Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Soot in Combustion Systems: and Its Toxic Properties
Soot in Combustion Systems: and Its Toxic Properties
COMBUSTION
SYSTEMS
AND ITS TOXIC
PROPERTIES
NATO CONFERENCE SERIES
I Ecology
II Systems Science
III Human Factors
IV Marine Sciences
V Air-Sea InteractiollS
VI Materials Science
VI MATERIALS SCIENCE
Edited by
J. Lahaye
and
G. Prado
Center for Research on the
Physico-Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, C.N.R.S., and
University of Haute-Alsace
Mulhouse, France
v
vi PREFACE
J. Lahaye
G. Prado
November, 1981
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION SESSION
vii
viii CONTENTS
OPTICAL DIAGNOSTICS
INDEX,.......................................................................................................... 427
SOOT COMPONENTS AS GENETIC HAZARDS
William G. Thilly
M = l: C. A.
ill
Two forms of the assay were used. In the first form, bacteria
were present alone so that any catalytic activity modifying the
structure of chemicals in the sample would be due entirely to
enzymes of the bacteria. In the second form an extract of a
homogenate of rat liver was also added to mimic the metabolic
capabilities of mammalian tissue to perform a wide variety of
oxygenation and conjugation reactions with chemicals such as the
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In general, these bacteria do
not contain enzymes capable of causing reactions of relatively
inert polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to form more reactive
and mutagenic derivatives. Thus, the essence of liver is required
in order to observed the mutagenic activity of simple PAR in
bacterial cultures.
OBSE RVATIONS
The first thing that strikes one about the intended replicate
samples from the same burner using identical fuel and nearly identi-
cal excess air conditions is that they are not so physically similar
as to support an assumption of identity. For instance, the two
samples at the lowest smoke level (Table I) have ratios of extracted
material from the filter and resin bed to the particulate weight
of 0.6 and 0.4. In Table 1 (High), we note an approximate two-
fold variation on this parameter between two samples. One is also
interested in the wide variation in purposely duplicate runs in the
amount and distribution of extractable material among the filters
and the resins traps.
13. F 1.5 48 NA
0.002 0.8
X 3.9 43 NA
t F, filter; X, XAD-2 resin trap 01
6 W. G. THILLY
. .
Mu t agen~ c~ ty
t
Samp Ie mg Extract/ Wi thout With
No. g fuel Metabol. Metabol.
t ...
Mutagen~c~ty ~s the mutant fraction observed x 10+5 for
tt2 hour expo~ure to 150 ~g/ml extract.
NA--not act~ve; value less than 17 observed.
Recently, Ms. Barbara Andon has worked out a micro assay which
permits measuring mutation from each peak of HPLC output. Her
collaborative effort with the analytical chemist Ms. Julie Leary
now permits us to identify the most mutagenic fractions when only
13 ~g of a combined filter + XAD-2 extract from our oil burner
series was separated on HPLC. Some forty separate peaks were
eluted, and one was found to contain some 60% of the activity of
the samp~e with only four others containing significant amounts of
mutagenic activity. We expect this to be fruitful in future studies.
REFERENCES
DISCUSSION
Thilly
Thilly
Thi lly
Thi lly
What is the explanation for the fact that perylene has high
mutagenicity but low carcinogenic activity? (Alternatively, is
much progress being made on structural theory of mutagenicity
vis a vis carcinogenicity?)
Thilly
Thi lly
Thilly
It seems from what has been said that, under the conditions
of sooting, less PAR is present than under non sooting conditions,
indicating that some PAH has been transformed into the solid
inactive soot. This is also born out from soot mechanism---
considerations.
Thi lly
How did you make sure that the analytical procedure, such
as using columns at elevated temperatures, did not change the
contents of the original samples?
Thilly
We are not sure that gas chromatography did not change the
samples. We hope to avoid this possibility by using low temperature
HPLC systems and checking for total biological activity before
and after separation. A set of appropriate reconstruction experi-
ments is planned.
THE TOXICOLOGY OF SOOT
E. Boyland
12
OH
Microsomal mono-oxygenase
CARBON BLACK
Composition
Carbon ( %) 98 99.2 88.4-95.2
(avg,91.2)
Oxygen (%) 0.8 0.4 3.6-11.2
(avg,7.8)
Hydrogen (%) 0.3 0.3 0.4-0.8
(avg,0.6)
Ash-Ca, Mg, Na
( %) 0.1-1.0 0.1-1.0 0.01
Volatile matter
( %) 1-2 1-2 5-18 <I
Average particle
di arne te r (]Jm) 0.018-0.06 0.04-0.08 0.01-0.03 O. 14-0.47
Specific surface
(m2/g) 25-200 25-50 100-1,000 7-13
pH 8-9 8-9 3-5 8-9
Benzene extract-
abIes (%) 0.05-0.1 0.05-0.15 0.03-1.75
co I
naphlhalene 69 690
10 18
q:,
pyrene benlO[U!] naphtho-
. hen.• G,b
benloth.op
acenaphthylene
C69 \I
benlO rll)d ibenlo-
C¢O
3
thiophene
benlo [!] pyrene
dibenlothiophene
09 ~ 12
benlo[f!.'J fluoran-
65,? 28'
"
phenanthrene thene benla Wpyrene
ceo 5 13
anthracene
cyel apenta [u] py- 21
rene perylent
H$
6
4H -cyclopenta ~l
ocB 14
benll!] anthracene
~ 22
phenanthrene
Indeno [1,2 ,3-~)
W
pyrene
~
t luoranthene
15
chrysene
23
benIO[i!!] perylene
benll!l acenaph-
thylene' btnlofi] I luoron ~'1
th.n. and btnlO~ 2"
lIuoronth.n. anthanlhrene
a9 9
b.nIO[U!) dib.nro-
Ihioplltn ••
17 b 25
b.nlol luoron th,n, coronen,
Fig. 3. Benzene ext rae tables.
THE TOXICOLOGY OF SOOT 19
P.A.H. Samp le
Vulcan J Regal 300 HAF 330 GPF 660 339
Phenanthrene and/or
anthracene 0.07 absent < 0.05 absent 0.2
(:C 0.05-0.1) (0.1-0.5)
Fluoranthene 4.1 3.7 3.5 4. 1 4.3
(3.8-4.3) (3.4-3.9) (2.9-4.3) (3.4-6.4) (3.9-5.2)
Benzo(d,e,f)dibenzo-
thiofene + benzo(e)
acenaphtylene < 0.05 < 0.3 < 0.3 absent < 0.05
Pyrene 22 .2 23.2 16.5 17.2 17.2
(21.3-24.9) (21.6-24.0) ( 13.4- 18. 7) ( 14 .3- 18 . 1) (14.3-20.1)
Benzo(ghi)
fluoranthene 7.2 6.3 6.9 4.6 7.8
(5.9-7.6) (5.6-7.2) (6.5-7.3) (4.2-5) (7.5-8.1)
Cyclopenta(cd)pyrene 10.2 < 0.3 7.0 4.4 6.5
(5.6-14.7) (6.8-7.3) (4.2-5) (5.2-7.8)
Benzofluoranthenes
( total) 0.7 absent < 0.3 1.2 0.6
(0.4-1.1) (0.9-1.4) (0.4-0~9)
m
Dimethyl Cyclo-penta- OJ
pyrene and/or Dimethyl 2.5 0.5 0.9 1.9 1.4 o
Benzo-fluoranthene (2.0-3.5) «0.3-0.7) (0.3-1.3) (1.7-2.3) (1.1-1.7)
-<
r
~
Z
o
--i
P.A.H. Sample I
m
--i
Vulcan J Regal 300 HAF 330 GPF 660 339 0
X
0
Benzopyrenes (Total) 1.4 0.5 1.1 2.6 2.7 0
r
(1.1-1.9) « 0.3-0.7) (0.4-2.1) (1.5-3.2) (2.0-3.9) 0
G)
I'V
22 E. BOYLAND
industries are needed. The use of carbon black with less than 0.1%
cyclohexane extractable matter might reduce the possible hazards.
