Temporary Spaces in a Hyper-Mosaic: Reflections on the MU Brussels Excursion 2018

TEMPORARY SPACES IN A HYPER-MOSAIC

Nurjehan Mawaz-Khan
Technical University of Darmstadt
“Mundus Urbano” International Cooperation in Urban Development
Reflections on the MU Brussels Excursion 2018

Summary
In May 2018, Mundus Urbano (MU) went on a class excursion to the European capital of paradox and
identity crises – at the time all I really knew was “Brussels: The Home of Magritte, Horta and the
European Parliament”. The itinerary comprised two sessions per day for 5 days, accompanied by a
series of papers to be presented (to MU, by MU) in pairs over the course of the trip. Our paper was
The Role of Temporary Use in Urban (Re)Development by Aurelie de Smet, while a number of the
other papers helped situate her work. This piece of writing is a reflection on the urban development of
Brussels, and the contextualisation of de Smet’s ideas therein, through the lens of our trip and the
provided papers.

Keywords: urban development; large-scale projects; socio-economic disparity; waiting spaces

As a visit to the city might well uncover, Brussels offers much more to the urban enthusiast than its
current staid persona of the European Capital implies. In the built context, the city’s chequered history
of urban development has left its fabric resembling a mosaic of architectural styles and typologies. A
relatively far cry from the regulated assemblage of uniform streets, boulevards and districts that one
might familiarise with many cities in this part of the world – Brussels has this but a lot, lot more going
on. In fact, the constant flux in public space has lent its citizens a heightened sense of awareness and
possession of communal spaces. Over the course of the trip, there was a recurrent theme of residents
and users scanning newspapers to track possible new development and rallying for their local public
spaces – their right to the city – often to be left alone.

The itinerary sessions included guided walks that gave an incisive view of many of the city’s
characteristics and processes. For example, in our time with Marianne Fossé, a doctoral candidate
researching Brussels’ historical warehouses and their typologies, we mapped not only the lost and/or
long gone elements of the city’s historic mercantile character, its spaces of production and storage as
they were shut down due to the covering of almost all of its waterways, but also its industrial transition
from manufacturing to tertiary service provision – and how this, in turn fuelled some of the socio-
economic divisions within the city. The ‘Decolonisation Walk’ or as it was listed, the Post-Colonial
Visions of Brussels, led by pro-African rights’ collective CMCLD (Collectif Mémoire Coloniale et Lutte
contre les Discriminations), illustrated the atrocities that happened, and continue to happen at a more
subtle level, to migrant African populations living in the city. The focus lay on areas that have been
largely appropriated by these communities, even as their access to formal ownership rights remains
low.

Hyper-mosaic
Brussels very visibly wears the brunt of its situation at ‘the crossroads of European history’ (Ritter,
2011). Apart from the obvious Flemish and French duality and differences, the evolution of the built
environment reveals the historical cycle of large swathes of land, across the city and typically including

Nurjehan Mawaz-Khan 1
Temporary Spaces in a Hyper-Mosaic: Reflections on the MU Brussels Excursion 2018

lower-income groups, being subject to violently imposed strategies: starting with the mass destruction
caused by Napoleon’s war (1659), to the violent effects of Hausmannisation and further delusions of
th th
grandeur embodied in the city plans of its newly-instated 18 century monarchs, to the 20 century
need for an effective transport system to support crucial industries while its polluted and disease-
1
infested waterways were covered up and finally, the chronic and continual impacts of aspirational
modernisation: development that favours automobiles and large steel and glass (re: cardboard)
buildings. Unsurprisingly then, such an order of events had led to the term Brusselisation: haphazard
urban redevelopment.

