Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aquatic Weeds and Their Management For Fisheries: January 2009
Aquatic Weeds and Their Management For Fisheries: January 2009
Aquatic Weeds and Their Management For Fisheries: January 2009
net/publication/258931408
CITATIONS READS
2 7,243
1 author:
Subhendu Datta
Central Institute of Fisheries Education
141 PUBLICATIONS 217 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Development of Cheap and Simple Test Kits for Fish Farmers and Entrepreneurs View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Subhendu Datta on 13 March 2014.
What is a weed?
Weeds are plants which grow out of their place, interfere with the utilization of natural
resources, prolific, persistent, resistant, competitive, harmful and even poisonous in nature and
can grow under adverse climatic conditions. Some times economical plants may also grow out
their proper places which are termed as rouge and not weeds e.g. presence of mustard plats in
wheat fields, plants of durum wheat variety growing in aestivum variety etc. The process of
removing (uprooting) these plants is called rouging.
Aquatic plants are essential parts of natural aquatic systems and form the basis of a water
body’s health and productivity. On the other side, when aquatic plants become over abundant it
requires control. Water is one of most important natural resource and in fact basis of all life
forms on this planet. Therefore, appropriate O2 management of water from source to its
utilization is necessary to sustain the normal function of life. It is an important part of the natural
resource management. The presence of excessive aquatic vegetation influences the management
of water in natural waterways; man made canals and reservoirs which amount to millions of
kilometres of such water bodies. They pose serious threat to fish and fisheries. They compete
with fish for water, nutrients, light, niche and oxygen and thus reduce the yields. Fish worth
millions of rupees are lost every year at the hand of weed menace. Considering the losses caused
by aquatic weeds, their management is of utmost importance to improve the availability of water
from the source to its end users. This does not only improve availability but also the conveyance
efficiency. Growth of aquatic weeds interferes with the storage and delivery systems of irrigation
water, maintenance of canals, drains, barrages, lakes, ponds etc. These systems often get choked
with the weeds and cause environmental pollution. On low lying areas, adjoining irrigation and
drainage channels, soil salinity and alkalinity problems do arise.
Algae
Microscopic algae are planktonic and their rapid proliferation results in to algal blooms,
in which they form scums and/or color the water green or yellow-green. Sometimes they cause
red, black, or oily streaks in the water called "blooms". Examples of this group are Microcystis
and Anabaena. Blooms usually occur where abundant nutrients are reaching the water. They
should be treated with chemicals before they cause a noticeable color but a sudden die-off of
these algae can cause fish kills. Filamentous algae also known as moss (Fig 1) form floating,
mat-like growths which usually begin around the edges and bottom of ponds in the early spring.
Most prominent filamentous algae in ponds are Spirogyra, Nitella and Pithophora. Often,
repeated chemical treatments during the summer season are necessary for effective control.
Chara (Fig 2) or stonewort usually grows in very hard water and is often calcified and brittle.
The plant is rooted, and leaves are arranged along the stem in whorls. It grows completely
underwater and has a musky smell. Chara can be difficult to control once it has become
established and has a heavy coating of calcium carbonate. Use contact herbicides when the plants
are still young and not heavily calcified. Although this plant resembles some flowering plants, it
is an alga.
Flowering Plants
Flowering plants can be grouped into three broad categories according to where they are
found in a body of water.
Submerged weeds
Weeds species belonging to this group germinate/sprout, grow and reproduce beneath the
water surface. Their roots and reproductive organs remain in the soil at the bottom of the water
body. These weeds damage the maximum, because they are not visible on the surface and
Aquatic Weeds and Their Management for Fisheries Subhendu Datta 4
impede the flow water varying upon the degree of their intensity and growth. Most of these
weeds are found in shallow and medium deep water bodies, continuous flowing canals and
drainage ditches. Submerged weeds may be further categorized as (a) Rooted and (b). Non-
rooted or floating-submerged weeds.
