Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hongkong Case Study
Hongkong Case Study
The British took over HongKong in late 1800s when China lost a series of wars to Britain and
as a result ended up ceding it for a period of 99 years. HongKong remained a British colony
until 1997, when British gave it back to China under a special agreement.
This agreement was called “ One Country, Two Systems”. It made Hongkong a “special
administrative region” Under this arrangement, HongKong would maintain “a high degree of
autonomy” as well as democratic freedoms like the right to vote, freedom of speech,freedom
of the press,assembly. This policy made it very different from China, where citizens dont have
the same freedoms. However this agreement is only valid for 50 years and in 2047, HongKong
is expected to fully become a part of China .
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM
Hong Kong’s Basic Law say that Hong Kong is supposed to administer itself. But the
arrangement also gives China the power to appoint Hong Kong’s chief executive, “on the basis
of the results of elections or consultations to be held locally.” An election committee, currently
of about 1,200 people, votes and selects the chief executive.However the committee is
stocked with Beijing loyalists, which means whoever wins is more or less the candidate Beijing
wants to win.
People were worried that China would take advantage of this law to arbitrarily detain
Hongkongers — such as those who openly dissent against the Chinese government. The
amendments would apply retroactively, meaning thousands of people who may have angered
mainland China with a supposed past crime could be at risk of facing trial there.
Current Scenario
Over the past ten weeks, the situation in Hong Kong has become increasingly tense. The broad
protests, which on one occasion totaled roughly two million people, initially demanded scrapping
of the extradition bill. The city’s chief executive, Carrie Lam, eventually suspended the bill
indefinitely calling bill “dead” but she has refused to formally withdraw it.
Incidents of police violence have added fuel to the fire. Incidents of police brutality, including
reports of excessive use of tear gas, rubber bullets, and other weapons have exacerbated
tensions between protesters and police. Fueled by anger toward the police, as well as the slow
erosion of civil liberties, the largely leaderless protests have morphed into a broader, more
complicated movement: about protecting freedoms, democracy and Hong Kong’s autonomy.
/*
It is more than just about a bill. It is about the status of hongkong and the power
China has over it . it is a fight to preserve the freedom people have here. China
and hongkong are two very different places with a very complex political
relationship.
*/