Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Exp 2 Head Loss Through Fittings
Exp 2 Head Loss Through Fittings
TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY: FLUID
REVISION NO:
MECHANICS
DATE
GROUP NO.
LECTURER/INSTRUCTOR/ 1)
TUTOR 2)
DATE OF REPORT
SUBMISSION
ATTENDANCE/PARTICIPATION/DISCIPLINE: /5%
INTRODUCTION: /5%
PROCEDURE: /5%
RESULTS& CALCULATIONS /15%
ANALYSIS /15%
DISTRIBUTION OF MARKS
FOR LABORATORY DISCUSSIONS: /20%
REPORT: ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS /15%
CONCLUSION /10%
SUGGESTIONS& RECOMENDATIONS /5%
REFERENCES: /5%
TOTAL: /100%
(KEP)
JABATAN TEKNOLOGI KEJURUTERAAN KIMIA
Saya dengan ini mengaku bahawa saya telah menyediakan laporan ini dengan daya usaha
saya sendiri. Saya juga mengaku tidak menerima atau memberi sebarang bantuan dalam
menyediakan laporan ini dan membuat ikrar ini dengan kepercayaan bahawa apa-apa yang
Ketua Nama:
(Tandatangan)
Ahli 1 Nama:
No. Matriks:
(Tandatangan)
Ahli 2 Nama:
No. Matriks:
(Tandatangan)
Ahli 3 Nama:
No. Matriks:
(Tandatangan)
1.0 OBJECTIVE
To determine the head loss associated with flow of water through standard fittings used in plumbing installations
Demonstrate the ability to conduct experiments related to fluid flow by following standard operating
procedure effectively in a group.
This apparatus is designed to allow the detailed study of the fluid friction head losses which occur when an incompressible fluid
flows through pipes, bends, valves and pipe flow metering devices. Friction head losses in straight pipes of different sizes can be
investigated over a range of Reynolds’ numbers from 103 to nearly 105, thereby covering the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow
regimes in smooth pipes. In addition, an artificially roughened pipe is supplied which, at the higher Reynolds’ numbers, shows a
clear departure from the typical smooth bore pipe characteristics. Pipe friction is one of the classic laboratory experiments and has
always found a place in the practical teaching of fluid mechanics. The results and underlying principles are of the greatest
importance to engineers in the aeronautical, civil, mechanical, marine, agricultural and hydraulic fields.
Osborne Reynolds distinguished between laminar and turbulent flow in pipes in his publication in 1883. Ludwig Prandtl, Thomas
Stanton and Paul Blasius later analysed pipe flow data in the early part of this century and produced the plot known as the Stanton
diagram. John Nikuradse extended the work to cover the case of rough pipes and one such pipe supplied with this equipment has
been roughened for flow comparison purposes. In addition to the equipment for the study of losses in straight pipes, a wide range
of accessories is available including pipe fittings and control valves, digital flow meter, a venturi tube and an orifice plate assembly.
FACULTY: ENGINEERING EDITION:
TECHNOLOGY
LABORATORY: FLUID
REVISION NO:
MECHANICS
A piping installation consists of various fittings such as bends, elbows, tees and valves that form obstructions to flow. Head
loss in a pipe fitting is proportional to the velocity head of the fluid flowing through the fittings.
K u2
H
2g
(1)
Where,
H = Head loss across fittings (mH2O)
K = Fittings Factor
u = Mean velocity of water through the pipe (m/s)
g = 9.81 (acceleration due to gravity m/s2)
5.0 PROCEDURES
Test Section:
a. A 45o elbow
b. A 45o “Y”(135o flow, 180o flow)
c. A 90o “T”(90o flow, 180o flow)
d. A sudden enlargement
e. A sudden contraction
f. An in-line strainer
g. A gate valve (Fully opened, 1 turn, 2 turns)
h. A globe valve (Fully opened, 1 turn, 2 turns)
Procedures:
Velocity
Flowrate, Velocity,
Head, Head loss,
Q u K
hv h Valve Position
(m3/s) (m/s)
(mH2O) (mH2O) (for valves)
V x 10-3 4Q h/hv
u2 0.0126 H
T d2
2g
1. Confirm that K is a constant for each fitting over the range of test flow rates.
2. Plot a graph of K factor against valve opening for each test valve. Note the differences in characteristic.
Signature / Tandatangan :
Signature/Tandatangan:
Name / Nama : PM. DR. ANGZZAS SARI
Name/Nama: DR. NOR FAIZAH BINTI RAZALI
BINTI MOHD KASSIM
Date/Tarikh :
Date / Tarikh :