Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Bogin y Smith 1996 Evolution of The Human Life Cycle
Bogin y Smith 1996 Evolution of The Human Life Cycle
Anthropologists have become increasingly ration (puberty) are two such characteris-
interested in explaining the significance of tics. The majority ofmammals progress from
life cycle characteristics of the human spe- infancy to adulthood seamlessly, without
cies. This is because the human life cycle any intervening stages, and puberty occurs
(also referred to as “life history”) stands in while growth rates are in decline (Bertalan-
sharp contrast to other species of social ffy, 1960). This pattern of postnatal growth
mammals, even other primates. Theory is illustrated in Figure 1 using data for the
needs to explains how humans successfully mouse. Highly social mammals, such as
combined a vastly extended period of off- wolves, wild dogs, lions, elephants, and the
spring dependency and delayed reproduc- primates (e.g., the baboon, Fig. 21, postpone
tion with helpless newborns, a short dura- puberty by inserting a period of juvenile
tion of breast-feeding, a n adolescent growth growth and behavior betwcen infancy and
spurt, and menopause. Are these character- adulthood. In these animals, puberty occurs
istics a package or a mosaic? while the rate of growth is still decelerating.
The pattern of human growth after birth
LIFE HISTORY AND STAGES OF THE may be characterized by five stages: infancy,
LIFE CYCLE childhood, juvenile, adolescence, and adult-
“A broad definition of life history includes hood (Bogin, 1988, 1990, 1993). Changes in
not only the traditional foci such as age-re- growth rate are associated with each stage
lated fecundity and mortality rates, but also as shown in Figure 3. Changes in trophic
the entire sequence of behavorial, physiolog- and reproductive behavior are also associ-
ical, and morphological changes that a n or- ated with each stage. As for all mammals,
ganism passes through during its develop- human infancy is the period when the
ment from conception t o death” (Shea, 1990, mother provides all or some nourishment to
p. 325). Recent work in mammalian life his- her offspring via lactation. Human infancy
tory and its evolution focuses on the postna-
tal t o adulthood period of the life cycle. One
way to define the stages of the life cycle is Recrivcd November 21, 1994; accepted April 15, 1995.
by biological characteristics. Changes in the Address reprint requests to Barry Bogin, Uept. of Behavioral
rate of growth and the onset of sexual matu- Sciences, University ofMichigan-Dearborn,Ilcarborn, MI 48128.
0.20 -
------____
----_
0.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 7 0 80 90 100 1 1 0 12G
Days postpartum
Fig. 1. Velocity curves for w i g h t growth in the mouse. In both sexes puberty (vaginal opening for
females or spcrmatocytes in testes ofmales) occurs just after weaning and maximal growth rate. Weaning
(W)takes place between days 15 and 20. (Reproducedfrom Tanner, 1962, with permissionofthe publisher.)
18
14
0 -2
Age (years)
Fig. 2. Baboon crown-rump length velocity. The let- by about 6.0 years in both sexes. Redrawn with some
tcrs indicate the stages ofgrowth: I, infancy; J, juvenile; data smoothing from Coelhn (1985). The pattern of
M, sexual maturity. In the wild the weaning (W) process growth for other primate species, including chimpan-
begins as early as 4 months of age and ends by 12-18 zeeR, is similar t that for the baboon (see Bogin, 1988,
months (Altmann, 1980). Puberty begins at about 3.5 pp. 57-68).
years in females ( 0 ) and 4.5 years in males (8J and ends
EVOLUTION OF LIFE CYCLE 705
J \
I I 1 I I I I I
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
AGE, years
Fig. 3. Idealized mean velocity curves of growth in height for healthy girls and boys. I, inkncy; C,
childhood; J, juvenile; A, adolescence; M, mature adult. (Aftcr Pradcr. 1984, and other sources.)
p.236). This definition is derived from etho- modest pubertal acceleration i n long bone
logical research with social mammals, espe- growth, the animal has already completed
cially nonhuman primates, but applies to the 86%ofits skeletal growth. At the onset of the
human species as well. Ethnographic re- human adolescent growth spurt, by contrast,
search shows that juvenile humans have the boys and girls havc completed only 77% of
physical and cognitive abilities t o provide their skelctal growth (Smith, 1993). Clearly,
much of their own food and to protect them- the human pattern of growth following pu-
selves from predation and disease (Weisner, berty is quantitatively different from the
1987; Blurton Jones, 1993).I n girls, the juve- pattern for other primates. The human skel-
nile period ends, on average, at about the etal growth spurt is unequaled by other spe-
age of 10, 2 years before it usually ends in cies and, when viewed graphically, thc
boys, the difference reflecting the earlier on- growth spurt defines human adolescence
set of puberty in girls. (Fig. 3).
