INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: MELANIE P. CORTEZ Name of Rater: MIRAFLOR A. RONQUILLO

Position: TEACHER II Position: ASSISTANT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL II
Bureau/Center/Service/DivisioPAGALANGGANG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: April 5, 2019
Rating Period: June 2018 - April 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied Quality No acceptable 5 5
Education Knowledge knowledge of evidence was
Services and content within and Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge shown Showed knowledge
Pedagogy across curriculum of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its
teaching areas. integration within integration within integration within integration within integration within
and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject and across subject
areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in areas as shown in
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
7.5% of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4 of 7
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 4
lessons using MOV lessons using MOV lessons using MOV the given MOV evidence was lessons using MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by shown 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Basic 2. Used a range Quality Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable Facilitated using 4 4
Education of teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was different teaching
Services strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown strategies that
enhance learner promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading promote reading
achievement in writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
literacy and numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
numeracy skills shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 6

7.5% Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3 learner-
learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered learner-centered evidence was centered lessons as
lessons as lessons as lessons as lessons as shown evidently shown in
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in MOV 1 and
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the other supported by any 1
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 given MOV of the other MOV
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV given
given given given
 Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 1. Content 3. Applied a range Quality Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable Used different 5 5
Education Knowledge of teaching teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was teaching strategies
Services and strategies to that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown that develop critical
Pedagogy develop critical and creative and creative and creative and creative and creative thinking
and creative thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills thinking skills skills and/or other
thinking, as well and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS HOTS as shown in
as other higher as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 MOV 1 with a rating
order thinking with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 of 7
skills. 7.5%
Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable Submitted at least 4
lessons as lessons as lessons as as evidenced by evidence was lessons as
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV any of the other shown evidenced by MOV
1 and supported by 1 and supported by 1 and supported by given MOV 1 and supported by
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other any 1 of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV given MOV

Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed Quality No acceptable 4 4
Used classroom Used classroom Used classroomUsed classroom Used classroom
Education Environment classroom evidence was
management management management management management
Services and Diversity structure to shown
strategies that strategies that strategies that
strategies that strategies that
of Learners engage learners,
individually or in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
engage learners in engage learners in
groups, in activities/tasks as activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
activities/tasks as activities/tasks as
meanigful shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
exploration, 7.5% with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5
with a rating of 4 with a rating of 6
discovery and Efficiency Submitted 1 lesson No acceptable
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 supported by any of evidence was Submitted 3 lessons
hands-on
lessons supported lessons supported lessons supported the acceptable shown supported by MOV 1
activities within a
by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any by MOV 1 and any MOV and any 1 of the
range of physical
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other other acceptable
learning
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV
environments.
Timeliness
Basic 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable Applied teacher 4 4
Education learner behavior management management management management evidence was management
Services constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown strategies of learner
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
Basic 5. Managed Quality Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable Applied teacher 4 4
Education learner behavior management management management management evidence was management
Services constructively by strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown strategies of learner
applying positive behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
and non-violent promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive
discipline to and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
ensure learning- discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
focused in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
environment with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 6
7.5%

