DepEdRO8 QAD-F31(CY2018-v01-r00)

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Regional Office VIII (Eastern Visayas)
Government Center, Candahug, Palo, Leyte
______________________________________________________________________________________________
SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE VALIDATION FORM
School: ________________________________________ District: ______________________
Division: ______________ Date of Assessment/Validation: _______________

1. PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT (60%)

Thematic Performance Indicators Rating & Equivalent Points Computation Result
Area
School Year Enrolment Percentage of Justification: Enrolment Rate based on
Baseline Increase community mapping (6-11 for Elem, 12-15
2015 – 2016 for Sec)
2016 – 2017 1-Marginal:at least 3% increase (at least
Access 2017 – 2018 85%) __ x 0.45
(45%) Ave. % of Increase 2-Average:at least 5% increase (at least 90%)
3-High:at least 7% increase (at least 95%)
School Year Drop-Out Rate Percentage of Baseline:7.06
Baseline (DR) Decrease
7.06 % 1-Marginal:
2015 – 2016 at least 2% decrease
2016 – 2017 2-Average:
2017 – 2018 at least 4% decrease
Ave.% of Decrease 3-High:
has 0 DR or more than 4% decrease

School Year Cohort Survival Percentage of Baseline:75%

Baseline Rate (CSR) Increase 1-Marginal:
Efficiency 75 % at least 5% increase ____
(25%) 2-Average:
2015 – 2016
at least 7% increase
2016 – 2017 3-High: ____ = 3 X
at least 10% increase or at least 95% CSR 0.25
2017 – 2018
Ave. % of Increase
School Year Completion Percentage of Baseline:75%
Rate (CR) Increase 1-Marginal:
75 % at least 5% increase
2015 – 2016 2-Average:at least 7% increase
2016 – 2017 3-High:at least 10% increase or at least 95%
2017 – 2018 CR

School Year Achievement Percentage of OPTION 1:

Rate (NAT MPS) Increase Elem:Baseline-67%
( option Over- 1-Marginal:at least 2% increase, 2-
all MPS ) Average:at least 5% increase,
3-High:at least 7% increase or at least
2015 – 2016 75%MPS
Quality 2016 – 2017 Sec:Baseline-48%
(30%) 2017 – 2018 1-Marginal:at least 7% increase, 2- __ X 0.30
Average:at least 8% increase,
Ave. % of Increase 3-High:at least 10% increase or at least
(Both Option 1&2 are considered) 75%MPS
OPTION 2:
1-Marginal:26-50%
2-Average:51-75%
3-High:76-100%
SUB-TOTAL
GOOD: 0.50 - 1.49 BETTER: 1.50 - 2.49 BEST: 2.50 – 3.00

LEAD, EMPOWER, AND ACHIEVE THROUGH DATA-DRIVEN DECISIONS

Page 1 of 4
…where LEADers create great schools

(053) 323-3156 | 323-7639 region8@deped.gov.ph | qad.region8@deped.gov.ph QAD-RRC

SUMMARY OF RATINGS:

I. Performance Improvement

Category Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating

Access 45%
Efficiency 25%
Quality 30%
Total 100%

INTERPRETATION: BEST

Legend: Good: 0.5 – 1.49

Better: 1.5 – 2.49
Best: 2.5 – 3.0

II. SBM Practice (DOD)

Principle Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating

A. LEADERSHIP AND 30%
GOVERNANCE
B. CURRICULUM AND 30%
INSTRUCTION
C. ACCOUNTABILITY AND 25%
CONTINUOUS
IMPROVEMENT
D. MANAGEMENT OF 15%
RESOURCES
Total 100%

INTERPRETATION: _________
Legend: Good: 0.5 – 1.49
Better: 1.5 – 2.49
Best: 2.5 – 3.0

OVERALL ASSESSMENT:
Area Weight Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
Part – I Performance Improvement 60%
Part – II SBM Practice 40%
100%
Total
SBM LEVEL: _________________________
Legend: Level I “Developing”: 0.5 – 1.49
Level II “Maturing”: 1.5 – 2.49
Level III “Advanced: 2.5 – 3.0

_______________________________
Ratee

Validated by:
SBM - PASBE Regional Validation Team:

______________________________ _______________________________________ _________________________

______________________________ ______________________________________ __________________________

DIVISION REPRESENTATIVE:
_____________________________
Sample Score Sheet for Part-II
Indicator Level I Level II Level III
A. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE
1
2
3
4
5
Computation per Level
Average Rating
B. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION
1
2
3
4

5
6

Computation per Level

Average Rating
C. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
Computation per Level
Average Rating
D. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES
1
2
3
4
5
Computation per Level
Average Rating
SUMMARY:
Principle Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
A 30%
B 30%
C 25%
D 15%
Total 100%

INTERPRETATION: ________________

Legend: Good: 0.5 – 1.49

Better: 1.5 – 2.49
Best: 2.5 – 3.0
OVERALL ASSESSMENT:
Area Weight Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
Part – I Performance Improvement 60% x 0.60
Part – II SBM Practice 40% x 0.40
Total 100%

SBM LEVEL: _

Legend: Level I “Developing”: 0.5 – 1.49

Level II “Maturing”: 1.5 – 2.49
Level III “Advanced: 2.5 – 3.0

Certified Correct by the School Assessment Committee:

_______________________________________ __________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

________________________________________ ___________________________________________

Validated by Division Assessment Committee:

_______________________________________ __________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

________________________________________ ___________________________________________