The complainant's counsel informs the court that they had subpoenaed the physician/records custodian of Parañaque Hospital but the attending physician is no longer there. When the complainant followed up to get a copy of the medico legal certificate, the current records custodian refused to accept the subpoena because it was addressed to the "Physician/records custodian" and not directly to him. The records custodian said he may not attend the June
The complainant's counsel informs the court that they had subpoenaed the physician/records custodian of Parañaque Hospital but the attending physician is no longer there. When the complainant followed up to get a copy of the medico legal certificate, the current records custodian refused to accept the subpoena because it was addressed to the "Physician/records custodian" and not directly to him. The records custodian said he may not attend the June
The complainant's counsel informs the court that they had subpoenaed the physician/records custodian of Parañaque Hospital but the attending physician is no longer there. When the complainant followed up to get a copy of the medico legal certificate, the current records custodian refused to accept the subpoena because it was addressed to the "Physician/records custodian" and not directly to him. The records custodian said he may not attend the June
National Capital Judicial Region Branch 90, Parañaque City
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES,
Complainant,
- Versus - CRIM. CASE NO.18-2697
FOR: LESS SERIOUS PHYSICAL INJURIES ANGELA MIA ARCANGEL y ACEBEDO, GIANNO GARCIA y GARING, RAYMOND WEIL YLAGAN y AZUCENA, Accused. X------------------------------------------x
MANIFESTATION
Complainant, through the undersigned counsel, most respectfully
manifest that;
1. During the preliminary conference the prosecutor ask that a
subpoena be served to the Physician/Records Custodian of Parañaque Hospital.
2. It was sent and was recieved by Parañaque Hospital. They
replied to the court that the attending Physician of the Complainant that was issued a subpoena is no longer there at the hospital.
3. Complainant followed it up when he tried to get the copy of
medico legal certificate from the hospital.
4. Complainant got to talk to the records custodian and served a
copy of the subpoena.
5. The said records custodian refused to receive the subpoena
for the reason that according to him the subpoena is addressed to the “Physician/records custodian” and not directed to him and said he can deny it, hence he might not appear in the hearing of this case on June 19, 2019.
Respectfully submitted, Parañaque City, June __, 2019.