Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Research On Ott and Fdi
Research On Ott and Fdi
Over The Top (OTT) platforms are are services which render internet based services
through telecom and internet service providers(s) networks. A few prominent examples
are Netflix, Spotify, Pandora, Tinder, Amazon, and Flipkart. Under the Consolidated
FDI Policy, 2017 (“FDI Policy”), E-commerce is defined as:
“E-commerce means buying and selling of goods and services including digital
products over digital & electronic network.”
It is evident that OTT services fall under the definition of the E-commerce sector as
defined hereinabove, as OTT services sell their goods and services on a digital and
electronic network, i.e., the TSP and ISP networks. OTT Content Services are in the
business of providing audio and video content to consumers through internet-based
broadcasts. Typically speaking, these Platforms do not produce the content they
broadcast. Entities such as Gamma Gaana Limited, Saavn LLC, Netflix, etc., enter into
a license agreement with owners of content, thereby procuring a license to, inter-alia,
stream, sell and communicate to the public through paid subscription (free services
excluded), the licensed contents, Accordingly, after a license is procured, the Platform
performs the following:
This amounts to hosting an inventory on the Platform which is further offered to the
consumer under certain terms and conditions of use, thereby effecting a sale.
The nature of OTT services is such that they offer digital products which may or may
not convert into tangible form. For instance, the purchase of an Apple Music
subscription which allows one to stream music, will not translate into tangible form.
The FDI Policy now expressly declares digital products as a specie of goods and
services covered under the definition of E-commerce:
“…. buying and selling of goods and services including digital products…”
Content consumption and buying products online does not make it it to be fair
comparison between OTT and ecommerce platforms.
A solution to the ‘OTT Content Platforms – FDI’ conundrum could be that the
Platform be hosted and the respective services be provided by an entity situated
and incorporated outside of India and an Indian entity be incorporated to merely
provide deal making, liaison, payment and related activities. A similar trend
appears to be emerging with the existing foreign players in the Indian market.
The objectives of the Indian entity Saavn Media Private Ltd do not purport it to
be a marketplace or any other type of online platform.
OTTs are distinct from network providers like TSPs and ISPs, though some of the
services by OTTs such as VoIP, video calls, text messaging, etc may overlap with
TSPs.
A video streaming service like Netflix which charges money for access
technically falls within this definition since it is “selling” a “digital product” to
the viewer, ie, the shows/movies you can watch after paying your subscription.
A thorough reading of the draft policy demonstrates that Govt. officials have
used e-commerce, electronic communications and digital economy in the same
breathe, all across the document. However, Information and Broadcasting
Ministry, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, and the
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India are still not clear about the difference
between ecommerce and a digital company like Netflix and Amazon Prime.
OTTs are distinct from network providers like TSPs and ISPs, though some
of the services by OTTs such as VoIP, video calls, text messaging, etc may
overlap with TSPs.
Any OTT platform/application cannot be offered to consumers without
access to physical infrastructures that TSPs and ISPs deploy
The following services by the OTT providers may be regarded as the same or
similar to services provided by TSPs –
OTT players have developed apps with various features, and they use the existing
infrastructure of traditional TSPs, they don’t have their own extensive
infrastructure to reach to their customers.