Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Activity 2 Writing Assignment
Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Activity 2 Writing Assignment
Number
Type of Collaborativ
Individual ☐ ☒ of 6
activity: e
weeks
Moment of Intermedia,
Starting ☐ ☒ Final ☐
evaluation: unidad:
Delivery environment:
Evaluative score: 120 points
Monitoring and evaluation
Starting date: September Closing date: October 18th,
6th, 2019 2019
Competence to develop:
Writing skill: The students write short texts coherently about
academic topics related to their discipline and use the semantics
appropriately.
Topics to develop:
Compound adjectives, Modal verbs, Past Progressive, Time and
enough clauses, Uses fo –ING forms, Future.
Phases, steps or stages of the learning strategy to
develop
Act. 2 : Writing Assignment
Activities to develop
Example:
I must follow the netiquette rules to participate in the
forum.
I can’t present the English quiz three times because there
are only two attempts.
Part 3: Write a text about how you imagine yourself in ten years.
Use at least two pictures related to your text. You should write
four paragraphs:
Individual:
Part 1: Send 10 sentences using the modal
verbs of obligation and advice regarding your
role as UNAD student.
Products to
submit by
the students
Collaborative:
Part 4: Send in the forum your comments about
two partners’ contributions.
Evaluation Rubric
Individual Collaborative
Type of activity: ☐ ☒
activity activity
Intermedia,
Moment of evaluation Starting ☐ ☒ Final ☐
unit
Peformance level of individual activity
Item Score
High score Media score Low score
The student did not
Grammar used in the
handle gramar
writing assignment
structures in the
shows a good handle of
writing assignment The student
structures. The student
according to the did not 25
Grammar expressed situations
level. The student participate in point
using modal verbs,
used different the activity. s
phrasal verbs and
structures from the
future tense
established ones in
appropriately.
the guide.
(Up to 25 points) (Up to 13 points) (0 points)
Ideas and
It was possible to grammatical
The student
understand clearly the construction in the
Coherence did not 20
message and main idea writing were not
and participate in point
of the text. The content coherent, it was
cohesion the activity. s
met the guidelines. disorganized and the
aim was not clear.
(Up to 20 points) (Up to 10 points) (0 points)
In the text the student
used appropriately the
vocabulary addressed It lacked a good use
The student
in the units and it is of proper vocabulary
Vocabulary did not 20
according to the in the writing
and participate in point
guidelines. The student assignment, besides
Spelling the activity. s
used properly the it was too limited.
order of adjectives to
describe his feelings.
(Up to 20 points) (Up to 10 points) (0 points)
The student
developed and
submitted the final
The student submitted
paper but it was
appropriately the final The student
incomplete. The
paper following the did not 20
Final assignment met the
instructions. The participate in point
product structures partially.
student met all the the activity. s
The students did not
steps of this activity.
send the final task in
the correct
environment.
(Up to 20 points) (Up to 10 points) (0 points)
Performance levels of collaborative activity
Item Score
High score Media score Low score
Participations
were meanigful,
linked and
contribute to the
The student’s
construction of
participations
the final paper.
were poor
The student
and/or did not
contributed
met the
Participatio appropiately and requirements. The student did not
n and meaningful 35
The student did participate in the activity.
interaction according to his point
not choose a
in the role. The s
role nor made
forum student’s
comments about
contributions
his partners’
follow the
contributions.
netiquette rules
and were sent on
time. The student
met his roles.
(Up to 35 (Up to 18
(0 points)
points) points)
Final score 120 points