IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND

CJM AT RAMANAGARA
O.S.NO. /2019

BETWEEN:

SMT.RADHA
W/o. Sri. Veeranna,
Aged about 44 years,
Residing at 1st Block,
Kaiwara,
Chikkaballapura-563 128 …… PLAINTIFF

AND:
1.M/s. DREAMLAND VENTURES (P) LTD.
Office at #4, New No.100, Plot No. 48,
2ndFloor, K.H. Road, Sudhama Nagar,
Bengaluru-560 027.
Represented by its Authorized Signatory,
SRI.G. DHARMA PRAKASH
S/o H. Govindappa.

2. M/s. AGRI GOLD PROJECTS LTD.

(Real Estate Division),
Having Registered Office at No.6-3-680/A/B,
Thakur Mansion Lane,
Near Somajuguda Circle,
Panjagutta,
Hyderabad-500 082. …… DEFENDANTS

MEMORANDUM OF PLAINT FILED BY THE PLAINTIFF UNDER

ORDER VII RULE 1 R/W SECTION 26 OF CODE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE, 1908

The Plaintiff submits as under:

1. That, the address of the Plaintiff for the purpose of service of

Notice, Summons and processes that may be issued by this
Hon’ble court is as stated in the cause title above. He may also be
served on his counsel SRI. B.P.SATHEESHA, SRI. C. S. GIRISH
and SMT.R.K.SHOBAVATHI, Advocate, No.401, 1st Floor,
Swasthik Complex, Opp. Sheshadripuram Police Station,
Sheshadripuram, Bengaluru-560 020.

2. The addresses of the Defendants are correct as shown in the

cause title for the purpose of issue of summons, notice, process,
etc.
3. The Plaintiff submits that, she being desirous to have her own
property, had been introduced and intimated about the layout
being formed in the name and style of “FORTUNE GARDEN CITY”
formed by the defendantshaving Katha No. 34 converted land
bearing Sy.No.12,14,15,16 and 17 situated at Lakshmisagara
Village and Bhimenahalli Village, Bidadi Hobli, Ramanagara Taluk
and District and Sy.No.47,49 and 50 situated at Bhimenahalli
Village, Bidadi Hobli, Ramanagara Taluk and District and Sy.No
36/1 situated at Billakempanahalli Village, Bidadi Hobli,
Ramanagara Taluk and District, Totally measuring to an extent of
16 Acres 06 Guntas (Sixteen acres six guntas) situated at Bidadi
Hobli, Ramanagara Taluk and District, Karnataka. Further the
defendants got the said land duly converted vide various
conversion orders bearing number ALN(R)CR-53/2008-09,
ALN(R)CR-50/2008-09, ALN(R)CR-54/2008-09, ALN(R)CR-
55/2008-09, ALN(R)CR-48/2008-09, ALN(R)CR-51/2008-09,
ALN(R)CR-47/2008-09, ALN(R)CR-52/2008-09, ALN(R)CR-
49/2008-09, all dated 12/2/2009 issued by the Deputy
Commissioner, Ramanagara District from agricultural purposes to
Non – agricultural purpose and developed a residential layout in
the said converted land. The layout so developed on the said
property has been duly approved by The Bangalore – Mysore
Infrastructure Corridor Area Planning Authority vide their approval
number BMICAPA/09/ Vasathi Vinyasa/052/2011-12. The
defendants have launched the completed project and have duly
assigned all the roads and CA sites along with the parks by
naming it as “FORTUNE GARDEN CITY” and has duly marketed
the same. Placing trust in the representation made to her, the
plaintiff had invested her hard earned money for purchase of a
residential site. The Plaintiff had been allotted the vacant Site
bearing No.172measuring an extent of 1200 Sq. Ft.bearing
Sy.No.49 situated at Bhimenahalli Village, Bidadi Hobli,
Ramanagara Taluk and District, in the above mentioned layout.
Necessary Sanction Plan and Sanction letter were obtained by the
Defendants and also the order releasing 60% & 40% of the sites,
passed by The Additional Director (Planning) Urban And Rural
Area Cum Member Secretary BMICAPA, Bangalore, including the
release of Site No. 172 for sale.

4. The Plaintiff submits that, subsequently, the Defendants had

had issued the Plot Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014 in the name
of the Plaintiff. The original Plot Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014
is produced herewith and marked as DOCUMENT NO.1.

