Metric Documents Specific Instruction to Not to be

Metric
No. Needed HEI considered
Extended profile
 Please include all
the students on
Number of students year campus in all the  Ensure to fill in the
2.1 wise during the last five semester year template
years wise completely
All semester students
year wise.
 The final year
student s of
Number of outgoing / final different program
2.2 year students year wise in the years of
during the last five years assessment
period should be
considered here
 No repeat count
Number of students
of the students if
appeared in the University
2.3 the institution is
examination year wise
following
during the last five
semester system.
 Revaluation is
based on number
of students and
Number of revaluation
2.4 not number of
applications year wise
subjects. One
during the last 5 years
student to be
counted once
only in a year
Metrics
Metr Specific
Not to be
ic Metric Documents Needed Instructions to
considered
No. HEI
 Copy of letter
issued by
state govt. or and
Central  Include only
Government (which- those reserved
ever categories as
applicable) specified by
Indicating State/central
the reserved Government
Due consideration is given to categories orders for
equity and inclusiveness by to be considered as admission.
2.1.1 providing reservation of per  Only those seats
seats to the GO rule filled against the
all categories (translated in quota should be
English) counted here.
 Final admission list  Number of
published by the HEI admitted cannot
 Admission extract go more than the
submitted to the state number
OBC, SC and ST cell allocated.
every year.
 Annual Report/
BOM
 report/ Admission
report
duly certified by the
Head of the
Institution.
 The details certified
by
the Head of the
Institution  Please provide
clearly mentioning only the number.
Average percentage of seats
the The ratio will be
filled
2.1.2 programs that are worked out
for the various programmes
not automatically by
as
against the approved intake covered under CET the system and
and will be visible in
the number of the response
applications
received for
the same
 Copy of the
domicile
 In case of large
certificate as part of
Average percentage of data, the DVV
the
students will seek
from other states and
enrolled demonstrates a document for
2.1.3 countries and/or
national specific list of
Previous
spread and includes students students during
degree/Matriculation
from other states DVV
/
clarification.
HSC certificate from
other state or country
The Institution assesses the
learning levels of the
students
after admission and
The supporting
organises
document should
special programmes for
clearly elicit the
advanced
following:
learners and low performers  Consolidated
 Methodology
1. Adopts measurable report of
and Criteria
criteria special programs for
for the
to identify low performers. advanced learners assessment
2.2.1 2. Adopts measurable and of Learning
criteria slow learners duly
levels Details
to identify advanced attested by the Head
of special
learners of programmes
3. Organizes special the Institution
Details of
programmes for low
outcome
performers and advanced
measures
learners
4. Follows protocols to
measure students’
achievement

This is an automatic  A teacher

Student - Fulltime teacher  Avoid
metric. employed for at
ratio inclusion
Both values used in the least 90 per cent of
2.2.2 (data for the preceding of part
formula is obtained the normal or
academic time /
from statutory number
year) Ad-hoc /
extended profile of hours of work for
 a full-time teacher visiting
over a complete faculty
academic year is
classified as a full
time teacher.
Use of Clinical Skills  Proof of
Laboratory Establishment of
and Simulation Based Clinical Skill
Learning Laboratories
5. Has Basic Clinical Skills  Proof of patient
Training Models and Trainers simulators for
for clinical skills in the relevant simulation
disciplines. based training Provide supporting
6. Has advanced patient  Report on training documents
simulators for simulation- programmes in mentioned as
2.3.2 based Clinical according to the
training skill lab/simulator choice of the
7. Has structured programs for Centre institution among
training and assessment of  Details of training A,B,C,D
students in Clinical Skills Lab / programs conducted
Simulation centre and
8. Conducts training programs details of participants.
for the faculty in the use of  Geotagged Photos of
clinical skills lab and the
simulation methods of Clinical Skills
teaching-learning Laboratory
 Copy of circular
pertaining
the details of mentor
and
their allotted mentees
 Approved Mentor list
as
announced by the HEI  Only full-time
Student :Mentor Ratio
2.3.4  Allotment order of teachers can be
(preceding
mentor considered as
academic year)
to mentee mentors.
 In addition, issues
raised
and resolved in the
mentor
system has to be
attached
mentor-wise
 Sanction letters  Appointment letter
indicating of selected faculty
number of posts will be asked
(including during DVV
Management clarification stage
Average percentage of
sanctioned
fulltime  All full-time
2.4.1 posts) by competent
teachers against sanctioned teachers with at
authority (in
posts least 90%
English/translated in
during the last five years prescribed
English)
workload should
This is automatic
be counted as full
metric
time teachers
and the values are
derived
 from the extended
profile

 These guide-ship
awarded before
Average percentage of the assessment
fulltime period can be
teachers with considered here
Ph.D./D.Sc./D.Lit./DM/M  Repeat count of
Ch/DNB in super the guides in
specialities each year is
/other PG degrees (like  Copies of Guide-ship allowed
MD/ letters or  If the data is
2.4.2 MS/ MDS etc.,) in Health authorization of large, details
Sciences for recognition as research guide provide selected (about
Ph.D by the university 5% )faculty will
guides as per the eligibility be asked during
criteria stipulated by the DVV clarification
Regulatory Councils / stage if the data
Universities. Last five is large
years data  Please do not
to be entered include those
mentioned in
6.5.2
 The experience
certificate of
selected faculty
Average Teaching (about 5% ) will
experience of  Consolidated be asked during
fulltime teachers in number Experience certificate DVV clarification
2.4.3
of duly certified by the stage
years (preceding academic Head of the institution Consider the
year) experience of the
faculty in other
institutions as well,
if any)
 Certificate of
completion
of training for
development of and
 Training
Average percentage of teachers delivery of e-contents
completion
trained for development and /e
certificate of
delivery of e-contents / e- courses / video
selected faculty
2.4.4 courses lectures /
(about 5% ) will
/ video lectures / demonstrations
be asked during
demonstrations  Web-link to the
DVV clarification
during the last 5 years contents
stage
delivered by the
faculty
hosted in the HEI’s
website
Average Percentage of Kindly consider
 e-Copies of award
fulltime awards like
letters
teachers who received THE CWG to provide
(scanned or soft copy)
2.4.5 awards and list of examples
for achievements
recognitions for excellence  Award that are
 Awards claimed
in local in nature
without
teaching, student mentoring, need to be
 scholarships, professional certificates will not be avoided. Only
achievements and academic considered State, National
leadership at State, National, and International
International levels from level from
Government / Government Government,
recognized agencies / recognised
registered bodies only
professional associations / should be
academies during the last considered
five years  The date of
award should fall
with-in the
assessment
period
 One Full-time
teacher to be
counted once for
a year
irrespective of
number of
awards or
recognition in
the same year.

The Institution provides

opportunities to students for
midcourse improvement of
performance through
specific
interventions Opportunities
provided to students for
midcourse
improvement of  Policy document of
performance the
through: options claimed by
Opportunities to students for the
2.5.4
midcourse improvement of instititution duly
performance are provided signed
through: by the Head of the
Options(Opt one which is Institution
applicable to you):
1. Timely administration
of CIE
2. On time assessment
and feedback
3. Make-up assignments
and tests
4. Remedial teaching
 Reports from
Controller
of Exam (COE)
Incremental performance in office/  Consider only
Pass Registrar evaluation pass of final year
2.6.2 percentage of final year mentioning the examination thus
students relevant qualifying the
in the last five years details and the result degree program
analysis performed
by
the institution duly

Online student satisfaction
2.7.1 survey regarding teaching
learning process.
attested by the Head
of
the Institution
Details to be provided
during SSR submission
only