Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Macro Part 2 Lecture Notes
Macro Part 2 Lecture Notes
Macro Part 2 Lecture Notes
Chapter 12 continued
Experiment
o Suppose there are only two possible shocks that can hit an economy. Shock 1 is
permanent increase in the money supply. If this occurs we know that this only
increases prices and has no real effects
o W = wP
Segmented Markets theory
o Firms who are in the market have already made their money allocation
Locked into financial obligations
o Central bank increases the money supply
o Firms turn this into labour demand
o Our demand for labour goes up
Real wage goes up
o Output supply curve shifts out
Real interest rate falls
o Opp cost of leisures falls
Supply of labour falls slightly
o Demand for money rises
o Money supply has not had time yet to shift right
Cuz only the financial sector observes the increase and the majority of
money is in bank accounts from consumers who don’t know yet
Central bank wants price stability
o They target the nominal interest rate (R = r + i)
o If there is a shock to money demand then this policy will work!
o If the demand for price is wobbly, then the price level is wobbly and this is bad
for the bank’s credibility
o If this is the case, the CB can change the overnight rate?
o CB increases the money supply to meet a rise in demand
Price level stays constant
o When shocks are to money demand, bank can adjust supply according to
maintain current prices
o Where is the interest rate on this chart?
If it is a real shock e.g. demand shock you have to give the economy more money than it
demands in order to maintain an interest rate target
Bottom line: if the shock is real, bank must change its interest rate target
CB will stifle the economy if they target an interest rate during a productivity increase
Chapter 13: Real Business Cycle
People have differing views on which model to use
DSGE = Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium model
Comes from the supply side
o Real shocks to the economy from productivity
Y=zf(K,N)
Assume shocks are positive unless stated otherwise
Effects of a persistent increase in TFP
o Firms want to hire more labour now
o Output supply increases
o Output demand increases, but less so than supply
What will the central bank do?
They will increase the money supply to hold the price level constant
The money supply increased because firms demanded more money
o Called reserve causation
Endogenous money
o Money created by the financial system
Y = zK0.3N0.7
o Z=1
o K = 100
o N = 50
o = 61.6 = 1(1000.3)(500.7)
Suppose only 95% of K is being used, and 90% N
56.3 = 1(950.3)(450.7)
Notice, z hasn’t changed
o People are still as effective, just not as much for them to do
If you try to recalculate z, it will be 0.914 instead of 1
o 56.3= z(1000.3)(500.7)
o Z= 0.914
Keynesian coordination failure model
The Party Syndrome
o Strategic complementarities
o Works when everyone does it
Upward sloping demand curve for labour
o It must be strongly steeper than the supply curve
o If interest rates rise, supply curve moves down(right) and labour supplied falls
Multiple equilibria
o The low interest high income one is the good equilibrium
o High interest low income is bad equilibrium
Sunspots
o Sunspots effected the agricultural output
o Term for a variable that shouldn’t matter but if people believe it to be good/bad
it will be a self-fulfilling prophecy
Government would like to stabilize the economy in the coordination failure model
o Reduce taxes, causes labour demand to shift to the left and labour supply to shift
to the right
Increases their lifetime wealth, and they take more leisure
o Reach a single equilibrium
CB gives banks money in exchange for T Bills
o They then reverse this trade a month (or however long) later
o Called repo
o Puts money into the economy
Selling bonds during a recession will have good effects?
New Monetarist Model review
o
End of Chapter 13
Chapter 14:
You can use monetary policy to lower the interest rate and close the output gap
Chapter 12 review
P = domestic price
P* = foreign price
e = nominal exchange rate
o one unit of foreign goods will cost eP* in units of domestic currency
Real exchange rate = eP* / P
o If eP* > P, it would be cheaper to buy goods domestically than abroad
o Foreigners would buy our goods and P would rise
With no transport costs, and no trade barriers we expect P = eP*
o Called the law of one price, or purchasing power parity
o Holds for goods than can easily be traded (oil) but not for things that cant
(haircuts)
A hard peg can be implemented in three ways
o Dollarization: using the currency of another country as national medium of
exchange
Disadvantage is that the gov cant print money to finance G spending
o Currency Board: a central institution holds interest bearing assets denominated
in the currency of a country against which the nominal exchange rate is fixed
CB is now ready to exchange at a specified rate, does this by
buying/selling interest bearing assets
o Agreement among countries to a common currency: e.g. Euro, controlled by
European Central Bank
Soft peg is just a somewhat commitment to stay within a range in the short term
o Usually collapse and change to other systems
IMF plays important role in exchange rate determination
o Also acts as a lender of last resort