Human adolescence begins with puberty, Adolescence ends and early adulthood be-
marked by some visible sign of sexual matu- gins with the completion of the growth spurt,
ration such as pubic hair. The adolescent the attainment of adult stature, and the
stage includes development of the secondary achievement of full reproductive maturity
sexual characteristics and the onset of adult (Figs. 3,4).The latter includes physiological,
patterns of sociosexual and economic behav- socioeconomic, and psychobehavioral attri-
ior. These physical and behavorial changes butes which all coincide, on average, by
occur in many species of social mammals. about age 19 in women and 21-25 years of
What makes human adolescence different age in men (Bogin, 1988, 1993, 1994).
is that during this life stage girls and boys
experience a rapid acceleration in the growth WHEN DID CHILDHOOD AND
of virtually all skeletal tissue, the adolescent ADOLESCENCE EVOLVE?
growth spurt. Thc magnitude of this acceler- The stages of the life cycle may be studied
ation in growth was calculated by Largo et directly only for living species. However,
al. (1978)for a sample of Swiss subjects mea- there are lines of evidence on the life cycle
sured annually between 4 and 18 years of of extinct species. Such inferences for the
age. In late childhood, statural growth accel- hominids are, of course, hypotheses based
eration averaged -0.47 cdyrlyr, i.e., growth on comparative anatomy, physiology and
rate was decelerating. From the point of min- ethology, and on archeology. Examples of this
imal childhood velocity to the peak of the methodology are found in Martin (1983)and
adolescent growth spurt, the acceleration in Harvey ct al. (1987) on patterns of brain and
height averaged +1.66 c d y r l y r for boys and body growth in apes, humans, and their an-
+0.88 c d y r l y r for girls. At the peak of the cestors.
growth spurt the average velocity of growth Apes have a pattern of brain growth that
was 9.0 c d y r for boys and 7.1 c d y r for girls. is rapid before birth and relatively slower
Other primate species may show a rapid after birth. I n contrast, humans have rapid
acceleration in soft tissue growth, such a s brain growth both before and after birth.
muscle mass in many male monkeys and This difference may be illustrated by com-
apes. However, in contrast to humans other paring ratios of brain weighUtota1 body
primate species either have no acceleration weight (in grams). At birth, this ratio aver-
in skeletal growth (Fig. 2) or a n increase in ages 0.09 for the great apes and 0.12 for
growth rate that is very small. In chimpan- human neonates. At adulthood, the ratio av-
zees, Watts and Gavan (1982) found that the erages 0.008 for the great apes and 0.028 for
pubertal increase in the velocity of growth people. In other words, relative to body size
of individual long bones is “. . .usually less human neonatal brain size is 1.33 times
than a centimeter”(p. 58)and often less than larger than that of great apes, but by adult-
5.0 m d y r . In contrast, the velocity of human hood the difference is 3.5 times. The rate of
long bone growth may be five times as rapid human brain growth exceeds that of most
as that of the ape. Cameron et al. (1982) other tissues of the body during the first few
found that peak adolescent velocities ranged years after birth (Fig. 4).Martin (1983) and
from 1.34 c d y r for the forearm to 2.44 c d Harvey et al. (1987) also show that human
yr for the tibia in British boys. Another im- neonates have remarkably large brains (cor-
portant ape-human difference in growth is rected for body size) compared with other
that by the time a chimpanzee begins its primate species. Together, relatively large
EVOLUTION OF LIFE CYCLE 707
neonatal brain size and the high postnatal tween successful births in the wild and
growth rate give adult humans the largest young chimpanzees are infants dependent
encephalization quotient (an allometric scal- on their mothers for about 5 years (Tclelri e t
ing of brain to body size) of all higher al., 1976; Goodall, 1983; Nishida et al.,
primates. 1990). Actuarial data for wild-living animals
Finally, Martin (1983) argues that a “hu- indicate that between 35% (Goodall, 1983)
man-like’’ pattern of brain and body growth and 38% (Nishida et al., 1990) of all live-
becomes necessary once adult hominid brain born chimpanzees survive to their mid-20s.
