Professional Documents
Culture Documents
401#25 IOCG Kiruna Fe 13
401#25 IOCG Kiruna Fe 13
Assignment 10
Geological Society of America 125th Anniversary Annual Meeting – Denver, CO
• Next week the Geological Society of America (GSA) holds its Annual Meeting (its 125th)
in Denver. This will be a special meeting with a number of important talks due to the
125th Anniversary. Many of the faculty and graduate students from the department will
be attending the meeting and I encourage you to attend as well.
• The assignment is to attend GSA and sit through at least one economic geology
session. Take notes on what you hear and write a two-page summary of the session
that describes the most interesting things you learned technically. I also want you to
critique the actual presentations – what worked well with the presentations and what
did not? Were the presentations suited to a general geology audience or were they too
specific.
• For those of you who do NOT attend the meeting – go the GSA website and look up the
abstracts for the sessions dealing with rare earth element deposits (T97, T106, and P11
– above). Read these abstracts and put together a two-page paper that discusses the
most important new results coming out of research into the REE deposits – cite the
abstracts correctly in your work and provide a reference list of the abstracts you utilize.
Page 1
Iron Oxide-Copper-Gold (IOCG) Deposits!
*Groves, D., Bierlein, F., Meinert, L., and Hitzman, M., 2010, Definition
of Iron Oxide-Copper-Gold (IOCG) Deposits and Proposed Associated
Ore Types and Their Distribution Through Earth History: Economic
Geology, v. 105, p. 641-654.
Murray Hitzman
Characteristics of IOCGs!
• Age - Archean to Pliocene
Page 2
Characteristics of IOCGs —
Mineralogy and Metals!
• Mineralogy
Iron oxide minerals (magnetite, hematite)
dominant, minor sulfides (generally
chalcopyrite, lesser pyrite), gangue carbonates,
calc-silicate minerals, barite, (quartz).
Murray Hitzman
IOCG Deposits!
Page 3
Kiruna-type Iron Deposits!
Murray Hitzman
Characteristics of Kiruna-types!
• Age - Archean to Pliocene
Page 4
Characteristics of Kiruna-type Iron Deposits —
Mineralogy and Metals!
• Mineralogy
Iron oxide minerals (magnetite, hematite) very
minor sulfides (pyrite),
gangue apatite.
Murray Hitzman
“Kiruna-type” Magnetite
Deposits!
Magnetite-apatite
deposits display
similarities in all settings!
Kiruna
Kantonga, Zambia
Pilot Knob (subsurface)
Murray Hitzman
Page 5
IOCG vs. Kiruna: Many criteria in common – primary
differences are % sulfides and alteration types
SENSU STRICTO IOCG KIRUNA - TYPE
Magmatic-hydrothermal deposits that Magmatic-hydrothermal deposits of
contain economic Cu + Au grades magnetite with minor/trace sulfides,
(generally 0.7-1.5% Cu; 0.8 – 1 g/t Au). dominantly pyrite.
Structurally controlled and commonly Structurally or intrusive contact
contain significant volumes of breccia. controlled. commonly contain significant
volumes of breccia.
Commonly associated with pre-sulfide Commonly associated with sodic or
sodic/sodic-calcic alteration on regional, sodic-calcic alteration sometimes on a
scale relative to economic large scale relative to economic
mineralization. Have potassic, calcic, or mineralization.
hydrolyitic alteration assemblages with
sulfides.
Generally have elevated (anomalous) Ce Generally have elevated (anomalous) Ce
and La. and La.
Lack significant or abundant quartz veins Lack significant or abundant quartz veins
or silicification. or silicification.
Form from highly oxidized, saline fluids. Form from highly oxidized, saline fluids.
Murray Hitzman
IOCG Deposits!
Hitzman et al. (1992) suggested that Magnetite-apatite (“Kiruna-type”)
deposits were equivalent to Iron oxide-Cu-Au (“Olympic Dam-type”)
deposits.
More recent work suggest that these “types” are end-members of a
continuum of “barren” to “productive” IOCGs.
Murray Hitzman
Page 6
Sensu Stricto IOCG Ore System Alteration
• Variable by district:
– Gawler - abundant hydrolytic with ore; large scale potassic.
– Chile - huge regional sodic alteration, and well developed potassic and
calcic with ore
Murray Hitzman
Page 7
Sensu Stricto IOCGs – Elemental Variation!
– Fe-rich
– P-rich
– Trace Ce, La
– Often minor Ba
Murray Hitzman
Page 8
Distribution of IOCG Districts!
Grenville 0!
1!
5! Yunnan
Baja
Carajas
Cloncurry
N. Chile/
Peru Lufilian Gawler
IOCG Mines!
