Analysis of Slope Stability by Limit Equilibrium Approach (Slopew Softwear)

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

ANALYSIS OF SLOPE STABILITY BY LIMIT

EQUILIBRIUM APPROACH (SLOPEW SOFTWEAR)

NAME: P.H.S MADUSANKA

INDEX NO: 150385E

MODULE: GEOTHECHNICAL ENG.


DATA SELECTION

INDEX NO = 85

N= 85- 15*(P), P = 5

So N = 10, N = 5*n + m

So n = 1, m = 5

Example 1 – construction of a road embankment on a site underlain with soft


clays

Parameters for example

Material 1- Dense sand – γ = 20 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 , ∅𝑢 = 320

Material 2- Peaty clay - 𝐶𝑢 = 12 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 ,∅𝑢 = 0 ,γ = 16 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2

Material 3- Sandy fill - γ = 20 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 , ∅𝑢 = 320

Required fill height = 5.4 m, H = 10.5


50
Stage 01 - safe fill height = 3 m FOS = 1.206
48
46
44
42
40
38
25

36 21

13
34
1.206
32
24 20
30 12

28 14 26
height

22
6 7
26
24 5 11
15
22 27
23 3
3 4 8

20
16 17
18
16 2
14
12
2 19 9
10
18

8
6
1
4
2
1 10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50

length
Stage 02- safe fill height = 2.2m FOS = 1.201

Enhanced properties of material types 3 and 4 below

 Material type 3

Total normal stress applied on clay deposit after stage one ∆𝜎 = 3*20 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 (=60 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 )

Enhanced cohesion ∆𝐶 = 0.2𝑈(∆𝜎) for U= 0.9, ∆𝐶 = 10.8 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2 hence new 𝐶𝑢 = 22.8 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2

 Material type 4

Enhanced cohesion taken due to distributed stress form soil layer of height 3 m is half of ∆𝐶 above

Hence the new 𝐶𝑢 = 17.4 𝑘𝑁/𝑚2

50
48
46
44
42
40 16

38
36 1.201
34
15
32
30
17
28
height

21 6 7
26 22

5
24 5 11
20

22 18
2
3 4 8

20
12 13

18
16 4 3
14
12
2 19 9
10
14

8
6
1
4
2
1 10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50

length
Stage 03 – fill height = 0.2 m
Example 2 – Cut slope in a site with a thin weak layer in the sub soil
C’ (kN/m2) Φ’ ( deg ) Unit weight ( kN/m3)

Soil 1 ( region 1 & 2 ) 28.5 20.0 18.84

Soil 2 ( region 3 ) 0.0 10.0 18.84

40

35

30
27

29
1.509

25
16

15
5 14 17 6
28
20 26
25
24
23
30 22 7
Y

21 8
20
15

19

18 1
10 11 12
33
4 10 13
3

31

0 3
2

32
1 9
-5
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

FOS 1.509
40

35

30
27

29

25
0.910 16

15
5 14 17 6
20 28
26
25
24
23
30 22 7
Y

21 8
20
15

19

18 1
10 11 12
33
4 10 13
3

31

0 3
2

32
1 9
-5
-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

By Auto locate center method, critical FOS - 0.910

The use of appropriate method of analysis based on the sub surface Geology
Analysis of Geological slopes by limit equilibrium method can be numerically done with two
approaches.

 Considering the equilibrium of the failure mass as a whole


 Method of slices

The reliability of the results that can be obtained by either of methods depend on the condition on the
sub surface.

 The first method can be useful for analyzing slopes that has been made of same soil type (or
uniform stratum, no discontinuities)
 The second method gives more reliable results for soil with a varying strata throughout the
depth.

The reason for avoiding the first method for analyzing soil with non-uniform conditions (varying
strata) is that, the failure happens exactly along the interface of low shear strength and the failure plane
is not a circular one. So it is a necessary task to investigate the variation of soil types below the earth
surface in the study area before designing slopes.

You might also like