size reaches about 850 cc. This biological Although this is a significantly greater per-
marker is based on a n analysis of cephalo- centage of survival than for most other spe-
pelvic dimensions of fetuses and their moth- cies ofanimals, the chimpanzee is a t a repro-
ers across a wide range of social mammals, ductive threshold. Goodall (1983) reports
including cetaceans, extant primates, and that for the period 1965-1980 there were 51
fossil hominids (Martin, 1983). Given the births and 49 deaths in one community of
mean rate of postnatal brain growth for liv- wild chimpanzees a t the Gombe Stream Na-
ing apes, an 850 cc adult brain size may be tional Park, Tanzania. During a 10-year pe-
achieved by all hominoids, including cxtinct riod a t the Mahale Mountains National
hominids, by lengthening the fetal stage of Park, Tanzania, Nishida et al. (1990, p. 96)
growth. At brain sizes above 850 cc, the size observed “. . .74 births, 74 deaths, 14 immi-
of the pelvic inlet of the fossil hominids, and grations, and 13 emigrations. . .” in one com-
living people, does not allow for sufficient munity. Chimpanzee population growth is,
fetal growth. Thus, a period of rapid postna- by these data, effectively equal to zero. Ex-
tal brain growth and slow body growth, the tending infancy and birth intervals beyond
human pattern, is needed to reach adult the chimpanzee range may not have been
brain size. possible for early hominids such a s H.
Given this background, Figure 5 repre- ha b i l k
sents an attempt to summarize the evolution Insertion of a brief childhood stage into life
of the human pattern of growth and develop- history could have reduced the reproductive
ment. This figure must be considered as “a strain. The archeological evidence for inten-
work in progress,” since only the data for sification of stone tool manufacture and use
the first and last species (Pan and Homo t o scavenge animal carcasses, especially
sapiens) are known with some certainty. Al- bone marrow (Potts, 19881, may be interprc-
though Australopithecus afarensis is a homi- ted a s a strategy to feed children. Such scav-
nid, i t shares many anatomical features with enging may have been needed to provide es-
nonhominid species including a n adult brain sential amino acids, some minerals, and
size of about 400 cc (Simons, 1989). Analysis especially fat (dense source of energy) that
of its dentition indicates a rate of dental de- children require for growth of the brain and
velopment indistinguishable from extant body (Leonard and Robertson, 1992).
apes (Smith, 1991b). Therefore, the chim- Brain size increased further during the
panzee andA. afarensis are depicted as shar- time of H. erectus. The earliest adult speci-
ing the typical tripartite stages of postnatal mens have brain sizes of 850-900 cc. This
growth of social mammals, infant, juvenile, places H. erectus a t Martin’s (1983) adult
and adult. To achieve the larger adult brain brain size marker, and may justify a n expan-
size of Australopithecus africanus (442 cc) sion of the childhood period to provide the
may have only required an addition to the high-quality foods needed for the rapid, hu-
length of the fetal or, possibly, the infant man-like, pattern of brain growth. Note also
stage. The rapid expansion of adult brain that infancy is depicted a s decreasing in du-
size during the time of Homo habilis (650- ration as childhood expands. Hypothetically,
800 cc) might have been achievcd with this gives H. erectus a reproductive advan-
expansion of the fetal, infant, and even the tage over other hominoids. With this advan-
juvenile periods. However, further extension tage it is easier to understand why popula-
of infancy may have placed a severe demo- tion size and the geographic range of H.
graphic constraint on H. habilis populations. erectus expand beyond that of all prior
Female primates, including humans, cannot hominids.
reproduce a new infant successfully if they There is evidence that early H. erectus did
are still nursing their current infant. Chim- not have a n adolescent growth spurt. Smith
panzees, for example, average 5.5 years be- (1993) analyzed the skeleton and dentition
70% B. BOGIN AND B. HOLLY SMITH
20
18
16 U Infancy
m
CI 14
a
4 Childhood
g 12
a 10
# Juvenile
.r(
0 8 Adolescent
: = Adult
4
Fig. 5. The evolution of hominid life histoiy during the first 20 ycars oflife. Abbreviated nomenclature
as follows: A. afar, Australopithecus afarensis; A. africa, Aiistralopithecus ajrimnus; H. habilis, Homo
hahilis; H. ercc. 1, early Homo erectus; 11. erec. 2. latc Homo erectum; H. sapiens, Homo supien.s.
of the fossil specimen KMN-WT 15000 (the likely to require a n adolescent stage of devel-
“Turkana boy”), a 1.6 million year old (early) opment in order to become a successful adult
H. erectus skeleton. Using data for skeletal member of society (see below for explana-
growth and maturation of living apes and tion). The transition to archaic and finally
humans, Smith (1993) developed a model of modern H. sapiens expands the childhood
H. erectus skeletal growth and maturation, and adolescent stages t o their current di-
in which a €3. erectus youth of 14.5 years mensions.
would be entering young adulthood and was
comparable in maturation to a n 11.4-year- WHY DO NEW LIFE STAGES EVOLVE?
