Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Deconstruct Practical Yeast Variables
Deconstruct Practical Yeast Variables
You are tasked with designing a logical, coherent, and detailed biological investigation.
This will be done by deconstructing a simple yeast practical and designing your own
variables to investigate. It’s important to show the process along the way, this can be
done through a mind map. Make sure to give reasoning and explanation behind decisions
you make. You must show why and how you went about designing the practical.
Per class:
Kitchen teaspoon measures set (have one but could buy more)
Dried yeast
Sucrose
Glucose, Maltose, Fructose, Lactose
Salt
Ammonium Phosphate
2 X Water baths set at 37oC
Ice
Kettle
Method:
1. Dissolve 2½ tsp yeast + 2½ tsp of sugar in 100 ml warm (37oC) water.
2. In each of 5 X 50ml labeled beakers add the test substances.
3. Add 20 ml of yeast solution to each beaker and mix well ensuring all the
test material has dissolves.
4. Pour the contents of each beaker into separate 100 ml labeled measuring
cylinders.
5. Place all measuring cylinders in the water bath at once and start the
stopwatch.
6. Remove all the measuring cylinders after 15 minutes (or when one of
them reaches the 100 ml mark - but remember to note the time)
7. Record level of foam in each measuring cylinder.
Possible Variables:
Concentration of yeast
Concentration of sugar
Concentration of salt (1/2 tsp will kill the yeast ie no foam production)
Concentration of Ammonium Phosphate (a small amount is said to help)
Different brands/freshness of yeast
Different sugars (Sucrose, Glucose, Maltose, Fructose, Lactose)
Temperature
NB: Tiny variations in yeast concentration give large variations in the rate of foam productions, so
mixing it together & then dividing it will give better results.
NB: If changing temperature, you need to equilibrate the yeast solution to the temperature before
starting otherwise 60oC will give no show the yeast is killed!
Science Inquiry Skills
Scientific methods enable systematic investigation to obtain measurable evidence.
Deconstruct a problem to determine and justify the most appropriate method for investigation.
Design investigations, including:
a hypothesis or inquiry question
types of variables
dependent
independent
factors held constant (how and why they are controlled)
factors that may not be able to be controlled (and why not)
materials required
the method to be followed
the type and amount of data to be collected
identification of ethical and safety considerations.
Obtaining meaningful data depends on conducting investigations using appropriate procedures and safe,
ethical working practices.
Conduct investigations, including:
selection and safe use of appropriate materials, apparatus, and equipment
collection of appropriate primary and/or secondary data (numerical, visual, descriptive)
individual and collaborative work.
Scientific information can be presented using different types of symbols and representations.
Select, use, and interpret appropriate representations, including:
mathematical relationships, such as ratios
diagrams
equations
to explain concepts, solve problems, and make predictions.
Analysis of the results of investigations allows them to be interpreted in a meaningful way.
Analyse data, including:
identification and discussion of trends, patterns, and relationships
interpolation/extrapolation where appropriate.
Critical evaluation of procedures and data can determine the meaningfulness of the results.
Identify sources of uncertainty, including:
random and systematic errors
uncontrolled factors.
Evaluate reliability, accuracy, and validity of results, by discussing factors including:
sample size
precision
resolution of equipment
random error
systematic error
factors that cannot be controlled.
Corrosive Other –
Steriliser
Sourdough Culture Biohazard Disinfectant
Flour Dust/aerosols Sharps container
Water Sharps Dust mask
Safety glasses
Manual handling
Gloves
Other –
Other –
Waste produced Waste disposal procedure
Pre-treatment of waste –
Sink with water –
Regular waste –
Licenced hazardous waste company –
Other –
Standard Operating Procedures
I have read the relevant Standard Operating Procedure.
I am experienced/trained in using all the equipment listed.
All chemicals used and produced are approved for use.
I have read the current SDSs for all hazardous chemicals used and produced.
I am aware of safety guidelines for using all chemicals, materials and equipment.
I will follow local guidelines for waste disposal (water authority, local council, EPA).
I am aware of first aid procedures if required.
Other comments:
Conclusion:
Risks not significant now and not likely to increase.
Risks significant but effectively controlled at the moment.
Risks significant and not adequately controlled at the moment.
Uncertain about risks; more detailed assessment required.
Assessment carried out by: Signature: Andrew Ayliffe Date:
Andrew Ayliffe
Assessment approved by: Signature: Date: