0601/1001/2075 Some BA. LLB.X Semoster /5 Year B.A. LLB Semester /5 Year B.B.A. LL.B. xX Sem (Ol lew Examination, June/July 2019 ee LAW OF EVIDENCE Year LL.B. vi Seme: aj.-Min. System) x ation : 3 Hours Max. Marks : 100 Instructions : 1, Answer Q. No. 9 and any five of the remaining. 2. Q. No. 9 carries 20 marks and rest Carry 16 marks each. 3. Answers must be written either in English or Kannada completely. Define Evidence. Explain the different kinds of evidence. Marks : 16 ESL Qn RBG da3 Spores Deon, No. 2._ Explain the doctrine of ‘Res gestae’ with decided cases. Marks : 16 “Ont rx ampodatah Agros gedrordnoor axon. No. a What is dying declaration ? What are the conditions for its ¢ admissibility as evidence 2 Bote ded Geos aowders 2 wi Boone cin 2 Marks : 16 Tia, MB TON AeCOXeD qdozh No. 4. Who is an Expert ? State the circumstances in which expert opinion becomes relevent. 335008 aad 9 sag expe odiie Aoxowcdemrioss Rockers, 8920, Marks : 16 No. 87 What are public documents ? How they are proved ? Marks : 16 % mBrwad dagsexondd aod oinaa) 7 vanday, wer PRBBARWBID No. 6: Define Estoppel. State the different kinds of estoppel. Marks : 16 Y anog ena MWA’, QO3 aeoord Qwowrday, 2040. P.T.O.os 01/1 001/2075 OE 1. No. 7. Explain the rotection given to the following communications @ iGo Indian Evidenoa'na M, (0) Communications between Husband and Wife th 4 (b) Communications between a client and his advocate, Bete Skea so ate 80h) me, eOHdaas, aes oer rts, oo Beeston qmoIe03) 8 OOF ag (a) as Bow xadog Beetnys (b) Bod bay RMobmMOow aerox atevsres, No. 8. Write Short notes on an it Y two of the following, Mark BRO Ava omy Laatd root f 2g £) Contession by co-accused We 0-6 — & edness asgaait ee Soa (0) Alibi 2-6 [| cag ADOT 9 Leading questions Fre T~ 998 zoese auriey S (a ~ 2: \ ». 8. Answer any two, 7) “Vale. 10: Seroes 0a eugor, g ~ Yn Pade. (8) The question is whether ‘A’ robbed ‘B’. Does the fact that Shortly \_ before the robbery, ‘B’ went to a shop with Money in his Possession \ and showed it to third Persons, become relevant ? ‘8 oowsaa> ‘ey Powvaaaay aor Rn@msaire dowwad Bee 9 (b) The question is whether ‘A’ Was a legitimate son of ‘B’. Does the fact ZL _ that, ‘A’ was always treated as such by the members of the family je relevant 2 WY [8'8 ‘ws dobre arg ov G8 acd. Devoe AcA ded ‘eda, Babee abritocse Aricbias sch soaoaotsy Abnotacle 9 (c) ‘A’ sues ‘B' for Money due ona bond, ‘B' has admitted the execution of bond, but contends that it was obtained by fraud. ‘A’ denies it, On whom the burden of proof was ? ‘ea wom moata 85,00 wordenod Booey ‘n'a ate) mst Beams. ‘wa © omobe tadebsotaria Lwaitrorh, sad vad BaewOod weoMATeY cond soos ROSA T. Serowae. and abled ceoaad 20