REFERENCES
DISCUSSION
Boyland
Rivin
Boyland
Boyland
Boyland
Boyland
Cabot Corporation
Concord Road
Billerica, Massachusetts 01821
INTRODUCTION
25
26 D. RIVIN AND A. I. MEDALIA
I I I I
100nm
ANALYSIS OF EXTRACTS
burning fireplace (DWF) 21.8 (20.3) 15.8 14.2 48.0 1.08 50 0.024 3 o
o-I
Blended chimney soot »
from domestic coal fires Z
o
(DCF) 24.6 (22.6) 35.6 19.0 52.4 1.21 23 0.36 17 ('")
»
:c
Chimney soot from III
English coal-burning o
Z
fireplace (ECF) 45.6 (n.d.) 15.8 14.7 36.4 1.00 0.89 < 1 III
r
Soot from "soot box" of »
('")
domestic oil furnace (DOF) 53.8 (40.7) 0.64 50.7 43.7 n~d. 8 0.83 32 A
extracts is similar for the chimney soots but differs for diesel soot
DE, in which much of the non-aromatic fraction in the methylene
chloride extract appears to be unburned fuel and both extracts have
relatively low polar PNA content.
MUTAGENICITY
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Materials
N351 MC 4 9 2 4
Toluene 3 20 2 12
Tol(PAH) 2 17 1 7
Me thods
Eluates from steps (2) and (5) are combined and reported as a polar
PNA fraction. This assignment is supported by proton magnetic
resonance analyses that indicate that this fraction is rich in
heteroaromatic molecules and by ultra-violet absorption measurements
which show a high content of polynuclear aromatics.
Individual PAll compounds were analysed by reverse phase HPLC
(Zorbax ODS column, 75% acetonitrile/water to acetonitrile
gradient) with both fluorescence and ultraviolet detectors.
34 D. RIVIN AND A. I. MEDALIA
Acknowledgements
REFERENCES
DISCUSSION
Rivin
Soots are complex mixtures of extractable and residue com-
ponents in addition to a particulate carbonaceous fraction.
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SOOT AND CARBON BLACK 35
John P. Longwell
INTRODUCTION
Compound
Particulates Extract
RPM Corning Filter mg/m 3 mg/m 3
1000 No 72 7
Yes 2.4 5
2000 No 59 -10
Yes 7.7 7
Cyc1openteno( cd)
pyrene epoxide 6 O. 7 NA 20 O. 4
NA = Not Active
Hexane 27 0
1:1 Hexane/toluene 6.5 40
Toluene 6.5 30
Methylene chloride 14 15
2: I Methylene chloride/methanol 38 15
1:2 Methylene chloride/methanol 4 0
Methanol 4 0
Wt % of Mutagenic
Total Contribution
Extract (Mutant Fraction
x 10 6 ) (a)
Bacterial
Bacharach Soot Extract (1) Mutagenic A~ttvity
Smoke No. %Excess Air mg/g Fuel mg/g Fuel % of Bapt 2 )
1 24 0.006 0.003 6
5 17 0.06 0.0005 2
9 13 0.5 0.0007 0.05
5 (Cyclic) 0.11 0.01 1.0
Hl2at Abstraction
i
- Oxidation - PyrOI ysi 5, Row FUI2I
Ai r
FUI2I
Soot
Pre-mixed Flames
®Air - FJczI
Mixturcz Injczctors
rr Sampl i ng Probcz
rT
.........Flomcz Zoncz
c=:::>
:7§.J,0,.'\Sf- Watczr Coolczd
I Porous PI ug
I
Nitrogcz! l A i r -FuczI Mixturcz
10
M
0
X 8
X
Z
0 6
~
U
«
0:
I.J... 4
W
...J
0 2
~
2 4 10 12 14
Flat Flame at
WSR at
2 mm (6 ms) 40 mm (120 ms) 5 ms
Phenol 300 1 1
Naphthalene 1200 4 2
Phe nan th rene 100 5 3
Fluoranthene 40 3
Cyclopenteno(cd)pyrene 50 2
Non-Flame Processes
PROBE SUPPORT
EXHAUST
SILENCER
Air entered the system through swirl vanes and diesel fuel
was injected at the axis of the burner through a standard swirl
type pressure atomizing nozzle. Samples were taken on the axis
for determination of composition. While the overall equivalence
ratio of the system was less than one, fuel concentration was
much higher along the axis. The effect of changing overall
fuel rate on stoichiometry and soot and PAR production at a point
three diameters from the fuel injector is shown in Figure 6.
Cyclopenteno(cd)pyrene 14 35 x 10-5
Benzo(a)pyrene 4 15 x 10-5
Fluoranthene 4 lOx 10-5
Total 60 x 10-5
Measured Mutagenicity 90 x 10-5
50 J. P. LONGWELL
MASS LOADING
70 mg/i
MASS LOADINGS ( AT liD 0 3) FOR 3 PR-ESSURES
vs.
