Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Running Head: Observation, Assessment, and Planning Cycle During Child Development
Running Head: Observation, Assessment, and Planning Cycle During Child Development
CHILD DEVELOPMENT.
DEVELOPMENT
Name.
Institution affiliation.
2
OBSERVATION, ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING CYCLE DURING CHILD
DEVELOPMENT
OBSERVATION, ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING CYCLE DURING CHILD
DEVELOPMENT
Observation is among the prominent stages used to educate young children. In the cycle
observe, assess, plan, the interests of the child are seen from an early stage of three to five years.
After sufficient observational data has been collected, the child is assessed, and the necessary
planning is made to ensure that the child has a conducive environment to grow in. It is during the
observation stage that the practitioners can view the child as an individual allowing them to
gauge his/her interests. It is of particular interest to observe a child during group actives to
understand how they relate with their agemates in a group setting (Synder , et al., 2013). The
observation, assessment, and planning method is one that ensures personal, social, and emotional
development of a child. Overarching principles are used to emphasize the uniqueness of every
sufficient tools in terms of data collecting and analysis tools. To improve data collection
methods, researchers and caregivers should employ the correct observation method. Several
observational methods can be used in a study, each with its own shortcoming as well as benefits.
Participant observation occurs where the behavior and interactions are documented while the
The other observation method is incidental or spontaneous observation. In this case, the
behavior of the child is observed and recorded purely by coincidence (Koehler, powell,
Diamond, & Burchinal , 2010). Therefore, practitioners and researchers must employ all the
above methods of observation to ensure that the activities of the child are well documented. The
3
OBSERVATION, ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING CYCLE DURING CHILD
DEVELOPMENT
reason as to why one way is not considered sufficient is because the behaviors of young children
can be unpredictable at best. Some may interact with adults in a manner that others may not
Interaction between children peers in a group setting has been one of the most valuable tools for
practitioners to understand what a child requires and plan for the needs of such an individual. It
is theorized that the interaction between children of a similar age group present the observes with
a much clear picture of the child’s development level (Snyder, Louise, & Fox, 2015). By using
the optimized group setting the practitioners can gather reliable data and implement evidence-
based practices.
According to Snyder et al, (2013), there a have been a couple of studies on how
observation can be used to understand the needs of children better as they grow. Reviews are
limited to observing how children interact with each other rather than how they interact with
adults. It is therefore essential to note the critical role observation plays in the assessment stage
on a child. To better our understanding of the needs of a child, researchers theorize that the
amount of data has to collected using the collect observation methodology for each child (Tuot,
Isner, & Zaslow, 2011). A clear activity schedule must also be developed for each group of
Furthermore, a baseline is required to evaluate each child individually to gauge their interests
within the group. For example, Snyder, Louise & Fox (2015) develop a research criterion for the
sample group to gauge the interest and thought the levels of each child within the sample group.
4
OBSERVATION, ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING CYCLE DURING CHILD
DEVELOPMENT
Some of the activities the researcher used to estimate the sample included; pretend play, own
Observation of a child's interactions provide caregivers and research with the necessary
data to gauge a child response to certain stimulants in the environment. By analyzing the
observational data, the practitioners are better equipped to understand the child's needs. Most
caregivers use optimized groups to observe the interaction of each child. In a group, children are
subjected to a variety of stimulants activity. Every child is grouped on how they respond to the
the environment. The data is analyzed, and the practitioners can plan an educational program for
each child's needs according to their response (Koehler, powell, Diamond, & Burchinal , 2010).
Like planning for individual children, early intervention employs the data gathered using
observational data is collected, it is possible to chart the behavior of a child with similar
backgrounds against one another. Take, for example, a child in a group setting who has trouble
sharing toys with other children in the same group. In the above example, if early intervention is
not implemented, the child would likely grow up to be an anti-social individual, which may
develop into other complex disorders. Observational data is used to intervene in such cases. The
practitioners utilizing the information can identify such children and win them of the destructive
path.
Some children may have trouble adjusting to specific environments. Having effective
response in a specific way to a particular context. With enough data at hand, practitioners can be
able to predict how a group of children will respond to a stimulant. The prediction of response
grants the practitioner an opportunity to ensure each child is exposed to the right environment for
maximum benefit (Nyland & Alfayez, 2012). As children transition, observational data collected
on earlier groups are particularly useful in predicting behavior. Changes are particularly tricky as
the children are experiencing two phases simultaneously. Having knowledge and experience on a
hat to expect becomes useful when guiding the children through the transition period.
The current framework has detailed what is required in terms of observation, planning,
and assessments. Principles of the practices are outlined to guide practitioners in the exercise.
Individuality in the manner each child can develop and acquire knowledge is also acknowledged.
Furthermore, in the current framework, a detailed assessment plan has been created to gauge the
children's development through milestone ages (Davenport & N.A, 2014). On the other hand,
although the current framework has explored some of the higher levels of observing, assess, plan
For example, although the principles clearly state that "every child is unique," and
deserve a chance to develop at their own pace, the prime areas are limited. Therefore, the prime
areas should not be limited to the seven that are in the current framework. Every child should be
encouraged to be their independent person. Through positive relationships, and their interests
developed in an enabling environment. The assessment criterion is also restrictive. Under the
current framework, children are only accessed twice. , continuous testing should be proposed
and planning for the developmental needs of a child. The observation stage is where the child is
treated as an individual. The child responds to different stimulants in the environment and
observations are used to make an educated decision regarding the best and most effective
teaching methodology for each child. Apart from planning development of a child, observations
are used to understand the behavioral response of a child. Hence, practitioners can provide a
guiding hand inform of interventions, during the transition period where children are facing
Observations are the intersection of decisions made to better the growth of a child.
Finally, although the current framework regarding early child development is exploratory, an
additional step needs to be taken to ensure that the process is flexible. It should accommodate all
Davenport, M., & N.A. (2014). Questions, Answers and Wait-time: implications for assessment
Koehler, M., powell, D., Diamond, K., & Burchinal , M. (2010). Effects of an early literacy
Nyland, B., & Alfayez, S. (2012, November 12). Learning Stories – crossing borders:introducing
Snyder, P. A., Louise, M., & Fox, L. (2015). Supporting Implementation of Evidence- Based
Synder , p., Hemmester, M., Mclean, M., Sandall, S., Mclaughlin, T., & Algina, J. (2013, August
03). Embedded instruction to support (Vol. 13). Baltimore: Buysse & E. Peisner-
Feinberg . doi:10.1080/13502930585209571
Tuot, K., Isner, T., & Zaslow, M. (2011). Coaching for Equity improvements: lesson learnt from