5. The Plaintiff submits that, in the said Plot Allotment Letter

dated 15.11.2014, it had been agreed that the total sale
consideration as Rs.10,20,300/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Twenty
Thousand and Three Hundred only) and at the time of issuance
of the Plot Allotment Letter Dated15.112014, the entire sale
consideration amount of Rs.10,20,300/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs
Twenty Thousand and Three Hundred only) had been paid by
the Plaintiff as sale consideration on various dates preceding the
date of issuance of the Plot Allotment Letter and the Defendants
have acknowledged the receipt of the said amount. The receipts (3
in number) are produced herewith and marked as DOCUMENT
NO.2 to 4 respectively.

6. The Plaintiff submits that, it is pertinent here to mention that it

has been specifically mentioned in the Clause No.2 of the Plot
Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014 that “All applicable rights
associated with ownership of the schedule property will be
transferred once full sale consideration is received.” Further
it is stated in Clause No. 5 of the Plot Allotment Letter dated
15.11.2014 that “From the date of handing over of the
property to you, you shall take care of the schedule property
at your risk and cost.”It is pertinent here to mention that the
entire Sale consideration of Rs.10,20,300/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs
Twenty Thousand and Three Hundred Only) has been paid by
the Plaintiff to the Defendants as per the Plot Allotment Letter
dated 15.11.2014. But, even though the Plaintiff had paid the
entire Sale Consideration in favour of the Defendants within the
stipulated time, both the Defendants have kept on postponing the
execution of the Sale Deed in favour of the Plaintiff on one or the
other reasons best known to them. The Defendants have not at all
come forward to execute the Sale Deed as per the terms contained
in the Plot Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014 in favour of the
Plaintiff. The Plaintiff with consistent and persistent approach had
tried in vain to contact the Defendants and their representatives
both personally and telephonically and also by visiting their offices
both at Bengaluru and at Hyderabad, till today. Thus, till today the
Defendants have not come forward to execute the Sale Deed in
favour of the Plaintiff as per the terms mentioned in the Plot
Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014. Thus, the Defendants are
avoiding executing the Sale Deed in favour of the Plaintiff on one or
the other reasons, till today for the reasons best known to them.
Thus, both the Defendants have deliberately failed to execute the
Sale Deed as per the Plot Allotment Letter and thus the Defendants
have clearly breached the terms and conditions as stipulated in the
Plot Allotment Letter.

7. It is submitted that, the First defendant M/s. DREAMLAND

VENTURES (P) LTD. herein is the sister concern of the Second
defendant i.e. M/s. AGRI GOLD PROJECTS LTD. However, there
was a complete shutdown of the entire activities of the M/s. Agri
Gold Projects Ltd. on the ground of misuse of the invested funds,
all the Directors of the parent Company as well as the Defendant
Companies herein have been arrested. An enquiry into the
irregularities in the transactions of the parent Company has been
ordered. Due to this shutting down of the parent company, the
defendant Company also got closed and thus, the Plaintiff could
not contact the Authorized Signatory or the Representative of the
Company, till today.

8. It is submitted that, at this juncture all the Allottees of the sites

have together formed an Association in the name and style of
“Fortune Garden City Site/Residential Plot Owners Welfare
Association (Registered)” and the Plaintiff is also one of the
members in the said Association. The copy of the Identity Card
issued to the Plaintiff in this regard is produced herewith and
marked as DOCUMENT NO.5.

9. The Plaintiff submits that, it is also pertinent here to mention

that the Plaintiff was ready and willing till from the beginning i.e.,
from the date of issuance of the Plot Allotment Letter dated
15.11.2014and to get the Sale Deed executed in her favour.

10. The Plaintiff submits that, the Plaintiff had tried her best, but
in vain, to get the Defendant to come forward and execute the Sale
Deed in her favour. However, the Defendants have never attempted
to execute the Sale Deed in favour of the Plaintiff. It appears that
the approach of the Defendants towards performing their part of
contract has been only to avoid the discharge of their part of the
obligation by making false promises.

11. The Plaintiff submits that, thus the Plaintiff had got issued a
Legal Notice on 22.08.2019 thereby calling upon the Defendants to
approach her immediately and make arrangements for the
execution of the Sale Deed as per the terms and conditions of
thePlot Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014 with respect to the
schedule property mentioned in the said Plot Allotment Letter,
within 15 days from the date of receipt of this notice, failing which
she will be constrained to initiate the appropriate legal action, both
civil and criminal to get the appropriate remedy at their risks and
costs. A copy of the Legal Notice dated 22.08.2019is produced
herewith and marked as DOCUMENT NO.6. The Postal receipts for
serving notice through RPAD are produced herewith and marked
as DOCUMENT NO.7. The unserved returned postal cover
containing the Legal Notice dated 22.08.2019 with the postal
shara marked as “Addressee left – Returned to Sender” are
produced herewith and marked as DOCUMENT NO.8and
DOCUMENT NO.9 respectively. This approach of the Defendants
indicates their malafide intention of selling the suit schedule
property to the third parties thereby depriving the legal right of the
Plaintiff.

12. The Plaintiff submits that, the cause of action for the suit
aroused when the Defendants, having issued the Plot Allotment
Letter dated 15.11.2014 and having received the full consideration,
willfully defaulting regarding execution of the sale deed,
constraining the Plaintiff to issue Legal Notice on 22.08.2019.
13. The Plaintiff submits that, there is no case filed between the
same parties seeking the same reliefs & pertaining to the same suit
schedule property either before any Civil Court or before any
Authority or Tribunal.

14. The Suit is in time and valuated for the purpose of Karnataka
Court Fee Act and the Court Fee is paid as per the valuation slip
annexed herewith.

PRAYER FOR JUDGEMENT AND DECREE

Wherefore, the Plaintiff most respectfully pray that this Hon'ble

Court be pleased to:

1. Pass the Judgment and Decree for the relief of Specific

Performance for the execution of the Sale Deed as per the Plot
Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014 issued by the Defendants in
favour of the Plaintiff with respect to the schedule property
mentioned in the said Plot Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014.

2. Consequently put the Plaintiff in possession of the Suit

Schedule Property with respect to the schedule property mentioned
in the said Plot Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014 issued by the
Defendants in favour of the Plaintiff with respect to the schedule
property mentioned in the said Plot Allotment Letter dated
15.11.2014.

3. Grant compensation to be payable by the Defendants to the

Plaintiff for the breach of the contract as per the Plot Allotment
Letter dated 15.11.2014 issued by the Defendants in favour of the
Plaintiff with respect to the schedule property.

4. In the alternative to pass the Judgment and Decree for any

other relief in favour of the Plaintiff to which she is entitled
including the refund of the sale consideration amount paid by her,
in case her claim for specific performance is refused along with the
penalty and penal interest,

5. Grant such other relief/s as this Hon’ble Court deems fit to

grant in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of
justice.
 DESCRIPTION OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY

All that piece and parcel of the immovable vacant residential

property bearing Site No.172, Khatha No. 34 measuring East to
West: 40-0 Feet and North to South: 30-0 Feet, totally measuring
1200 Sq. Feet, carved out of Sy.No.49 of Bhimenahalli Village,
Bidadi Hobli, Ramanagara Taluk and District, duly converted
from agricultural to non-agricultural residential by the Order of
the Deputy Commissioner, Ramanagara District vide Official
Memorandum bearing No. ALN(R)CR-47/2008-2009 dated
12.02.2009, in the layout known as FORTUNE GARDEN CITY,
approved by the Bangalore-Mysore Infrastructure Corridor Area
Planning Authority (BMICAPA) vide Approval No.
BMICAPA/09/052/2011-2012 dated 30.09.2011 and bounded on:

East By : 30 Feet Road,

West By : Plot No.177,
North By : Plot No.171 and
South By : Plot No.173.

ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFF PLAINTIFF

(B.P.SATHEESHA) (RADHA)

VERIFICATION

I, SMT. RADHAW/o. Sri. Veeranna, the Plaintiff in the above case,

do hereby verify and declare that what is stated above from Paras 1
to 14 are true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information
and belief.

RAMANAGARA PLAINTIFF
DATE: .09.2019 (RADHA)
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
CJM AT RAMANAGARA
O.S.NO. /2019

BETWEEN:

SMT. RADHA …… PLAINTIFF

AND:
M/s. DREAMLAND VENTURES (P) LTD.
AND ANOTHER ……DEFENDANTS

VERIFYING AFFIDAVIT

I,SMT. RADHAW/o. Sri.Veeranna, Aged about 44 years, Residing

at 1st Block, Kaiwara, Chikkaballapura-563 128, do hereby
solemnly affirm & state on oath as under:

1. I state that, I am the Plaintiff in the above case and conversant

with the facts of the case. Hence, I am swearing to this affidavit.

