303 Manalang v. Quitorano

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

MANALANG v. QUITORANO ISSUE: Whether or not Republic Act No.

761 abolished the Placement


Bureau.
Topic: Restrictions to the Power of Congress to Prescribe Qualifications

FACTS: HELD: NO.

The original respondent was Aurelio Quitoriano, who, at the time of the RA 761 is one of legislative intent, about which there can be no controversy
filing of the petition held said office by virtue of a designation made, in whatsoever, in view of the explicit declaration in the second paragraph of
his favor, as Acting Commissioner of the National Employment Service, by section 1 of said Act reading:
the Office of the President of the Philippines. Petitioner included, "Upon the organization of the Service, the existing Placement Bureau and
as respondents, Emiliano Morabe, who was designated Acting the existing Employment Office in the Commission of Social Welfare shall
commissioner of National Employment Service, and Zosimo G. Linato, be abolished, and all the files, records, supplies, equipment, qualified
the Collecting, Disbursing and Property Officer of said National personnel and unexpended. balances of appropriations of said Bureau and
Employment Service in order to restrain him from paying, to respondent Commission pertaining to said bureau or office shall thereupon
Morabe, the salary of the Commissioner of said Service. Still later, be transferred to the Service.”
Mohamad de Venancio, who was designated Acting Commissioner of
said Service, and assumed said office was included as respondent. To begin with, petitioner has never been Commissioner of the National
Employment Service and, hence, he could not have been, and has not been
Petitioner, Luis Manalang, was Director of the Placement Bureau, an removed therefrom.
office created by Executive Order No. 392.
Neither may petitioner profit by the provision of the second paragraph of
Republic Act No. 761, entitled "An Act to Provide for the Organization of a section 1 of Republic Act No. 761, concerning the transfer to the Service of
National Employment Service," the "qualified personnel" of the Placement Bureau and of the Employment
Office in the Commission of Social Welfare, because:
T h e t h e n S e c r e t a ry o f L a b o r , J o s e F i g u e ra s , re c o m m e n d e d
t h e appointment of petitioner Luis Manalang as Commissioner of the
Congress cannot either appoint the Commissioner of the Service, or impose
Service. On June 29, 1953, respondent Aurelio Quitoriano, then Acting
upon the President the duty to appoint any particular person to said office.
Secretary of Labor, made a similar recommendation in favor of Manalang,
The appointing power is the exclusive prerogative of the President, upon
upon the g r o u n d t h a t " h e i s b e s t q u a l i f i e d " a n d " l o y a l t o
which no limitations may be imposed by Congress, except those resulting
s e r v i c e a n d administration." Said Acting Secretary of Labor even
from the need of securing the concurrence of the Commission on
informed Manalang that he would probably be appointed to the office in
Appointments and from the exercise of the limited legislative power to
question. However, on July 1, 1953, Quitoriano was the one
prescribe the qualifications to a given appointive office.
designated, and sworn in, as Acting Commissioner of the Service.
Such designation of Quitoriano —like the subsequent designation,
first, of Emiliano Morabe, and the, of Mohamad de Venancio — is now
assailed by Manalang as "illegal" and equivalent to removal of the
petitioner from office without cause.

You might also like