LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES outcome

/METHOD=ENTER nlr nihss_masuk

/SAVE=PRED PGROUP
/PRINT=GOODFIT CORR CI(95)
/CRITERIA=PIN(0.05) POUT(0.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(0.5).

Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 85 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 85 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 85 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value

death 0
survived 1

Block 0: Beginning Block

a,b
Classification Table

Predicted
outcome Percentage
Observed death survived Correct
Step 0 outcome death 0 22 .0
survived 0 63 100.0
Overall Percentage 74.1
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant 1.052 .248 18.049 1 .000 2.864

Page 1
 Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables nlr 9.871 1 .002
nihss_masuk 27.663 1 .000
Overall Statistics 29.535 2 .000

Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 31.490 2 .000
Block 31.490 2 .000
Model 31.490 2 .000

Model Summary

-2 Log Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R

Step likelihood Square Square
1 65.720a .310 .454
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.

1 7.573 7 .372

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

outcome = death outcome = survived

Observed Expected Observed Expected Total
Step 1 1 8 7.891 1 1.109 9
2 5 4.910 4 4.090 9
3 1 3.080 8 5.920 9
4 2 1.997 7 7.003 9
5 2 1.540 7 7.460 9
6 3 1.017 6 7.983 9
7 1 .773 8 8.227 9
8 0 .461 9 8.539 9
9 0 .330 13 12.670 13

Page 2
 Classification Tablea

Predicted
outcome Percentage
Observed death survived Correct
Step 1 outcome death 13 9 59.1
survived 2 61 96.8
Overall Percentage 87.1
a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a nlr -.080 .046 2.969 1 .085 .923
nihss_masuk -.163 .044 14.099 1 .000 .849
Constant 4.359 .906 23.175 1 .000 78.203

Variables in the Equation

95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower Upper
a
Step 1 nlr .843 1.011
nihss_masuk .780 .925
Constant

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: nlr, nihss_masuk.

Correlation Matrix

Constant nlr nihss_masuk

Step 1 Constant 1.000 -.578 -.717
nlr -.578 1.000 -.037
nihss_masuk -.717 -.037 1.000

LOGISTIC REGRESSION VARIABLES outcome

/METHOD=ENTER nlr nihss_masuk usia jk lokasi volume surgery
/CONTRAST (jk)=Indicator
/CONTRAST (lokasi)=Indicator
/CONTRAST (volume)=Indicator
/CONTRAST (surgery)=Indicator
/SAVE=PRED PGROUP
/PRINT=GOODFIT CORR CI(95)
/CRITERIA=PIN(0.05) POUT(0.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(0.5).

Page 3
Logistic Regression
Case Processing Summary
a
Unweighted Cases N Percent
Selected Cases Included in Analysis 85 100.0
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 85 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 85 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value

death 0
survived 1

Categorical Variables Codings

Parameter
coding
Frequency (1)
surgery operated 8 1.000
conservative 77 .000
lokasi supratentorial 69 1.000
infratentorial 16 .000
volume less than 30cc 66 1.000
more than 30cc 19 .000
jk male 49 1.000
female 36 .000

Block 0: Beginning Block

a,b
Classification Table

Predicted
outcome Percentage
Observed death survived Correct
Step 0 outcome death 0 22 .0
survived 0 63 100.0
Overall Percentage 74.1
a. Constant is included in the model.
b. The cut value is .500

Page 4
 Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant 1.052 .248 18.049 1 .000 2.864

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables nlr 9.871 1 .002
nihss_masuk 27.663 1 .000
usia 1.686 1 .194
jk(1) .436 1 .509
lokasi(1) .008 1 .929
volume(1) 3.357 1 .067
surgery(1) .824 1 .364
Overall Statistics 34.255 7 .000

Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 36.898 7 .000
Block 36.898 7 .000
Model 36.898 7 .000

Model Summary

-2 Log Cox & Snell R Nagelkerke R

Step likelihood Square Square
1 60.312a .352 .517
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 6 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.