60 CENTERLINE ole RATIO
T AIR = 3QOK
50 2.3
• o
Q. Q
• o
" <v
6.Q
40
30
20
10
OxvGEN/CARBON-ATOM RATIO
FLUIDIZED
FE EDE R
FI
-----lru --.n L.J ..~~- RADIATION BAFFLES
WATER - COOLED
COLLECTION PROBE
TO GAS ANALYZERS
Expected Observed
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
13. G. Prado, M.L. Lee, R.A. Hites, D.P. Hoult and J.B. Howard,
Soot formation in a turbulent diffusion flame,
Sixteenth Symposium (International) on Combustion,
The Combustion Institute, 1975
14. R.L. Bennet, K.T. Knapp, P.W. Jones, J.E. Wilkinson
and P.E. Strup, Measurement of polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons in stack gases. Polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbon, Ann Arbor Science, 1979
15. R.P. Giammar, R.B. Engdahl and R.E. Barrett,
Emission from Residential and Small Commercial
Stoker-Coal-Fired Boilers Under Smokeless
Operation, EPA-600/7-76-029 (1976).
DISCUSSION
Longwell
Longwell
INTRODUCTION
57
58 J. B. HOWARD AND J. D. BITTNER
PREVIOUS OBSERVATIONS
the early stage of soot formation exceeds the amount of soot even-
tually formed.
PRESENT STUDY
Many species larger than 200 amu are detectable under the con-
ditions of Table 1, but in the near-sooting (¢ = 1.8) flame, most
of the signals are too low to make quantitative measurements in the
normal mode of operation. In order to study the high-mass material
the mass spectrometer was operated without the DC voltage on the
quadrapole and thus as a high-pass filter that transmits all and
only ions with mass/charge ratio greater than a specified value.
The signal is effectively the sum of the ion currents of species
with molecular weights, M, greater than a specified low-mass cutoff,
m. The sensitivity and mass discrimination effects in this high-
mass mode are difficult to quantify (see below), but the results are
STRUCTURE OF SOOTING FLAMES 61
The mass scale for the high-mass work was calibrated up to 671
amu by observing the fragment ions from perf1uorotributy1amine (PTA)
[(C4Fq)3N] at an electron energy of 25.0 eV (nominal). The high-
mass signals in the flames were measured with an electron energy of
17.0 eV (referenced to argon) to prevent fragmentation. At this
energy, the only significan fragmentation was the formation of M-l
ions from species with methyl and methylene groups. This did not
distort the relationship between the molecular weight distribution of
the neutrals from the flame and that of the ions formed by electron
impact.
High mass signals, IM>m' from the near-sooting flame for three
values of the cutoff mass (m = 200, 450, and 700 amu) are plotted
in Fig. 1 as intensities relative to that of argon. The signal from
species larger than the cutoff mass maximizes at a certain height
above the burner. As the cutoff mass increases, the signal maxima
decrease and move further from the burner, i.e., the total number of
species above the cutoff mass decreases while the molecular weight
of the most abundant species increase. These observations alone
would be consistent with either of the following two concepts, or
both: that the heavy hydrocarbons, beginning perhaps with individu-
ally measurable polycyclic aromatics between 100 and 200 amu, react
among themselves so as to grow in size while decreasing in number;
or that the heavy hydrocarbons are destroyed by oxidation, with the
smaller species being preferentially consumed. These concepts are
further discussed later.
The signal from species larger than 200 amu, I M>200' maximizes
at 8.4 mm. This is about the same location where the mole fraction
of mass 202 (C16H10) maximizes 21 , thus implying that much of the
M>200 material is in a narrow mass range beginning at 200 amu. The
difference between the signals from species with masses greater than
200 amu, IM>zOO, and those greater than 450 amu, I M>450, is a rela-
tive measure of the number concentration of species between 200 and
450 amu. Comparison of this difference with IM>450 and IM>700 in
Fig. 1 reveals that, in the region between the burner surface and
about 8 mm, the material with molecular masses above 450 amu is a
small molar fraction (less than 5%) of the material between 200 and
450 amu, and the material with masses above 700 amu is even less.
