interested in whatever is going on and gets confused in the end a bit and he changes his vote twice. Actually, he is playing the side role in this movie. He was not amongst the jury members who were not taking their roles seriously and were only making the environment more aggressive and under controlled. He was in fact trying to controlling other members of the jury and calming the environment. He was one of the member who were ready with the decision almost immediately when the discussion started, but later on the logic and facts were presented he changes his opinion. 8.K.K RAINA
He is the person who start the situation with his facts.
He plays the most crucial role in the entire movie. He is the only member of the jury who votes ‘not guilty’ and withstand all the pressure from the other jury members. He stands logically, calmly and competently in the discussion. He draws his inferences using various analytical tools and proving if something is universally accepted, it doesn't have to be always correct. He was the one who felt that the accused may not be guilty from the beginning itself. An architect by profession, he doesn’t lose his temper even once and faced an uncompromising jury with bravery. He believes that there is too much at stake to pronounce the boy guilty without discussing the aspects of the crime in detail.