To these sequential, anti-poor spatial ramifications in the city, one might add the continuous socio-
spatial pressures of two distinct sets of immigrants: the decades-long migration from Belgium’s (and
France’s) former colonies, an ethnically-rich mix of people traditionally marginalised and mistreated as
that are denied attention and proper assistance (Van Hamme, Grippa and Van Criekingen, 2016) and
more recently, a newer, much more affluent set coming in to fulfill their well-heeled, official capacities
as (we learnt at the session at the EU Parliament) their elected, representative role – and everything
that entails – at the Capital of Europe. This final pressure includes the ever-rising expectations of such
a place: what might the ‘heart of Europe’ look like (Van Hamme, Wertz and Biot, 2011) and who lives
there? Thus today, the city’s raze-and-rebuild policies are perpetuated through the power dynamics of
the land, construction and housing markets, all embedded within the free market – all favouring profit
th
(and not people). This then, sustains the class disparity that began with the 18 century suburban
incentivisation for the rich – an approach that paved the way for a rather ignored city centre – and
2
created the concentric socio-economic divide that defines Brussels’ income map today. The central
areas still display high rates of unemployment, while research in these areas exposes feelings of
alienation and resentment amongst the youth (Mazzocchetti, 2012).

And yet..
Despite this burden of socio-economic complexity and the oft-proposed, outrageous and blind-sided
plans by greedy developers, the city’s vibrant migrant communities and its Bouwmeester’s (BM)
st
progressive urban strategies, also work to define 21 century Brussels. Over the past decades, there
have been movements of sustainable neighbourhood development and social integration, some
successful (re: suburban) for a time, such as the utopic socialist garden cities that MU visited with a
former member of the urban activist group ARAU (Atelier de recherche et d’action urbaines), and
others that never quite reached their intended mark (Bilande, Dal, Damay et al, 2016; Lenel, 2017 and
Ananian, 2017).

MU’s visit to the city’s chief architect’s team at the Bouwmeester’s (BM) office, was particularly
insightful. We discovered that the entire process of urban development and upgrading in the city is
determined through the use of Competitions as a tool, supported by in-house Research and Quality
Control Departments. At the legislative level, the city is its own region demarcated along a
decentralised structure that comprises 19 municipalities, each with their own administration and city
councils. New projects in the city must go through a competitive bidding process; those short-listed are
compensated for their time (!) and designs that make it to the final round are further improved upon
utilising in-house capacities. Meanwhile, neighbourhoods located in chosen municipalities are granted
time and money to improve upon their situation and meet local requirements. This last scenario was
demonstrated on a visit to the central municipality of Etterbeek where, complemented by the candid –
and spirited – sagacity of one of its residents, MU was introduced to a neighbourhood that was
working with a part-central, part-municipal, part-local grant to upgrade its spaces on a refreshingly
small scale.

Even as there is a vague recognition at the public scale of the lack and need thereof for inclusivity and
support to these typically – often migrant-based – disregarded areas, the increasingly inaccessible
prices of land and housing, as well as the culture of large-scale urban projects across the city, are still
the norm. On the broader scene, the BM in partnership with respective competition-project winners,
the public planning agency (perspective.brussels) and the Commisioner’s Office, has taken up a
number of these large projects with an aim to promote the renewal of urban spaces through mixed-use
development and the spatial incorporation of small-scale enterprises (that a large part of the inner

1
What has been done to the River Zenne during this period of time is equally tragic for Nature and man but given
that Nature is stronger, man might as well work towards bringing her out.
2
As shown in the presentation at the office of the Brussels Bouwmeester.
Nurjehan Mawaz-Khan 2
Temporary Spaces in a Hyper-Mosaic: Reflections on the MU Brussels Excursion 2018

populations are involved in), with an aesthetic focus on the regeneration of Brussels’ industrial
character. Some examples of these are French architect Alexandre Chemetoff’s winning proposal for a
14 km strip of the canal – The Kanal Project – and the 15 sq. km area slated for urban highway
removal at the southeastern edge of Brussels by the firm ORG. In the context of regularly proposed
large-scale projects, the office of the BM works to re-programme them such that they include more
than just the single function they are built for, an example we were shown at the BM office: a cement
factory that doubles as a concert venue.