Rooted and non-rooted submerged weeds: Submerged weeds which are completely
submerged within water and rooted in the bottom soil e.g. Hydrilla, Najas etc.
Non-rooted free floating submerged weeds e.g. Ceratophyllum.
Fish poisons:
Few weeds are also used for fish poisons. The bulb of Chlorogelum pomeridinum is used
for fish poison. Leaves of turkey mullein is also used as fish poison.
(a). Aquatic weeds create situation which are ideal for mosquito growth:
The mosquitoes are sheltered and protected from their predators by aquatic weeds roots
and leafy growth and are responsible for the spread of malaria, yellow fever, river blindness and
encephalitis.
The habitat and the type of aquatic weed flora influence the technique of weed control. In
broader sense, weed “control” means keeping the weeds at a level where they do not cause
economic damage. Aquatic weed can be brought under control to manageable limits by various
methods. Broadly, these methods can be grouped under four groups: -
Preventive Approaches
Quarantines are legislative tools that may be used to mitigate the effect of weeds.
Quarantine is defined as the restriction imposed by duly constituted authorities whereby the
production, movement or existence of plants, plant products, animals, animal products, any other
article or material or the normal activity of persons is brought under regulation in order that
introduction or spread of a pest may be prevented or restricted. If a pest has already been
introduced and established in a small area, quarantine is necessary so that it may be controlled or
eradicated or dissemination stopped in newer areas, thereby reducing the losses that would
otherwise occur through damage done by pest. Preventive weed programs usually require
community action through enactment and enforcement of appropriate laws and regulations. In
India, irrigation canals appear to be a potential source for spreading water hyacinth.
Proper design and construction of ponds is an important factor in preventive control of
weeds. Shallow water at the margins provides an ideal habitat for immersed weeds, such as
cattails. These weeds can spread then to deeper water. Banks should be sloped steeply so that in
shallow region water is at least 2' to 3' deep. Proper design and construction of ditches and
channels makes weed control easier in the future. If the banks are leveled and smoothed, hard-to-
reach places will be eliminated. Lining canals will help to alleviate water weed problems, too.
When prevention and eradication fail to give desired results under aquatic environment, the only
alternative left is to keep aquatic weeds under manageable limits so that water use efficiency
with respect of water storage in reservoirs and transportation through canals is not reduced.
Control Methods
Controlling weeds in an aquatic environment is greatly complicated because of lack of
ownership of water bodies. Most of these are places of public interest. Often frequent approvals
are needed from public health Dept., water surveyor, fish and other wildlife agencies before
weed control works may be carried out. In many developing and under developed countries there
is no control on water use. In many Asian countries a water body can be used for a number of
purposes including bathing, drinking, stock watering and irrigation.
(ii). Cutting
This method consists of physically cutting the biomass over and under the water with the
help of heavy knives, or mechanical weed cutters. In the case of Typha, it has been observed that
if plants are cut under the water and remain submerged for more than a week to 10 days, control
is possible. This may also hold good for Phragmites, spp. Also mechanical cutting of water
hyacinth, Chara spp, Filamentous algae, Potamogeton spp. will give temporary relief from weed
infestations. A mechanical weed cutter is used to cut floating and submersed weed at 1-1.5 m
depth in water reservoirs. It consists of sharp cutter bar and operates from a boat. The harvested
weeds are collected and water is squeezed from them to hasten dehydration and desiccation.
Water weed cutters and harvesters: In high discharge canals and very large water bodies weed
cutters/harvesters are used to control rooted submerged weeds.
Under water cutters: These are normally attached to a motorboat. The equipment consists of
sharp and strong cutter bars with heavy reciprocating blades, sliding against a fixed blade.
Harvesters: Machine that cut and picks up the weeds from water body and convey these to shore
simultaneously.