2. I state that, the averments made in Paras 1 to 14 of the Plaint

are true and correct and the documents produced at Documents 1
to 4 are Original copies, Documents 5 is the true copy and
Documents 6 to 9 are Original copies.

I, the Deponent, do hereby verify and state that what is stated

above is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information
and belief.

I swear accordingly.

IDENTIFIED BY ME DEPONENT
(RADHA)

ADVOCATE

RAMANAGARA
DATE: .09.2019
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
CJM AT RAMANAGARA
I.A.NO.I

IN
O.S.NO. /2019

BETWEEN:

SMT. RADHA
W/o. Sri. Veeranna,
Aged about 44 years,
Residing at 1st Block,
Kaiwara,
Chikkaballapura-563 128 …… PLAINTIFF

AND:
1.M/s. DREAMLAND VENTURES (P) LTD.
Office at #4, New No.100, Plot No. 48,
2ndFloor, K.H. Road, Sudhama Nagar,
Bengaluru-560 027.
Represented by its Authorised Signatory,
SRI.G. DHARMA PRAKASH
S/o H. Govindappa.

2. M/s. AGRI GOLD PROJECTS LTD.

(Real Estate Division),
Having Registered Office at No.6-3-680/A/B,
Thakur Mansion Lane,
Near Somajuguda Circle,
Panjagutta,
Hyderabad-500 082. .… DEFENDANTS
APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 & 2 R/W
SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 R/W
SECTIONS 36 AND 37 OF THE SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963.

For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, this

Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass an ad-interim injunction,
against all the Defendants thereby restraining them, their agents,
representatives or legal heirs from alienating the suit schedule
property till the disposal of the Suit, in the interest of justice.

DESCRIPTION OF SCHEDULE PROPERTY

All that piece and parcel of the immovable vacant residential

property bearing Site No.172, Khatha No. 34 measuring East to
West: 40-0 Feet and North to South: 30-0 Feet, totally measuring
1200 Sq. Feet, carved out of Sy.No.49 of Bhimenahalli Village,
Bidadi Hobli, Ramanagara Taluk and District, duly converted
from agricultural to non-agricultural residential by the Order of
the Deputy Commissioner, Ramanagara District vide Official
Memorandum bearing No. ALN(R)CR-47/2008-2009 dated
12.02.2009, in the layout known as FORTUNE GARDEN CITY,
approved by the Bangalore-Mysore Infrastructure Corridor Area
Planning Authority (BMICAPA) vide Approval No.
BMICAPA/09/052/2011-2012 dated 30.09.2011 and bounded on:

East By : 30 Feet Road,

West By : Plot No.177,
North By : Plot No.171 and
South By : Plot No.173.

RAMANAGARA
DATE: .09.2019 ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFF
(B.P.SATHEESHA)
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
CJM AT RAMANAGARA

I.A.NO.I

IN

O.S.NO. /2019

BETWEEN:

SMT. RADHA …… PLAINTIFF

AND:

1. M/s. DREAMLAND VENTURES (P) LTD.

Represented by its Authorised Signatory,
SRI.G. DHARMA PRAKASH

2. M/s. AGRI GOLD PROJECTS LTD ..… DEFENDANTS

AFFIDAVIT

I,SMT. RADHAW/o. Sri. Veeranna, Aged about 44 years, Residing

at 1st Block, Kaiwara, Chikkaballapura-563 128, do hereby
solemnly affirm & state on oath as under:

1. That I am the Plaintiff in the above case and conversant with the
facts of the case. Hence, I am swearing to this affidavit. The
contents of the plaint may be read as part and parcel of this
affidavit.

