This case involved Jennie applying to register her son Christian under the surname of her deceased partner Dominique. The local registrar denied the application. The Supreme Court ruled that Dominique's unsigned autobiography, though not a formal recognition, provided sufficient evidence of paternity given the corroborating circumstances. Specifically, Dominique died before the child's birth but his autobiography matched Jennie's testimony and was supported by Dominique's father's affidavit. This established that Dominique considered Jennie his wife and they were living together when she became pregnant, recognizing him as the father.
This case involved Jennie applying to register her son Christian under the surname of her deceased partner Dominique. The local registrar denied the application. The Supreme Court ruled that Dominique's unsigned autobiography, though not a formal recognition, provided sufficient evidence of paternity given the corroborating circumstances. Specifically, Dominique died before the child's birth but his autobiography matched Jennie's testimony and was supported by Dominique's father's affidavit. This established that Dominique considered Jennie his wife and they were living together when she became pregnant, recognizing him as the father.
This case involved Jennie applying to register her son Christian under the surname of her deceased partner Dominique. The local registrar denied the application. The Supreme Court ruled that Dominique's unsigned autobiography, though not a formal recognition, provided sufficient evidence of paternity given the corroborating circumstances. Specifically, Dominique died before the child's birth but his autobiography matched Jennie's testimony and was supported by Dominique's father's affidavit. This established that Dominique considered Jennie his wife and they were living together when she became pregnant, recognizing him as the father.
Facts: Jennie, 21 and Dominique, 19 lived as husband and wife. They lived at together at Dominique’s parents’ house. Dominique died. Two months after, Jennie gave birth to Christian. Jennie applied for Christian’s registration local civil registrar using Dominique’s surname. In support is an Affidavit to Use the Surname of Father (AUSF) which Jennie signed and Affidavit of Acknowledgment which is executed by Dominique’s father. Attached in AUSF is a document entitled “Autobioraphy” which Dominique, during his lifetime, wrote in his own handwriting. A portion state; AS OF NOW I HAVE MY WIFE NAMED JENIE DELA CRUZ. WE MET EACH OTHER IN OUR HOMETOWN, TEREZA RIZAL. AT FIRST WE BECAME GOOD FRIENDS, THEN WE FELL IN LOVE WITH EACH OTHER, THEN WE BECAME GOOD COUPLES. AND AS OF NOW SHE IS PREGNANT AND FOR THAT WE LIVE TOGETHER IN OUR HOUSE NOW.THAT’S ALL. The Local Civil Registrar Gracia denied the application. Issue: Whether or not the unsigned handwriting statement of Dominique can be considered as a recognition of paternity in a private handwritten instrument within the contemplation of Art 176 of the Family Code? Held: Yes. Special circumstances exist to hold that Dominique’s Autobiography, though unsigned by him, substantially satisfies the requirement of the law. First, Dominique died about two months prior to the child’s birth. Second, the relevant matters in the Autobiography, unquestionably handwritten by Dominique, correspond to the facts culled from the testimonial evidence Jenie proffered.20 Third, Jenie’s testimony is corroborated by the Affidavit of Acknowledgment of Dominique’s father Domingo Aquino and testimony of his brother Joseph Butch Aquino whose hereditary rights could be affected by the registration of the questioned recognition of the child. These circumstances indicating Dominique’s paternity of the child give life to his statements in his Autobiography that “JENIE DELA CRUZ” is “MY WIFE” as “WE FELL IN LOVE WITH EACH OTHER” and “NOW SHE IS PREGNANT AND FOR THAT WE LIVE TOGETHER.”
Anthony Nicini, Jr. v. Edward Morra New Jersey Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Youth and Family Services Frank Cyrus John Doe(s), a Fictitious Person or Persons Xyz Entity (Ies), a Fictitious Entity or Entities Frank Cyrus, 212 F.3d 798, 3rd Cir. (2000)