Under water weed cutters were employed at Kota (India) to clear Chambal canal from
aquatic weeds (Gupta, 1973). At the Central Institute of Fisheries Technology (CIFT), a portable
machine gadget has been developed which can clear both floating and submersed weeds at the
rate of 1-1.5 ha area per day.
(iii) Chaining:
Chaining consists of a heavy iron drag chain attached between two tractors, which is
dragged down a densely weed infested ditch or medium canal. The chains tear the rooted weeds
and loosen them from the bottom. This method has been found effective where there is
dominance of emergent and submersed weeds. The practice of chaining should be followed when
new shoots of weed are around 30-50cm above water level. Dragging the chain up and down the
stream may be effective in dislodging most of the weeds. For effective weed control the practice
should be repeated at frequent intervals if found successful. One of the limitations of this method
is that ditches need to have uniform width, accessible from both the sides with tractors and free
from trees and other such obstructions. The debris thus collected at the end should be removed to
avoid reinfestation by plant propagules further downstream.
Aquatic Weeds and Their Management for Fisheries Subhendu Datta 11
(iv) Dredging:
Dredging is one of the techniques by which the weed vegetation along with excess silt is
removed. A Dredger is a machine equipped with a forked bucket which can be opened and
closed on command. The machine could operate from the ground or from a boat in water.
Dredging is done in large water bodies, canals and drains. It is a slow, time consuming and costly
operation. Small lakes, water reservoirs etc. get silted if area surrounding them is under
cultivation or surrounded by erodable lands with poor aforestation. When silts gets sedimented at
bottom the water retention gets decreased and emergent weeds (Typha, Scirpus spp. etc.)
establish. Such a situation demands the use of dredging facilities to remove silt and increase the
water capacity of lakes. This also reduces the problem of emergent weeds.
Fig. 11. Dredging essentially meant for desilting along shores also helps in removal of aquatic
weed vegetation
(v) Mowing
This process consists of cutting the weeds close to the ground with the help of manual or
power operated mowing machines. Mowing is effective on tall growing plants. Repeated
mowing not only prevents seed production of emergent weeds but may also starve the under
ground parts which store carbohydrate reserves and provides energy to vegetative reproductive
organs. The best time to mow is when carbohydrate reserves are low. For many species it is
when the active growth phase is over and the time of flowering initiation starts. Repeated
mowing hastens carbohydrate depletion and slow death of plants. Generally, this practice
effectively controls emergent weeds on canals, water reservoirs etc banks. The effect of mowing
is short lived. The operation needs to be done frequently to exhaust carbohydrate resources.
Therefore this process does not give any effective control on long term basis.
(vi) Netting: Scattered floating weeds can be skimmed out of small water bodies using nets
usually made of 3 mesh coir ropes.
Fig. 12. Lining of canals helps in reducing weed vegetation (Yamuna Canal at Haryana)
Fig. 13.High velocity of water in flow water system discourages weed growth
b) Light
Light is an essential component of the photosynthetic process, which is necessary for the
growth and development of aquatic plants, especially submersed aquatic weeds. Growth of
submerged aquatic plants in small tanks and ponds can be checked by reducing light penetration.
Use of fiber glass screen is popular in some countries. Coloring chemicals have also been tried
for intercepting solar radiation reaching the water. Planting of trees on the banks of canals may
create shade to reduce light intensity hence checking the weed growth. However care should be
taken that trees or their appendages do not impede water flow. Light intensity can also be
checked by adding dyes to the water. This type of control is more effective in static water such as
ponds or tanks where dye remain suspended for a longer time. Ponds that are adequately
fertilized develop millions of tiny plants which give the water a cloudy appearance. If this water
is nearly 75 cm deep, submerged aquatic weeds have almost no chance to grow. This is due
primarily to shading the submerged plants.
(c) Sub-mergence
Typha is one of the most important emergent weed growing all along the unlined canals
margins of the water bodies and shallow submersed area s along canals. Cutting Typha close to
the ground followed by subsequent submergence or cutting Typha under the water provides
effective control of this weed.
