Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Executive Department Structural Outline
Executive Department Structural Outline
Structural Outline
(All parenthetical references are to Article VII of the 1987 Constitution, unless
otherwise specified)
POWERS
Powers in general:
SPECIFIC POWERS
APPOINTMENT POWER
Officers lower in rank whose appointments the Congress may by law vest in
the president alone.
o For the lower courts, the President shall issue the appointments within
ninety days from the submission of the list. (Art. VIII, S9)
o Essentially executive.
o The faithful execution clause gives the President the following powers
and duties –
President must observe the limits imposed by the Constitution and Laws
(Faithful Execution Clause; S17)
NOTE:
While the power of control pertains to the power over “acts or decisions” or officers in the executive
department. Power to discipline or remove pertains to the power over the “person” of the officers
themselves.
The power of an officer to alter or modify or nullify or set aside what a subordinate had done in the
performance of his duties and to substitute the judgment of the former for that of the latter. This power,
however, merely applies to the exercise of control over the acts of the subordinate in the performance of
his duties. It only means that the President may set aside the judgment or action taken by a subordinate
in the performance of his duties.
The power of control, therefore, is not the source of the Executive's disciplinary power over the person
of his subordinates. Rather, his disciplinary power flows from his power to appoint The power to
remove is inherent in the power to appoint. Moreover, this inherent disciplinary power has been made
subject to limitation by the legislature through the tatter's power to provide for a civil service system one
of whose main features is security of tenure: "No officer or employee in the Civil Service shall be
suspended or dismissed except for cause as provided by law.” (Article IX, B, Section 2(3). Hence, it can
be said that while the Executive has control over the "judgment" or "discretion" of his subordinates, it is
the legislature which has control over their “person."
Grant reprieves, commutations and pardons, and remit fines and forfeitures.
o After conviction by final judgment, the Presidemt may grant:
PARDON AMNESTY
Granted solely by the President Granted by the President but requires the concurrence of
a majority of all the Members of the Congress
Private act which must be pleaded and proved by the Public act of which the courts should take judicial notice
person pardoned
Granted only to those convicted by final judgment for Granted to classes of persons or communities who may
all be guilty of political offense (but has been recognized in
kinds of offenses tax cases), generally before or after the institution of the
criminal prosecution and sometimes after conviction
Looks forward and relieves the offender from the Looks backward and abolishes and puts into oblivion the
consequences of an offense of which he has been offense itself, it so overlooks and obliterates the offense
convicted, that is, it abolishes or forgives the with which is charged that the person released by
punishment, amnesty stands before the law precisely as though he
and for that reason it does not work restoration of the had committed no offense.
rights to hold public office, or the right of suffrage,
unless
such rights be expressly restored by the terms of the
pardon," and it "in no case exempts the culprit from the
payment of the civil indemnity imposed upon him by the
sentence"
In cases of impeachment
QUALIFICATIONS
Natural-born citizen
Registered voter
Able to read and write
At least 40 years of age on day of election
Resident of Philippines at least 10 immediately preceding election years
TERM AND TERM LIMITS
Executive Privilege
o The power to withhold certain types of information from the courts,
Congress and the public. (Senate v. Ermita, G.R. No. 169777, April
20, 2006)
o The claim of executive privilege is highly recognized in cases where
the subject of the inquiry relates to a power textually committed by the
Constitution to the President, such as in the area of military and
foreign relations. Under our Constitution, the President is the
repository of the commander-in-chief, appointing, pardoning and
diplomatic powers. Consistent with the doctrine of separation of
powers, the information relating to these powers may enjoy greater
confidentiality than others. (Neri v. Senate Committee 2008)
o The types of information include those which are of a nature that
disclosure would subvert military or diplomatic objectives, or
information about the identity of persons who furnish information of
violations of law, or information about internal deliberations
comprising the process by which government decisions are reached.
o A claim of privilege must be stated with sufficient particularity to
enable Congress or the court to determine its legitimacy. Absent then a
statement of the specific basis of a claim of executive privilege, there
is no way of determining whether it falls under one of the traditional
privileges, or whether, given the circumstances in which it is made, it
should be respected. The lack of specificity renders an assessment of
the potential harm resulting from disclosure impossible. However,
Congress must not require the executive to state the reasons for the
claim with such particularity as to compel disclosure of the
information which the privilege is meant to protect. (Senate vs Ermita,
supra)
o Privilege covers:
Military
Diplomatic
Other national security matters
o It is the information itself that is privileged, not the executive officials
themselves
o There must be a formal claim of privilege with specific basis given
o Exception to privilege:
Information covered by executive privilege may be disclosed if
there is a “sufficient showing of need”.
PROHIBITIONS