Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PHD Lecture11 12
PHD Lecture11 12
PHD Lecture11 12
David Vegh
30 January 2019
1 Lagrangian mechanics
Invented by George Atwood in 1784 to verify the mechanical law of motion with constant acceleration.
• Constraint: x1 + x2 = 0
• 1 degree of freedom
• generalized coordinate: x ≡ x1 = −x2
1 1 1
T = m1 ẋ21 + m2 ẋ22 = (m1 + m2 )ẋ2
2 2 2
V = m1 gx1 + m2 gx2 = (m1 − m2 )gx
1
L=T −V = (m1 + m2 )ẋ2 − (m1 − m2 )gx
2
The Euler-Lagrange equation:
d ∂L ∂L
− = (m1 + m2 )ẍ + (m1 − m2 )g = 0
dt ∂ ẋ ∂x
and thus
m1 − m2
ẍ = − g
m1 + m2
No constraint forces (tension) appear.
1
1.2 Example: A bead sliding on a uniformly rotating wire
An example of time-dependent constraints.
x = r cos ωt
y = r sin ωt
2
2 Curvilinear coordinates
Let us recall a few examples for curvilinear coordinate systems. These will be useful as generalised coordi-
nates.
3
• Components of the hatted vectors are
Finally,
φ̂ = (− sin φ, cos φ, 0)
r̂ · θ̂ = r̂ · φ̂ = θ̂ · φ̂ = 0
and that r̂ · (θ̂ × φ̂) = +1, i.e. they form a right-handed frame.
~ = m~r × ~r˙ = mrr̂ × (ṙr̂ + rθ̇θ̂ + r sin θ φ̇φ̂) = mr2 (θ̇ r̂ × θ̂ + sin θ φ̇ r̂ × φ̂) = mr2 θ̇φ̂ − mr2 sin θ φ̇θ̂
L
| {z } | {z }
φ̂ −θ̂
4
2.3 Cylindrical coordinates
~r = (ρ cos φ, ρ sin φ, z)
1 ˙2 1 1
T = m~r = m(ẋ2 + ẏ 2 + ż 2 ) = m(ρ̇2 + ρ2 φ̇2 + ż 2 )
2 2 2
5
Let us look at some examples of Lagrangian mechanics using these coordinate systems.
pz = mż = const.
• for ρ:
d ∂L ∂L
=
dt ∂ ρ̇ ∂ρ
mρ̈ = mρφ̇2
| {z }
centrifugal force
• for φ:
d ∂L ∂L
= =0 cyclic coordinate
dt ∂ φ̇ ∂φ
pφ = mρ2 φ̇ = const. ≡ l
6
Plugging this into the E-L equation for ρ,
2
l2
l
mρ̈ = mρ =
mρ2 mρ3
7
Thus,
2 2
1 ~˙ 2 1 m2 1 m1 1 ~˙ 2 1 m1 m2 ˙ 2
T = M R + m1 − ~r˙ + m2 ~r˙ = MR + ~r
2 2 m1 + m2 2 m1 + m2 2 2 m1 + m2
and we get
1 ~˙ 2 1 ˙ 2
T = M R + µ~r
2 2
m1 m2
where µ ≡ m1 +m2 is the reduced mass.
Assume that the potential depends only on the relative position: V = V (~r). Then,
1 ~˙ 2 1 ˙ 2
Ltotal = M R + µ~r − V (~r)
|2 {z } |2 {z }
~˙
LCOM (R) Lrel (~ r˙ )
r ,~
Note that the COM motion and the relative motion decouple from each other.
Explicitly,
~
• E-L equation for R:
d ∂L ∂L ~¨ = 0 :
= =0 ⇒ MR trivial inertial motion
˙~
dt ∂ R ~
∂R
The two-body problem thus reduces to a one-body problem. The #DoF has been reduced to 3.
8
Take polar coordinates (r, φ) on the plane of motion.
1
L=T −V = µ(ṙ2 + r2 φ̇2 ) − V (r)
2
Claim: pφ = Lz .
Proof:
~r = (r cos φ, r sin φ, 0)
~r˙ = (ṙ cos φ − r sin φ φ̇, ṙ sin φ + r cos φ φ̇, 0)
Let’s take the cross-product,
~r × ~r˙ = (0, 0, r2 φ̇)
~ = ~r × µ~r˙ = (0, 0, µr2 φ̇)
L
so indeed Lz = pφ .
9
3.3 Reduction to one-dimensional problem
Energy is conserved,
µ 2
E =T +V = (ṙ + r2 φ̇2 ) + V (r)
2
l
using φ̇ = µr 2 from eqn. (1),
2
l2
1 1 l 1 2
E = µṙ2 + µr2 + V (r) = µṙ + + V (r)
2 2 µr2 2 2µr2
or
1 2 l2
E= µṙ + Veff (r) Veff (r) = V (r) +
2 2µr2
• This is the expression for the energy of a particle in one dimension with potential Veff .
• The 2d problem has been reduced to a 1d problem (#DoF: 6 → 3 → 2 → 1)
• The extra “force” is
l2 l2
d
− =
dr 2µr2 µr3
This is nothing but the centrifugal force
µv 2 l l2
Fcf = , v = rφ̇ = ⇒ Fcf =
r µr µr3
The Newton equation is
l2
µr̈ = − V 0 (r)
µr3
l
Note: It would have been incorrect to replace φ̇ in the Lagrangian by φ̇ = µr 2 as we did in the formula
2
l WRONG
for the energy. This would lead to a wrong effective potential = V (r) − 2µr Veff (r)
2 which has the
wrong sign for the second term. This is because the Lagrangian formulation assumes that the dynamical
variables are independent (see p. 140 of Hand & Finch).
10