Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 29

Economic Consulting

Introduction to Transfer Pricing Principles,


Methods and Recent Developments

Sébastien Gonnet
Gonnet, NERA Economic Consulting

Hong-Kong, The Hong Kong Bankers Club, 28th September 2011

www.nera.com
Objectives of the Presentation

ƒ Provide an overview of the principles governing transfer pricing


worldwide, discuss recent developments in developed (OECD) countries
and in the BRICS, and describe transfer pricing / valuation methods

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


1
Contents

ƒ What
Wh t is
i Transfer
T f Pricing?
Pi i ?

ƒ The Arm’s
Arm s Length Principle

ƒ O
OECD
C Developments
e e op e ts and
a d Recent
ece t Trends
e ds

ƒ Transfer Pricing and Valuation Methods

ƒ Transfer Pricing Challenges in the BRICS

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


2
What is Transfer Pricing?

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


3
What is “Transfer Pricing”?!

Shanghai Daily
Daily, 15 September 2011

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


4
Case Study 1 - Producing in China

ƒ Overview of transfer pricing flows

Transfer Price Market Price

Group Manufacturing Plant Group Commercial entities


China Europe
Related Transaction
Unrelated Transaction

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


5
Case study 1 - Producing in China

ƒ What is the “right” (arm’s length) Transfer Price?

Plant P&L Budget / normal course Following year / sudden drop in


of business demand
Volumes 10000 6000
Transfer Price (per unit) 0.011 0.011 0.013
Revenues 110 66 77
Cost of Goods 35 21 21
OPEX – variable 40 24 24
OPEX - fixed 25 25 25
Operating profit
10 (4) 7
Return on total costs
10% -5.7%
5 7% 10%

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


6
Case Study 2 - Selling in China

Group Parent (EU)


IP owner / Service Provider

WHAT REMUNERATION FOR PARENT’S IP


AND SERVICES?

Market Price Market Price

Third-party
Third party Group Commercial Entity
Manufacturing Plants China
Asia

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


7
The Arm’s
Arm s Length Principle

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


8
The Arm’s Length Principle

ƒ What is transfer pricing?


– Transfer
T f pricing
i i refers
f to
t cross-border
b d iintra-group
t t
transactions
ti
- Products
- Services
- Intangibles
- Financial transactions
ƒ What does it do for your company?
– It drives the allocation of profit inside your company
- Allocation between business units, divisions, countries…
– And ultimately it is seen as the major controversy issue with the tax authorities

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


9
The Transfer Pricing Equation

ƒ How do you manage it?


– Key concept is “arm’s length”
- Determine the price that would have been agreed between third parties, for
a given transaction
transaction, under similar economic circumstances

ƒ IIn order
d tot meett the
th “arm’s
“ ’ length”
l th” requirement,
i t it iis essential
ti l tto adequately
d t l
map the “circumstances”
– To design a transfer pricing system which is consistent with the way
business operates, and follows its dynamics

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


10
Meeting the Arm’s Length Requirement – Beyond « Compliance »

BUSINESS
OPERATIONS

TRANSFER PRICING

TAX
ECONOMICS
LEGAL
FINANCE

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


11
Meeting the Arm’s Length Requirement – Sustainable Transfer Pricing System

BUSINESS
OPERATIONS

TRANSFER
PRICING

TAX
ECONOMICS
LEGAL
FINANCE

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


12
Process For Designing an Arm’s Length Transfer Pricing System

Documentation
« Compliance
C li » Benchmarking
/ Litigation

Industry Functional Economic Implementation / Communication


Sustainable Analysis /
Analysis Analysis / Contracts (internal &
system Value Chain TP design external)

Disciplines ECO BUSINESS ECO / TAX / LEGAL TAX


BUSINESS BUSINESS / IT

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


13
OECD developments and recent trends

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


14
The OECD’s Role in the Promotion of the Arm’s Length Principle

ƒ Revised
R i d Transfer
T f Pricing
P i i Guidelines
G id li
– Chapters I -III Methods and Comparability (final & approved)
– Chapter IX Business Restructurings (final & approved)

