Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

In the Laboratory

Complexometric Titration of Zinc


An Analytical Chemistry Laboratory Experiment
S. G. Novick
Department of Chemistry, 135 Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY 11549-1350

Complexometric titrations with EDTA have tradition- 3. Prepare the EDTA solution by weighing 0.93 g of
ally been performed in undergraduate analytical chemistry “dry” Na2 EDTA·2H2O into a 250-mL volumetric flask and
courses to determine the calcium or magnesium content of diluting to the mark. Deduce the actual molarity assuming
water. These titrations are performed at a basic pH, where that the EDTA is pure.
the formation constants of Ca-EDTA and Mg-EDTA com- 4. Perform each titration as follows: Dissolve one cold
plexes are high. These types of problems are well-treated lozenge in 50.0 mL of buffer; gentle heating may be neces-
in the analytical chemistry textbooks (1, 2). In contrast, sary. Cool to room temperature. (Optional: measure the pH
treatment of metal ions whose EDTA complexes occur sig- of the resultant solution.) Prepare a blank solution to
nificantly at low pH (e.g., Zn2+, Fe3+ , Cu2+, Ni2+, Pb 2+, Al3+) determine the endpoint color. Add a few drops of Xylenol
(3) is sparse. An incorrect conclusion can be reached by the Orange solution and titrate with EDTA solution to the end-
See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.

student that practical EDTA titrations are only performed point. Use one titration to determine the endpoint and care-
at high pH. In addition, widening the window of possible fully complete three additional titrations.
metal ions for complexometric titration affords the possi-
bility of analyzing real world products, such as the cold Results
lozenges discussed below. Results from analyses of lozenges by this method have
Downloaded via MIAMI UNIV on June 26, 2018 at 13:32:12 (UTC).

yielded consistent data. For the 14.5-mg lozenges, 108


Discussion
analyses had an average of 14.33 mg zinc with a standard
Zinc content in a sample can be determined quantita- deviation of 0.74, and 119 analyses of the 11.5-mg lozenges
tively by complexometric titration with EDTA at pH 5.5. had an average of 11.58 mg zinc with a standard deviation
The effective formation constant of the Zn-EDTA complex of 0.62. This is well within the FDA guideline of 90–120%
is ≥ 106 above pH 4 (3). Xylenol Orange is used as an indi- of the theoretical amount.
cator; it is yellow when it is free and red when complexed
with zinc. A competition is set up between EDTA and the Conclusion
indicator. When all of the zinc ions have been complexed This experiment is straightforward and easy to perform,
with EDTA, only the free indicator remains, causing a giving students experience in buffer preparation and EDTA
change in color from pink to yellow. titration. The endpoint is crisp with a visible change of color.
Cold-Eeze™ cold lozenges are a product designed to Students are given the opportunity to analyze a marketed
reduce the duration and severity of the common cold product in the same way as is used by the manufacturers.
through the actions of ionic zinc in the mouth, throat and Students can consider themselves the “quality control” chem-
nasal cavity (4–8). Therefore, the zinc ions must be quanti- ists for the manufacture of these cold lozenges. They can com-
tatively released from the cold lozenges into saliva. Analytical pare the average milligrams of zinc to the expected amount
studies have shown that 93% of the zinc ions are released and comment on the consistency of manufacture.
into saliva (9). However, EDTA is a much stronger complex-
ing agent that any other ingredient in the lozenges, and can Acknowledgments
be used to quantitatively determine zinc content. The cold
I wish to acknowledge John C. Godfrey and NancyJane
lozenges are designed to be slowly dissolved in the mouth
Godfrey for analytical results.
where the pH of saliva is on average 5.5. For this reason,
the titrations are performed at that pH. The cold lozenges Notes
also contain gluconate, glycine, and a hard candy base. The
theoretical amount of zinc per lozenge is 11.5 mg or 14.5 1. Order product directly by calling 1-800/505-COLD.
mg, depending on the type of lozenge. Amounts of zinc per 2. Xylenol Orange is available from Aldrich Chemical Co.,
lozenge are printed on the packages. product # 22,785-4. The author has found that solutions made with
pure Xylenol Orange perform better than those prepared from a
Experimental Procedure prepackaged mixture of Xylenol Orange and NaCl (diluent).

Reagents Literature Cited


1. Cold-Eeze™ cold lozenges (Quigley Corporation, 1. Day, R. A., Jr.; Underwood, A. L. In Quantitative Analysis, 6th ed.;
Doylestown, PA)1 Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1991; pp 623–624.
2. Harris, D. C. In Quantitative Chemical Analysis; 4th ed.; W. H.
2. pH 5.5 acetate buffer Freeman: New York, 1995; pp 793–794.
3. Xylenol Orange indicator (0.1% solution in DI water)2 3. Harris, D. C. In Quantitative Chemical Analysis; 4th ed.; W. H.
4. 0.01 M Na 2EDTA solution Freeman: New York, 1995; p 323.
4. Al-Nakib, W.; Higgins, P. C.; Barrow, I.; Batstone, G.; Tyrell, D. A.
Procedure J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1987, 20, 893–901.
5. Godfrey, J. C. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1988, 32, 605–606.
1. Dry Na2 EDTA·2H2O for about one hour in the oven; 6. Godfrey, J. C.; Conant-Sloane, B.; Turco, J. H.; Mercer, N.; Godfrey,
cool in a desiccator. N. J.; Smith, D. S. In ICAAC; Chicago, 1991; Abs. No. 1381.
2. Prepare the pH 5.5 buffer by combining 1.35 g of 7. Godfrey, J. C.; Conant-Sloane, B.; Smith, D. S.; Turco, J. H.; Mer-
glacial acetic acid (C AUTION!) and 10.25 g of sodium acetate cer, N.; Godfrey, N. J. J. Int. Med. Res. 1992, 20, 234–246.
8. Godfrey, J. C.; Godfrey, N. J.; Novick, S. G. Alternative Therapies
(or 17.01 g of sodium acetate trihydrate) in a 250-mL volu- 1996, 2(6), 63–72.
metric flask and diluting to the mark. Adjust pH to 5.5 with 9. Zarembo, J. E.; Godfrey, J. C.; Godfrey, N. J. J. Pharm. Sci. 1992,
either 6 M NaOH or glacial acetic acid. 81, 128–130.

Vol. 74 No. 12 December 1997 • Journal of Chemical Education 1463

You might also like