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 4
of the given of the given of the given the given strategies evidence was of the given
strategies as strategies as strategies as as observed in only shown strategies as
observed in at least observed in 3 observed in 2 1 lesson observed in 3
4 lessons lessons lessons lessons
Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 2. Learning 6. Used Quality Applied Applied Applied No acceptable 4 4
Education Environment differentiated, differentiated Applied differentiated differentiated evidence was Applied
Services and Diversity developmentally teaching strategies differentiated teaching strategies teaching strategies shown differentiated
of Learners appropriate to address learner teaching strategies to address learner to address learner teaching strategies
learning diversity as shown to address learner diversity as shown diversity as shown to address learner
experiences to in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown in MOV 1 with a in MOV 1 with a diversity as shown in
in MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a rating
address learners’ rating of 7 rating of 5 rating of 4
rating of 6 of 6
gender, needs,
strengths, Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No acceptable Submitted 3
interests and differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was differentiated
7.5% teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategy in shown teaching strategies
experiences.
in at least 2 in at least 2 in 2 lessons as only 1 lesson as in at least 2 lessons
lessons as lessons as evidenced by MOV evidently shown in as evidenced by
evidenced by MOV evidenced by MOV 1 and supported by any 1 of the MOV 1 and
1 and supported by 1 and supported by any 1 of the other acceptable MOV supported by any 1
any 1 of the other any 1 of the other acceptable MOV of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, Quality Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable Planned and 4 4
Education and Planning managed and implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was implemented
Services implemented developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown developmentally
developmentally sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced teaching
sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and and learning
teaching and learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as process as shown in
learning shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 MOV 1 with a rating
processes to with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 of 6
meet curriculum
requirements and Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3
varied teaching 7.5% developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally evidence was developmentally
contexts. sequenced sequenced sequenced sequenced shown sequenced teaching
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and and learning
learning process as learning process as learning process as learning process as process as evidently
evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in shown in MOV 1
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the given and supported by
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 MOV any 1 of the other
of the other given of the other given of the other given given MOV
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 3. Curriculum 8. Participated in Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable Frequently 4 4
Education and Planning collegial participated in participated in participated in in LAC/FGD/ evidence was participated in
Services discussions that LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/ meeting to discuss shown LACs/FGDs/meeting
use teacher and gs to discuss gs to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner s to discuss
learner feedback teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich teacher/learner
to enrich teaching feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as feedback to enrich
practice. instruction as instruction as instruction as shown in the MOV instruction as shown
shown in the MOV shown in the MOV shown in the MOV submitted in the MOV
7.5% submitted submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable Participated in 3

least 4 LACs/FGDs/meetin LACs/FGDs/meetin LAC/FGD/meeting evidence was LACs/FGDs/meeting
LACs/FGDs/meetin gs as evidently gs as evidently as evidently shown shown s as evidently
gs as evidently shown in any 1 of shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the shown in any 1 of
shown in any 1 of the given MOV the given MOV given MOV the given MOV
the given MOV
Timeliness
Basic 9. Selected, Quality Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No acceptable Developed and used 5 5
Education developed, used varied used varied used varied used varied evidence was varied teaching and
Services organized and teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and shown learning resources,
used appropriate learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, including ICT, to
teaching and including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to address learning
learning address learning address learning address learning address learning goals as shown in
resources, goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in MOV 1 with a rating
including ICT, to MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating of 7
address learning of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
goals.
Efficiency Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any No acceptable
7.5%
teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence was
Submitted at least 4 learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, shown Submitted at least 4
varied teaching and including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as varied teaching and
learning resources, evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in learning resources,
including ICT, as MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any of the including ICT, as
evidently shown in supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV evidently shown in
MOV 1 and of the acceptable of the acceptable MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 MOV MOV supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable
 evidently shown in supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV evidently shown in
MOV 1 and of the acceptable of the acceptable MOV 1 and
supported by any 1 MOV MOV supported by any 1
of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV MOV
Timeliness

Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 4. 10. Designed, Quality Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, No acceptable Designed, selected, 5 5
Education Assessment selected, organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used evidence was organized and used
Services and organized and diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, shown diagnostic, formative
Reporting used diagnostic, formative and formative and formative and formative and and summative
formative and summative summative summative summative assessment
summative assessment assessment assessment assessment strategies consistent
assessment strategies strategies strategies strategies with curriculum
strategies consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with requirements as
consistent with curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum shown in MOV 1
curriculum requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as with a rating of 7
requirements. shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1
7.5%
with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted at least 4
varied assessment assessment tools assessment tools assessment tool as evidence was varied assessment
tools as evidently as evidently shown as evidently shown evidently shown in shown tools as evidently
shown in any 1 of in any 1 of the in any 1 of the any of the shown in any 1 of
the acceptable acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV
MOV
Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored and Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely monitored No acceptable Consistently 5 5 5
Education evaluated learner monitored and monitored and monitored and and evaluated evidence was monitored and
Services progress and evaluated learner evaluated learner evaluated learner learner progress shown evaluated learner
achievement progress and progress and progress and and achievement progress and
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner achievement using
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as learner attainment
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV data as shown in the
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted MOV submitted
using learner achievement using achievement using achievement using using learner achievement using
attainment data. learner attainment learner attainment learner attainment attainment data as learner attainment
data as shown in data as shown in data as shown in shown in the MOV data as shown in the
the MOV submitted the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted MOV submitted
7.5%
Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted a
combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of acceptable MOV evidence was combination of at
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown least 4 of the
acceptable MOV MOV MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown across 4 quarters
 Performance Indicators
Rating
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight Outstanding Very Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual Results
QET
(5) Satisfactory (4) (3) (2) (1) Q E T
Basic 4. 12.Communica Quality Consistently Frequently showed Occasionally Rarely showed No acceptable Consistently showed 5 5 5
Education Assessment ted promptly and showed prompt and prompt and clear showed prompt and prompt and clear evidence was prompt and clear
Services and clearly the clear communication of clear communication of shown communication of
Reporting learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, communication of the learners’ needs, the learners’ needs,
progress and the learners’ needs, progress and the learners’ needs, progress and progress and
achievement to progress and achievement to key progress and achievement to key achievement to key
key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, achievement to key stakeholders, stakeholders,
including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ stakeholders, including parents/ including parents/
guardians. including parents/ guardians as including parents/ guardians as guardians as shown
guardians as shown in the MOV guardians as shown in the MOV in the MOV
7.5% shown in the MOV submitted shown in the MOV submitted submitted
submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted a