old chimpanzee and a n 18 to 21-year-old Bonner (1965)has developed the idea that
modern human. The Turkana boy, who was the stages of the life cycle of a n individual
probably less than 11 years of age a t death, organism, a colony, o r a society are “. . .the
was “too advanced” in skeletal development basic unit of natural selection.” Bonner’s fo-
to have followed a modern human pattern cus on life cycle stages follows in the tradi-
of growth. Smith (1993) concludes that, ‘‘[the tion of many of the 19th century embryolo-
‘Turkana boy’s’] dental age, skeletal age, and gists who proposed that speciation is often
body size are quite consistent with the idea achieved by altering rates of growth of ex-
that the adolescent growth spurt had not isting life stages and by adding or deleting
yet evolved in Homo erectus. . .(butj.. .the stages. Bonner shows that the presence o f a
unique skeleton of KMN-WT 15000 stands stage and its duration in the life cycle relate
a t a point near the very beginning.. .of to such basic adaptations a s locomotion, re-
the evolution of human life history” (pp. productive rates, and food acquisition. From
2 18-219). this theoretical perspective, it is profitable
Late H. erectus, with adult brain sizes up t o view the evolution of human childhood
to 1,100 cc, is depicted in Figure 5 with fur- and adolescence as adaptations for both
ther expansion of childhood and the inser- feeding and reproduction.
tion of thc adolescent stage. Along with big- Figure 6 depicts several honiinoid devel-
ger brains, late H. erectus shows increased opmental landmarks. In comparison with
complexity of technology (tools, fire, and living apes, people experience develop-
shelter) and social organization that were mental delays in eruption of the first perma-
EVOLUTION OF LIFE CYCLE 709
cepted definition of menopause is “. . .the Pavelka and Fedigan (1991) found that
sudden or gradual cessation of the men- menopause is a virtually universal human
strual cycle subsequent t o the loss of ovarian female characteristic and that menopause
function. . .” (Timiras, 1972, p. 531). The pro- occurs a t approximately 50 years of age in
cess of menopause is closely associated with all human populations. In contrast, Pavelka
the adult female post-reproductive stage of and Fedigan note that wild-living nonhu-
life, but menopause is distinct from the post- man primate females do not share the uni-
reproductive stage. Reproduction usually versality of human menopause, and human
ends before menopause. In traditional socie- males have no comparable life history event.
ties, such a s the !Kung (Howell, 1979), the In a review of data for all mammals, Austad
Dogon of Mali (B. Strassman, personal com- (1994, p. 255) finds that no wild-living spe-
munication), and the rural-living Maya of cies except, possibly, pilot whales, “. . .are
Guatemala (Minesterio de Salud Publica, known to commonly exhibit reproductive
1989),women rarely give birth after 40 years cessation.. .” Female primates studied in
of age and almost never give birth after 44 captivity, including langurs, baboons, rhesus
years. Menopause, however, occurs after age macaques, pigtailed macaques, and chim-
45 in these three societies. In the United panzees, usually continue estrus cycling un-
States, from 1960 to 1990, data for all births til death, although there are fertility de-
show that women 45-49 years gave birth to clines with age (Fedigan and Pavelka, 1994).
fewer than 1 out of 1,000 live born infants. These declines are best interpreted a s a nor-
In contrast, there were 16.1/1,000 live births mal part of aging. The review of Fedigan and
to women aged 40-44 years (National Center Pavelka (1994)finds that one captive bonobo
for Health Statistics, 1994). Similar patterns over 40 years old (Gould et al., 1981) and
of birth are found for the Old Order Amish, one captive pigtail macaque over 20 years old
a high fertility, noncontracepting population (Graham et al., 1979) ceased estrus cycling.
residing primarily in the states of Pennsyl- These two very old animals showed changes
vania, Ohio, and Indiana. Amish women in hormonal profiles similar to human meno-
aged 45-49 years born before 1918 gave pause and on autopsy had depleted all oo-
birth to a n average of 13 infants per 1,000 cytes. Finally, Pavelka and Fedigan (1991)
married women, while women between 40 point out that, in contrast to the senescent
and 44 years of age gave birth to an average decline in fertility of other female primates,
of 118 infants per 1,000 married women the human female reproductive system is
(Ericksen e t al., 1979). Thus, even in the abruptly “shut down” well before other sys-
United States of 1960-1990, with modern tems of the body which usually experience
health care, good nutrition, and low levels a gradually decline toward senescence.
of hard physical labor, and even among social Moreover, women may live for decades after
groups attempting t o maximize lifetime fer- oocyte depletion (menopause), but other fe-
tility, women rarely give birth after age 45 male primates die before or just after oo-
years. As for the !Kung, Dogon, and Maya, cyte depletion.
