Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Voids in Crystals
Voids in Crystals
&
ENGINEERING
AN INTRODUCTORY E-BOOK
Anandh Subramaniam & Kantesh Balani
Materials Science and Engineering (MSE)
Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur- 208016
Email: anandh@iitk.ac.in, URL: home.iitk.ac.in/~anandh
http://home.iitk.ac.in/~anandh/E-book.htm
Voids
We have already seen that as spheres cannot fill entire space the packing
fraction (PF) < 1 (for all crystals)
This implies there are voids between the atoms. Lower the PF, larger the volume
occupied by voids.
These voids have complicated shapes; but we are mostly interested in the largest
sphere which can fit into these voids hence the plane faced polyhedron version
of the voids is only (typically) considered.
The size and distribution of voids in materials play a role in determining aspects
of material behaviour e.g. solubility of interstitials and their diffusivity
The position of the voids of a particular type will be consistent with the
symmetry of the crystal
In the close packed crystals (FCC, HCP) there are two types of voids
tetrahedral and octahedral voids (identical in both the structures as the voids are
formed between two layers of atoms)
The octahedral void has a coordination number 6 (should not be confused with 8 coordination!)
In the ‘BCC crystal’ the voids do NOT have the shape of the regular tetrahedron
or the regular octahedron (in fact the octahedral void is a ‘linear void’!!)
SC
The simple cubic crystal (monoatomic decoration of the simple cubic lattice) has large void in the
centre of the unit cell with a coordination number of 8.
The actual space of the void in very complicated (right hand figure below) and the polyhedron version
of the void is the cube (as cube is the coordination polyhedron around a atom sitting in the void)
rx
( 3 1) 0.732
r
True Unit Cell of SC crystal Polyhedral model (Cube) Actual shape of the void (space)!
4-tetrahedra in view
FCC = CCP VOIDS
Tetrahedral TV Octahedral OV
If ‘e’ is the edge length of the tetrahedron then CV = (6/4)e → see below in triangle ABC
6
DT erx e 2r 6
rrx
4 2
x 6
1 ~ 0.225
r 2
In tetrahedron ABCD
In triangle ABC AD2 e2 AO2 DO2
e2 2 2
e AM 2
2 e
e DO 2
2 DO e
4 3 3
3 3
AM e DT DO
2 4
2 2 3 e
AO AM e DT
3 2
e
6
e
3 3 2 3 4 3 4
Size of the largest atom which can fit into the Octahedral void of FCC
TETRAHEDRAL OCTAHEDRAL
This void extends across 3
conventional unit cells and
hence is difficult to visualize
Octahedral voids
Tetrahedral void
Check below
Voids /
HCP voids Position Voids / atom
cell
(0,0,3/8), (0,0,5/8), (⅔, ⅓,1/8),
Tetrahedral 4 2
(⅔,⅓,7/8)
Octahedral • (⅓ ⅔,¼), (⅓,⅔,¾) 2 1
Further views
Octahedral void
Tetrahedral void
A
Further views with some models
There are NO voids in a ‘BCC crystal’ which have the shape of a regular
polyhedron (one of the 5 Platonic solids)
The voids in BCC crystal are: distorted ‘octahedral’ and distorted tetrahedral
→ the correct term should be non-regular instead of distorted.
However, the ‘distortions’ are ‘pretty regular’ as we shall see
The distorted octahedral void is in a sense a ‘linear void’
an sphere of correct size sitting in the void touches only two of the six atoms surrounding it
Carbon prefers to sit in this smaller ‘octahedral void’ for reasons which we shall
see soon
BCC VOIDS
a3/2
a
a a3/2
Note: Atoms are coloured differently but are the same ** Actually an atom of correct size touches only
the top and bottom atoms
TV OV
{0, 0, ½})
Illustration on one face only
Voids / Voids /
BCC voids Position
cell atom
Distorted
• Four on each face: [(4/2) 6 = 12] (0, ½, ¼) 12 6
Tetrahedral
a3/2
a2 a2 5
From the right angled triange OCM: OC arx
16 4 4
4r
For a BCC structure: 3a 4r ( a )
3
5 4r x 5
rx 1 0.29
4 3 r 3
Calculation of the size of the distorted octahedral void
This implies:
a
a
OB r x
2
4r
rx BCC : 3a 4r
2 3
* Point regarding ‘Linear Void’ x 2 3
Because of this aspect the OV along the 3 axes can be 1 0.1547
differentiated into OVx, OVy & OVz r 3
Similarly the TV along x,y,z can be differentiated
Where does the carbon atom sit in the BCC and FCC forms of iron? How does it affect
the solubility of carbon in these forms of Fe?