Biological management of aquatic weeds is a broad term for the exploitation of living
organisms or their products to reduce or prevent the growth and reproduction of weeds. The
organisms that are used for biological control are diverse e.g. insects, pathogens, nematodes,
parasitic and competing plants. Biological control involves the deliberate use of organisms such
as insects or fungi to control weeds. Biological control is more complex than chemical control
because it requires (a) long term planning (b) multiple tactics and (c) manipulation of cropping
system to interact with the environment.
Weeds and its Bioagents and its origin Introduced Present status and remarks
origin and
released in
India
Eichhornia Neochetina bruchi 1983 Ex. Argentina via USA. Released
crassipes Hustache (Coleoptera, in Bangalore, Central India, North
(Mauritius) Solms, Curculionidae) eastern India. Established very
South America good control
Neochetina eichhorneae 1983 Ex. Argentina via USA. Released
Warner (Coleoptera, in Bangalore, Trichur, Hyderabad,
Curculionidae) Central and North eastern India.
Established very good control.
Orthogalumna terebrantis 1982 Ex. Argentina via USA. Released
Wheelwork, (Acar: in Bangalore, Established.
Galumindae)
Salvinia molesta Cyrtobagous Salviniae 1982 Ex. Brazil, via Australia. Released
D.S. Mitchell Calder and Sand in Bangalore and Trichur.
South America (Coleoptera; Established excellent control.
(Water fern, curculionidae)
Salvinia)
Paulinia acuminata (Da 1974 Ex. Trinidad. Established at one
Geer) (Orthoptera; site. Establishment elsewhere
Acrididea) uncertain because of Predatory
action of frogs and lycosid spiders.
Alternanthera Agasicles hygrophilla Ex. South America via USA.
Philoxeroides Selman and Vogt. Damages foliage.
(Mauritius)
Grisebach
Submerged Ctenopharyngodon idella 1959 Ex. China via Hong-Kong widely
aquatic weeds like (Cuvier and established and successful in fish
Hydrilla, Valenciennes) (Pisces; ponds and tank etc.
Ceratophyllum Cyprinidae) Grass carp
Najas
------do-------- Osphronemus goramy From early Ex. Java and Mauritius. Well
Lacepedes (Pisces; 1800 to established in Tamil Nadu and
Osphronemidae) 1916 successfully distributed to other
areas.
------do--------- Tilapia mossamabia 1953 Ex. Africa, limited value in
Peters (Pisces; Cichlidae) controlling soft leaf weeds in
ponds, tanks etc.
---------do------ Hypophthalmichthys !959 Established but not very effective.
moitrix (Cuvier and
Valenciennes) (Pisces;
Cyprprinidae) (Silver
Carp)
Fig. 16. Grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella), voracious feeder of submerged aquatic weeds
Allelopathy:
The concept that some plants may be allelopathic to certain weeds is receiving increased
attention in the search for weed control strategies. A great deal of literature is available on the
phenomenon of allelopathy which has been defined as “the direct or indirect harmful effect of
one plant on another through the production of chemical compounds that escape into the
environment.” Dry Casitta powder was added at the rate of 50g, 100, 150 and 200g/10 liters of
water (0.5,1.0,1.5 and 2.0 percent respectively) and water hyacinth plants were grown in plastic
tubs. All the treatments showed reduction in number of leaves and biomass in the treated tubs
when compared with untreated ones. Casitta powder @ 1 to 2% w/v could completely kill the
leaves and reduce the biomass two fold.
Aquatic weeds can be controlled effectively by use of herbicides. The time and method of
herbicide application varies with the type of weed flora and the habitat in which the weeds are to
be controlled. Control of aquatic weeds by herbicides is generally easier, quick and usually
cheaper, when compared to mechanical methods. The use of herbicides has the disadvantage of
being in water as residue and more especially in areas where there is no control on water use.
