Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Business Law (BL) - Task 1
Business Law (BL) - Task 1
by
Business Law
IBA – LBIS
Jakarta, Indonesia
9 September 2019
George Samuel Wijaya 2
Final Assignment
Task 1
A Seattle based Smartphone Company called HDC asked a software company SDC to
develop software for them. The software company gave a total estimate of 10,000
dollars for a total work of 20 days. It was agreed between the two companies that HDC
would be paying SDC 30 percent before the beginning of the work, 60 percent after the
After 10 days, of work SDC wrote a letter that the work will take more time since their
chief software developer has left the company. After 15 days SDC wrote back saying
that they would be only able to deliver the source codes and would provide an assistant
developer who will finish the rest of the work. After 20 days, when HDC asked for the
final version, SDC told them that it can provide them with 80 percent of the work and
would like the 60 percent as promised. However, fearing non-completion of the project,
HDC cancelled the contract and asked for a full refund. SDC has threatened to take
1. Does HDC entitled for a refund? Which Basics Law should HDC used to
Considering that SDC did not keep their promise of the estimation
working time, HDC is entitled to ask for a refund since they had a business
contract which it can help to support their lawsuit. The business contract itself
legally enforced to perform or refrain from doing certain tasks in keeping with
Joseph (n.d.). However, HDC is not entitled to get a full refund, seeing that
George Samuel Wijaya 3
SDC already did 80 percent of the work and tried to offer HDC an assistant
developer to finish the rest of the work. Another reason on why HDC does not
deserve a full refund is because they promised to pay 60% of the fee once
they get the initial version (which SDC already did), not the full version.
Thus, as the conclusion; it is better for HDC to file a lawsuit against SDC with
the aim of getting 30% of refund which it was given before the beginning of
lawsuit against HDC. SDC is able to file a lawsuit for a breach of contract.
contract or agreement that occurs when one party fails to fulfill its promise in
The contract that HDC and SDC have is a bilateral contract which is under the
With that contract, SDC surely has the opportunity to win because a
bilateral contract is a two-sided contract which each party promises each other
to perform an act and HDC is not allowed to cancel it just like that. There are
some things that HDC has to consider and negotiate first with SDC before
and the consequences which were made in the contract. In addition, SDC has
an opportunity to win since they already did the initial version of the work
developer to complete the work, which we can see that SDC is responsible
In my opinion, SDC has the bigger chance to win if HDC cancels the
contract with the basis that SDC already did the work and they did not neglect
their responsibility even though the chief software developer has left the
company. Instead of giving an excuse, SDC tried their best to complete the
work to fulfill the contract which enables SDC to file a lawsuit of a material
itself occurs when one of the parties in the contract fails to perform an act,
and the injured party suffers significantly in terms of material. In the case of
material breach, the court will provide the greatest remedy to the injured party
to make them whole again. However, HDC has the bigger chance to win if
they do not cancel the contract with the basis that SDC was not able to fulfill
contract to look for a rescission or canceling the contract and get a refund for
meaning that one of the parties in the agreement does not hold their part of the
to the agreement that the other party cannot complete their responsibilities in
References