Photoelectric Effect - Wikipedia

9/3/2019 Photoelectric effect - Wikipedia
Photoelectric effect
The photoelectric effect is the emission of electrons or other free carriers when light hits a material. Electrons emitted
in this manner can be called photoelectrons. This phenomenon is commonly studied in electronic physics, as well as in
fields of chemistry, such as quantum chemistry and electrochemistry.
According to classical electromagnetic theory, the photoelectric effect can be attributed to the transfer of energy from the
light to an electron. From this perspective, an alteration in the intensity of light would induce changes in the kinetic energy
of the electrons emitted from the metal. Furthermore, according to this theory, a sufficiently dim light would be expected
to show a time lag between the initial shining of its light and the subsequent emission of an electron. However, the
experimental results did not correlate with either of the two predictions made by classical theory.
Instead, experiments showed that electrons are dislodged only by the impingement of photons when those photons reach
or exceed a threshold frequency (energy). Below that threshold, no electrons are emitted from the material regardless of
the light intensity or the length of time of exposure to the light.
To make sense of the fact that light can eject electrons even if its intensity is low, Einstein proposed that a beam of light is
not a wave propagating through space, but rather a collection of discrete wave packets (photons).
Emission of conduction electrons from typical metals usually requires a few electron-volts, corresponding to short-
wavelength visible or ultraviolet light. Emissions can be induced with photons with energies approaching zero (in the case
of negative electron affinity) to over 1 MeV for core electrons in elements with a high atomic number. Study of the
photoelectric effect led to important steps in understanding the quantum nature of light and electrons and influenced the
formation of the concept of wave–particle duality.[1] Other phenomena where light affects the movement of electric
charges include the photoconductive effect (also known as photoconductivity or photoresistivity), the photovoltaic effect,
and the photoelectrochemical effect.
Contents
Emission mechanism
Experimental observations of photoelectric emission
Mathematical description
Stopping potential
Three-step model
History
19th century
20th century
Uses and effects
Photomultipliers
Image sensors
Gold-leaf electroscope
Photoelectron spectroscopy
Spacecraft
Moon dust
Night vision devices
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric_effect 1/14
Cross section
See also
References
External links
Emission mechanism
The photons of a light beam have a characteristic energy which is proportional
to the frequency of the light. In the photoemission process, if an electron Schematic of experimental
within some material absorbs the energy of one photon and acquires more apparatus to demonstrate the
energy than the work function (the electron binding energy) of the material, it photoelectric effect. The filter
is ejected. If the photon energy is too low, the electron is unable to escape the passes light of certain wavelengths
from the lamp at left. The light
material. Since an increase in the intensity of low-frequency light will only
strikes the curved electrode, and
increase the number of low-energy photons sent over a given interval of time,
electrons are emitted. The
this change in intensity will not create any single photon with enough energy to adjustable voltage can be increased
dislodge an electron. Thus, the energy of the emitted electrons does not depend until the current stops flowing. This
on the intensity of the incoming light, but only on the energy (equivalent "stopping voltage" is a function only
frequency) of the individual photons. It is an interaction between the incident of the electrode material and the
frequency of the incident light, and
photon and the innermost electrons. The movement of an outer electron to
is not affected by the intensity of the
occupy the vacancy then result in the emission of a photon.
light.
Electrons can absorb energy from photons when irradiated, but they usually
follow an "all or nothing" principle. All of the energy from one photon must be
absorbed and used to liberate one electron from atomic binding, or else the energy is re-emitted. If the photon energy is
absorbed, some of the energy liberates the electron from the atom, and the rest contributes to the electron's kinetic energy
as a free particle.[2][3][4]
Photoemission can occur from any material, but it is most easily observable from metals or other conductors because the
process produces a charge imbalance, and if this charge imbalance is not neutralized by current flow (enabled by
conductivity), the potential barrier to emission increases until the emission current ceases. It is also usual to have the
emitting surface in a vacuum, since gases impede the flow of photoelectrons and make them difficult to observe.
Additionally, the energy barrier to photoemission is usually increased by thin oxide layers on metal surfaces if the metal
has been exposed to oxygen, so most practical experiments and devices based on the photoelectric effect use clean metal
surfaces in a vacuum.
When the photoelectron is emitted into a solid rather than into a vacuum, the term internal photoemission is often used,
and emission into a vacuum distinguished as external photoemission.
Experimental observations of photoelectric emission