..Waiting Spaces
It is clear then that Aurelie de Smet’s paper is very well-grounded in Brussels’ background of large-
scale urban (re)production, its BM’s efforts to build multi-tasking spaces and the socio-economic
polarities in its population and their service provision. In essence, de Smet’s work imagines one as a
readily available Band-Aid for the other. Basing her research and case studies, some self-initiated,
others extant, within the city’s animated development scene, she promotes the alternative usage of
sites that are marked for these large-scale urban projects. Given that these sites remain empty for
long periods of time due to the time taken for permissions, building allowances and other bureaucratic
processes, in addition to long-drawn out construction phases – all of which are parcelled within the
project cycle – in spatial terms, this prolonged stage of pre-construction is where the concept of
temporary or waiting spaces is borne.

It is during this length of time, while future development sites of all sizes lie in disuse, that new (re:
other) users, often those who would be otherwise unable to afford the occupation of said space, enter
the picture and attribute a system of alternative functions to the space. These functions and people,
temporary as they are until the site re-enters its slated cycle of development, usually tend to contrast
the intended mono-thematic (re: capitalist and pro-rich) programme and cater to the shortfall in fulfilling
citizens’ actual, pressing requirements. And in doing so, as Smet highlights, they provide a ‘test-bed
for urban innovation’. She promotes this surrogate occupation of temporary spaces to the point of
creation for a network of such ‘waiting spaces’, claiming that the patterns of usage derived therein
might be more accurate indicators of – and effectively ‘guide, initiate and influence’ – urban
transformation that is better suited to the needs of the people of Brussels. This exercise of
regenerating the ‘intermittent city’ (Farone and Sarti, 2008) would then help to provide a plan of action
to deal with the challenges of contemporary urban development.

Smet’s methodology is rooted in both theory – having based the spatial (dis)ambiguities of waiting
spaces in Foucalt’s conception of Heterotopias as well as De Solà-Morales’ work on Terrain Vagues –
and practical work, including 10 case studies located in different parts of the city, exemplifying the
potential diversity of temporary use beyond location and single user group, as well as relevant
document analysis and interviews. She also positions her work alongside historical precedents such
as the citizen occupation of Les Halles in Paris (between the 1960s and 1970s), Brussels own urban
activist movements, ARAU from the 1970s and Disturb from the 1990s, and its case of temporary
occupation at the Hotel Central in 1995. She categorises temporary occupation and similar usage of
space within three categories: (1) Activism – citizens hoping to reorder the ’disgraceful’ and ‘under-
creative’ emptiness of temporary spaces, (2) Opportunism – whereby citizens self-appropriate
available spaces to fulfill their basic needs, and (3) Self-Organisation – the primary means of
successful collective occupation. In the case studies there is also an interesting connection to be
made between waiting spaces and public art, art associations and artists in general, that further
support the idea of pro-creativity that the alternative usage of temporary spaces implies.

She concludes her paper with suggestions for tools that could support her proposed network of
temporary/ waiting spaces: a flexible and interactive regional database of temporary spaces to
aggregate specific geographic and structural information on available temporary spaces; an ‘office for
temporary use’ that might provide a point of contact, guidance and experience-sharing for temporary
projects – in line with the Neuland project in Berlin and the Meanwhile project in the UK; a public
department for (the study of) temporary spaces for detection, coordination and organisation for these;
and finally, crucial government support – financial and otherwise – to validate this progressive and
perfectly in sync idea, given that formal institutions can prove to be the most averse and yet once
convinced, the strongest alibis for such postulations.

Nurjehan Mawaz-Khan 3
Temporary Spaces in a Hyper-Mosaic: Reflections on the MU Brussels Excursion 2018

Smet’s paper then, shows that there are innovative ways that the urban development of Brussels
might traverse, beyond solely serving the moneyed EU-spurred influx, and finally take its beautifully
diverse population into full consideration by employing processes that are equally vibrant.

