Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Godrej Chotukool Case Analysis: Team Name: The Spartans
Godrej Chotukool Case Analysis: Team Name: The Spartans
Godrej Chotukool Case Analysis: Team Name: The Spartans
TEAM MEMBERS:
The case “GODREJ CHOTUKOOL” is about India-based Godrej & Boyce (G&B), a holding
company of the Godrej Group, which was incorporated in year 1897. The company has come up
with an innovative product which was considered affordable even for the Bottom of the Pyramid
customers of rural India. With an idea of penetrating the untapped rural market, the company has
come up with a refrigerator called Chotukool, which is the result of disruptive innovation. The
case talks about Godrej’s journey of disruptive innovation beginning from its coming up with the
idea of inventing a low cost refrigerator for the rural market in India to the challenges faced by
the company in manufacturing and distributing the product. It concludes with a discussion on the
Main Report
Situation Analysis
The Godrej & Boyce has come up with an innovative product “Chotukool”, to extend its reach
G&B had to address many emerging challenges such as affordability, scaling-up, distribution,
and an overall business model that will fit well with the technology.
Objectives
To determine how the value proposition, cost structure and the entire supply chain with the help
of a series of commercial pilots, in its attempts to zero in on the right business model and to
determine whether to penetrate rural or urban market first, for the grand success of the product.
Problem Statement
G. Sunderraman has to resolve the four problems which were requiring immediate attention, the
Value proposition
Business model
Description of the Decision
G. Sunderraman should recommend that G&B should focus on penetrating the urban markets
functionality and design it would be able to target midlevel buyers (good for bachelors) at a price
The first thing that Godrej and Christensen did was to come up with a solution. Oddly, they first
decided to create a nano refrigerator even without considering the need of potential customer
(rural people). They probably jumped to such conclusion because they were following disruptive
innovation. The assumption that rural people wanted a low-cost refrigerator is not at all sufficient
for the success of the product. One must always consider, “what is pushing and pulling the
customers to make a change?” and also understand the impact of “functional & psychological
value”. If we consider a critical comment which states that “I don’t feel the need for a
refrigerator” and dig deeper into consumer benefit ladder, we shall realize the impact of
functional and psychological value. Discussing about profits, how will the company make
profits, if its target customers are the people who lives on only a few dollars a day? How are they
going to afford a refrigerator worth 60 dollar? Such price point would make sense only when the
target customer is investing on such comparable solutions. Or they start saving for the product as
they feel it would improve their lives dramatically. Neither of it seems to be true, which is why
even if the company manages to create an effective supply chain, the product shall not be