menopause occurs well after this fertility de- Figure 7 illustrates the timing of the onset
cline, a t a mean age of 49 years for United of the adult female post-reproductive stage
States women (Pavelka and Fedigan, 1991). and menopause in the context of the evolu-
After age 50, births are so rare that they tion of human life history. Again, a s for
are not reported in the data of the National Figure 5, the data for fossil hominids are
Center for Health Statistics or for the Amish. speculative and extrapolated, in part, from
These ages for the onset of human female evidence provided by extant chimpanzees
post-reproductive life vs. the ages for meno- and human beings. Nishida et al. (1990) re-
pause are given for two reasons. The first is port that wild-living female chimpanzees
that some scholars incorrectly equate meno- give birth to their last offsprng in their late
pause with the beginning of the post-repro- 30s or early 40s. They may then experience
ductive stage. The second reason is that between 2.5-9.5 years (median = 3.9 years)
menopause and a significant period of life of post-reproductive life, but most of these
after menopause are claimed by some schol- females continue estrus cycles until death.
ars to be uniquely human characteristics. Based on these findings, a median age of 40
Other scholars assert that menopause is a years for the onset of the chimpanzee post-
shared trait with other mammals. reproductive stage is used for Figure 7. At
I n a review of menopause from a compara- the other end of the range are human fe-
tive primate and evolutionary perspective, males. The data available from industrial-
712 B. BOGIN AND B. HOLLY SMITH
90 =7
85
80 UInfancy
75
70
65 Childhood
60
55 Juvenile
50
45
40 Adolescent
35
30
25
a Adult 9
reproductive
20
15 Adult 0 post
10 reproductive
5
0
Fig. 7. The evolution or human remale life history emphasizing lhe post-reproductive stage. Life
expectancy estimated by the formula of Smith i1991b). The arrow above theH. sapiens column represents
Sacher’s (1975) estimate of maximum longevity t n 89 years. Increased human longevity extends the
post-reproductive stage, not earlier stages of the life cycle. Abbreviations as i n Figure 5.
ized nations and a few traditional societies longevity and is being approached by popula-
provide mean ages of menopause from 48 to tions of’ the most highly industrialized na-
51 years (Timiras, 1972; Pavelka and Fedi- tions. Smith’s (1991b) formula is also used
gan, 1991),and as noted, virtually no womcn for prediction of life expectancy for fossil spe-
over age 50 give birth. Accordingly, 50 years cies. The predictions are hypothetical and
is used a s a representativc age for mcno- are based on the best available estimates of
pause and also the maximum age for onset body and brain weight.
of the human female post-reproductive Age at onset of the post-reproductive stage
stage. It is also proposed that 50 years is the for female fossil hominids is based on an
effective upper limit for the age at meno- extrapolation between known mean ages for
pause (oocyte depletion) of hominoids in gen- chimpanzees and humans. A linear interpo-
eral, based upon the human condition and lation was used t o calculate the ages for the
the one known chimpanzee (bonobo) to expe- fossils. A curvilinear fit, a step function, or
rience menopause. some other discontinuous function may bet-
The estimates of life expectancy depicted ter represent the true nature of change in
in Figure 7 are based on regression formulae the age of onset of a post-reproductive life
developed by Smith (1991b). The formulae stage. Empirical research is needed to de-
predict life expectancy using data for body termine the best model. It is possible that
and brain weight. The estimates for the empirical evidence for evolution of the
chimpanzee (43 years) and for H. sapiens (66 post-reproductive stage for women will be
years) accord well with data for wild chim- recoverable from the fossil rccord because
panzees (the maximum lifespan of captive the hormonal changes associatcd with meno-
chimpanzees is 50 years) and traditional hu- pause have profound effects on the bone
man societies (e.g., Nishida et al., 1990 for mass and histology of tubular bones. Ac-
chimps; Nee1 and Wciss, 1970; Howell, 1979 cording to Garn (19701, there is a gain of
for humans). The H. aapiens column also in- bone mass and an increase in deposition on
cludes a n extension of predicted life expec- the endosteal surface of tubular bones dur-
tancy to 89 years. This estimate is based on ing the “steroid mediation phase” of life, e.g.,
the formula of Sacher (1975) for maximum during adolescence and reproductive adult-
EVOLUTION OF LIFE CYCLE 713
tal development, but suspend the meiotic vive to a post-reproductive stage. There are
division of the eggs in anaphase. Approxi- some exceptional species, e.g., hyenas.
mately 1million primary oocytes may be pro- Grandmother caretaking occurs in this spe-
duced, but most degenerate, so that in the cies, including the nursing of grandoffspring.
case of female humans only about 400 are Indeed, when both are still fertile, mother
available for reproduction. During human and daughter hyenas take turns nursing
adolescence and adulthood, the remaining each other’s young (Mills, 1990). I t is not
primary oocytes complete their maturation known if this practice is widespread in other
and are released in series during menstrual social carnivores. Nevertheless, the point is
cycles. By about age 50, all of these eggs are that when females do survive regularly past
depleted. If the woman lives beyond the age the reproductive stage of life, the basis for
of depletion she will experience menopause. affiliative behaviors, including some grand-
The physiological connection between oocyte mother interaction and care of young, exists
depletion and the hormonal changes of in social mammals.