62 J. B. HOWARD AND J. D. BITTNER
>-
t-
V)
Z
W
t-
Z
..J
«
Z
C>
V)
-4
10
W
>
t-
«
..J
W
0:
-6
10
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
DI STANCE rROM BURNER Z, mm
0
0 -1
N
10
~
~"
-.........
E
~ "
I-i -2
10
E
=~
distance, and are shown in Fig. Z. To the extent that the relative
signal intensity is a measure of the relative number concentration,
the curves in Fig. Z are cumulative distributions of the molecular
mass m for species larger than ZOO amu. Thus the value of the cum-
ulative distribution function
I
M>m
FZOO(m) (1)
~>ZOO
at a point on one of the curves represents the number of species
larger than mass m expressed as a fraction of the total number of
species larger than ZOO amU. As distance from the burner increases,
the fraction of the M>ZOO amu material that is from the higher
masses (e.g., >700 amu) increases several orders of magnitude.
-dFZOO(m)
fZOO(m) (Z)
dm
SOOfZOo(m)dm 1 (3)
ZOO amu
Fig. 3. Probability Density Function for High- Fig. 4. Mass of Material as Function of Mol-
Mass Signal at Several Positions in ecular Weight at Different Heights
Near-Sooting Benzene/Oxygen Flame above Burner, Normalized with Number
[Equivalence ratio, 1.B. Other con- of Moles of M > 200 amu Material at
ditions, see Table 1]. 7.95 mm above Burner [Benzene/Oxygen
flame. Equivalence ratio, 1.B.
Other conditions, see Table 1]. 0>
01
66 J. B. HOWARD AND J. D. BITTNER
An apparent kink in the curves at about 400, 450, and 650 amu
for 10.0, 10.9, and 12.1 mm, respectively, and the emergence of the
upward slope in the region of the largest mass numbers at the high-
STRUCTURE OF SOOTING FLAMES 67
7 8 9 10 II 12
DISTANCE FROM BURNER, mm
est heights above the burner give the appearance of a bimodal dis-
tribution. Thus, one could draw in Fig. 4, for example at 12.1 mm,
two distributions with maxima at about 450 amu and 750 amu or beyond,
the sum of which would give the observed curve. Because of experi-
mental uncertainties, we do not know if this bimodal behavior is
real. Since the heavy material is being destroyed in a region of the
flame where growth can also occur, the observed change in the distri-
bution with distances from the burner is presumably the net effect
of destruction and growth, and the apparent evolution of the two modes
may reflect different relative contributions of these opposing pro-
cesses within the two different regions of the molecular weight
spectrum. Accordingly, the change with height above the burner of
the first (lower-mass number) mode of the distribution might reflect
primarily destruction while the behavior of the second mode might be
strongly influenced by growth processes. To speculate further, the
relatively slow net consumption of the highest molecular weight mat-
erial in this nonsooting flame might under sooting conditions become
net production, with the second (higher-mass number) mode of the
distribution being an early stage of what would become the soot par-
ticle system if the equivalence ratio were high enough.
The mean molecular weight and overall relative mass and number
concentrations of the high~mass material are calculated as follows.
Since mf200(m)dm is the total mass of species of molecular mass m,
per mole of all species exceeding 200 amu, the mass mean molecular
weight of the M>200 amu material is
00
(4)
~>200 ) mf 200 (m)dm
200amu
(5)
C
C(mass) = ~>200 [c
-(molar)
z=7. 95mm lH~P20qZ=7. 95mm Cz=7. 95mm
] (6)
E
°5
Q>
E
E 10
"-
c>
N-
0\
Z'" 1.0 +
/+
'Q 0
.LAN~WT
)(
I- fi
0::
I4 l- 0.8
e> z
w w
~ U
0::
~ 0.6
<X ~
...J "-
=>
u 3 ~ 0.4
w
...J
0 fi
:!: ~ 0.2
z z
W
<X U
w 2 z-O
:!: 0 7 8 9 10 II 12
U
DISTANCE FROM BURNER, mm
Fig. 6. Variation of Mean Molecular Weight and Mass and Number Con-
centrations of M > 200 amu Material with Distance from
Burner [Benzene/Oxygen flame. Equivalence ratio, 1.8.