The theory of the source of photoelectric effect must explain the experimental observations of the emission of electrons
from an illuminated metal surface.
For a given metal surface, there exists a certain minimum frequency of incident radiation below which no photoelectrons
are emitted. This frequency is called the threshold frequency. Increasing the frequency of the incident beam, keeping the
number of incident photons fixed (this would result in a proportionate increase in energy) increases the maximum kinetic
energy of the photoelectrons emitted. Thus the stopping voltage increases (see the experimental setup in the figure). The
number of electrons also changes because of the probability that each photon results in an emitted electron are a function
of photon energy. If the intensity of the incident radiation of a given frequency is increased, there is no effect on the kinetic
energy of each photoelectron.
Above the threshold frequency, the maximum kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectron depends on the frequency of the
incident light, but is independent of the intensity of the incident light so long as the latter is not too high.[5]
For a given metal and frequency of incident radiation, the rate at which photoelectrons are ejected is directly proportional
to the intensity of the incident light. An increase in the intensity of the incident beam (keeping the frequency fixed)
increases the magnitude of the photoelectric current, although the stopping voltage remains the same.
The time lag between the incidence of radiation and the emission of a photoelectron is very small, less than 10−9 second.
The direction of distribution of emitted electrons peaks in the direction of polarization (the direction of the electric field)
of the incident light, if it is linearly polarized.[6]
Mathematical description
In 1905, Einstein proposed an explanation of the photoelectric effect using a concept first put forward by Max Planck that
light waves consist of tiny bundles or packets of energy known as photons or quanta.
The maximum kinetic energy of an ejected electron is given by
where is the Planck constant and is the frequency of the incident photon.
The term is the work function (sometimes denoted , or [7]), which gives
the minimum energy required to remove an electron from the surface of the
metal. The work function satisfies
Diagram of the maximum kinetic
energy as a function of the
frequency of light on zinc
where is the threshold frequency for the metal. The maximum kinetic
energy of an ejected electron is then
Kinetic energy is positive, so we must have for the photoelectric effect to occur.[8]
Stopping potential
The relation between current and applied voltage illustrates the nature of the photoelectric effect. For discussion, a light
source illuminates a plate P, and another plate electrode Q collects any emitted electrons. We vary the potential between P
and Q and measure the current flowing in the external circuit between the two plates.
If the frequency and the intensity of the incident radiation are fixed, the photoelectric current increases gradually with an
increase in the positive potential on the collector electrode until all the photoelectrons emitted are collected. The
photoelectric current attains a saturation value and does not increase further for any increase in the positive potential. The
saturation current increases with the increase of the light intensity. It also increases with greater frequencies due to a
greater probability of electron emission when collisions happen with higher energy photons.
If we apply a negative potential to the collector plate Q with respect to the plate P and gradually increase it, the
photoelectric current decreases, becoming zero at a certain negative potential. The negative potential on the collector at
which the photoelectric current becomes zero is called the stopping potential or cut off potential[9]
i. For a given frequency of incident radiation, the stopping potential is independent of its intensity.
ii. For a given frequency of incident radiation, the stopping potential is determined by the maximum kinetic energy
of the photoelectrons that are emitted. If qe is the charge on the electron and is the stopping potential, then the work
done by the retarding potential in stopping the electron is , so we have
Recalling
we see that the stopping voltage varies linearly with frequency of light, but depends on the type of material. For any
particular material, there is a threshold frequency that must be exceeded, independent of light intensity, to observe any
electron emission.
Three-step model
In the X-ray regime, the photoelectric effect in crystalline material is often decomposed into three steps:[10]:50–51
1. Inner photoelectric effect (see photo diode below). The hole left behind can give rise to Auger effect, which is visible
even when the electron does not leave the material. In molecular solids phonons are excited in this step and may be
visible as lines in the final electron energy. The inner photoeffect has to be dipole allowed. The transition rules for
atoms translate via the tight-binding model onto the crystal. They are similar in geometry to plasma oscillations in that
they have to be transversed.
2. Ballistic transport of half of the electrons to the surface. Some electrons are scattered.
3. Electrons escape from the material at the surface.
In the three-step model, an electron can take multiple paths through these three steps. All paths can interfere in the sense
of the path integral formulation. For surface states and molecules the three-step model does still make some sense as even
most atoms have multiple electrons which can scatter the one electron leaving.
History
When a surface is exposed to electromagnetic radiation above a certain threshold frequency (typically visible light for
alkali metals, near ultraviolet for other metals, and extreme ultraviolet for non-metals), the radiation is absorbed and
electrons are emitted. Light, and especially ultra-violet light, discharges negatively electrified bodies with the production
of rays of the same nature as cathode rays.[11] Under certain circumstances it can directly ionize gases.[11] The first of these
phenomena was discovered by Hertz and Hallwachs in 1887.[11] The second was announced first by Philipp Lenard in
1900.[11]
The ultra-violet light to produce these effects may be obtained from an arc lamp, or by burning magnesium, or by sparking
with an induction coil between zinc or cadmium terminals, the light from which is very rich in ultra-violet rays. Sunlight is
not rich in ultra-violet rays, as these have been absorbed by the atmosphere, and it does not produce nearly so large an
effect as the arc-light. Many substances besides metals discharge negative electricity under the action of ultraviolet light:
lists of these substances will be found in papers by G. C. Schmidt[12] and O. Knoblauch.[13]
19th century
In 1839, Alexandre Edmond Becquerel discovered the photovoltaic effect while studying the effect of light on electrolytic
cells.[14] Though not equivalent to the photoelectric effect, his work on photovoltaics was instrumental in showing a strong
relationship between light and electronic properties of materials. In 1873, Willoughby Smith discovered photoconductivity
in selenium while testing the metal for its high resistance properties in conjunction with his work involving submarine
telegraph cables.[15]
Johann Elster (1854–1920) and Hans Geitel (1855–1923), students in Heidelberg, developed the first practical
photoelectric cells that could be used to measure the intensity of light.[16][17]:458 Elster and Geitel had investigated with
great success the effects produced by light on electrified bodies.[18]
In 1887, Heinrich Hertz observed the photoelectric effect and the production and reception of electromagnetic waves.[11]
He published these observations in the journal Annalen der Physik. His receiver consisted of a coil with a spark gap, where
a spark would be seen upon detection of electromagnetic waves. He placed the apparatus in a darkened box to see the
spark better. However, he noticed that the maximum spark length was reduced when inside the box. A glass panel placed
between the source of electromagnetic waves and the receiver absorbed ultraviolet radiation that assisted the electrons in
jumping across the gap. When removed, the spark length would increase. He observed no decrease in spark length when
he replaced the glass with quartz, as quartz does not absorb UV radiation. Hertz concluded his months of investigation
and reported the results obtained. He did not further pursue the investigation of this effect.
The discovery by Hertz [19] in 1887 that the incidence of ultra-violet light on a spark gap facilitated the passage of the
spark, led immediately to a series of investigations by Hallwachs,[20] Hoor,[21] Righi[22] and
Stoletow[23][24][25][26][27][28][29] on the effect of light, and especially of ultra-violet light, on charged bodies. It was proved
by these investigations that a newly cleaned surface of zinc, if charged with negative electricity, rapidly loses this charge
however small it may be when ultra-violet light falls upon the surface; while if the surface is uncharged to begin with, it
acquires a positive charge when exposed to the light, the negative electrification going out into the gas by which the metal
is surrounded; this positive electrification can be much increased by directing a strong airblast against the surface. If
however the zinc surface is positively electrified it suffers no loss of charge when exposed to the light: this result has been
questioned, but a very careful examination of the phenomenon by Elster and Geitel[30] has shown that the loss observed
under certain circumstances is due to the discharge by the light reflected from the zinc surface of negative electrification
on neighbouring conductors induced by the positive charge, the negative electricity under the influence of the electric field