1 11.238 7 .129

Page 5
 Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

outcome = death outcome = survived

Observed Expected Observed Expected Total
Step 1 1 9 8.314 0 .686 9
2 4 5.335 5 3.665 9
3 1 2.829 8 6.171 9
4 3 1.967 6 7.033 9
5 2 1.400 7 7.600 9
6 3 .884 6 8.116 9
7 0 .590 9 8.410 9
8 0 .382 9 8.618 9
9 0 .299 13 12.701 13

Classification Tablea

Predicted
outcome Percentage
Observed death survived Correct
Step 1 outcome death 13 9 59.1
survived 2 61 96.8
Overall Percentage 87.1
a. The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 1a nlr -.101 .057 3.142 1 .076 .904
nihss_masuk -.178 .052 11.690 1 .001 .837
usia .024 .027 .791 1 .374 1.024
jk(1) -.884 .710 1.550 1 .213 .413
lokasi(1) -.174 .907 .037 1 .848 .841
volume(1) 1.289 .832 2.402 1 .121 3.630
surgery(1) 1.504 1.333 1.273 1 .259 4.499
Constant 2.829 2.190 1.668 1 .197 16.925

Page 6
 Variables in the Equation

95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower Upper
Step 1a nlr .809 1.011
nihss_masuk .755 .927
usia .972 1.080
jk(1) .103 1.661
lokasi(1) .142 4.973
volume(1) .711 18.536
surgery(1) .330 61.298
Constant

a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: nlr, nihss_masuk, usia, jk, lokasi, volume, surgery.

Correlation Matrix

Constant nlr nihss_masuk usia jk(1) lokasi(1)

Step 1 Constant 1.000 -.102 -.256 -.703 -.221 -.467
nlr -.102 1.000 -.075 -.164 .016 -.043
nihss_masuk -.256 -.075 1.000 -.226 .245 .294
usia -.703 -.164 -.226 1.000 .014 -.029
jk(1) -.221 .016 .245 .014 1.000 -.011
lokasi(1) -.467 -.043 .294 -.029 -.011 1.000
volume(1) -.427 -.005 -.195 .243 -.247 .240
surgery(1) -.304 -.366 .062 .381 .030 .034

Correlation Matrix

volume(1) surgery(1)
Step 1 Constant -.427 -.304
nlr -.005 -.366
nihss_masuk -.195 .062
usia .243 .381
jk(1) -.247 .030
lokasi(1) .240 .034
volume(1) 1.000 .105
surgery(1) .105 1.000

CORRELATIONS
/VARIABLES=nlr outcome nihss_masuk usia jk lokasi volume surgery
/PRINT=TWOTAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Correlations

Page 7
 Correlations

nlr outcome nihss_masuk usia jk

** **
nlr Pearson Correlation 1 -.341 .354 .081 .064
Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .001 .461 .559
N 85 85 85 85 85
** **
outcome Pearson Correlation -.341 1 -.570 -.141 .072
Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .000 .199 .515
N 85 85 85 85 85
** ** **
nihss_masuk Pearson Correlation .354 -.570 1 .306 .071
Sig. (2-tailed) .001 .000 .004 .517
N 85 85 85 85 85
**
usia Pearson Correlation .081 -.141 .306 1 .133
Sig. (2-tailed) .461 .199 .004 .223
N 85 85 85 85 85
jk Pearson Correlation .064 .072 .071 .133 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .559 .515 .517 .223
N 85 85 85 85 85
lokasi Pearson Correlation -.020 .010 .061 -.013 .014
Sig. (2-tailed) .855 .930 .581 .909 .902
N 85 85 85 85 85
*
volume Pearson Correlation .105 -.199 .127 .216 .112
Sig. (2-tailed) .340 .068 .247 .047 .309
N 85 85 85 85 85
** *
surgery Pearson Correlation -.321 -.098 .044 .274 -.050
Sig. (2-tailed) .003 .370 .689 .011 .650
N 85 85 85 85 85