SOE model with FLEXIBLE exchange rate
o M = eP*L(Y,r*)
o If Ms increases, e depreciates proportionately
No effect on real variables though
o Nominal shock from abroad: P* rises
Money demand curve shifts rightwards, e appreciates
No change in domestic price
Flexible e has insulated the domestic economy
Under flexible rates, foreign monetary policy don’t affect us
o A real shock to the domestic economy from abroad: increase in world r
CA increases, shifting Yd right to meet higher r*
I falls, C ambiguous
Total absorption may rise or fall
Increase r causes Md to fall, but increase in output causes Md to rise
Assume Md more responsive to output than interest rates
Md rises, e appreciates
PPP holds, P = eP* therefore P falls with e
Flexible e cannot insulate domestic economy from foreign real shocks
To stabilize, would have to increase Ms in response
SOE Model with FIXED exchange rate
o We will consider a type of soft peg where they fix for extended periods of time
but might revalue the currency at times
o The gov must through CB stand ready to support the fixed rate
o Government can’t change the money supply when they set a fixed rate, market
will undo any monetary action by CB
o Nominal Foreign Shock: Foreign Prices increase
Demand for money shifts right
Puts downward pressure on e
Gov exchanges domestic currency for foreign
Leads to increase in M
P = eP*, therefore domestic P must rise in proportion to P*
Under fixed rate, CB must adopt world’s inflation rate domestically
o Real Foreign Shock: world interest rate increases
Domestic output increases, Yd shift right
Output effect dominates, Md increases
Ms must rise under fixed e
Domestic price level doesn’t change
Fixed rate insulates the domestic economy from real shocks abroad
Same result can be achieved under flexible, but it requires CB to act, here
it is automatic
o Exchange Rate Devaluation
Under fixed rate, gov might want to devalue domestic currency in
response to a shock
Suppose temporary negative shock to TFP
Ys shifts left
CA falls, shifting Yd left to keep constant r
C and absorption fall
Md falls cuz of fall in income
If gov were to still support the fixed rate, they would have to buy
up domestic currency to prevent depreciation
o Implies Ms would contract
What if gov doesn’t want to, or doesn’t have enough foreign
exchange reserves?
Gov can let their currency depreciate and Ms will stay at M1
Note: devaluation doesn’t affect the Current Account, trying to
make a real change through nominal means
Flexible vs Fixed exchange rates
o Depends on whether or not they think nominal or real shocks are important to
be insulated from
Flexible for nominal
Fixed for real
o Flexible allows CB to have independent monetary policy
Capital Controls
o Can help reduce nominal shock’s affect under flexible and can reduce
fluctuations in foreign reserves under fixed
o In general they are undesirable, create inefficiencies
o BP = KA + CA (balance of payments = capital account + current account)
o BP must be zero, so KA = - CA
o Temporary negative shock to domestic productivity under flexible rate
Ys shifts leftward
Implies CA decreases and Yd shifts left
Md shifts left, and e depreciates
Now what if gov prohibits all capital inflows and outflows
Ys shifts left but Yd doesn’t
o R is allowed to rise to r1
Income falls but less than before
Md falls but less than before
E depreciates, but less than before
If country is worried about effects of fluctuating nominal e under flexible,
capital controls will dampen the effects
o Under a fixed rate, output market acts the same but money market is different
E is fixed so when Md falls, Ms must be decreased
Capital controls make Ms fall by less
Chapter 17
Q is labour force
N is working age population
N–Q
o Consumers who decide not to work
k is the cost of posting a vacancy
A = active firms
Matching function
o M = em(Q,A)
# of matches is a function of people who want to work, and number of
active firms
e is the equivalent of z in the production function
it is the efficiency with which matches can be made within the labour
market
o em(Q,A) / A
Pc = em(1,A/Q)
Pc = em(1,j)
J = labour market tightness
1 – Pc = 1 – em(1,j)
o Probability of being unemployed, while searching
V(Q) = Pc w + (1 – Pc)b
o b are unemployment benefits
V(Q) = em(1,j) w + [1- em(1,j)]b
o = b + em(1,j)(w – b)
V(Q) is the supply curve of labour
The probability that a girm with a vacancy finds a worker to fill the job is
o Pf = em(1/j, 1)
Z – w is the profit for the firm
K = em(1/j,1)(z-w)
o K is the cost of matching
o Basically MR = MC
k/(z-w) = em(1/j , 1)
Nash Bargaining
o W = az + (1 – a)b
o A = worker’s share of total surplus (bargaining power)
Experiments
1. Increase in UI benefit b
o
2. Increase in productivity
3. Decrease in matching efficiency
Endogenous Growth
Solow model uses total factor productivity, labour force growth rate, saving rate
Why are there barriers to technology/tfp?
Exam info:
Please note Money Surprise model – Friedman Lucas Model and Segmented Markets
model are all the same operationally. They work because some sector of the economy
perceives money as having real effects and therefore output and employment rise –
albeit temporarily
55 – 60 Q’s
Chpt 12,13,14 = 12 – 14 q
Cpt 15,16 = 8 – 10 q
Cpt 17,18 = 14- 16q
Chpt 6 = 9 – 11q
Chpt 8 = 5 – 8q