moving up to the positively electrified surface.[31]
With regard to the Hertz effect, the researchers from the start showed a great complexity of the phenomenon of
photoelectric fatigue — that is, the progressive diminution of the effect observed upon fresh metallic surfaces. According to
an important research by Wilhelm Hallwachs, ozone played an important part in the phenomenon.[32] However, other
elements enter such as oxidation, the humidity, the mode of polish of the surface, etc. It was at the time not even sure that
the fatigue is absent in a vacuum.
In the period from February 1888 and until 1891, a detailed analysis of photo effect was performed by Aleksandr Stoletov
with results published in 6 works;[33][34][35][36][37][38] four of them in Comptes Rendus, one review in Physikalische
Revue (translated from Russian), and the last work in Journal de Physique. First, in these works Stoletov invented a new
experimental setup which was more suitable for a quantitative analysis of photo effect. Using this setup, he discovered the
direct proportionality between the intensity of light and the induced photo electric current (the first law of photo effect or
Stoletov's law). One of his other findings resulted from measurements of the dependence of the intensity of the electric
photo current on the gas pressure, where he found the existence of an optimal gas pressure Pm corresponding to a
maximum photocurrent; this property was used for a creation of solar cells.
In 1899, J. J. Thomson investigated ultraviolet light in Crookes tubes.[39] Thomson deduced that the ejected particles were
the same as those previously found in the cathode ray, later called electrons, which he called "corpuscles". In the research,
Thomson enclosed a metal plate (a cathode) in a vacuum tube, and exposed it to high-frequency radiation.[40] It was
thought that the oscillating electromagnetic fields caused the atoms' field to resonate and, after reaching a certain
amplitude, caused a subatomic "corpuscle" to be emitted, and current to be detected. The amount of this current varied
with the intensity and color of the radiation. Larger radiation intensity or frequency would produce more current.
During the years 1886-1902, Wilhelm Hallwachs and Philipp Lenard investigated the phenomenon of photoelectric
emission in detail. Hallwachs connected a zinc plate to an electroscope. He allowed ultraviolet light to fall on the zinc plate
and observed that the zinc plate became uncharged if initially negatively charged, positively charged if initially uncharged,
and more positively charged if initially positively charged. From these observations he concluded that some negatively
charged particles were emitted by the zinc plate when exposed to ultraviolet light. A few years later, Lenard observed that
when ultraviolet radiation is allowed to fall on the emitter plate of an evacuated glass tube enclosing two electrodes, a
current flows in the circuit. As soon as ultraviolet radiation is stopped, the current also stops. This initiated the concept of
photoelectric emission.
In 1900, while studying black-body radiation, the German physicist Max Planck suggested that the energy carried by
electromagnetic waves could only be released in "packets" of energy. In 1905, Albert Einstein published a paper advancing
the hypothesis that light energy is carried in discrete quantized packets to explain experimental data from the
photoelectric effect. This was a key step in the development of quantum mechanics. In 1914, Millikan's experiment
supported Einstein's model of the photoelectric effect. Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1921 for "his discovery of
the law of the photoelectric effect",[41] and Robert Millikan was awarded the Nobel Prize in 1923 for "his work on the
elementary charge of electricity and on the photoelectric effect".[42]
20th century
The discovery of the ionization of gases by ultra-violet light was made by Philipp Lenard in 1900. As the effect was
produced across several centimeters of air and yielded a greater number of positive ions than negative, it was natural to
interpret the phenomenon, as did J. J. Thomson, as a Hertz effect upon the solid or liquid particles present in the gas.[11]
In 1902, Lenard observed that the energy of individual emitted electrons increased with the frequency (which is related to
the color) of the light.[2]
This appeared to be at odds with Maxwell's wave theory of light, which predicted that the electron energy would be
proportional to the intensity of the radiation.
Lenard observed the variation in electron energy with light frequency using a powerful electric arc lamp which enabled
him to investigate large changes in intensity, and that had sufficient power to enable him to investigate the variation of
potential with light frequency. His experiment directly measured potentials, not electron kinetic energy: he found the
electron energy by relating it to the maximum stopping potential (voltage) in a phototube. He found that the calculated
maximum electron kinetic energy is determined by the frequency of the light. For example, an increase in frequency
results in an increase in the maximum kinetic energy calculated for an electron upon liberation – ultraviolet radiation
would require a higher applied stopping potential to stop current in a phototube than blue light. However, Lenard's results
were qualitative rather than quantitative because of the difficulty in performing the experiments: the experiments needed
to be done on freshly cut metal so that the pure metal was observed, but it oxidized in a matter of minutes even in the
partial vacuums he used. The current emitted by the surface was determined by the light's intensity, or brightness:
doubling the intensity of the light doubled the number of electrons emitted from the surface.
The researches of Langevin and those of Eugene Bloch[43] have shown that the greater part of the Lenard effect is certainly
due to this 'Hertz effect'. The Lenard effect upon the gas itself nevertheless does exist. Refound by J. J. Thomson[44] and
then more decisively by Frederic Palmer, Jr.,[45][46] it was studied and showed very different characteristics than those at
first attributed to it by Lenard.[11]
In 1905, Albert Einstein solved this apparent paradox by describing light as composed of discrete quanta, now called
photons, rather than continuous waves. Based upon Max Planck's theory of black-body radiation, Einstein theorized that
the energy in each quantum of light was equal to the frequency multiplied by a constant, later called Planck's constant. A
photon above a threshold frequency has the required energy to eject a single electron, creating the observed effect. This
discovery led to the quantum revolution in physics and earned Einstein the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1921.[47] By wave-
particle duality the effect can be analyzed purely in terms of waves though not as conveniently.[48]
Albert Einstein's mathematical description of how the photoelectric effect was caused by absorption of quanta of light was
in one of his 1905 papers, named "On a Heuristic Viewpoint Concerning the Production and Transformation of Light".
This paper proposed the simple description of "light quanta", or photons, and showed how they explained such
phenomena as the photoelectric effect. His simple explanation in terms of absorption of discrete quanta of light explained
the features of the phenomenon and the characteristic frequency.
The idea of light quanta began with Max Planck's published law of black-body radiation ("On the Law of Distribution of
Energy in the Normal Spectrum"[49]) by assuming that Hertzian oscillators could only exist at energies E proportional to
the frequency f of the oscillator by E = hf, where h is Planck's constant. By assuming that light actually consisted of
discrete energy packets, Einstein wrote an equation for the photoelectric effect that agreed with experimental results. It
explained why the energy of photoelectrons was dependent only on the frequency of the incident light and not on its
intensity: at low-intensity, the high-frequency source could supply a few high energy photons, whereas a high-intensity,
the low-frequency source would supply no photons of sufficient individual energy to dislodge any electrons. This was an
enormous theoretical leap, but the concept was strongly resisted at first because it contradicted the wave theory of light
that followed naturally from James Clerk Maxwell's equations for electromagnetic behavior, and more generally, the
assumption of infinite divisibility of energy in physical systems. Even after experiments showed that Einstein's equations
for the photoelectric effect were accurate, resistance to the idea of photons continued since it appeared to contradict
Maxwell's equations, which were well understood and verified.
Einstein's work predicted that the energy of individual ejected electrons increases linearly with the frequency of the light.
Perhaps surprisingly, the precise relationship had not at that time been tested. By 1905 it was known that the energy of
photoelectrons increases with increasing frequency of incident light and is independent of the intensity of the light.
However, the manner of the increase was not experimentally determined until 1914 when Robert Andrews Millikan
showed that Einstein's prediction was correct.[3]
The photoelectric effect helped to propel the then-emerging concept of wave–particle duality in the nature of light. Light
simultaneously possesses the characteristics of both waves and particles, each being manifested according to the
circumstances. The effect was impossible to understand in terms of the classical wave description of light,[50][51][52] as the
energy of the emitted electrons did not depend on the intensity of the incident radiation. Classical theory predicted that
the electrons would 'gather up' energy over a period of time, and then be emitted.[51][53]
Uses and effects