Other conditions, see Table 1].
the total number of moles and the total mass of the heavy hydro-
carbon material proceed through maximum values at about 8.3 and 8.Smm,
respectively, and then decrease to values at the largest distance
(12.1 mID) that are factors of about 30 and 20, respectively, smaller
than those at the peaks. At the same time the mean molecular weight
MM>200 increases from about 230 a~u at 7.20 mID to about 480 amu
at 12.1 mID. Whether the maximum MM>200 is truly located as depicted
in Fig. 6, or slightly before or beyond 12.1 mID cannot be discerned
from these data.
70 J. B. HOWARD AND J. D. BITTNER
The behavior of the high mass signal was studied as the fuel
equivalence ratio was increased beyond the sooting limit of ¢ = 1.9
while the burner chamber pressure, cold gas velocity, and mole per-
cent argon in the unburned mixture were maintained constant at the
values used in the near-sooting ¢ = 1.8 flame. The high mass sig-
nal for species larger than 700 amu, I M>700' at ¢ = 2.0 (a sooting
flame; conditions in Table 1) is plotted as a function of the dis-
tance from the burner in Fig. 7. For comparison, the high-mass
signals IM>200 and I~>700 from the near-sooting flame are also
shown. The IM>700 slgnal for ¢ = 2.0 increased by a factor of 10 4
over the distance of 6 mm to a maximum at 12.7 mm from the burner.
This corresponds to the boundary (Fig. 7) between the blue zone and
the orange zone that is characteristic of the continuum emission
from soot. This maximum is 100-times higher than the IM>700 signal
maximum for the ¢ = 1.8 flame, and even larger than the IM>200 sig-
nal maximum for the ¢ = 1.8 flame.
10°.--------------------------------,
~
I-
rJ)
Z
z 10
~ 2
....J
<1
Z
~
rJ)
W -3
~ 10
~
....J
W
a::
0.5 r---,-----,--,----r--,-----.----,-----,
¢ = 1.8,2.0
A & C2 H2
o • 02
o • C6 H6
10 35
BLUE ORANGE
DISTANCE FROM BURNER, mm
DISCUSSION
% of Ox en or Carbon Fed
Species Nearl Sooting (¢=2.0)
Begin. End Decrease
(12.6mm) (19.6mm) (7.0mm=
1. 84ms)
bution of oxygen and carbon among the species that dominate the
material balances can be drawn as follows, by consideration of con-
straints imposed by these few known fluxes together with trends
observed in the fluxes of other species when ~ is increased from
1.0 to 1.8 22 • Given the 02 flux of about 0.18 of the original oxy-
gen, the fraction of the oxygen carried by CO, C02 and H20 must be
about 0.82, since oxygen in OH and other species is negligible in
these balances. Similarly, since the sum of the fractions of the
original carbon carried by C2H2 (0.32), C6H6 (0.01), and M>700 amu
species (0.006) is about 0.34, the total carbon in CO, C02, and the
other hydrocarbons must be about 0.66. The part of this remaining
carbon that can be attributed to the other hydrocarbons is con-
strained by the fraction of the carbon in CO and C02 which in turn
is constrained by the fraction of oxygen in CO and C02 and the col
C02 ratio. From a hydrogen balance using the fluxes of C2H2 and
C6H6' the fraction of the total hydrogen in H20, H2' and other
hydrocarbons is 0.67. In the ~ = 1.8 flame at 10.1 mm, the H2 flux
is 0.2-times that of C2H2' and as ~ increases from 1.0 to 1.8 the
H2 mole fraction increases approximately 6-fold at similar stages
of fuel consumption in these two flames. The C2H2 flux at the
position of the M>700 amu peak increases by only a few percent in
going from ~ = 1.8 to ~ = 2.0 (Table 2). Therefore, the H2 flux
at 12.6 mm in the ~ = 2.0 flame should be at least 0.2-times that of
C2H2 , which means that H2 carries at least 0.06 of the total hydro-
gen, leaving no more than 0.61 for H20 and other hydrocarbons. Since
the H/O feed ratio is 0.8, the foregoing means that the fraction of
the total oxygen in H20 must be less than 0.8xO.6l/2 or 0.24. This
fraction from 0.82 leaves 0.58 or more for the fraction of the total
oxygen in CO and C02. In order to place a limiting value on the col
CO 2 flux ratio, we note that this quantity increases approximately
10-fold at similar stages of fuel consumption as ~ increases from
1.0 to 1.8. Since the ratio is 7 at 10.1 mm and ~ = 1.8, we assume
the value at 12.6 mm and ~ = 2.0 is at least 7 and probably larger.