Not all herbicides can be used for weed control in aquatic environment.
A herbicide should have certain specifications for its use in different types of aquatic
environments;
(a). It should have high degree of phytotoxicity to kill weeds fast.
(b). The chemical should degrade or dissipate from water immediately after the action on weeds.
(c). Technology should be available for their use in static or flow water systems.
(d). It should be environmentally safe for humans, fish and other aquatic fauna. Many herbicides
are harmless to fish at concentrations required for control of weeds.
General considerations:
a) Spray of herbicides should be made when aquatic weeds are tender or they have just started
growth.
b) Emergent and floating perennial weeds are most susceptible when the herbicide is sprayed in
the mid to late summer when the leaves are fully emerged and succulent.
c) Annual weeds are sprayed before flowering to prevent production of seeds.
d) Treatment of submerged weeds and algae is normally recommended in spring and early
summer when the weeds are young and actively growing.
2,4-D, Glyphosate, Diquat, Paraquat are used to control the emergment and floating weeds.
o Diquat and Paraquat are contact, non selective herbicides and are very effective for control of
floating and submerged aquatic weeds and algae. However, the use of Diquat and Paraquat is
not permitted in fisheries.
2, 4-D
2,4-D is available in salt, ester or amine formulations. Few Trade names of 2,4-D in
India:
Na-Salt of 2,4-D (80% WP) - Killweed,
2,4-D Ethyl Ester (38% EC) -U-Kill
2,4-D Dimethyl amine salt (58% SL) – Aeromine
2,4-D is a translocated herbicide that is available as a granular or liquid formulation.
Liquid formulations of 2,4-D are used to control floating weeds such as water hyacinth
(Eichhornia crassipes) and several emerzed weeds. Amine formulations are slightly better for
aquatic applications because they are less toxic to fish. Granular 2,4-D controls submersed weeds
such as coontail (Ceratophyllum demersum) and emersed weeds such as waterlily (Nymphaea
spp.) in still water condition. In case of emergent ditch and bank weeds like Ipomea carnea such
situation develop during March-June in subtropical part of the world when it is most effective
time for spray treatment as water levels are low and crops not in nearby vicinity. Plant roots
absorb polar (salt) forms of 2,4-D most readily. Leaves absorb non-polar (ester) forms most
readily. A rainfree period of 4 to 6 hours is adequate for uptake and effective control of weeds. It
is effective in controlling water hyacinth; Sagittaria and Alamos spp., water lettuce (Pistia spp),
Nymphaea and other floating and broad-leaved emergent weeds. Post emergence spray
applications are effective. Apply 2,4-D when weeds are in active growth phase. If surface sprays
are used, they are most effective if entire plant is treated. Therefore in the case of ponds and
other reservoirs, decrease in water level will increase herbicide effectiveness. 2 to 4 kg 2,4-D/ha
is an effective rate for controlling floating and emergent weeds. Ester formulations being oil like
and contain oil soluble materials are toxic to fish. The granular ester form is safer to use in
aquatic applications than the liquid ester form.
Glyphosate (Roundup®)
Glyphosate translocates from the treated foliage to underground storage organs such as
rhizomes. It is most effective when applied during a perennial weed’s flowering or fruiting stage
@ 1.5-4 Kg/ha. If rainfall occurs within 6 hours of application, the effectiveness of glyphosate
will be reduced. It may take 7 to 10 days or more to observe the symptoms and may take 30 days
or more for complete destruction.
2,4-D, glyphosate etc. are not effective against submerged weeds. Till today there is not a
single herbicide registered in India which can give effective control against submerged weeds
(Datta, S., 2009; unpublished data from the research experiment on herbicidal control of floating
and submerged aquatic weeds).