Photomultipliers
These are extremely light-sensitive vacuum tubes with a photocathode coated onto part (an end or side) of the inside of
the envelope. The photo cathode contains combinations of materials such as cesium, rubidium, and antimony specially
selected to provide a low work function, so when illuminated even by very low levels of light, the photocathode readily
releases electrons. By means of a series of electrodes (dynodes) at ever-higher potentials, these electrons are accelerated
and substantially increased in number through secondary emission to provide a readily detectable output current.
Photomultipliers are still commonly used wherever low levels of light must be detected.[54]
Image sensors
Video camera tubes in the early days of television used the photoelectric effect, for example, Philo Farnsworth's "Image
dissector" used a screen charged by the photoelectric effect to transform an optical image into a scanned electronic
signal.[55]
Gold-leaf electroscope
Gold-leaf electroscopes are designed to detect static electricity. Charge placed on
the metal cap spreads to the stem and the gold leaf of the electroscope. Because
they then have the same charge, the stem and leaf repel each other. This will cause
the leaf to bend away from the stem.
An electroscope is an important tool in illustrating the photoelectric effect. For

example, if the electroscope is negatively charged throughout, there is an excess of The gold leaf electroscope
electrons and the leaf is separated from the stem. If high-frequency light shines on
the cap, the electroscope discharges, and the leaf will fall limp. This is because the
frequency of the light shining on the cap is above the cap's threshold frequency. The photons in the light have enough
energy to liberate electrons from the cap, reducing its negative charge. This will discharge a negatively charged
electroscope and further charge a positive electroscope. However, if the electromagnetic radiation hitting the metal cap
does not have a high enough frequency (its frequency is below the threshold value for the cap), then the leaf will never
discharge, no matter how long one shines the low-frequency light at the cap.[56]:389–390
Photoelectron spectroscopy
Since the energy of the photoelectrons emitted is exactly the energy of the incident photon minus the material's work
function or binding energy, the work function of a sample can be determined by bombarding it with a monochromatic X-
ray source or UV source, and measuring the kinetic energy distribution of the electrons emitted.[10]:14–20
Photoelectron spectroscopy is usually done in a high-vacuum environment, since the electrons would be scattered by gas
molecules if they were present. However, some companies are now selling products that allow photoemission in air. The
light source can be a laser, a discharge tube, or a synchrotron radiation source.[57]
The concentric hemispherical analyzer is a typical electron energy analyzer and uses an electric field to change the
directions of incident electrons, depending on their kinetic energies. For every element and core (atomic orbital) there will
be a different binding energy. The many electrons created from each of these combinations will show up as spikes in the
analyzer output, and these can be used to determine the elemental composition of the sample.
Spacecraft
The photoelectric effect will cause spacecraft exposed to sunlight to develop a positive charge. This can be a major
problem, as other parts of the spacecraft are in shadow which will result in the spacecraft developing a negative charge
from nearby plasmas. The imbalance can discharge through delicate electrical components. The static charge created by
the photoelectric effect is self-limiting, because a higher charged object doesn't give up its electrons as easily as a lower
charged object does.[58][59]
Moon dust
Light from the sun hitting lunar dust causes it to become charged with the photoelectric effect. The charged dust then
repels itself and lifts off the surface of the Moon by electrostatic levitation.[60][61] This manifests itself almost like an
"atmosphere of dust", visible as a thin haze and blurring of distant features, and visible as a dim glow after the sun has set.
This was first photographed by the Surveyor program probes in the 1960s. It is thought that the smallest particles are
repelled kilometers from the surface and that the particles move in "fountains" as they charge and discharge.
Night vision devices