menopause has yet to be elucidated. How- During hominid evolution, a post-repro-
ever, the pleiotropy hypothesis does account ductive life stage of’significant duration and
for the observation that few female mam- menopause became commonplace a s life ex-
mals reproduce after 40-50 years of age, pectancy increased beyond 50 years. It is not
even though some species, such as humans, known when this occurred, but needs to be
may live another 25 or 50 years. investigated. The regular occurrence of a
Menopause and the post-reproductive life post-reproductive female hominid life stage
stage of women are, then, a n inevitable con- would select for females (and males?) of the
sequence of the age-limited reproductive ca- species to develop biocultural strategies to
pacities of all female mammals. However, take greatest advantage of this situation.
even if menopause is a pleiotropic conse- Viewed in this context, human grandmoth-
quence of mammalian reproduction, grand- erhood may be added to human childhood
motherhood may still be a n important bio- and adolescence as distinctive stages of the
logical and sociocultural stage in the human human life cycle.
female life cycle. The universality of human
menopause makes it possible to develop bio- LITERATURE CITED
cultural models to support a combination of Ntmann d (1980) Baboon Mothers and Infants. Cam-
the pleiotropy and “grandmother’) hypothe- bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
ses. Basically, if a 50-year age barrier exists Austad SN (19941Menopause: An evolutionary perspec-
to female fertility, then the only reproductive tive. Exp. Gerontol. 29255-263.
Bertalanffy L von (1960) Principlcs and theory of
strategy open to women living past that age growth. In WN Kowinski (ed.): Fundamental Aspects
is to provide increasing amounts of aid to of Normal and Malignant Growth. Amsterdam: Else-
their children and their grandchildren. This vier, pp. 137-259.
strategy is compatible with Hamilton’s kin Klurton Jones NG (1993)The lives ofhunter-gatherchil-
selection hypothesis. Kin selection alone, dren: Effects of parental behavior and parental rcpro-
ductive strategy. In ME Periera, and LA Fairbanks
however, cannot account for the evolution of (eds.): ,Juvenile Primates. Oxford: Oxford University
menopause or grandmotherhood. A biocul- Press, pp. 309-326.
tural model for the evolution of grandmoth- Bogin B (1988) Patterns of Human Growth. New York:
erhood that combines the pleiotropy and kin Cambridge University Press.
selection hypotheses is proposed. In favor of Bogin B (1990) The evolution of human childhood. Bio-
science. 40:16-25.
the biocultural model is the ethnographic Bogin B 11993) Why must I be a teenager a t all? New
evidence showing that significant numbers Sci. 137r34-38.
of women in virtually every society, tradi- Bogin B ( 1994)Adolescence in evolutionary perspective.
tional or industrial, live for many years after Acta Paediatr. (Suppl.)406%-35.
menopause. Moreover, the ethnographic evi- Ronner J T (19653 Size and Cycle. Piinccton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
dence also shows that grandmothers and Cabana T, Jolicoeur P, and Michaud J (1993) Prenatal
other post-reproductive women are benefi- and postnatal growth and allometry of stature, head
cial to the survival of children in many hu- circumference, and brain w i g-h t in Qubbec children.
man societies. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 5:93-99.
Little comparative mammalian data on Cameron N, Tanner J M , and Whitehouse RH (1982‘1A
longitudinal analysis of the growth of limb scgments
the value of grandmotherhood exist because in adolescence, Ann, Hum. Biol, 9,211-220,
the ofwi1d-living species of primates Carlson DS, Armelagos GJ, and Van Gerven I)P (1976)
and other social mammals only rarely sur- Patterns of age-related cortical bone loss (osteoporo-
EVOLUTION OF LIFE CYCLE 715
sis) within the femoral diaphysis. Hum. Biol 48: mal accuracy and the evolution of aging. In TBL Kirk-
295-314. wood, RF Kosenberger, and DJ Galas (eds.):Accuracy
Charlesworth B (1980) Evolution in Age-Structured in Molecular Processes. New York Chapman and Hall,
Populations. Cambridge: Cambridge University pp. 363-379.
Press. Lancaster JB, and Lancaster CS ( I 983) Parental invest-
Coelho AM (1985) Bahoon dimorphism: Growth in ment: The honiinid adaptation. In DJ Ortncr ied.):
weight, length, and adiposity from birth to 8 years of How Humans Adapt. Washington, DC: Sinithsonian
age. In ES Watls (ed.):Nonhuman Primate Models for Institution Press, pp. 33-65.
