Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISA - Jurnal 1
ISA - Jurnal 1
11. Conclusions
The main contribution of this paper is that we propose a conceptual framework
and corresponding solution processes for validating electronic transactions
and for conducting external continuous auditing in an EC environment. In
particular, our CAPM provides a first step to answer several issues proposed by
Kogan et al. (1999) related to continuous online auditing (COA) (e.g. the
architecture of COA, system audit, security of COA, and electronic records).
12. Improvement/Extensions
Three regulation issues that have been omitted in our discussion deserve further
research. First, it is important to have legal rules guiding the separation and
designation of duties on the development, modification, and control of invoice
applications between the CA and the
vendor.
Second, the role and legal responsibility of the CA at the stage of invoice
validation should be specified. Finally, since companies will disclose their financial
information to the public on a real-time and continuous basis, there should be a set of
generally accepted electronic principles (GAFP) that specify the content and format,
the time interval and frequency, and the amount and extent of such disclosures
17. Hypotheses
19. Sample
210 internal auditors worldwide on the status of their use of continuous auditing
21. Results
internal auditors' perceptions of effort expectancy and social influence are significant
predictors of their intentions to use continuous auditing.
We also find that annual sales volume of the company and voluntariness of use
significantly moderate the relationship between performance expectancy and social
influence respectively.
Specifically, we find that the North American internal auditors are more likely to use
continuous auditing due to soft social coercion pressures of Social Influence through
peers and higher authorities.
On the other hand, Middle Eastern auditors are more likely to use the technology if it
is mandated by the higher authorities.
22. Conclusions
strong cultural differences among the critical antecedents affecting internal auditors'
intentions to use the system. North American internal auditors are more likely to
respond to soft coercion pressures created by positive Social Influence through peers
and higher authorities. On the other hand, Middle Eastern internal auditors are much
more likely to use the system if it is mandated by the higher authorities
23. Improvement/Extensions