Photons hitting a thin film of alkali metal or semiconductor material such as gallium arsenide in an image intensifier tube
cause the ejection of photoelectrons due to the photoelectric effect. These are accelerated by an electrostatic field where
they strike a phosphor coated screen, converting the electrons back into photons. Intensification of the signal is achieved
either through acceleration of the electrons or by increasing the number of electrons through secondary emissions, such as
with a micro-channel plate. Sometimes a combination of both methods is used. Additional kinetic energy is required to
move an electron out of the conduction band and into the vacuum level. This is known as the electron affinity of the
photocathode and is another barrier to photoemission other than the forbidden band, explained by the band gap model.
Some materials such as Gallium Arsenide have an effective electron affinity that is below the level of the conduction band.
In these materials, electrons that move to the conduction band are all of the sufficient energy to be emitted from the
material and as such, the film that absorbs photons can be quite thick. These materials are known as negative electron
affinity materials.
Cross section
The photoelectric effect is an interaction mechanism between photons and atoms.[62]
At the high photon energies comparable to the electron rest energy of 511 keV, Compton scattering, another process, may
take place. Above twice this (1.022 MeV) pair production may take place.[63] Compton scattering and pair production are
examples of two other competing mechanisms.
Indeed, even if the photoelectric effect is the favoured reaction for a particular single-photon bound-electron interaction,
the result is also subject to statistical processes and is not guaranteed, even if the photon has certainly disappeared and a
bound electron has been excited (usually K or L shell electrons at gamma ray energies). The probability of the
photoelectric effect occurring is measured by the cross-section of interaction, σ. This has been found to be a function of the
atomic number of the target atom and photon energy. A crude approximation, for photon energies above the highest
atomic binding energy, which is given by:[64]
Here Z is atomic number and n is a number which varies between 4 and 5. (At lower photon energies a characteristic
structure with edges appears, K edge, L edges, M edges, etc.) The obvious interpretation follows that the photoelectric
effect rapidly decreases in significance, in the gamma-ray region of the spectrum, with increasing photon energy, and that
photoelectric effect increases steeply with atomic number. The corollary is that high-Z materials make good gamma-ray
shields, which is the principal reason that lead (Z = 82) is a preferred and ubiquitous gamma radiation shield.[65]
See also
Anomalous photovoltaic effect
Dember effect
Photo–Dember effect
Photomagnetic effect
Photochemistry
Timeline of mechanics and physics
References
1. Serway, R. A. (1990). Physics for Scientists & Engineers (3rd ed.). Saunders. p. 1150. ISBN 0-03-030258-7.
2. Lenard, P. (1902). "Ueber die lichtelektrische Wirkung" (https://zenodo.org/record/1424009). Annalen der Physik. 313
(5): 149–198. Bibcode:1902AnP...313..149L (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1902AnP...313..149L).
doi:10.1002/andp.19023130510 (https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fandp.19023130510).
3. Millikan, R. (1914). "A Direct Determination of "h." ". Physical Review. 4 (1): 73–75. Bibcode:1914PhRv....4R..73M (htt
ps://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1914PhRv....4R..73M). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.4.73.2 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhys
Rev.4.73.2).
4. Millikan, R. (1916). "A Direct Photoelectric Determination of Planck's "h"" (http://www.fisica.net/quantica/millikan_a_dir
ect_photoelectric_determination_of_plancks_h.pdf) (PDF). Physical Review. 7 (3): 355–388.
Bibcode:1916PhRv....7..355M (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1916PhRv....7..355M). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.7.355
(https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRev.7.355).
5. Zhang, Q. (1996). "Intensity dependence of the photoelectric effect induced by a circularly polarized laser beam".
Physics Letters A. 216 (1–5): 125. Bibcode:1996PhLA..216..125Z (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996PhLA..216..
125Z). doi:10.1016/0375-9601(96)00259-9 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2F0375-9601%2896%2900259-9).
6. Bubb, F. (1924). "Direction of Ejection of Photo-Electrons by Polarized X-rays". Physical Review. 23 (2): 137–143.
Bibcode:1924PhRv...23..137B (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1924PhRv...23..137B). doi:10.1103/PhysRev.23.137
(https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRev.23.137).
7. Mee, C.; Crundell, M.; Arnold, B.; Brown, W. (2011). International A/AS Level Physics. Hodder Education. p. 241.
ISBN 978-0-340-94564-3.
8. Fromhold, A. T. (1991). Quantum Mechanics for Applied Physics and Engineering. Courier Dover Publications. pp. 5–
6. ISBN 978-0-486-66741-6.
9. Gautreau, R.; Savin, W. (1999). Schaum's Outline of Modern Physics (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. pp. 60–61. ISBN 0-07-
024830-3.
10. Hüfner, S. (2003). Photoelectron Spectroscopy: Principles and Applications. Springer. ISBN 3-540-41802-4.
11. Report of the Board of Regents By Smithsonian Institution. Board of Regents, United States National Museum,
Smithsonian Institution. p. 239 (https://books.google.com/books?id=ic0rAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA239).
12. Schmidt, G. C. (1898) Wied. Ann. Uiv. p. 708.
13. Knoblauch, O. (1899). Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie. xxix. p. 527.
14. Vesselinka Petrova-Koch; Rudolf Hezel; Adolf Goetzberger (2009). High-Efficient Low-Cost Photovoltaics: Recent
Developments (http://www.springerlink.com/content/vn6024740l4343p6/). Springer. pp. 1–. ISBN 978-3-540-79358-8.