Page 8
 Correlations

lokasi volume surgery

**
nlr Pearson Correlation -.020 .105 -.321
Sig. (2-tailed) .855 .340 .003
N 85 85 85
outcome Pearson Correlation .010 -.199 -.098
Sig. (2-tailed) .930 .068 .370
N 85 85 85
nihss_masuk Pearson Correlation .061 .127 .044
Sig. (2-tailed) .581 .247 .689
N 85 85 85
* *
usia Pearson Correlation -.013 .216 .274
Sig. (2-tailed) .909 .047 .011
N 85 85 85
jk Pearson Correlation .014 .112 -.050
Sig. (2-tailed) .902 .309 .650
N 85 85 85
*
lokasi Pearson Correlation 1 -.258 -.051
Sig. (2-tailed) .017 .643
N 85 85 85
*
volume Pearson Correlation -.258 1 -.020
Sig. (2-tailed) .017 .852
N 85 85 85
surgery Pearson Correlation -.051 -.020 1
Sig. (2-tailed) .643 .852
N 85 85 85
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

NONPAR CORR
/VARIABLES=nlr outcome nihss_masuk usia jk lokasi volume surgery
/PRINT=SPEARMAN TWOTAIL NOSIG
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Nonparametric Correlations

Page 9
 Correlations

nlr outcome nihss_masuk

** **
Spearman's rho nlr Correlation Coefficient 1.000 -.300 .439
Sig. (2-tailed) . .005 .000
N 85 85 85
** **
outcome Correlation Coefficient -.300 1.000 -.538
Sig. (2-tailed) .005 . .000
N 85 85 85
** **
nihss_masuk Correlation Coefficient .439 -.538 1.000
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .000 .
N 85 85 85
*
usia Correlation Coefficient .096 -.145 .259
Sig. (2-tailed) .382 .187 .017
N 85 85 85
jk Correlation Coefficient .097 .072 .113
Sig. (2-tailed) .379 .515 .302
N 85 85 85
lokasi Correlation Coefficient -.039 .010 .050
Sig. (2-tailed) .726 .930 .647
N 85 85 85
volume Correlation Coefficient .084 -.199 .086
Sig. (2-tailed) .445 .068 .435
N 85 85 85
**
surgery Correlation Coefficient -.297 -.098 -.018
Sig. (2-tailed) .006 .370 .869
N 85 85 85

Page 10
 Correlations

usia jk lokasi volume

Spearman's rho nlr Correlation Coefficient .096 .097 -.039 .084
Sig. (2-tailed) .382 .379 .726 .445
N 85 85 85 85
outcome Correlation Coefficient -.145 .072 .010 -.199
Sig. (2-tailed) .187 .515 .930 .068
N 85 85 85 85
*
nihss_masuk Correlation Coefficient .259 .113 .050 .086
Sig. (2-tailed) .017 .302 .647 .435
N 85 85 85 85
*
usia Correlation Coefficient 1.000 .147 -.006 .216
Sig. (2-tailed) . .179 .960 .047
N 85 85 85 85
jk Correlation Coefficient .147 1.000 .014 .112
Sig. (2-tailed) .179 . .902 .309
N 85 85 85 85
*
lokasi Correlation Coefficient -.006 .014 1.000 -.258
Sig. (2-tailed) .960 .902 . .017
N 85 85 85 85
* *
volume Correlation Coefficient .216 .112 -.258 1.000
Sig. (2-tailed) .047 .309 .017 .
N 85 85 85 85
*
surgery Correlation Coefficient .254 -.050 -.051 -.020
Sig. (2-tailed) .019 .650 .643 .852
N 85 85 85 85

Page 11
 Correlations

surgery
**
Spearman's rho nlr Correlation Coefficient -.297
Sig. (2-tailed) .006
N 85
outcome Correlation Coefficient -.098
Sig. (2-tailed) .370
N 85
nihss_masuk Correlation Coefficient -.018
Sig. (2-tailed) .869
N 85
*
usia Correlation Coefficient .254
Sig. (2-tailed) .019
N 85
jk Correlation Coefficient -.050
Sig. (2-tailed) .650
N 85
lokasi Correlation Coefficient -.051
Sig. (2-tailed) .643
N 85
volume Correlation Coefficient -.020
Sig. (2-tailed) .852
N 85
surgery Correlation Coefficient 1.000
Sig. (2-tailed) .
N 85
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Page 12