Rubric - Assessment Criteria for FIN5003 Project S1 2019

Student name Student ID

Required Outcome Criteria Excellent Satisfactory More effort required
Management have requested you to Presentation of AON Correct AON network AON network diagram with Incorrect AON network diagram
prepare an appropriate AON (Activity network diagram as per diagram showing correct minor errors (2 or less) in with multiple (more than 2)
on Node) network diagram for this example in readings nodes/activities and nodes/activities and/or errors in nodes/activities and/or
project. You should draw the node for / out of 6 marks precedence relationships precedence relationships precedence relationships
each activity as per the examples in your
readings
Management would like to know from Calculations and Correctly calculate ES/EF/LS 2 or less errors in calculating More than 2 errors in calculating
your project network the critical path, the presentation of results. and LF times for all activities. ES/EF/LS and LF times for ES/EF/LS and LF times for all
length of the critical path, the earliest / out of 6 marks Correctly identify critical path. all activities. Critical path activities. Critical path incorrect.
start, earliest finish, latest start and latest still sequentially correct
finish of each activity of the project based on calculations
network. You can identify these on the
network diagram or summarise this
information in a table if you so wish

Management would like to know what
activities to crash and at what cost to
bring their computer to market 8 days
earlier than scheduled i.e. they wish to
evaluate the option of crashing 8 days
from the project schedule. Provide a
discussion of the information that
management requires so that they can
make an informed decision.
Discussion and use of Correct identification of
relevant supporting crashing activities and total
calculations. crashing cost with appropriate
/ out of 6 marks justification via either tables
or diagrams. Relevant and
accurate calculations.
Minor errors in identification
of crashing activities and
crashing costs. Limited
justification via either tables
or diagrams
Major errors in identification of
crashing activities and crashing
costs. Little to no justification
via either tables or diagrams

Finally, don’t forget that your report
should be concise and should be no more
than 500 words in length or alternatively
no more than 8-12 PowerPoint slides in
total. You can present additional
tables/diagrams etc. in appendices to
your report if need be which do not count
towards your word count.
Length, conciseness, Word length excluding tables,
grammar, spelling and appendices, calculations not
overall presentation exceeding 20% in total i.e.
/ out of 2 marks 500 words +/- 10%. Concise
professional presentation.
Good grammar and spelling (1
error allowable).
Word length excluding
tables, appendices,
calculations exceeding 20%
in total but less than 40% in
total. Discussion reasonably
concise. 2-3 errors in
grammar and spelling.
Reasonable presentation.
Word length excluding tables,
appendices, calculations
exceeding 40% in total.
Discussion and analysis not
concise. More than 3 errors in
grammar and spelling. Poor
presentation of tables/graphs etc.

Total Possible marks /20 marks = /10

Overall comments: