The document discusses the philosophical foundation of the 20th century compared to the 19th century. In the 19th century, there was too much trust in science, reason, and the human mind. Hegel's philosophy had faith in reason but distinguished between subjective spirit (individual consciousness) and objective spirit (rationality in society). For Hegel, individual reason is not fundamental; society shapes subjective spirit. The 20th century critique of reason is different because we are no longer confident that any single idea or philosophy can fully explain reality.
The document discusses the philosophical foundation of the 20th century compared to the 19th century. In the 19th century, there was too much trust in science, reason, and the human mind. Hegel's philosophy had faith in reason but distinguished between subjective spirit (individual consciousness) and objective spirit (rationality in society). For Hegel, individual reason is not fundamental; society shapes subjective spirit. The 20th century critique of reason is different because we are no longer confident that any single idea or philosophy can fully explain reality.
Original Description:
Short essay on Gadamer's critique against metaphysics
The document discusses the philosophical foundation of the 20th century compared to the 19th century. In the 19th century, there was too much trust in science, reason, and the human mind. Hegel's philosophy had faith in reason but distinguished between subjective spirit (individual consciousness) and objective spirit (rationality in society). For Hegel, individual reason is not fundamental; society shapes subjective spirit. The 20th century critique of reason is different because we are no longer confident that any single idea or philosophy can fully explain reality.
The document discusses the philosophical foundation of the 20th century compared to the 19th century. In the 19th century, there was too much trust in science, reason, and the human mind. Hegel's philosophy had faith in reason but distinguished between subjective spirit (individual consciousness) and objective spirit (rationality in society). For Hegel, individual reason is not fundamental; society shapes subjective spirit. The 20th century critique of reason is different because we are no longer confident that any single idea or philosophy can fully explain reality.
What is the philosophical foundation of the 20th century?
- We are no longer confident that there is an idea – be all, end all.
19th century: Trust (almost too much) in science/ reason/ human mind Philosophy had to confer on the achievement on science Hegel philosophy Faith in reason (this reason refers to human understanding, this faith has to pass the criterion of reason) Hegel made a distinction of reason Subjective spirit ( subjective consciousness) Objective spirit ( rationality outside the subjective rationality, the rationality of society) The very formation of rationality (subjective spirit) unless you are part of the objective society. It is not like enlightenment where individuals enters into a contract, but it is a society first, that brings formation to your subjective spirit. Individual reason is not the primordial We could read the history as the story of reconciliation of these two. E.g. the fall of man. Without that fruit of knowledge, we are actually part of everything, but when we ate the fruit of knowledge, we come to be conscious of our own existence. Social order – it is the reconciliation of the two spirit. Sooner or later, it will stumble, hence, need another social order. Time will come, I will see the society as a mirror of myself. This refers to absolute spirit. NATURE x(irreconcilable)x SPIRIT = object + subject How is our (20th century) critique of reason different from Hegel’s (19th century critique of reason?