Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Taxation Review
Taxation Review
More info
to the other
PART I – GENERAL PRINCIPLES
• Applies only to entities exercising
government functions (acta jure
TAXATION – power inherent in every sovereign imperii)
State to impose a charge or burden upon persons,
properties, or rights to raise revenues for the use and
support of the government to enable it to discharge CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS
its appropriate functions A. Direct
1) Due process
SCOPE OF TAXATION Should not be harsh, oppressive,
•
! Far-reaching, (Substantive)
! Plenary Must be for a public purpose
•
! Comprehensive (Substantive)
! Supreme Imposed
• within territorial
jurisdiction (Substantive)
STAGES OF TAXATION: (LAP) No arbitrariness in assessment
•
3. Payment (Procedural)
2) Equal protection
Basic Principles of a Sound Tax System All persons subject to legislation
•
—Advisers: Atty. Serafin Salva do r, Atty. Micha el Dana Mo ntero, Atty. Gaud enc io Mend oza ; Head: Julie Ann B.
Domino, Juan J. P. Enriquez III; Und erstud ies: Rac helle T. Sy, Ald win Me nd oza, Timo thy John Bata n —
Pa g e 2 o f 145
15) Special purpose - special fund for said (c) without regard to their property,
purpose, balance goes to general funds occupation or business
16) Veto power of the President - revenue/tariff Ex. Community Tax (Cedula)
bill 2) property tax –
17) Power of review of the SC (a) imposed on property, real or personal
18) Power of Local Government to create their (b) in proportion to its value or other
own sources and levy taxes, fees, charges reasonable method of apportionment
19) Just share of local government in national Ex. Real estate tax
revenue which shall be automatically 3) excise, privilege tax - (different from the
Download
released. excise tax in Taxation II)
20) Tax exemption of all revenues and assets of (a) imposed upon performance of an act, the
(a) proprietary or cooperative educational enjoyment of a privilege or the engaging
institutions in an occupation, profession or business
(b) subject to limitations provided by law Ex. Income tax, VAT, estate tax, donor’s tax
21) Tax exemption of grants, endowments, B. As to who bears the burden
donations or contributions USED 1) Direct – the tax is imposed on the person
ACTUALLY, DIRECTLY and EXCLUSIVELY who also bears the burden thereof
for educational purposes Ex. Income tax, community tax, estate tax
2) Indirect – imposed on the taxpayer who
CIR v. CA (298 SCRA 85) shifts the burden of the tax to another
Ex. VAT, specific tax, percentage tax,
Facts: YMCA is a non-stock, non-profit institution, customs duties
which conducts various programs and activities C. As to determination of amount
beneficial to the public pursuant to its religious, 1) Specific – tax imposed and based on a
educational and charitable objective. In 1980, YMCA physical unit of measurement, as by head,
earned an income of more than P600K from leasing number, weight, length or volume
out a portion of its premises to small shop owners Ex. Tax on distilled spirits, fermented
and P47K from parking fees. liquors, cigars
2) Ad Valorem - tax of a fixed proportion of the
Issue: Is the rental income from real property owned value of property with respect to which the
by the YMCA subject to income tax? tax is assessed; requires intervention of
assessor.
Held: YES, the exemption claimed by YMCA is Ex. Real estate tax, excise tax on cars, non-
expressly disallowed by the last paragraph of then essential goods
§27 of the NIRC. Furthermore, Art. XIV, §4 (3) of the D. As to purpose
Constitution only exempts YMCA from property taxes 1) General, fiscal or revenue - imposed for the
NOT income tax. YMCA cannot be considered as an general purpose of supporting the
“educational institution” within the purview of the government
above-cited article. The term “educational institution” Ex. Income tax, percentage tax
under the Education Act of 1982 refers to schools. 2) Special or regulatory - imposed for a
The school system is synonymous with formal special purpose, to achieve some social or
education, which refers to hierarchically structured economic objectives
and chronologically graded learnings organized and Ex. Protective tariffs or customs duties on
provided by the formal school system and for which imported goods intended to protect local
certification is required in order for the learner to industries
progress through grades or more to higher levels. E. As to authority imposing the tax
Nothing in the Articles of Incorporation
decompressor or By-Laws of
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (Uncompressed)
1) National - imposed by the national
the YMCA suggests are needed to see this picture.
