Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 65 views

    Case of Malpractice - Group 4

    Uploaded by

    Farhanisa R
    The document discusses a medical malpractice case involving a patient named Emeralda Tripp. To win a malpractice claim, four things must be proven: 1) the standard of care was not met, 2) there was a breach of the standard of care, 3) the breach caused harm, and 4) damages resulted. In Emeralda Tripp's case, risks included insufficient medical history, misdiagnosis, and permanent injury putting her in a vegetative state. The hospital is at risk of internal process failures, lawsuits, reputational harm, and losing business from investors. While risk management allows for more risk-taking, it also threatens increasing risks instead of managing them and can become too complex.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Case of Malpractice - Group 4

    Uploaded by

    Farhanisa R
    65 views7 pages
    The document discusses a medical malpractice case involving a patient named Emeralda Tripp. To win a malpractice claim, four things must be proven: 1) the standard of care was not met, 2) there was a breach of the standard of care, 3) the breach caused harm, and 4) damages resulted. In Emeralda Tripp's case, risks included insufficient medical history, misdiagnosis, and permanent injury putting her in a vegetative state. The hospital is at risk of internal process failures, lawsuits, reputational harm, and losing business from investors. While risk management allows for more risk-taking, it also threatens increasing risks instead of managing them and can become too complex.

    Original Description:

    Risk Management

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses a medical malpractice case involving a patient named Emeralda Tripp. To win a malpractice claim, four things must be proven: 1) the standard of care was not met, 2) there was a breach of the standard of care, 3) the breach caused harm, and 4) damages resulted. In Emeralda Tripp's case, risks included insufficient medical history, misdiagnosis, and permanent injury putting her in a vegetative state. The hospital is at risk of internal process failures, lawsuits, reputational harm, and losing business from investors. While risk management allows for more risk-taking, it also threatens increasing risks instead of managing them and can become too complex.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    65 views7 pages

    Case of Malpractice - Group 4

    Uploaded by

    Farhanisa R
    The document discusses a medical malpractice case involving a patient named Emeralda Tripp. To win a malpractice claim, four things must be proven: 1) the standard of care was not met, 2) there was a breach of the standard of care, 3) the breach caused harm, and 4) damages resulted. In Emeralda Tripp's case, risks included insufficient medical history, misdiagnosis, and permanent injury putting her in a vegetative state. The hospital is at risk of internal process failures, lawsuits, reputational harm, and losing business from investors. While risk management allows for more risk-taking, it also threatens increasing risks instead of managing them and can become too complex.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 7

    CASE OF MALPRACTICE

    GROUP 4:
    - Farhanisa Ridayani (29118162)
    - Gihon River Peace Marpaung (29118002)
    - Gilang Ariawan Wicaksono (29118009)
    - Diella Justinadia (29118046)
    - Dio Ardana Pramandika (29118136)
    MEDICAL MALPRACTICE CLAIMS
    4 things you must prove to win:
    The Standard of Care Doctors check patient’s condition and any medical
    information

    Breach of the standard of care Wrong medication

    Causation Insufficient information of patient’s medical history,


    misdiagnosis

    What are the damages? Permanent injury → vegetative state


    EMERALDA TRIPP’S MALPRACTICE

    RISK IDENTIFICATION RISK OWNER

    1. Internal processes 1. Doctor and hospital


    2. Legal (Lawsuit) 2. Hospital
    3. Permanent injury 3. Patient
    4. Reputational 4. Hospital
    5. People & System 5. Doctor, Patient, Nurses
    6. Business 6. Hospital (Investor)
    ◉ Allow people to take more risks
    than they otherwise would.
    ADVANTAGES ◉ Enhance quality of life.
    ◉ Used in many sectors,
    NEW RELIGION IN RM
    construction, insurance, capital
    market and corporate practice.
    ◉ The exposure to discontinuity
    ◉ The arrogance of quantifying
    the unquantifiable
    ◉ The threat of increasing risk
    DISADVANTAGES instead of managing it
    NEW RELIGION IN RM ◉ The result is a culture that
    threatens to become so
    complex and frequently so
    arcane as to constitute a new
    religion.
    CONCLUSION
    Risk of malpractice can be caused by the internal processes in the hospital itself and
    the insufficient information provided by the patient’s family about the medical
    history of patient.

    Hospital has already tried to minimize the risk with the standardization they have
    based on analysis from any information provided.

    The science of risk management is capable of creating new risk even it brings old
    risks under control. Our faith in RM encourages us to take risks otherwise we would
    not take.
    Thank You.

    You might also like