Human Growth. New York: Alan R. Liss, pp. 125-169. Largo RH, Gasser Th, Prader A, StutzleW, and Huher PJ
Dettwyler KA (1994)A time to wean: The hominid blue- ( 1978) Analysis of thc adolescent growth spurt using
print [or the natural age of weaning in modern human smoothing spline functions. Ann. Rum. Biol. 5:421-
populations. Am. J . Phys. Anthropol. (Suppl.) 18:80 434.
(abstract). Leonard WR. and Kohertson MI, (1992) Nutritional re-
Ericksen JA, Ericksen EP, IIostctler JA, and Huntington quirements and human evolution: A bioenergetics
GE (1979) Fertility patterns and trends among the model. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 4:179-195.
Old Order Amish. Popul. Stud. 33:255-276. Martin RD 11983)Human brain evolution in an ecologi-
Estioko-Griffin A (1986)Daughters of the forest. Natural cal context. New York: American Museiim of Xatu-
History 95:36-43. ral History.
Pedigan LM and Pavelka MSM (1994)The physical an- Medawar PB (1952) An Unsolved Problem in Biology.
thrnpology ormenopause. In A Herring and MSM Pa- London: HK Lewis.
velka (eds):Strength in Diversity. Toronto: Canadian Mills MGL I 1990) Kalahari Hyenas. London: Unwin
Scholars Press, pp. 103-126. IIyman.
Galdikas BM, and Wood JW 11990) Birth spacing pat- Ministerio de Salud Publica (1989) Encuesta Nacional
terns in humans and apes. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. de Salud Materno Infantil 1987. Guatemala City:
Mr185-191. Minesterio dc Salud Publica.
Garu SM (1970) The Earlier Gain and Later Loss o€ Muller J, Nielsen CT, and Skaklrehaek NE (~19891 Testic-
Cortical Bone in Nutritional Perspective. Springfield, ular maturation and pubertal growth and devclop-
IL: Charles C. Thomas. ment in normal boys. In J M Tanner and MA Preece
Goodall J (1983) Population dynamics during a 15 year (eds.):The Physiology of Human Growth. Cambridge:
period in one community of free-living chimpanzees Cambridge University Press, pp. 201-207.
in the Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Zeit. Tierpsy-
chol. fiZ:l-60. National Center for Health Statistics (1994)Vital Statis-
tics of the LJnited States, Vol. 1, Natality. Washington,
Gould KG, Flint M, and Graham CE (1981) Chimpanzee DC: Public Health Service.
reproductive senesence: A possible model for the evo-
lution of the menopause. Maturitas 3:157-166. Nee1 JV,and Weiss K (1975) The genetic structure of a
tribal population, the Yanomamo Indians. Biodemo-
Graham CE, Kling OR, and Steiner RA (1979)Rcproduc- graphic studies X I . Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 4225-52.
tive senescence in female nonhuman primates. In DJ
Bowden (ed.): Aging in Nonhuman Primates. New Nishida T,TakasakiH, andTakahataY (1990)Demogra-
York: Van Noslrand Reinhold, pp. 183-209. phy and 1-eproductivcprofiles. In T Nishida (ed.): The
Halpern CT, Udry R J , Campbell €3, and Suchinddran Chimpanzees o f the Mahale Mountains: Sexual and
C (1993): Testosterone and pubertal development as Life History Strategies. Tokyo: University of Tokyo
predictors of sexual activity: A panel analysis of ado- Press, pp. 63-97.
lescent males. Psychosom. Med. 55;436-447. Pavelka MSM, and Fedigan LM (1991) Menopause: A
Hamilton W 11966I The moulding of senescence by natu- comparative life history perspective. Yrhk. Phys. An-
ral selection. J. Theor. Biol. 12:12-45. thropol. 34:13-38.
IIarvey PH, Martin RD, and Clutton-Brock TH (1987) Pereira ME, and Altmann J (1985)Development ofsocial
Life histories i n cornparativc perspective. In BB behavior in frce-living nonhuman primates. In ES
Smuts, DL Chency, RM Seyfarth, RW Wrangham, and Watts (ed): Nonhuman Primate Models for Human
TT Struhsaker (eds.):Primat.e Societies. Chicago: 1Jni- Growth and Development. New York: Alan R. Liss,
versity of Chicago Press, pp. 181-196. pp. 21 7-309.
Hewlitt BS (1991I Intimate Fathers: The Nature and Pctersen AC, and Taylor €3 (1980) The biological ap-
Context ofAka Pygmy Paternal Care. Ann Arbor, MI: proaeh to adolescence: Biological change and psycho-
University o f Michigan Press. logical adaptation. In J Adelson (ed.i: Handbook of
Higham K (1980) Variations in adolescent psychohor- Adolescent Psychology New York: Wiley, pp. 117-155.
munal development. In J Adelson (ed.): Handbook of Piaget J , and Inhelder B (1969): The Psychology o r lhe
Adolescent Psychology. New York: Wiley, pp. 472-494. Child. New York: Basic Rooks.