ƒ Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments (final & approved)


– 2010 version of the Report on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments

ƒ Intellectual Property (on-going)

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


15
Revised Transfer Pricing Guidelines
Chapter III
C

1 New Guidance on the selection of the “most


1. most appropriate TP method to
R
Revised

the circumstances of the case”


2. New guidance on how to apply the Transactional Net Margin Method
and the Profit Split method in practice
Ch
hapter III
New

3. New Guidance on comparability analysis


Ch
hapter IX

4 Ne
4. New GGuidance
idance on the transfer pricing aspects of b
business
siness
New

restructurings
X

Extract from OECD presentation, Caroline Silberztein, IBC London, March 2011

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


16
New Guidance on the Transfer Pricing Aspects of Business
Restructurings (Chapter IX)

What is a “business restructuring” in the context of the TP Guidelines?


ƒ Cross-border redeployment by a multinational enterprise of functions, assets
and risks; cross-border reallocation of profits (or loss) potential
– Can involve the transfer of valuable intangibles
intangibles, although not always the
case
– Can also,, or alternatively,
y, involve the termination or substantial
renegotiation of existing arrangements.
- example: conversion of “full fledged distributors” into “commissionaires”;
of “full
full fledged manufacturers”
manufacturers into “toll
toll-manufacturers
manufacturers”;; etc
ƒ 4 Parts:
1 Risks
1. Ri k
2. Compensation of the restructuring itself
3. Remuneration of post-restructuring transactions
4. Recognition of transaction / recharacterisation issues

Extract from OECD presentation, Caroline Silberztein, IBC London, March 2011

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


17
Attribution of Profits to PEs

ƒ The Authorized OECD Approach

– The Functionally Separate Entity Approach


- To determine the profits attributable to the PE, a mechanism has to be
developed for attributing risks, economic ownership of assets and capital
to the hypothetically distinct and separate PE, forf associating with the
PE the rights and obligations derived from its “dealings” with other parts
of the enterprise of which the PE is a part and from its transactions with
related
l t d and
d unrelated
l t d parties.
ti
– The Significant People Functions
- The significant people functions relevant to the assumption of risks are
those which require active decision-making with regard to the
acceptance and/or management (subsequent to the transfer) of those
risks
i k

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


18
Intellectual Property (1/2)

ƒ Current guidance: Chapters VI and VIII of the TP Guidelines

ƒ Major area of disputes / uncertainty for business and for governments

ƒ Main areas covered

– Definition / scope beyond traditional / accounting / legally protectable


i t
intangibles
ibl assets:
t

- e.g. some marketing intangibles, workforce in place, business


opportunities etc:
opportunities,

– Are these intangibles?

– More importantly, should they be compensated at AL?

Extract from OECD presentation, Caroline Silberztein, IBC London, March 2011

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


19
Intellectual Property (2/2)

ƒ Main areas identified for possible future work


– R&D; contract R&D
– Know-how, employee assignments (=> Similarities and differences
b t
between th
the characterisation
h t i ti off a service
i or royalty
lt ffor Article
A ti l 12 purposes
and the TP notion?)
– Marketing intangibles
– Business attributes and others
– Identifying and characterizing an intangible transfer
– Right of an enterprise to share in the return of an intangible it does not
own:
- Notions of “economic”, “beneficial”, “functional” ownership?
– Cost contribution arrangements
g
– Valuation of intangibles

Extract from OECD presentation, Caroline Silberztein, IBC London, March 2011

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


20
Transfer Pricing and Valuation
Methods

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


21
Transfer Pricing Methods for Pricing Transactions

Comparable Uncontrolled Resale Price Method Cost Plus Method Transactional Net
Profit Split
Price Method (CUP) (RPM) (CPLM) Margin Method (TNMM)
• Comparable intra-group • Compares the intra- • Compares the • Splits the profits • Compares the
price to prices earned in group resale margin markup on costs of between the related controlled company's
comparable uncontrolled (gross margin) to the tested party to companies profitability to the
OVERV