Surprising facts!
C dissolves more in the close packed structure (FCC, -Fe) (albeit at higher temperatures
at 1 atm. pressure where FCC is stable) than in the open structure (BCC-Fe).
C sits in the smaller octahedral void in BCC in preference to the larger tetrahedral void in
BCC.
Fe carbon alloys are important materials and hence we consider them next.
The octahedral void in FCC is the larger one and less distortion occurs when
carbon sits there this aspect contributes to a higher solubility of C in -Fe.
The distorted octahedral void in BCC is the smaller one but (surprisingly)
carbon sits there in preference to the distorted tetrahedral void (the bigger one) -
(we shall see the reason shortly).
Due to small size of the voids in BCC the distortion caused is more and the
solubility of C in -Fe is small
this is rather surprising at a first glance as BCC is the more open structure
but we have already seen that the number of voids in BCC is more than that in
FCC i.e. BCC has more number of smaller voids.
See next slide for figures
Spend some time over this slide Relative size of voids, interstitials and Fe atom
FCC
Void (Oct) Void (Tet)
Size of Fe atom
CCP crystal rFe
FCC 1.292 A
FeFCC C
Size of the OV
Fe
xFCC (oct) 0.534 A N r N 0.71 A
H r H 0.46 A
Size of Carbon atom
r 0.77 A
C
Relative sizes of voids w.r.t to atoms
(d .tet) 0.364 A
Fe xBCC (d .tet )
0.29
Size of the TV x
BCC
Fe
rBCC
FeBCC Fe
xBCC (d .oct )
Size of the OV x Fe
BCC (d .oct) 0.195 A Fe
rBCC
0.155
We had mentioned that the octahedral void in BCC is a linear one
(interstitial atom actually touches only two out of the 6 atoms surrounding it)
In the next slide we make a approximate calculation to see till what size will it
continue to touch only two Fe atoms
(these are ‘ideal’ simplified geometrical calculations and in reality other complications will have to be considered)
Ignoring the atom sitting at B and assuming the interstitial atom touches the atom at A
2a
OA r xA rFe
BCC 1.258 A
2
2 6r BCC : 3a 4r
r xA
3
xA 2 6
1 0.6329
r 3
OX xA 0.796A OY xB 0.195A
Fe
x
BCC (d .tet) 0.364 A
This implies for x/r ratios between 0.15 and 0.63 the interstitial atom has to push
only two atoms
(xcarbon/rFe)BCC ~ 0.6
This explains why Carbon preferentially sits in the apparently smaller octahedral
void in BCC
DC
In the DC structure out of the family of 8 (¼, ¼, ¼) type positions only 4 are occupied
[(¼, ¼, ¼), (¾, ¾, ¼), (¼, ¾, ¾), (¾, ¼, ¾)].
The other four are like void positions- which are all tetrahedral in nature.
Summary of void sizes
rvoid / ratom
SC BCC FCC DC
Octahedral Not 0.155
present 0.414 Not present
(CN = 6) (non-regular)
Tetrahedral Not 0.29 1
present 0.225
(CN = 4) (non-regular) (½,½,½) & (¼, ¼, ¼)
Cubic
0.732 Not present Not present Not present
(CN = 8)
Funda Check Some points and checks on voids!
Voids should not be confused with vacancies- vacancies are due to missing atoms or ions
in crystals.
Holes should also not be confused with voids- holes are ‘missing electrons’ from the
valence band of a solid.
Voids have complicated shapes- we usually use a polyhedral version – the coordination
polyhedron around a sphere of ‘correct size’.
Sometimes, as in the case of ‘octahedral void’ in the BCC- the second nearest neighbours
are also included in constructing the coordination polyhedron.
In ionic crystals, unlike metallic crystals the cation ‘does not sit’ in the void formed by the
anions- the cation is bigger than the anion. The void size calculation is to demarcate the
regimes of various coordination structures.
If an interstitial atom wants to jump from one metastable equilibrium position to another-
it has to cross an energy barrier.