Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Transfer Pricing
Transfer Pricing
Sébastien Gonnet
Gonnet, NERA Economic Consulting
www.nera.com
Objectives of the Presentation
What
Wh t is
i Transfer
T f Pricing?
Pi i ?
The Arm’s
Arm s Length Principle
O
OECD
C Developments
e e op e ts and
a d Recent
ece t Trends
e ds
Shanghai Daily
Daily, 15 September 2011
Third-party
Third party Group Commercial Entity
Manufacturing Plants China
Asia
IIn order
d tot meett the
th “arm’s
“ ’ length”
l th” requirement,
i t it iis essential
ti l tto adequately
d t l
map the “circumstances”
– To design a transfer pricing system which is consistent with the way
business operates, and follows its dynamics
BUSINESS
OPERATIONS
TRANSFER PRICING
TAX
ECONOMICS
LEGAL
FINANCE
BUSINESS
OPERATIONS
TRANSFER
PRICING
TAX
ECONOMICS
LEGAL
FINANCE
Documentation
« Compliance
C li » Benchmarking
/ Litigation
Revised
R i d Transfer
T f Pricing
P i i Guidelines
G id li
– Chapters I -III Methods and Comparability (final & approved)
– Chapter IX Business Restructurings (final & approved)
4 Ne
4. New GGuidance
idance on the transfer pricing aspects of b
business
siness
New
restructurings
X
Extract from OECD presentation, Caroline Silberztein, IBC London, March 2011
Extract from OECD presentation, Caroline Silberztein, IBC London, March 2011
Extract from OECD presentation, Caroline Silberztein, IBC London, March 2011
Extract from OECD presentation, Caroline Silberztein, IBC London, March 2011
Comparable Uncontrolled Resale Price Method Cost Plus Method Transactional Net
Profit Split
Price Method (CUP) (RPM) (CPLM) Margin Method (TNMM)
• Comparable intra-group • Compares the intra- • Compares the • Splits the profits • Compares the
price to prices earned in group resale margin markup on costs of between the related controlled company's
comparable uncontrolled (gross margin) to the tested party to companies profitability to the
OVERV
transactions under resale margin earned the markups earned engaged in the one of similar
comparable in comparable in comparable same transaction(s) companies
circumstances uncontrolled uncontrolled based on the
VIEW
developed
distribution activities manufacturing
ROS
significant
i ifi req ired than in
required
activities and CUP, RPM and
intangible assets
provision of services CPLM
data • Consistency
Co s s e cy o
of • Consistency
Co s s e cy o
of transfer
a se p pricing
c g
ONS
• The method is rarely used for • The method is frequently used • The income approach provides
Our point of asset/company valuation, for company valuation given the most accurate asset /
view except in cases where it is the availability of publicly- company value
assumed that no value above traded/acquired companies
the costs incurred is • For asset valuation, multiples
perceived to have been may not be readily available
created
Most firms originate their value and growth through a combination of unique
know-how, intangibles, and value-creating activities
Intellectual Property (IP) can generally be considered as key differentiators for
the group and ultimately at the origin of a performance above average
Accurate valuations can only be developed under the economic framework that
reflects:
– The competitive advantage to the user of the IP and
– The opportunity cost to the owner of the IP
120
100
80
60
40
20
y
na
am
l
o
S
K
zi
an
si
di
si
ic
U
U
ra
hi
ne
us
In
ex
tn
m
C
ie
do
R
er
M
G
In
Source: World investment prospects survey 2010-2012
2010 2012 – United Nations
“location
location savings, intangibles,
and market premiums” (SAT, April 2010)
“how
how cost advantage impacts profitability
profitability”
(Director Wang, head of APA program July 2009)
“RMB0
RMB0.5
5 billion was collected as additional tax revenue in
BAPA cases in 2009 applying the concepts of location saving
and market intangible”
intangible (SAT)
©2011 NERA Economic Consulting www.nera.com
28