings by acquiring ownership issue.
 Staging of the principles of collaborative work: it
is important to internalize the principles of interaction,
growth and responsible action to ensure the excellent
development of their learning process and presentation
of written products that correspond to the quality of
what was requested in the course.
The active participation: it requires a proactive
participation with individual contributions relevant to
the construction of a product that account as requested
by the activity guide.

Each student will choose one of the five roles that

are specified in the check box next to this and assume
responsibly the function of this in order for the
participation in the collaborative work is relevant,
active with an assertive communication and the
construction of collaborative products requested and
Roles to within the established times.
perform by The document "General Guidelines of the
the student curriculum in the UNAD / Aspects of collaborative work
in the and accompanying teaching (abbey and others: 2014),
collaborative p. 11, establishes the following roles for the
group implementation of the collaborative work of course:
Compiler.
Reviewer.
Evaluator.
Deliveries.
Alerts.

Relate the roles that are established in the UNAD

for collaborative work. It is important to assume with
Roles and responsibility, but without leaving your commitment as
responsibilit a student in front of the development of the activity.
y for the
delivery of Compiler: Consolidate the document that is
products by constituted as the end product of the debate, taking
students into account that has been included the contributions
of all participants and to include only the participants
involved in the process. You should inform the person
 responsible for the alerts to notify who did their shares,
which are not included in the product to be delivered.
Reviewer: Ensure that the written to comply with
the rules of presentation of works required by the
teacher.
Evaluator: Ensure that the document contains
the criteria present in the rubric. You must
communicate to the person in charge of the alerts to
report to the other members of the team in case you
have to make any adjustment on the subject.
Deliveries: Alert on the delivery times of
products and send the document in the time stipulated,
using the resources allocated for the shipment, and
indicate to other colleagues who has made the delivery.
Alerts: Ensure that you notify the members of
the Group of developments in the work and inform the
teacher through the forum of labor and the messaging
of the course, which has been carried out in the delivery
of the document.

Use of the standard PAC, version 3 in Spanish

Translation (version 6):
APA are the style of organization and
presentation of information used in the area of social
sciences. These are published under a Manual that
Use of allows you to have the ways in which you must submit
references a scientific article. You can find the most relevant
aspects of the sixth edition of the Manual of APA, as
references, quotes, preparation and presentation of
tables and figures, headers and seriation, among
others, by going to the page http://www.apastyle.org/

What is plagiarism for the UNAD? plagiarism is

defined by the dictionary of the Real Academia as the
Plagiarism
action of "copy the substance of the works of others,
policy
making them as their own." Therefore plagiarism is a
serious offense is the equivalent in the academic field,
to theft. A student who plagiarizes does not take their
 education seriously, and does not respect the
intellectual work of others.

There is no plagiarism. If a student makes use of

any portion of the work of another person, and does
not document its source, is committing an act of
plagiarism. Now, it is clear that all we have with the
ideas of others at the time of submission of our own,
and that our knowledge is based on a knowledge of the
other. But when we rely on the work of others,
academic honesty requires that explicitly announce the
fact that we are using an external source, either by
appointment or by means of a paraphrase annotated.

For the UNAD, 029 in the agreement of 13

December 2013, article 99, are regarded as offenses
against the academic order, among others, the
following: "(e)The plagiarism, that is to say, to present
as their own the whole or part of a work, work,
document, or invention made by another person. It also
implies the use of quotations or references, or propose
citad offenses where there is no coincidence between it
and the reference"; and (f) "The play, or copy with non-
profit, educational materials or results of research
products, which have intellectual rights reserved for the
University.

Academic sanctions that will face the student are

the following:
(A) In cases of academic fraud shown in the
respective evaluation or academic work, the grade will
be zero point zero (0.0) without prejudice to the
disciplinary sanction.
(B) In cases related to plagiarism in academic
work whatever its nature, the grade will be zero point
zero (0.0), without prejudice to the disciplinary
sanction.

4. Evaluation rubric
evaluation rubric
Type of Individual Collaborative
activity: activity ☐ activity ☒
Intermediate
Unit: I -
Time of requirenments
Initial ☐ Engineering ☒ Final ☐
evaluation
and
Managemen
The performance levels of individual
activity
evaluated Punctuation
Highest
Media score low score
score
It presents
It presents significant No
Contributions
contributions contributions contributions
with little
to building to the for
meaningful 15 points
collaborative development construction
content
work of the work
activity
(15 points) (7 points) (0 points)
Assertive
Performs
Feeds back opinions Does not
opinions but
the performs the participate in
has no
contributions contributions the forum. 25 points
foundation
made by of fellow
their peers (Up to 25 (To 0
(12 points)
points) points)
Solve at Resolves less
Does not
least five (5) than five (5)
Resolves as solve any of
of the of the
items the
proposed proposed 100 points
proposed questions
questions questions
activity
(Up to 100 (To 0
(12 points)
points) points)
Performance levels collaborative activity
Aspect
Highest Punctuation
evaluated Media score low score
score
Participates a substantial Although Does not
makes contribution there is no participate in 12 points
contributions to the participation, the
to the construction contributions construction
construction of the final lacking depth of the final
of the final product document
document makes
(Up to 12
(6 points) (Up 0 points)
points)
APA applies
Not
throughout It is partially
applicable
the applied APA
APA apply APA 12 points
document
(Up to 12
(6 points) (Up 0 points)
points)
It presented
a document It presented a
with a good document document
organization with some devoid of
Structure of
comply with errors in your any
the final 11 points
the request organization organization
document
contained in or spelling
the Guide
(Up to 5 (Up 0
(11 points)
points) points)
Final score 175