combination of at combination of 3 of combination of 2 of the given MOV evidence was combination of at
least 4 of the the acceptable the acceptable shown least 4 of the
acceptable MOV MOV MOV acceptable MOV
Timeliness Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was were distributed
across 4 quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown across 4 quarters
Basic 5. Plus Factor 13. Performed Quality Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed No acceptable Consistently 5 5
Education various related performed various performed various performed various various related evidence was performed various
Services works/activities related related related work/activities that shown related
that contribute to work/activities that work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the work/activities that
the teaching- contribute to the contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning contribute to the
learning process. teaching learning teaching learning teaching learning process as shown teaching learning
process as shown process as shown process as shown in the MOV process as shown in
10% in the MOV in the MOV in the MOV submitted the MOV submitted
submitted submitted submitted

Efficiency Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 4
different kinds of different kinds of different kinds of the acceptable evidence was different kinds of
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV MOV shown acceptable MOV
Timeliness
RATING FOR OVER-ALL
Outstanding
ACCOMPLISHMENTS

ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCIES

RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500-5.000 Outstanding
3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500-3.499 Satisfactory
1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory MELANIE P. CORTEZ MIRAFLOR A. RONQUILLO LORINDA R. POBLETE
below 1.499 Poor Ratee Rater Approving Authority
AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teacher I-III
MIRAFLOR A. RONQUILLO
ASSISTANT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL II
April 5, 2019

TO BE FILLED OUT DURING EVALUATION

Ave Score

5.000 0.375

4.000 0.3
 Ave Score

5.000 0.375

4.000 0.3

4.000 0.300
4.000 0.300
Ave Score

4.000 0.3

4.000 0.3
 Ave Score

4.000 0.3

5.000 0.375
Ave Score

5 0.375

5.000 0.375
 Ave Score

5 0.375

5.000 0.500

Outstanding 4.550
LORINDA R. POBLETE
Approving Authority
 INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) SUMMARY SHEET
Teacher I-III (Proficient Teacher)

Name of Employee: MELANIE P. CORTEZ Name of Rater: MIRAFLOR A. RONQUILLO

Position: TEACHER II Position: ASSISTANT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL II
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: PAGALANGGANG NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL Date of Review: April 5, 2019
Rating Period:

Weight per Numerical Ratings

KRA Weight per KRA Objectives Score
Objective
Q E T Ave
Objective 1 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
KRA 1 22.5% Objective 2 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 3 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 4 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 2 22.5% Objective 5 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 6 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 7 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
KRA 3 22.5% Objective 8 7.5% 4 4 4.000 0.300
Objective 9 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 10 7.5% 5 5 5.000 0.375
KRA 4 22.5% Objective 11 7.5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.375
Objective 12 7.5% 5 5 5 5.000 0.375
Plus Factor 10% Objective 13 10% 5 5 5.000 0.500
Final Rating Outstanding
Adjectival Rating 4.55

MELANIE P. CORTEZ MIRAFLOR A. RONQUILLO LORINDA R. POBLETE

Ratee Rater Approving Authority
HEET

POBLETE
Authority