Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

JOSE A. ANGARA vs. ELECTORAL COMMISSION, et. al.

G.R. No. L-45081, July 15, 1981

NATURE: A petition was filed by Jose A. Angara requesting to dismiss the “Motion to Protest” filed by
Private Respondent Pedro Ynsua to nullify the election of the petitioner as member of National
Assembly and to prohibit and restrain the Electoral Commission from taking further cognizance of the
protest filed by the respondent.

SC RULING: DENIED.

LEGAL DOCTRINE: The grant of power to Electoral Commission to judge all contests relating to the
election, returns and qualifications of the members of the National Assembly.

FACTS:
On November 15, 1935, the Petitioner Jose A. Angara was proclaimed to be the member of National
Assembly and took his oath of office. The National Assembly then passed the Resolution No. 8
confirming the election of the members and declaring the National Assembly in session. The Electoral
Commission adopted its own resolution providing that the filing of election protest must not exceed on
December 9, 1935. However, prior to such date given as the deadline of filing, respondent Pedro Ynsua
filed its Motion to Protest to the election of the petitioner. The petitioner sitting as new member of
National Assembly filed its Motion to dismiss the Protest upholding the resolution issued by the National
Assembly; however, the respondent answered such motion alleging that there is no legal or
constitutional provision barring the presentation of a protest against election of a member of the
National Assembly after confirmation. On the reply made by the petitioner, the resolution of National
Assembly has the effect of cutting off the power of the Electoral Commission to entertain protests
against the election, returns, and qualifications of the members of the National Assembly.

ISSUE:
Did the Electoral Commission acted without or in excess of its jurisdiction in assuming to the cognizance
of the protest filed against the election of the petitioner notwithstanding the previous confirmation of
such election by resolution of the National Assembly.

RULING:
NO. The Electoral Commission did not acted without or in excess of its jurisdiction in assuming to the
cognizance of the protest filed against the election of the petitioner notwithstanding the previous
confirmation of such election by resolution of the National Assembly.

The Electoral Commission acted within the legitimate exercise of its constitutional prerogative in
assuming to take cognizance of the protest filed by the respondent Ynsua against the election of the
petitioner Angara, and that the earlier resolution of the National Assembly cannot in any manner toll the
time for filing election protests against members of the National Assembly, no prevent the filing of a
protest within such time as the rules of the Electoral Commission might prescribe.
The grant of power to Electoral Commission to judge all contests relating to the election, returns and
qualifications of the members of the National Assembly, is intended to be as complete and unimpaired
as if it had remained originally in the legislature. The express lodging of that power in the Electoral
Commission is an implied denial of the exercise of that power by the National Assembly.

Under Section 4 of Article VI of the Constitution, the creation of the Electoral Commission carried with it
ex necessitate rei the power regulative in character to limit the time with which protests entrusted to its
cognizance should be filed. Where the general power is conferred or duty enjoined, every particular
power necessary for the exercise of the one or the performance of the other is also conferred. In
absence of any further constitutional provision relating to the procedure to be followed in filing protests
before the Electoral Commission, therefore, the incidental power to promulgate such rules necessary for
the proper exercise of its exclusive power to judge all contests relating to the election, returns and
qualifications of members of the National Assembly, must be deemed by necessary implication to have
been lodged also in the Electoral Commission.

You might also like