15. Smith, W. (1873). "Effect of Light on Selenium during the passage of an Electric Current" (https://www.histv.net/willoug
hby-smith). Nature. 7 (173): 303. Bibcode:1873Natur...7R.303. (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1873Natur...7R.30
3.). doi:10.1038/007303e0 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2F007303e0).
16. Asimov, A. (1964) Asimov's Biographical Encyclopedia of Science and Technology, Doubleday, ISBN 0-385-04693-6.
17. Robert Bud; Deborah Jean Warner (1998). Instruments of Science: An Historical Encyclopedia. Science Museum,
London, and National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution. ISBN 978-0-8153-1561-2.
18. Elster and Geitel arrange the metals in the following order with respect to their power of discharging negative
electricity: rubidium, potassium, alloy of potassium and sodium, sodium, lithium, magnesium, thallium and zinc. For
copper, platinum, lead, iron, cadmium, carbon, and mercury the effects with ordinary light are too small to be
measurable. The order of the metals for this effect is the same as in Volta's series for contact-electricity, the most
electropositive metals giving the largest photo-electric effect.
19. Hertz, Heinrich (1887). "Ueber einen Einfluss des ultravioletten Lichtes auf die electrische Entladung". Annalen der
Physik. Wiley Online Library. 267: 983–1000. doi:10.1002/andp.18872670827 (https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fandp.1887
2670827).
20. Hallwachs, Wied. Ann. xxxiii. p. 301, 1888.
21. Hoor, Repertorium des Physik, xxv. p. 91, 1889.
22. Bighi, C. R. cvi. p. 1349; cvii. p. 559, 1888
23. Stoletow. C. R. cvi. pp. 1149, 1593; cvii. p. 91; cviii. p. 1241; Physikalische Revue, Bd. i., 1892.
24. Stoletow, A. (1888). "Sur une sorte de courants electriques provoques par les rayons ultraviolets". Comptes Rendus.
CVI: 1149. (Reprinted in Stoletow, M.A. (1888). "On a kind of electric current produced by ultra-violet rays" (https://zen
odo.org/record/1431191). Philosophical Magazine. Series 5. 26 (160): 317. doi:10.1080/14786448808628270 (https://
doi.org/10.1080%2F14786448808628270).; abstract in Beibl. Ann. d. Phys. 12, 605, 1888).
25. Stoletow, A. (1888). "Sur les courants actino-electriqies au travers deTair". Comptes Rendus. CVI: 1593. (Abstract in
Beibl. Ann. d. Phys. 12, 723, 1888).
26. Stoletow, A. (1888). "Suite des recherches actino-electriques". Comptes Rendus. CVII: 91. (Abstract in Beibl. Ann. d.
Phys. 12, 723, 1888).
27. Stoletow, A. (1889). "Sur les phénomènes actino-électriques". Comptes Rendus. CVIII: 1241.
28. Stoletow, A. (1889). "Актино-электрические исследовaния". Journal of the Russian Physico-chemical Society (in
Russian). 21: 159.
29. Stoletow, A. (1890). "Sur les courants actino-électriques dans l'air raréfié" (https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-002391
38/document). Journal de Physique. 9: 468. doi:10.1051/jphystap:018900090046800 (https://doi.org/10.1051%2Fjphy
stap%3A018900090046800).
30. Elster and Geitel, Wied. Ann. xxxviii. pp. 40, 497, 1889; xli. p. 161, 1890; xlii. p. 564, 1891; xliii. p. 225, 1892; lii. p.
433, 1894 ; lv. p. 684, 1895.
31. Thomson, J. J. (2005). Conduction of Electricity Through Gases (https://books.google.com/books?id=x7KsD1GmIK0
C). Watchmaker Publishing. ISBN 978-1-929148-49-3. Retrieved 9 July 2011.
32. Hallwachs, W. (1907). "Über die lichtelektrische Ermüdung". Annalen der Physik. 328 (8): 459–516.
Bibcode:1907AnP...328..459H (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1907AnP...328..459H).
doi:10.1002/andp.19073280807 (https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fandp.19073280807).
33. Stoletow, A. (1888). "Sur une sorte de courants electriques provoques par les rayons ultraviolets". Comptes Rendus.
CVI: 1149. (Reprinted in Stoletow, M.A. (1888). "On a kind of electric current produced by ultra-violet rays" (https://zen
odo.org/record/1431191). Philosophical Magazine. Series 5. 26 (160): 317. doi:10.1080/14786448808628270 (https://
doi.org/10.1080%2F14786448808628270).; abstract in Beibl. Ann. d. Phys. 12, 605, 1888).
34. Stoletow, A. (1888). "Sur les courants actino-electriques au travers deTair". Comptes Rendus. CVI: 1593. (Abstract in
Beibl. Ann. d. Phys. 12, 723, 1888).
35. Stoletow, A. (1888). "Suite des recherches actino-électriques". Comptes Rendus. CVII: 91. (Abstract in Beibl. Ann. d.
Phys. 12, 723, 1888).
36. Stoletow, A. (1889). "Sur les phénomènes actino-électriques". Comptes Rendus. CVIII: 1241.
37. Stoletow, A. (1889). "Актино-электрические исследовaния". Journal of the Russian Physico-chemical Society (in
Russian). 21: 159.
38. Stoletow, A. (1890). "Sur les courants actino-électriques dans l'air raréfié" (https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-002391
38/document). Journal de Physique. 9: 468. doi:10.1051/jphystap:018900090046800 (https://doi.org/10.1051%2Fjphy
stap%3A018900090046800).
39. The International Year Book. (1900). New York: Dodd, Mead & Company. p. 659.
40. Buchwald, Jed; Warwick, Andrew, eds. (2004). Histories of the Electron: The Birth of Microphysics (http://mitpress.mit.
edu/sites/default/files/titles/content/9780262524247_sch_0001.pdf) (PDF) (illustrated, reprint ed.). MIT Press. pp. 21–
23. ISBN 978-0-262-52424-7.
41. "The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921" (http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/index.html). Nobel
Foundation. Retrieved 2013-03-16. Cite web requires |website= (help)
42. "The Nobel Prize in Physics 1923" (https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1923/press.html).
Nobel Foundation. Retrieved 2015-03-29. Cite web requires |website= (help)
43. Bloch, E. (1908). "L'ionisation de l'air par la lumière ultra-violette" (https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/jpa-00242302/docu
ment). Le Radium. 5 (8): 240. doi:10.1051/radium:0190800508024001 (https://doi.org/10.1051%2Fradium%3A01908
00508024001).
44. Thomson, J. J. (1907). "On the Ionisation of Gases by Ultra-Violet Light and on the evidence as to the Structure of