Nico
(open 2013?)
Guleb Dahongshan
0!
1!
5!
Sossego,
Igarape Bahia Ernest
Raul
Henry,
Candelaria Olympic Osborne
Manto Verde Dam,
Prominent
Hill
Murray Hitzman
Page 9
IOCG Ore System!
Murray Hitzman
IOCG Alteration -
Sodic-calcic &
Sodic!
Murray Hitzman
Page 10
Sodic Alteration!
“White Rock”
Murray Hitzman
Murray Hitzman
Page 11
IOCG Alteration -
Potassic
Note that it is
sometimes difficult
to distinguish albitic
alteration from Ksp
alteration in hand
specimen.
Murray Hitzman
Page 12
Potassic Alteration - Biotite
Outcrop
Andesite altered to
massive biotite-
magnetite rock.
Candelaria deposit,
Chile.
Mgt
Bio
Thin section
Murray Hitzman
Page 13
ICOG Alteration — Calcic
Calcic (Sodic-Calcic)!
Sodic-Calcic Alteration
Murray Hitzman
Page 14
Calcic Alteration
Murray Hitzman
Calcic Alteration
Page 15
Calcic Alteration
Coarse-grained pyroxene
(diopside) with later vug filling
calcite. (“Skarn”). Mt. Elliot,
Cloncurry district, Australia.
Calcic Alteration
Page 16
IOCG Alteration —
Hydrolytic!
Murray Hitzman
Hydrolytic Alteration
Murray Hitzman
Page 17
Hydrolytic
Alteration
Murray Hitzman
Hydrolytic Alteration
Murray Hitzman
Page 18
Hydrolytic
Alteration
Andesites altered to
quartz-sericite-
hematite and highly
brecciated. El
Espino system,
Chile.
Murray Hitzman
Alteration Assemblage
Depends Partially on Protolith
“Hydrolytic” alteration
Basalt Rhyolite basalt: chl - carb - hm
rhyolite: ser - chl - hm
“Potassic” alteration
basalt: bio - chl - cal - hm
Limestone
rhyolite: Ksp - bio - mgt -hm
Sodic alteration
alb - scap - act - hbl
Sandstone Skarn
garnet - pyrox - act
Evaporites
Hematite /
Intrusive Magnetite
Murray Hitzman
Page 19
Vertical Variation in
IOCG System
Alteration Patterns
5 km
1 km
Hydrolytic alteration
Potassic alteration
Sodic alteration
IOCG deposit
Mgt-apatite deposit
Murray Hitzman
Pb, Zn?
Vertical Metal Variation
Ag, Co, in IOCG System
5 km U, S
1 km
Fe, Cu, S, Hydrolytic alteration
Au
Potassic alteration
Fe Sodic alteration
IOCG deposit
Fe Mgt-apatite deposit
Murray Hitzman
Page 20
Metal Content of IOCGs
IOCG system
Potassic alteration
Sodic -calcic
alteration
Source of
wallrock Oxidized
buffered brine Porphyry
brines magmatic Cu
Fluid system
-Na, Ca, K, Si, metals
Intrusion
Each IOCG displays a different metal “fingerprint” (Au, U, Ag, Zn, Ni, Co,
LREE, etc.) This is expected as the enormous hydrothermal systems
which forms these deposits “see” different crust along their flow path.
Murray Hitzman
Olympic Dam
Salobo Sossego
Sequerinho Ernest Henry
Sin Quyen
Murray Hitzman
Page 21
IOCG Structural Models - Physical Trap!
Candelaria
N Lanham
Furnas
Sossego
Alteration
Zone
Alvo
Alteration 118
Zone
Tip Top
intrusion
Blockbuster
Gameleira
Mt Elliot-Swan
Pajuca
Salobo
5 km
Starra Alemao
Mt Dore-Merlin
5 km N Murray Hitzman
Page 22
Sensu Stricto IOCG
“Hydrothermal
Metamorphism”
• In a number of Sensu Stricto
IOCG deposits high
temperature (and sometimes
apparent high pressure)
alteration assemblages along
faults suggest significant
upward migration of
“metamorphic” conditions.
• Such “hydrothermal
metamorphism” not apparent
at Kiruna-type deposits.
Murray Hitzman
• The Gawler Shelf includes two producing IOCG deposits - Olympic Dam
and Prominent Hill as well as a number of subeconomic magnetite-
dominant deposits.
• Olympic Dam has resources of 8 Bt 0.87% Cu, 0.29 kg/t U3O8, 0.3 g/t Au,
1.61 g/t Ag.