transactions under resale margin earned the markups earned engaged in the one of similar
comparable in comparable in comparable same transaction(s) companies
circumstances uncontrolled uncontrolled based on the
VIEW

transactions under transactions under related value of


• Internal/External CUPs
comparable comparable each company's
circumstances circumstances contribution to the
combined profit
• "The most direct and • Less comparability • Less comparability • Adapted when both • Simple
reliable way" to apply the required than in the required than in the parties in the • In practice, the most
arm's length principle CUP method CUP method related-party
used
transaction have
• Well adapted to • Well adapted to • Less comparability
PR

developed
distribution activities manufacturing
ROS

significant
i ifi req ired than in
required
activities and CUP, RPM and
intangible assets
provision of services CPLM

• High comparability • Financial data (gross • Financial data (gross • Complex


C l economic i • Ex-post / testing
required (products, profit) of comparable profit) of comparable analysis method
volumes, markets) companies may not be companies may not • Not adapted to all • Net margin may be
• Lack of publicly available available be available economic models impacted by non-
CO

data • Consistency
Co s s e cy o
of • Consistency
Co s s e cy o
of transfer
a se p pricing
c g
ONS

accounting standards accounting issues


standards

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


22
Valuation Methods for Pricing Assets, Rights, Businesses or Companies

Cost approach Market approach Income approach


• Seems easy to implement • Direct measure of the value of a • Most accurate measure of
company based on references asset/company value, as equal
to multiples derived from to the net present value of
publicly-traded comparable expected future cash flows of
Strengths
g companies and/or transactions the asset/company
• Take into account the
specificity of an (intangible)
asset/company
More complex
M • l ththan it seems • R
Reasonable
bl llevell off • R b t
Robustness off projections
j ti
• Replacement costs should comparability with the publicly-
be computed not actual costs traded/acquired companies is
Weaknesses • Provides a wrong measure, necessary
in general the lower end off
the range

• The method is rarely used for • The method is frequently used • The income approach provides
Our point of asset/company valuation, for company valuation given the most accurate asset /
view except in cases where it is the availability of publicly- company value
assumed that no value above traded/acquired companies
the costs incurred is • For asset valuation, multiples
perceived to have been may not be readily available
created

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


23
The Economic Framework for Accurately Valuing IP

ƒ Most firms originate their value and growth through a combination of unique
know-how, intangibles, and value-creating activities
ƒ Intellectual Property (IP) can generally be considered as key differentiators for
the group and ultimately at the origin of a performance above average
ƒ Accurate valuations can only be developed under the economic framework that
reflects:
– The competitive advantage to the user of the IP and
– The opportunity cost to the owner of the IP

ƒ The economic framework is superior to other valuation methods


– Adapts to the specific context of the IP
– Is best suited to deal with the uncertainty associated with IP

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


24
Transfer Pricing Challenges in the
BRICS

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


25
BRICS and FDIs

Expected location of FDI by MNEs in 2011-2012


Number of responses

120

100

80

60

40

20

y
na

am
l

o
S

K
zi

an
si
di

si

ic
U

U
ra
hi

ne
us
In

ex

tn

m
C

ie

do
R

er
M

G
In
Source: World investment prospects survey 2010-2012
2010 2012 – United Nations

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


26
The BRICS’s Economic Environment

2000 - 2010 2010 - 2020

Produce in China (or


Produce in China, Sell outside),
), Sell in China
outside
t id China
Chi

Location savings at stake L


Location
ti savings
i att stake
t k
and… « market premium »

©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com


27
Examples of Subjects at a Center Stage in China

“substantial market premium in the


auto
t iindustry”
d t ” (SAT, July 2010)

“location
location savings, intangibles,
and market premiums” (SAT, April 2010)

“unique potential in the Chinese


market
market” (Director Wang, head of APA program July 2009)

“how
how cost advantage impacts profitability
profitability”
(Director Wang, head of APA program July 2009)

“RMB0
RMB0.5
5 billion was collected as additional tax revenue in
BAPA cases in 2009 applying the concepts of location saving
and market intangible”
intangible (SAT)
©2011 NERA Economic Consulting  www.nera.com
28

You might also like