Light afforded by its Electrical Effects". Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc. 14: 417.
45. Palmer, Frederic (1908). "Ionisation of Air by Ultra-violet Light" (https://zenodo.org/record/1429499). Nature. 77
(2008): 582. Bibcode:1908Natur..77..582P (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1908Natur..77..582P).
doi:10.1038/077582b0 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2F077582b0).
46. Palmer, Frederic (1911). "Volume Ionization Produced by Light of Extremely Short Wave-Length". Physical Review.
Series I. 32 (1): 1–22. Bibcode:1911PhRvI..32....1P (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1911PhRvI..32....1P).
doi:10.1103/PhysRevSeriesI.32.1 (https://doi.org/10.1103%2FPhysRevSeriesI.32.1).
47. "The Nobel Prize in Physics 1921" (http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1921/index.html). Nobel
Foundation. Retrieved 2008-10-09. Cite web requires |website= (help)
48. Lamb, Willis E.; Scully, Marlan O. (1968). "Photoelectric effect without photons, discussing classical field falling on
quantized atomic electron" (https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19680009569.pdf) (PDF). Cite news
requires |newspaper= (help)
49. Planck, Max (1901). "Ueber das Gesetz der Energieverteilung im Normalspectrum (On the Law of Distribution of
Energy in the Normal Spectrum)". Annalen der Physik. 4 (3): 553. Bibcode:1901AnP...309..553P (https://ui.adsabs.har
vard.edu/abs/1901AnP...309..553P). doi:10.1002/andp.19013090310
(https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fandp.19013090310).
50. Resnick, Robert (1972) Basic Concepts in Relativity and Early Quantum Theory, Wiley, p. 137, ISBN 0-471-71702-9.
51. Knight, Randall D. (2004) Physics for Scientists and Engineers With Modern Physics: A Strategic Approach, Pearson-
Addison-Wesley, p. 1224, ISBN 0-8053-8685-8.
52. Penrose, Roger (2005) The Road to Reality: A Complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe, Knopf, p. 502, ISBN 0-
679-45443-8
53. Resnick, Robert (1972) Basic Concepts in Relativity and Early Quantum Theory, Wiley, p. 138, ISBN 0-471-71702-9.
54. Timothy, J. Gethyn (2010) in Huber, Martin C.E. (ed.) Observing Photons in Space, ISSI Scientific Report 009, ESA
Communications, pp. 365–408, ISBN 978-92-9221-938-3
55. Burns, R. W. (1998) Television: An International History of the Formative Years, IET, p. 358, ISBN 0-85296-914-7.
56. Tsokos, K. A. (2010). Cambridge Physics for the IB Diploma (revised ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-
521-13821-5.
57. Weaver, J. H.; Margaritondo, G. (1979). "Solid-State Photoelectron Spectroscopy with Synchrotron Radiation".
Science. 206 (4415): 151–156. Bibcode:1979Sci...206..151W (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1979Sci...206..151
W). doi:10.1126/science.206.4415.151 (https://doi.org/10.1126%2Fscience.206.4415.151). PMID 17801770 (https://w
ww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17801770).
58. Lai, Shu T. (2011). Fundamentals of Spacecraft Charging: Spacecraft Interactions with Space Plasmas (illustrated
ed.). Princeton University Press. pp. 1–6. ISBN 978-0-691-12947-1.
59. "Spacecraft charging" (http://holbert.faculty.asu.edu/eee460/spacecharge.html). Arizona State University.
60. Bell, Trudy E., "Moon fountains" (https://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2005/30mar_moonfountain
s/), NASA.gov, 2005-03-30.
61. Dust gets a charge in a vacuum (http://www.spacedaily.com/reports/Dust_Gets_A_Charge_In_A_Vacuum.html).
spacedaily.com, July 14, 2000.
62. Evans, R. D. (1955). The Atomic Nucleus (https://archive.org/details/atomicnucleus032805mbp). Malabar, Fla.:
Krieger. p. 673. ISBN 0-89874-414-8.
63. Evans, R. D. (1955). The Atomic Nucleus (https://archive.org/details/atomicnucleus032805mbp). Malabar, Fla.:
Krieger. p. 712. ISBN 0-89874-414-8.
64. Davisson, C. M. (1965). "Interaction of gamma-radiation with matter". Alpha-. 1: 37–78. Bibcode:1965abgs.conf...37D
(https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1965abgs.conf...37D).
65. Knoll, Glenn F. (1999). Radiation Detection and Measurement (https://archive.org/details/radiationdetecti00knol_0).
New York: Wiley. p. 49. ISBN 0-471-49545-X.
External links
Astronomy Cast "http://www.astronomycast.com/2014/02/ep-335-photoelectric-effect/". AstronomyCast.
Nave, R., "Wave-Particle Duality (http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/mod1.html)". HyperPhysics.
"Photoelectric effect (https://web.archive.org/web/20081019151010/http://www.colorado.edu/physics/2000/quantumzo
ne/photoelectric.html)". Physics 2000. University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado. (page not found)
ACEPT W3 Group, "The Photoelectric Effect (https://web.archive.org/web/20081213000603/http://acept.la.asu.edu/Pi
N/rdg/photoelectric/photoelectric.shtml)". Department of Physics and Astronomy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Haberkern, Thomas, and N Deepak "Grains of Mystique: Quantum Physics for the Layman (http://www.faqs.org/docs/
qp/)". Einstein Demystifies Photoelectric Effect (http://www.faqs.org/docs/qp/chap03.html), Chapter 3.
Department of Physics, "The Photoelectric effect (http://www.phy.davidson.edu/ModernPhysicsLabs/hovere.html)".
Physics 320 Laboratory, Davidson College, Davidson.
Fowler, Michael, "The Photoelectric Effect (http://www.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/photoelectric_effect.html)".
Physics 252, University of Virginia.
Go to "Concerning an Heuristic Point of View Toward the Emission and Transformation of Light (https://web.archive.or
g/web/20141121114532/http://www.esfm2005.ipn.mx/ESFM_Images/paper1.pdf)" to read an English translation of
Einstein's 1905 paper. (Retrieved: 2014 Apr 11)
http://www.chemistryexplained.com/Ru-Sp/Solar-Cells.html
Photo-electric transducers: http://sensorse.com/page4en.html
Applets
"HTML 5 JavaScript simulator (https://iwant2study.org/ospsg/index.php/interactive-resources/physics/06-quantum-phy

