Have we taken security too far?

What’s the difference between a medical student and a convict? The answer: A convict doesn’t pay $50,000 a year for
the privilege of being fingerprinted and patted down. I am referring, of course, to the increasingly stringent security
measures that have come to characterize modern educational testing. As student evaluation techniques have
migrated from face-to-face assessment to computer-based exams administered in dedicated testing centers,
evaluators have become less and less likely to know examinees, leading to heightened precautions around exam
security.
I recently interviewed a group of fourth-year medical students who had just taken Step 2 of the United States Medical
Licensing Clinical Knowledge Examination at test-administration centers. Each of the students had paid $560 for the
privilege, and had devoted nine hours to the single-day exam, which consists of eight sections of 40 to 45 questions
each. Over the day, they received a total break time of 45 minutes. Students must pass the exam to obtain a medical
license, and scoring well is an important factor in gaining admission to competitive medical specialties. So anxiety
tends to run high.
This inevitable anxiety is compounded by Checkpoint Charlie-esque security measures. IDs are checked. Each
student wears a unique number on his or her shoulder throughout the day. Students are fingerprinted each time they
enter and exit the testing room (up to 16 times). They are patted down and asked to roll up their pants legs and pull
their pockets inside-out. If they wear a jacket or sweater into the exam room, they cannot take it off. They are warned
that they will be under constant camera surveillance.
One of the students, a former U.S. marine, said he had found the entire atmosphere of the exam eerily familiar. He
had served in Iraq, helping to preside over the return of inhabitants to Fallujah after the city’s recapture by U.S. forces.
“It was weird,” he said. “They were using many of the exact same procedures and equipment we used in Fallujah. It
took so long for them to verify identities that you almost didn’t dare leave the room, for fear you couldn’t get back in
time. I finally had to show one of the examiners how to do it properly.” Of course, these techniques are not merely for
medical students. Aspiring accountants and architects, students sitting for the GRE, and prospective employees of
Silicon Valley companies are all subjected to these medieval measures.
Some might say that a high-security approach to testing students is not only necessary but laudable. In the case of
medical testing, the health of the nation is a vital resource, and we cannot afford to place it in the hands of physicians
who might have succeeded through academic dishonesty. Who would want a loved one to be cared for by a physician
who had cheated on the medical-licensing exam? As public policy, exam hawks argue, we should demand the very
highest security in all such testing.
But perhaps we have gone overboard. After all, the core of the patient-physician relationship is trust. The Hippocratic
Oath, which has shaped the ethics of medicine for many centuries, enjoins the physician to respect patients’ privacy
and dignity and to always put each patient’s interests first. We entrust to our physicians all sorts of matters we would
not share with anyone else—private details of our health and personal relationships, access to intimate parts of our
bodies, sometimes even our lives. We want to trust our physicians. No one is arguing that security is unnecessary, but
perhaps we haven’t quite yet found the sweet spot.

Exam security has become stricter because …

• a. most exams are done on computers

• b. evaluators don’t often know the examinees’ identities
• c. evaluators prefer not to know who the examinees are

2
The examination …

• a. is a privilege to take
• b. is unnecessarily long
• c. puts students under great pressure

3When they are taking the exam, students …

• a. are watched all the time

• b. must remain in total silence
• c. must ask for permission to take their sweaters off

4According to the ex-marine, …

• a. the staff were not competent enough

• b. identification processes are always time consuming
• c. it was advisable not to leave the exam room till the end

5According to the writer, the security measures described are …

• a. peculiar
• b. outrageous
• c. far to strict

6The writer concludes that …

• a. security is not necessary

• b. a midpoint should be reached
• c. it’s getting difficult to rely on our GPs
2. Lisa Tyler was weary after a long, hard day at the pottery factory where she works. But as she approached her
home in the English city of Stoke-on-Trent, her heart lightened.; soon she would be having a nice cup of tea, putting
her feet up and watching Friends, her favourite TV series. But first, she needed to change out of her work clothes and
pick up her three-year-old son from his grandmother’s house nearby. As Lisa walked up her garden path, she noticed
a light flashing on and off in an upstairs bedroom. A shiver went down her back. What if it was a burglar? Quietly, she
crept round to the back of the house to see if there was any sign of a break-in. Sure enough, a window was open and
someone’s coat was hanging on the gatepost! Well, 26-year-old Lisa didn’t fancy coming face to face with a burglar,
so she ran to a neighbour’s house and rang the police. But as she sat waiting for the police to arrive, Lisa’s curiosity
got the better of her and she decided to go back and see what was going on. That’s when she saw a leg coming out of
the downstairs front window. It was a man climbing out. Lisa gasped in shock. The burglar was carrying her portable
television! At this point, Lisa saw red. She didn’t have many possessions and she’d saved long and hard to buy that
set. Besides, nobody was going to stop her watching Friends. „Oh, no you don’t,‟ she muttered under her breath, as
the fury swelled inside her. Without even stopping to think, she tore across the garden and started shouting at the
burglar. „Give me my TV - drop it now!‟ she screamed. Ignoring her, the man fled across the garden. So Lisa threw
herself at him and successfully rugbytackled him to the ground. The burglar struggled to escape, but Lisa hung on like
the best kind of guard dog despite being punched and kicked. As she looked up, she realised that she recognised the
burglar’s face. She was so surprised that she lost her grip and burglar got away, leaving the TV behind in the garden.
By the time the police and her father arrived, Lisa was in tears. ‟I can’t believe you were so foolish, Lisa,' scolded her
father. „You could have been killed.‟ „I know, but at least he didn’t get my TV,‟ she replied. Lisa later remembered the
name of the burglar, who had been in the same year as her at school. He was later caught and jailed for 15 months
after admitting burglary and assault. In May last year, Lisa was given a Certificate of Appreciation by Staffordshire
Police, for her “outstanding courage and public action‟. But in the future she intends to leave household security to a
new member of her family, Chan, who is real guard dog.

1. How was Lisa feeling as she walked home from work?

A tired C depressed
B anxious D relieved
2. What does “pick up‟ mean in line 5 ?
A contact C collect
B visit D check
3. What first led Lisa to think there was a burglar in her house?
A Something had been broken. C Something was in the wrong place.
B Something had been left outside. D Something was moving inside.

4. Why didn’t Lisa wait in her neighbor's until the police arrived?
A She was worried about losing her C She noticed something from her
television. neighbor's window.
B She wanted to know what was D She realised that the burglar was
happening. leaving.
5. What does “Lisa saw red‟ (line 16) mean?
A She got impatient. C She got angry.
B She felt frightened. D She felt brave.
6. What happened when Lisa shouted at the burglar?
A He tried to explain why he was there. C He pretended not to have heard her.
B He fell over as he ran towards her. D He dropped the TV and attacked her.
7. What did Lisa’s father do when he arrived?
A He told her off. C he praised her
B He comforted her. D He argued with her.