Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 37 views

    Final Group Presentation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Kristina De los Reyes
    The scoring rubric evaluates group presentations on 10 criteria across 100 points total. It assesses introduction (10 points), body of presentation (20 points), conclusion (10 points), speaking style (10 points), response to questions (20 points), and audiovisuals (20 points). Competence is measured on a scale from A to below B. An "A" presentation would have a clearly defined introduction stating objectives, a valid argument appropriate for the audience, a summary of major points and weaknesses, and eye contact.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Final Group Presentation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Kristina De los Reyes
    37 views1 page
    The scoring rubric evaluates group presentations on 10 criteria across 100 points total. It assesses introduction (10 points), body of presentation (20 points), conclusion (10 points), speaking style (10 points), response to questions (20 points), and audiovisuals (20 points). Competence is measured on a scale from A to below B. An "A" presentation would have a clearly defined introduction stating objectives, a valid argument appropriate for the audience, a summary of major points and weaknesses, and eye contact.

    Original Description:

    Rubrics for groupings

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The scoring rubric evaluates group presentations on 10 criteria across 100 points total. It assesses introduction (10 points), body of presentation (20 points), conclusion (10 points), speaking style (10 points), response to questions (20 points), and audiovisuals (20 points). Competence is measured on a scale from A to below B. An "A" presentation would have a clearly defined introduction stating objectives, a valid argument appropriate for the audience, a summary of major points and weaknesses, and eye contact.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    37 views1 page

    Final Group Presentation Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Kristina De los Reyes
    The scoring rubric evaluates group presentations on 10 criteria across 100 points total. It assesses introduction (10 points), body of presentation (20 points), conclusion (10 points), speaking style (10 points), response to questions (20 points), and audiovisuals (20 points). Competence is measured on a scale from A to below B. An "A" presentation would have a clearly defined introduction stating objectives, a valid argument appropriate for the audience, a summary of major points and weaknesses, and eye contact.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Scoring Rubric for Group Presentations

    Competence Weighting Criteria Comments


    /100 A A- B+ B and below
    Introduction Clearly defined background Defined background and General description of Limited background
    10 and relevance of policy general relevance of policy background and relevance information.
    issue. States objective issue. Stated objectives of policy. Objectives not No objectives
    precisely stated or are not clear.
    Body of Clear valid argument Argument made clearly Argument made though Confused argument
    presentation 20 Appropriate level of Level appropriate for not always consistent Inappropriate level of
    presentation taking into audience Level of presentation fixed presentation
    account the audience and not always appropriate
    Convincing argument for level of audience
    Conclusion All major points fully Major points fully Some major points Few major points
    10 summarized summarized summarized summarized
    All weaknesses admitted Most weaknesses admitted Some weaknesses No weaknesses
    Take home messages are Take home messages are admitted admitted
    clear unclear Take home messages are Take home messages
    not clear or absent absent
    Speaking style Presenters speak clearly Presenters speak fairly Presenters speak Presenters speak
    10 Maintain eye contact clearly indistinctly or too fast poorly
    Well rehearsed Maintain some eye contact Minimal eye contact Maintain no eye
    Appropriate and effective Some rehearsal obvious Some rehearsal possible contact
    body language Appropriate body language Body language No rehearsal obvious
    Dressed for the occasion Some dressing for the inappropriate Absent body language
    occasion Minimal dressing for the No dressing for the
    occasion occasion
    Response to Answer respectfully Answer politely Answer aggressively Does not really
    questions 20 Answer knowledgably Answer repeating Answer without referring answer the question
    Involve all team members presentation to presentation One individual
    in responses Involve some team Involve a few team answers all questions
    members in responses members in responses ignoring other team
    members in responses
    Audiovisuals Clear and understandable Understandable Barely Understandable Not understandable
    20 Text readable and clear Text readable Text not fully readable Text crowded and
    Fully support the main Support the main points of Support some of the main difficult to read
    points of the presentation the presentation points of the presentation Hardly supports the
    Well referenced Some references Few references main points of the
    presentation
    No references
    Overall Convincing presentation Adequate Presentation Weak presentation Poor Presentation
    Assessment 10

    You might also like