References
Ananian, P., Housing production in Brussels: the neighbourhood city to stand the test of urban
densification. Brussels Studies [Online], General collection, no 107, Online since 19 December 2016,
Accessed 27 April 2018.
URL: http://brussels.revues.org/1461

Bilande, A., Dal, C., Damay, L., Delmotte, F., Neuwels, J., Schaut ,C., and Wibrin, A., The Tivoli
sustainable neighbourhood: a new way of building the city in Brussels? Brussels Studies
[Online], General collection, no 100, Online since 13 June 2016, Accessed 27 April 2018.
URL: http://brussels.revues.org/1360

Brussels’ Bouwmeester’s Office

http://bma.brussels/en/homepage/about-en/#GENERAL-APPROACH
Accessed 9 June 2018

Citygeek [Blog]: Brussels won’t get its river back (yet)

http://thecitygeek.tumblr.com/post/94832832829/brussels-wont-get-its-river-back-yet
Accessed 10 June 2018

De Fossé, M., Historical urban warehouses in Brussels: architecture and construction. Brussels
Studies [Online], General collection, no. 117, Online since 27 November 2017, Accessed 8 May 2018.
URL: http://brussels.revues.org/1579

Demart, S., Riots in Matonge and… the indifference of public authority? Brussels Studies
[Online], General collection, Document 68. Online since 01 July 2013, Accessed 8 May 2018.
URL: http://brussels.revues.org/1168

De Solà‐Morales Rubio, I., 1995. Terrain Vague. In: Davidson, C., Anyplace. Cambridge: MIT Press,
pp. 118-123.

de Smet, A., The role of temporary use in urban (re)development: examples from Brussels.
Brussels Studies [Online], General collection, Document 72. Online since 12 November 2013.
Accessed 27 April 2018.
URL: http://brussels.revues.org/1196

Farone, C., En Sarti, A., Intermittent Cities, On waiting Spaces and how to Inhabit Transforming
Cities. In: Architectural Design. 2008. Vol 78, n° 1, pp. 40-45

Foucault, M., 1984. Of Other Spaces, Heterotopias. In: Michel FOUCAULT.info [Online]. Accessed
29 April 2018.
URL: http://www.foucault.info/documents/heterotopia/foucault.heterotopia.en.html

Highway Removal Project

http://urbanism.orginnovation.com/projects/hermann-debroux/
Accessed 10 June 2018

Kanal Project
http://canal.brussels/en/content/meeting-alexandre-chemetoff
Accessed 10 June 2018

Nurjehan Mawaz-Khan 4
Temporary Spaces in a Hyper-Mosaic: Reflections on the MU Brussels Excursion 2018

Lenel, E., Social mix in public urban action in Brussels: project or political language? Brussels
Studies [Online], General collection, Document 65, Online since 25 February 2013, Accessed 13 June
2018.
URL: http://brussels.revues.org/1134

Mazzocchetti, J., Feelings of injustice and conspiracy theory. Representations of

adolescents from an African migrant background (Morocco and sub-Saharan Africa) in
disadvantaged neighbourhoods of Brussels. Brussels Studies [Online], General collection, no. 63,
Online since 26 November 2012, Accessed 8 May 2018.
URL: http://brussels.revues.org/1123

Meanwhile Space CIC

www.meanwhilespace.com
Accessed 5 May 2018

Neuland Project
www.neuland-berlin.org
Accessed 5 May 2018

Ritter, C., The City of Brussels and Diversity, In: Diversity Journal [Online], 19 October 2011.
Accessed 6 May 2018.
URL: http://www.diversityjournal.com/5918-the-city-of-brussels-and-diversity/

Van Hamme, G., Wertz I. and Biot, V.,Economic growth devoid of social progress: the situation
in Brussels. Brussels Studies [Online], General collection, no. 48. Online since 28 March 2011.
Accessed on 27 April 2018.
URL: http://brussels.revues.org/857

Van Hamme, G., Grippa, T. and Van Criekingen, M., Migratory movements and dynamics
of neighbourhoods in Brussels. Brussels Studies [Online], General collection, Document 97, Online
since 21 March 2016. Accessed 9 May 2018.
URL: http://brussels.revues.org/1338

Nurjehan Mawaz-Khan 5