Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lundberg - 1935 - Light From The Near East
Lundberg - 1935 - Light From The Near East
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Oxford University Press and Social Forces, University of North Carolina Press are collaborating with JSTOR
to digitize, preserve and extend access to Social Forces.
http://www.jstor.org
ColumbiaUniversity
of questions on these subjects; the thor- count, thus violating the most elementary
ough criticism of this list by clinic and fundamental scientific requirement,
physicians and nurses as well as by others; will appreciate the unusual character of
the trial of the schedule in the field and Dodd's work from this point of view alone.
resulting revisions. From this process While the methodological significance
there emerged the first complete form, a of this book is of far greater importance
schedule of 27o questions with approxi- than any contribution to the knowledge of
mately 2,ooo possible answers for check- contemporary hygiene in the Near East
ing. A detailed manual of instructions could possibly be, the author never allows
for interviewing with this schedule was himself to become so fascinated by meth-
also prepared. It was then administered odological considerations as to forget his
to 345 families in order to gain data for practical objectives. As a result, we have
still further improvement of the instru- here also an excellent account of one of the
ment. Frequency graphs for the scoresof culture complexes of Syria. I hasten to
eachof the 270 questionsfor eachof six sample reassure those who have been discouraged
populations were then studied to locate by my emphasis upon the scientific
ambiguous and subjective questions, and aspects of the work that there is also a
other defects in the schedule, as well as score of excellent photographs and much
for characteristics of the populations to be juicy "case" material. The important
studied and the reliability of the procedure difference between Professor Dodd's use
in general. On the basis of this experi- of this material and its current use in
ence and these data, subjected to the most surveys is that Dodd is fully aware of the
searching analysis, the final schedule, purely illustrative and entertainment value
abbreviated and corrected for all the of the episodes portrayed and at no time
defects of the first, was finally formulated. confuses them with his scientific data or
In short, no pains were spared to make the makes random incidents the basis of his
instrument as perfect as possible under the conclusions. This "warm," "human,"
circumstances; to measure the unreliabili- "interesting," "readable" material is
ties which remained; and, finally, to always kept in its proper place with
report every step in the process. The reference to the rigorous requirements of
full description of this procedure will scientific methods. When used in this
stand for a long time as a brilliant example way such material is, of course, very
of scientific technique in sociology. valuable. But too often a serious study
As a piece of scientific reporting alone is so deflected and diluted by a desire to
the book is notable. I do not recall cater to tabloid tastes as to destroy its
having encountered in the whole literature scientific value. Journalists, novelists,
of social research a superior account of and other sociological clairvoyants who
exactly what was done, the results achieved, are all too frequently scientifically illit-
and a full exhibit of the instrumentsused. erate are still regarded as proper reviewers
Sociologists will do well to consider the and critics of sociological monographs.
book from this point of view alone. Their lamentations about "worlds on
Those who have been urged by their paper," "encountering no human beings,"
university presses to eliminate even the and the failure of sociological writings to
more important statistical material and conform to the stereotypes of contem-
who have been compelled to exclude porary cartoons, are taken quite seriously
entirely an adequate methodological ac- and are not infrequently used by soci-