Hill K, and HurtadoAR (1991): The evolution ofprema- Potts R 11988)Early Hominid Activities at Oldnvai. New
ture reproductive senescence and menopause in hu- York: Aldinc de Gruyter.
man females: An evaluation of the “Grandmother Hy- Prader A (1984)Biomedicaland endocrinological aspects
pothesis.” Hum. Nature 2:319-350. of normal growth and development. In J Rornis, R
Howell N (1979) Demography of the Dobe !Kung. New Hauspie, ASand, C Susanne, and M Hebbelinck (eds.):
York: Academic Press. Human Growth and Development.New York: Plenum,
Jaswal S (1983) Age and sequence of permanent tooth pp. 1-22.
emergence among Khasis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 62: Ruff CR (1991)Aging and Osteoporosis in Native Ameri-
177-186. cans from Pecos Pueblo, New Mexico: Behavioral and
Kirkwood TBL (19771 Evolution of aging. Nature 270: Biomechanical Eflbcts. New York: Garland.
301-304. Ruff CB, Tnnkhaus E, Walker A, and Larsen CS (7993)
Kirkwood TBL, and Holliday R i 1986) Selection for opti- Postcranial robusticity in Homo. I: Temporal trends
716 B. BOGIN AND B. HOLLY SMITH
and mechanical interpretation. Am. J. Phys. Anthro- Tcleki GE, Hunt E, and Pfifferling J H (1976) Demo-
pol. 9 1 2 - 5 3 . gaphic observations (1963-19733 on the chimpanzees
Sacher GA (19753 Maturation and longevity in rclation of the Gombe National Park, Tanzania. J. Hum.
to cranial capacity in hominid cvolution. In R Tuttle Evol. 5559-598.
(ed.): Primate Functional Morphology and Evolution. Timirat;YS (1972)Developmental Physiology and Aging.
The Hague: Mouton, pp. 417-441. MacMillan: New York.
Scammon RE (1930) The measurcment of the body in Trinkaus E, Churchill SE, and Ruff CB ( 1994) Postcra-
childhood. In JA Harris, CM Jackson, DG Paterson, nial rohusticity in Horrio. 11: Humeral bilatcral asym-
and RE Scammon (eds.): Thc Measurement of Man. metry and bone plasticity. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 93:1-34.
173-2 15. Watts DP. and Puscy AE 11993) Behavior of juvenile
Shea BT (1990)Dynamic morphology: Growth, life his- and adolescent great apes. In ME Pereira and LA
tory, and ecology in primate evolution. In CJ DeRous- Fairbanks (cds.): Juvenile Primates. Oxford: Oxford
seau (ed.): Primate Life History and Evolution. New IJniversity Press, pp. 148-170.
York: Wiley-Liss, pp. 325-352. Watts ES, and Gavan JA (1982) Postnatal growth of
Simon5 EL (1989) Human origins. Science 245: nonhuman primates: The problcm of the adolesecnt
1343-1 350. spurt. Hum. Biol. 5453-70.
Smith BH (1991a) Agc at weaning approximates agc of Weisner TS (1987) Socialization for parenthood in sih-
erncrgence ofthe first permanent molar in non-human ling carctaking societies. In J B Lancaster, J Ntmann,
primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. (Suppl.) 12:163- AS Rossi, and LR Sherrod 1eds.l Parenting Across the
164 (abstract). Lifc Span: Biosocial Dimensions. New York: Aldine de
SmithBH(1991b)1)entaldevelopmentand theevolution Gruyter, pp. 237-270.
of' life history in Hominidae. Am. J. Phys. Anthro- Williams GC 11957)Pleiotropy, natural selection and the
pol. 86t157-174. evolution of senescence. Evolution I f 398-411.
Smith BH (19921Life history and the evolution ofhuman Worthman C (1986) Developmental dyssynchrony as
maturation. Evol. Anthropol. I :134-142. normativc experience: Kikuyu adolescents. In J Lan-
Smith BH 11993) Physiological age of KMN-WT 15000. caster and BA Hamburg (cds.): School-age Prcgnancy
In AC Walker and RF Leakey (eds.):The Nariokotome and Parenthood: Biosocial Dimensions. Ncw York: Al-
Homo w e d u s Skeleton. Cambridge, MA. Bclknap dine de Gruyter, pp. 95-112.
Press, pp. 195-220.
Tanner J M (1962) Growth a t Adolesccnce. 2nd edition.
Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.