2. I state that, the above Suit has been filed seeking to pass the
Judgment and Decree for the relief of Specific Performance for the
execution of the Sale Deed as per the terms and conditions of the
Plot Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014 issued by the Defendants
in my favour with respect to the schedule property mentioned in
the said Plot Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014 in my favour
issued by the Defendants and consequently put me in possession
of the Suit Schedule Property with respect to the schedule property
mentioned in the said Plot Allotment Letter and to grant
compensation to be payable by the Defendants to me for the
breach of the contract as per the Plot Allotment Letter dated
15.11.2014 issued by the Defendants in my favour with respect to
the schedule property mentioned in the said Plot Allotment Letter
dated 15.11.2014 issued by the Defendants in my favor and in the
alternative to pass the Judgment and Decree for any other relief in
my favour to which I am entitled including the refund of the entire
sale consideration amount paid by me, in case my claim for
specific performance is refused along with the penalty and to grant
such other relief as this Hon’ble court deems fit to grant in the
facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice.

3. I state that, the Defendants being the absolute owners of the

immovable vacant residential property bearing Site No.172,
Khatha No. 34 measuring East to West: 40-0 Feet and North to
South: 30-0 Feet, totally measuring 1200 Sq. Feet, carved out of
Sy.No.49 situated at Bhimenahalli Village, Bidadi Hobli,
Ramanagara Taluk and District, duly converted from agricultural
to non-agricultural residential by the Order of the Deputy
Commissioner, Ramanagara District vide Official Memorandum
bearing No. ALN(R)CR-47/2008-2009 dated 12.02.2009, in the
layout known as FORTUNE GARDEN CITY, approved by the
Bangalore-Mysore Infrastructure Corridor Area Planning Authority
(BMICAPA) vide Approval No. BMICAPA/09/052/2011-2012 dated
30.09.2011 and had issued the Plot Allotment Letter dated
15.11.2014 tome.

4. I state that, in the Plot Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014, it

had been agreed that the total sale consideration as
Rs.10,20,300/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Twenty Thousandand
Three Hundred only) and at the time of the issuance of the Plot
Allotment Letter an amount of Rs.10,20,300/- (Rupees Ten
Lakhs Twenty Thousand and Three Hundredonly) has been paid
by me as entire sale considerationand the Defendants have
acknowledged the receipt of the said amount. Thus, I had paid an
amount of Rs.10,20,300/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Twenty
Thousand and Three Hundred only) till today to the Defendants
and the Defendants have acknowledged the receipt of the said
amount.
5. I state that,it is pertinent here to mention that it has been
specifically mentioned in the Clause No.2 of the Plot Allotment
Letter dated 15.11.2014 that “All applicable rights associated
with ownership of the schedule property will be transferred
once full sale consideration is received.” Further it is stated in
Clause No. 5 of the Plot Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014 that
“From the date of handing over of the property to you, you
shall take care of the schedule property at your risk and
cost.” It is pertinent here to mention that the entire Sale
consideration of Rs.10,20,300/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs Twenty
Thousand and Three Hundred Only) has been paid by me to the
Defendants as per the Plot Allotment Letter dated
15.11.2014.But,even though I had paid the entire Sale
Consideration amount in favour of the Defendants within the
stipulated time, both the Defendants have kept on postponing the
execution of the Sale Deed in my favour on one or the other
reasons best known to them. The Defendants have not at all come
forward to execute the Sale Deed as per the terms contained in the
Plot Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014 in my favour. I, with
consistent and persistent approach had tried in vain to contact the
Defendants and their representatives both personally and
telephonically and also by visiting their offices both at Bengaluru
and at Hyderabad, till today.Thus, till today the Defendants have
not come forward to execute the Sale Deed in my favour as per the
terms mentioned in the Plot Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014.
Thus, the Defendants are avoiding executing the Sale Deed in my
favour on one or the other reasons, till today for the reasons best
known to them. Thus, both the Defendants have deliberately failed
to execute the Sale Deed as per the Plot Allotment Letter and thus
the Defendants have clearly breached the terms and conditions as
stipulated in the Plot Allotment Letter.

6. I further state that, it is also pertinent here to mention that I

was ready and willing till from the beginning i.e., from the date of
the execution of unregistered Agreement of Sale and till today I am
willing to get the Sale Deed executed in my favour.

7. I further state that, I had waited all these years thinking that
the Defendants will come forward and executes the Sale Deed in
my favour, but the same was in vain. It appears that the approach
of the Defendants towards performing their part of contract has
never been attempted.