Effect of fluridone on 90 days after treatment on different submerged weeds are given below
(Lab. experiment results of fluridone on submerged weeds, Datta, S. 2009 unpublished):
Fig. 19a. Ceratophyllum and Fig. 19b. Najas at 20 ppb Fig. 19c. Vallisneria at 25 ppb
Hydrilla at 25 ppb Fluridone
Boyd, C.E. (1968). Evaluation of some common aquatic weeds as possible feed stuffs. Hyacinth
Contr. J. 7:26-27.
Boyd, C.E. (1969). The nutritive value of three species of water weeds. Econ. Bot. 22 (4): 359-
368.
Casfbow, A. J. (1967). Convert water hyacinth to methane. PANS (C): 13(3): 243-244.
Datta, S. (2009). 2nd year project Report on Studies on Safe and Effective Chemical Control
Measures for Floating and Submerged Aquatic Weeds Affecting Aquaculture. Submitted to
CIFE, Mumbai. 54p.
Frank, P.A. (1976). Distribution and utilization research on tropical and subtropical aquatic
weeds in United States. In Aquatic Weeds in S.E. Asia. DR. W. Junk B.V. Publisher, The
Hague 353-360 pp.
Gopal, B. and Sharma, K. P. (1979). Aquatic weed control versus utilisation. Economic Botany.
33 (3):340-346.
Gupta, O.P. (1973). Aquatic weed control. World crops. 25(4): 132-190.
Gupta, O.P. (1987). Aquatic weed management-Their menace and control. Today & Tomorrow’s
Printers and Publishers. New Delhi, 300p.
Haller, W. T. and Sutton, D. L. (1973). Effect of pH and high P concentrations on growth of
water hyacinth. Hyacinth contr. J. 11:59-61.
Hazra, A. and Tripathy, S.D. (1985). Nutritive value of aquatic weed Spirodella polyrhiza
(Linn.) in grass carp. Ind. J Anim Sci. 55: 702-705.
Jhingran, V.G. (1968). Progress of inland fisheries research in India. Everyman's Science, 3(1):
38-47.
Kivaisi A.K., and Mtila, M. (1998). Production of biogas from water hyacinth (Eichhornia
crassipes) (Mart) (Solms) in a two-stage bioreactor. World Journal of Microbiology and
Biotechnology, 14 (1): 125-131.
Labrada R. and Fornasari, L. (2003). Management of problematic aquatic weeds in Africa, FAO
efforts and achievements during the period of 1991-2001. FAO, Rome, 28 p.
Lancar, L. and Krake, K. (2002). Aquatic Weeds & their Management. International
Commission on irrigation and Drainage. p.1- 65.
Little, E.C.S. and Henson, I.E. (1967). The water content of some important tropical water
weeds. PANS. (C). 13(3):223-227.
Malhotra, S. P. (1976) Haryana's efforts to irrigate its high areas. Irrigation Department Haryana,
Chandigarh, 1-20.
Matai, S. (1976). Protein from water weeds. In Aquatic weeds in S.E. Asia, Dr. W. Junk b.v.
Pub., The Hague, 369-374 pp.
Mukhopadhyay S.K, Hossain, A. (1990). Management and utilization of water hyacinth as
natural resources in India for the benefit of Agriculture. Indian Journal of Agronomy. 35
(1- 2): 218 - 223.
Murugesan, A. G., Vijayalakshmi, G. S., Sukumaran, N. and Mariappan C. (1995), Utilization
of water hyacinth for oyster mushroom cultivation. Bioresource Technology, 51 (1): 97-98.
Nageswaran, M., Gopalakrishnan, A., Ganesan, M., Vedhamurthy, A. and Selvaganapathy, E.
(2003). Evaluation of Water hyacinth and Paddy Straw Waste for Culture of Oyster
Mushrooms. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 41: 122-123.
Nolan, W.J. and Kirmse, D.W. (1974). The paper making properties of water hyacinth. Hyacinth
Control Journal, 12: 90-97.
********