Feedback analysis and reward /corrective measures taken, if any

(Feedback collected for all courses: YES/NO; Specify the feedback collection process;
Average Percentage of students who participate; Specify the feedback analysis process; Basis
of reward/ corrective measures, if any; Indices used for measuring quality of teaching &
learning and summary of the index values for all courses/teachers; Number of corrective
actions taken.)

Feedback collected for all courses: YES

Feedback collection process: Online-ECAP software
Eligibility of percentage of students to give feedback: 100%

Introduction:
The teaching-learning system followed by any educational institution needs continuous
refinement. To capacitate this process of continuous refinement, the institution has adopted a
feedback system that takes suggestions from students of each program. This eventually helps
to fine-tune the teaching-learning process and the curriculum. The Institution follows a well-
defined and formal feedback system. Feedback system has been identified as one of the
important processes in our Quality Management System.

Specify the feedback collection process:

 Collecting feedback for all the courses that are being taught twice in a semester,
through the ECAP (Engineering College Automation Package) software.
 The students’ feedback collection process is described in flow chart in the figure
given below.
 Once the feedback process is completed, the reports are generated automatically.
 The consolidated report containing grade for each course is sent to the respective
Heads of the departments and the information is circulated to the faculty of their
department for necessary action.

Algorithm for feedback:

Step 1: Enter E-Cap URL is 172.168.1.215.

Step 2: Students login with their id and password.

Step 3: Click on Academics.

Step 4: Select feedback system option.

Step 5: Select the staff feedback system option.

Step 6: After selecting the staff feedback, student will select any one of the level
corresponding to each parameter for particular subject.
Step 7: Repeat Step 6 for all current semester courses

Step 8: After completion of all current semester courses, students save the details.

Step 9: Logout.

A flow chart for student feedback processing steps in ECAP (Online)

Fig: A flow chart for student feedback processing steps in ECAP (Online)

Specify the feedback analysis process:

 The feedback analysis is done manually.
 The feedback collected from students is first analyzed at the level of HoD and then at
the level of Principal.
 The contents of the feedback will be shared with each faculty member personally
based on the parameters in questionnaire and their metrics of measurement in the
given format
 Based on these parameters the feedback given on faculty is taken from the students
and the average is calculated.
 The faculty who gets less than 6.5average in the feedback is identified by the HoD
and he will be asked to submit an explanation letter to him.
Format of student feedback on faculty rating of scale:

Fig: Student will select any one of the level corresponding to each parameter for
current semester courses

Basis of reward:
 The feedback system works as an eye opener for the faculty.
 The increments and promotions are considered based on a scale of 5 for student
feedback in faculty appraisal form
 Those with low scores will be counseled and asked to improve their performance in
the subsequent semesters by incorporating team teaching or attending pedagogical
training or other faculty development programs as per the necessity.
 The faculty members are constantly motivated by giving a word of appreciation in
the departmental meetings.
 Rewards are given based on the following performance factors such as:
 Award based on university examination results
 Outstanding Overall performance in Research and publications
 Award for outstanding Grants and funds received
Corrective measures:
 Normally the feed-back of the students is used to improve the performance of the
faculty. They are advised to improve upon specific areas like usage of blackboard,
class control, effective teaching aids etc.
  Regular training programs in collaboration with NITTTR, seminars by experienced
faculty are organized every year to train the faculty in teaching methodologies and
teaching- learning processes.
 Apart from this the faculty members are encouraged to attend various faculty
development programs (FDP) / seminars / workshops to hone up their skills.
 If needed explanation from the faculty will be demanded for any inappropriate result
and subsequent action will be taken for improvement of the faculty.
 Counseling will be given to the concerned faculty by HOD and Principal whenever
required.
Evaluation form from HoD for the action taken:
Class:
Feedback No Section:
No of students participated Date of feedback
Avg of
Areas which HoD’s
Faculty students HoD’s Signature Signature
require Follow
S. No Name marked last Recommendations of faculty of HoD
improvement Up
two grades

Table 9.2.1: Details of Mechanical faculty counselled by HoD for getting below average
performance in the last three years:

Corrective actions No. of corrective actions in last 3 years

2017-2018 2016-2017 2015-2016
No of faculty counseled for 12 05 12
below average performance

Table 9.2.2: Details of Mechanical faculty who got awards and rewards based on their
best performance in the last three years:

Basis of reward No. of awards and rewards in last 3 years

2017-2018 2016-2017 2015-2016
No of faculty who got
03 02 01
awards and rewards

Table 9.2.3: Feedback summary of Mechanical faculty for even semester (2017-2018)
Name of the Faculty Name of the Subject/Lab Feedback-1 Feedback-1 Avg for 1&2
P Veera Bhadra Rao / T
Heat Transfer Lab 92 92.2 92.1
V S Siva
P Veera Bhadra Rao Heat Transfer 91.2 92.6 91.9