that it is an educational government
institution. Ex. National internal revenue taxes, custom
duties
Classification of Taxes 2) Municipal or local - imposed by the
A. As to subject matter of object municipal corporations or local governments
1) personal, poll, capitation tax – Ex. Real estate tax, occupation tax
(a) fixed amount
(b) individuals residing within specified
territory
Pa g e 3 o f 145
Pa g e 4 o f 145
TAX SPECIAL
within the same jurisdiction or taxing
•
ASSESSMENT
district
Imposed persons, Only on land within the same taxable period
•
Pa g e 5 o f 145
TAX TREATY AS A MODE OF ELIMINATING taxpayer’s property. As long as the power to tax
DOUBLE TAXATION: does not violate any constitutional or statutory
1) EXEMPTION METHOD – the income or capital provisions, said power can be a power to destroy.
which is taxable in the state of source or situs is
exempted in the state of residence, although in But for all its plenitude, the power to tax is not
some instances it may taken into account in unconfined as there are restrictions. Adversely
determining the rate of tax applicable to the tax effecting as it does property rights, both the due
payer’s remaining income or capital (ex. Tax process and equal protection clauses of the
Sparing Credit scheme) Constitution may properly be invoked to invalidate in
2) CREDIT METHOD – the tax paid in the state of appropriate cases a revenue measure. If it were
source is credited against the tax levied in the otherwise, there would be truth to the dictum that “the
state of residence power to tax involves the power to destroy.” The web
Afisco Insurance Corp v. CA (G.R. No. 112675, or unreality spun from Justice Marshall’s famous
Jan. 25, 1999) dictum was brushed away by one stroke of Mr.
Justice Holmes’ pen, thus: “The power to tax is not
Petitioners are local non-life insurance corps. Which the power to destroy while this Court sits.” “So it is in
formed a “pool” in order to enter into a Reinsurance the Philippines.” [Reyes v. Almanzor (1991), citing
Treaty with a German company. BIR assessed Sison v. Ancheta (1984); Obillos v. CIR (1985)].
deficiency taxes against the “pool” on the ground that
it is considered a partnership taxable as a corp. Tax Avoidance (Tax Minimization) – tax saving
Petitioners insist that the pool is a mere agent, not device that is legally permissible
acting on its own and therefore, cannot be taxed as a
corp., there being no risk undertaken by the pool, no
common fund and no control exercised by its board in Tax Evasion (Tax Dodging) – connotes fraud
the management of its fund. through the use of pretenses and forbidden devices
to lessen or defeat taxes; must be willful and
Issue (1) : Is the Pool Taxable as a Corp? intentional.
Held (1): YES. Pursuant to §24 of the NIRC, the CIR vs. The Estate of Benigno Toda, GR No.
pool is included within the definition of “domestic 147188, Sept. 14, 2004
corps.” Which comprises even unregistered
partnerships and associations. In this case, the Facts: This Court is called upon to determine in
ceding cos. Entered into an association that would this case whether the tax planning scheme adopted
handle all business under the Treaty. It has a by a corporation constitutes tax evasion that would
common fund and an executive board to manage its justify an assessment of deficiency income tax.
affairs. Moreover, even if the pool itself did not issue CIC authorized Toda, Jr., President and owner
any policies on its own, its work was indispensable to of 99.991% of its issued and outstanding capital
the business of the ceding companies and the stock, to sell the Cibeles Building and the two
German Co, parcels of land on which the building stands for an
amount of not less than P90M. Toda then
Issue (2): Is there double taxation? purportedly sold the property for P100 M to Rafael
Altonaga, who, in turn, sold the same property on
Held(2 ): NO. Double taxation means taxing the the same day to RMI for P200M. These 2
same person twice by the same jurisdiction for the transactions were evidenced by Deeds of Absolute
same thing. The pool is a taxable entity distinct from Sale. For the sale of the property to RMI, Altonaga
the individual corporate entities of the ceding paid capital gains tax in the amount of P10M.
QuickTime™ and a
companies. The TIFF tax(Uncompressed)
on its decompressor
income is obviously CIC filed its corporate annual ITR for the year
are needed to see this picture.
different from the tax on the dividends received by 1989, declaring, among other things, its gain from
the said companies. the sale of real property in the amount of
P75,728.021. Toda sold all his shares. He died 3
Power to Tax Involves Power to Destroy [Chief yrs. later.
Justice Marshall, McCullough v. Maryland, 4 L.Ed. The BIR sent an assessment notice and
579 (1819)] demand letter to the CIC for deficiency income tax
for the year 1989 in the amount of P79,099,999.22,
The imposition of a valid tax could not be judicially representing the tax, surcharge, & interest on the
restrained merely because it would prejudice a
Pa g e 6 o f 145