sics/344-photoelectriceffectwee3)" Open Source Physics project
"Photoelectric Effect (http://phet.colorado.edu/new/simulations/sims.php?sim=Photoelectric_Effect)". The Physics
Education Technology (PhET) project. (Java)
Fendt, Walter, "The Photoelectric Effect (http://www.walter-fendt.de/ph14e/photoeffect.htm)". (Java)
"Applet: Photo Effect (http://lectureonline.cl.msu.edu/~mmp/kap28/PhotoEffect/photo.htm)". Open Source Distributed
Learning Content Management and Assessment System. (Java)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Photoelectric_effect&oldid=913038302"
This page was last edited on 29 August 2019, at 13:47 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this
site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia
Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.

Photoelectric Effect - Wikipedia

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Photoelectric Effect - Wikipedia

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

9/3/2019 Photoelectric effect - Wikipedia

Experimental observations of photoelectric emission

The maximum kinetic energy of an ejected electron is given by

Uses and effects

An electroscope is an important tool in illustrating the photoelectric effect. For

Night vision devices

"HTML 5 JavaScript simulator (https://iwant2study.org/ospsg/index.php/interactive-resources/physics/06-quantum-phy

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Photoelectric_effect&oldid=913038302"

This page was last edited on 29 August 2019, at 13:47 (UTC).

You might also like