8. I further state that,I had got issued a Legal Notice on

22.08.2019 thereby calling upon the Defendants to approach me
immediately and make arrangements for the execution of the Sale
Deed as per the Plot Allotment Letter dated 15.11.2014 with
respect to the schedule property mentioned in the said Plot
Allotment Letter, within 15 days from the date of receipt of this
notice, failing which I will be constrained to initiate the appropriate
legal action, both civil and criminal to get the appropriate remedy
at their risks and costs. Though, the legal notice has been issued
to the Defendants, the Defendants failed to claim the said legal
notice. This approach of the Defendants indicates their malafide
intention to depriv my legal right.

9. I further state that, to avoid further complications it is just and

proper to grant an ad-interim exparte temporary injunction order
restraining the Defendants from alienating the suit schedule
property till the disposal of the Suit.

10. I state that, I have a prima facie case and balance of

convenience lies in my favour. If an order of ad-interim injunction
is granted in my favour, no prejudice would be caused to the other
side, if not I will be put to irreparable loss, which could not be
compensated otherwise.

WHEREFORE, I pray this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to pass an

ad-interim injunction order, against all the Defendants thereby
restraining them, their agents, representatives or legal heirs from
alienating the suit schedule property till the disposal of the Suit, in
the interest of justice.

I swear accordingly.

IDENTIFIEDBY ME DEPONENT
(RADHA)

ADVOCATE

RAMANAGARA
DATE: .09.2019
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
CJM AT RAMANAGARA
O.S.NO. /2019

BETWEEN:

SMT. RADHA .…… PLAINTIFF

AND:

1. M/s. DREAMLAND VENTURES (P) LTD.

Represented by its Authorised Signatory,
SRI.G. DHARMA PRAKASH

2. M/s. AGRI GOLD PROJECTS LTD …… DEFENDANTS

LIST OF DOCUMENTS

SL.NO. DOCUMENT NUMBER PARTICULARS

1. DOCUMENT NO.1 Original Plot Allotment Letter
Dated 15.11.2014
2. DOCUMENT NO.2 to Original Receipts of the sale
DOCUMENT NO.4 consideration amount paid
3. DOCUMENT NO.5 Identity Card
4. DOCUMENT NO.6 True Copy of Legal Notice dated
22.08.2019
5. DOCUMENT NO.7 Postal Receipts for sending
Legal Notice through RPAD
6. DOCUMENT NO.8 and Two numbers of Unserved
DOCUMENT NO.9 returned postal covers
containing the Legal Notice and
bearing Postal shara marked as
“Addressee left – Returned to
Sender”

RAMANAGARA
DATE: .09.2019 ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFF
(B.P.SATHEESHA)
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
CJM AT RAMANAGARA
O.S.NO. /2019

BETWEEN:

SMT. RADHA …… PLAINTIFF

AND:

1. M/s. DREAMLAND VENTURES (P) LTD.

Represented by its Authorised Signatory,
SRI.G. DHARMA PRAKASH

2. M/s. AGRI GOLD PROJECTS LTD ..… DEFENDANTS

APPLICATION FILED UNDER ORDER VI RULE 14(A) OF THE

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908.

The Names of the parties mentioned in the plaint are the registered
one. Any correspondence by this Hon’ble court may be made to the
address mentioned in the plaint.

ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFF PLAINTIFF

(B.P.SATHEESHA) (RADHA)

VERIFICATION

What is stated above is true to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief.

RAMANAGARA

DATE: .09.2019 PLAINTIFF

(RADHA)
IN THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
CJM AT RAMANAGARA
O.S.NO. /2019

BETWEEN:

SMT. RADHA …… PLAINTIFF

AND:

1. M/s. DREAMLAND VENTURES (P) LTD.

Represented by its Authorised Signatory,
SRI.G. DHARMA PRAKASH

2. M/s. AGRI GOLD PROJECTS LTD ..… DEFENDANTS

INDEX

Sl.No. DESCRIPTION PAGE NOs.

1. Plaint filed under Order 7 Rule 1 R/W Sec.

26 of C.P.C.

2. Verifying Affidavit

3. Valuation Slip

4. List of Documents along with Documents

5. Application under Order 6 Rule 14-A

6. Vakalath

7. Application under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2

R/W. Sections 36 and 37 of The Specific
Relief Act, 1963.

8. Affidavit

9. Plaint II Set filed under Order 7 Rule 1

R/W Sec. 26 of C.P.C.

10. Process Memo along with copy to

Defendants.

RAMANAGARA
DATE: .09.2019 ADVOCATE FOR PLAINTIFF
(B.P.SATHEESHA)