Page 23
Geology of the
Gawler Craton!
• X
Murray Hitzman
Murray Hitzman
Page 24
Acropolis Prospect - Magnetite Deposit
Murray Hitzman
Acropolis Prospect -
Gawler Volcanic Rocks
Page 25
Acropolis Prospect - Hiltaba Granite
Murray Hitzman
Murray Hitzman
Page 26
Acropolis Prospect -
Magnetite Mineralization
Murray Hitzman
Acropolis Prospect -
Foliated texture in granite cut by sulfides
Murray Hitzman
Page 27
Gawler Craton - IOCG Deposits
Carrapateena
Olympic Dam
Prominent Hill
Murray Hitzman
Page 28
Olympic Dam Cu-U-Au-Ag-LREE Deposit
• More recent drilling (from Reynolds, 2001, MESA Journal)
has shown that
outmost alteration
recognized is biotite-
out line.
• The company then
uses 5% Fe contour
as edge of main
hydrothermal system.
• They state that all the
Ksp in the OD granite
is igneous and that
the plagioclase in the
granite is dominantly
albitic — both these
seem questionable —
early sodic alteration
and later potassic?
• The deposit
occurs within an
elongate breccia
body sitting
within granite.
• The breccia
units flair out
upwards.
Murray Hitzman
Page 29
Olympic Dam - Structural Controls
• Most recent
structural
interpretation
(Ehrig et al., 2012)
still has complex
network of faults
with NW-trending
faults cut by NE-
trending faults.
• Difficult to pick
out fundamental
structure.
Granite cut by
hematite veins;
anomalous U.
Granite-rich
breccia.
Heterolithic
hematite breccia
with granite and
hematite clasts.
Hematite-quartz
breccia.
(from Reynolds, 2001, MESA Journal) Murray Hitzman
Page 30
OD - Replacement of Host Rock Granite
(from Reynolds, 2001, MESA Journal)
Page 31
Olympic Dam – Sulfide Zonation
More work has refined the patterns. Probably not
well preserved supergene blanket.
Murray Hitzman
Bornite-chalcocite mineralization in a
hematite granite breccia. Disseminated chalcopyrite
mineralization in both clasts and matrix
of a hematite-rich breccia.
(from Reynolds, 2001, MESA Journal)
Page 32
Olympic Dam Cu-U-Au-Ag-LREE Deposit - Mineralization
Murray Hitzman
Murray Hitzman
Page 33
Gawler IOCGs - Hydrothermal Fluids
• Two hydrothermal fluids are currently recognized:
– CAM (calc-silicate-alkali feldspar-mgt)—- High temperature (>350°C,
hypersaline, multiphase, high pressure? (Fluid inclusions decrepitate
before 400°C). Associated with albitic, calcic, and potassic alteration.
Dominant fluids observed in magnetite-copper systems.
– HSCC — Medium to low temperature (<250°C), variable salinity, few
daughter minerals. Associated with HSCC or hydrolytic alteration.
(Bastrakov, Skirrow,
and Barovich, 2002)
Murray Hitzman
Page 34
Gawler IOCGs - CAM & Cu
(Bastrakov, Skirrow,
and Barovich, 2002)
Murray Hitzman
• Metals —
– Crustal (large-scale hydrothermal system) [mgt-Cu]
– Magmatic [HSCC contributor?]
• Sulfur —
– Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary rocks with evaporites (?)
– Magma?
• Fluids —
– Paleoproterozoic metasedimentary basins - already
dehydrated at time of alteration/mineralization?
– Magmas - not enough volume of fluid
– Lower crustal dehydration
Murray Hitzman
Page 35
Gawler IOCG System — Migration Paths
• Crustal-scale —
– Along terrane boundaries and upper-crustal major fault complexes active at
1575-1595 Ma (may be both extensional and compressional)
• District-scale —
– NW-trending regional and district transpressive (?) fault/shear zones and
district- to deposit-scale NE-trending faults.
• Deposit-scale —
– Localized extension, such as dilational jogs, during alteration/mineralization;
breccias are a product of these structural-magmatic-hydrothermal settings.
Murray Hitzman
• Fluid mixing:
– Reduced fluid (+Cu,Au) with Oxidized fluid (+Cu,Au)
• Water-rock interaction
– Oxidized fluid with Cu, Au interacts with reduced wallrock
(could be mgt if hm-stable fluid) - redox change
– Note: could possibly leach Cu from magnetite-Cu bodies
and concentrate in hematite zone.
Page 36
Exploration for IOCG Ore Systems
• Look for old magnetite (iron) districts, especially
those with trace copper.
Page 37
Conclusions & Challenges
Page 38