Ch Mani Kumar Thermal Engineering –I 91.5 91.6 91.55

Dr. R Umamaheswara
Operation Research 91.4 89 90.2
Rao
M Vijay Krishna Production Technology 89.6 89.2 89.4
M Vijay Krishna / B K Production Technology
88.2 88.5 88.35
Murthy Lab
P Veera Bhadra Rao Thermal Engineering –I 88.3 88.3 88.3
P V V Nageswara Rao / K Fluid Mechanics &
88.9 86.3 87.6
Daniel Hydraulic Machinery Lab
P V V S Nageswara Rao Power Plant Engineering 86.6 85.1 85.85
D U V Satyanarayana / J Fluid Mechanics &
85.4 85.2 85.3
Vijay Kumar Hydraulic Machinery Lab
Production Planning &
P Chaitanya Krishna 84.6 85.8 85.2
Control
Dr. R Umamaheswara
Operation Research 84.2 85.9 85.05
Rao
Industrial Engineering and
Sk Salman Basha 86.9 82.1 84.5
Management
Refrigeration & Air
P Chaitanya Krishna 86.2 82.5 84.35
Conditioning
Industrial Engineering and
Sk Salman Basha 86.8 81.8 84.3
Management
Y Raghu Ram Green Engineering Systems 84.2 83.9 84.05

P Rajendra Babu Robotics 88.9 78.3 83.6

T N V Ashok Kumar Kinematics Of Machinery 80.5 85.1 82.8

K Naga Suresh Power Plant Engineering 82.9 81.8 82.35

Production Planning &
K K Daniel 81.9 81.9 81.9
Control
Y Raghu Ram Green Engineering Systems 82 80.7 81.35
Design of Machine
J Madhu Kiran 79.8 82.4 81.1
Members – I
M V S Pavan Kumar Heat Transfer 81.3 80.4 80.85

B Kiran Kumar Operation Research 78.8 82.3 80.55

M V Kiran Kumar / T N Fluid Mechanics &
80 80.3 80.15
V Ashok Kumar Hydraulic Machinery Lab
P C Krishna / CH Mani
Heat Transfer Lab 77.6 82 79.8
Kumar
Dr. R B Chowdary Non Destructive Evaluation 77.6 81.4 79.5
Dr. Akhilesh Kumar
Production Technology 80.1 78.6 79.35
Singh
Sk Sheshavali / Ch
Venkateswara Rao / K N Machine Drawing 80.9 77.3 79.1
Suresh
J Vijay Kumar Refrigeration & Air 78.6 79.4 79
 Conditioning

M V S Pavan Kumar Heat Transfer 74.3 83.7 79

P Rajendra Babu Robotics 80.9 76.9 78.9

Design of Machine
J Madhu Kiran 72.4 84.9 78.65
Members – I
Refrigeration & Air
M Vinod Kumar 77.5 79.6 78.55
Conditioning
J Kantha Rao / P Rajendra Production Technology
75.4 81 78.2
Babu Lab
Sk Shasavali Robotics 75.2 81.1 78.15
Dr. Akhilesh Kumar
Production Technology 74.2 82 78.1
Singh
P Surendra Kinematics Of Machinery 77 78.3 77.65
M V S Pavan Kumar / M
Heat Transfer Lab 78.1 76.4 77.25
Vinod Kumar
Design of Machine
R Narenda Kumar 70.1 78.2 74.15
Members - II
Industrial Engineering &
N S V N Hanuman 73 75.2 74.1
Management
Design of Machine
K Kantha Rao 76 71.2 73.6
Members - II
Design of Machine
B Krishna Murthy 75.6 70.1 72.85
Members - II
Industrial Engineering and
J Subash Kumar 72.9 72.6 72.75
Management
U Sai Krishna Non Destructive Evaluation 70.3 73.6 71.95

J Vijay Kumar Thermal Engineering –I 76.5 66.8 71.65

Industrial Engineering &
N S V N Hanuman 69.7 70.5 70.1
Management
K Bhargav / P Phani
Machine Drawing 66.6 70.3 68.45
Kumar
P Phani Kumar / M Vinod
Machine Drawing 68.1 68.5 68.3
Kumar / K Bhargav
J Subhash Kumar / J Production Technology
68.2 65.8 67
Kantha Rao Lab
CH Venkateswara Rao Kinematics Of Machinery 65.7 66.2 65.95
Industrial Engineering &
U Sai Krishna 61.5 67.7 64.6
Management
Design of Machine
M V Kiran Kumar 64.2 63.9 64.05
Members – I