Accordingly, the above 0.58 or more of the total oxygen as CO and
C02 would be equivalent to 0.64 or more of the carbon as CO and C02'
leaving 0.02 or less of the carbon for hydrocarbons other than C2H2 ,
C6H6 , and M>700 amu material.
Not only does the amount of high mass material at the critical
position increase 100-fold as ¢ is increased from 1.8 to 2.0, but
the ratio of carbon as M > 200 amu material to that remaining as
C6H6 increases from 0.01 to 2. Thus the mass of heavy species in
the sooting flame exceeds that of C6H6 before the latter becomes
negligible. Therefore it might appear that an important distinction
between the two flames at the critical position could be availabil-
ity of OH and 0 in the consumption of high-mass material immediately
82 J. B. HOWARD AND J. D. BITTNER
CO + OH ~ CO 2 + H (R3)
The data are consistent with the picture that not all of the
initial C6H6 rings are opened, in that the moles of C2H2 produced is
slightly less than the moles of C6H6 consumed. The difference be-
tween the amount of carbon in C2H2 and one-third of the carbon in
C6H6 consumed up to the M>7QO amu peak in the sooting flame is about
one-sixth of the amount of carbon in the M>200 amu material at that
location (the latter being about 6% of the carbon fed). This obser-
vation supports the concept that the growth involves addition reac-
tions between a small fraction of the initial C6H6 rings that are
not opened and some of the abundant C2 and C4 products of ring de-
struction. The same picture holds qualitatively for the near-sooting
flame where growth is less competitive and a much larger fraction
STRUCTURE OF SOOTING FLAMES 85
the M>700 amu material occurs and that the average molecular weight
increases through growth reactions. Such behavior would be consis-
tent with, but an extension of, the trends seen in Figs. 4 and 5 at
the larger distances from the burner and for the higher molecular
weights. The evidence (discussed above) of species growth in the
near-sooting flame that can be seen in these figures would presum-
ably be even stronger in the sooting flame where, in the zone of
rapid consumption of M>700 amu material (see Table 2), less oxida-
tion occurs and the concentration of high-mass species is much
greater. Thus the system of decomposing heavy aromatics in the
presence of CZHZ and related acetylenic species offers the ingredi-
ents of growth, and growth indeed occurs, the smaller of the high-
mass species being consumed while the mass flux of larger species
increases. Although the mass flux of the M>200 amu material re-
maining at the end of the zone of rapid consumption of M>700 amu
species is large enough to account for the soot eventually formed,
the mass flux of C2H2 is much larger and the relative extents to
which acetylenic species and high-mass aromatics contribute to the
growth of larger species and hence of soot is not established. How-
ever, it is clear that the heavy aromatics are the critical ingredi-
ent since it is their flux and not that of acetylenic species that
differs between the near-sooting and sooting flames.
Thus it appears that the onset and earliest stage of soot forma-
tion in the acetylene flame, in comparison with the same stages in
the benzene flame, occur in the presence of much lower concentrations
of aromatics and much less oxidation, and with a larger C2H2 consump-
tion in the growth reactions. Because of the much smaller concen-
trations of aromatics in the primary reaction zone of the acetylene
flame, the growth rate of heavy species does not match their destruc-
tion rate until the 02 is almost gone. Therefore the occurrence of
the peak concentration of heavy hydrocarbons and hence the onset of
soot formation are delayed almost to the end of the oxidation zone.
The soot formation begins, as in the benzene flame, in a mixture of
heavy aromatics and C2H2' and of course many related species such as
C4H2 and C4H4 • Addition reactions among these aromatics and acety-
lenic species would appear to be as important for the growth leading
to soot in this flame as in the benzene flame. Since the flux of
aromatics available at the onset of soot formation is much less in
the acetylene flame, it is plausible that a larger portion of the
final soot mass may be added as acetylenic species in this case.
Once soot formation begins, the time required for the growth
of the final particles in the acetylene flame is not greatly dif-
ferent from that in the benzene flame. What is strikingly differ-
ent is the fraction of the soot formed during the zone of rapid
consumption of high-mass species. In the acetylene flame, only
8 x 10- 4 of the final soot mass is formed up to 18 mm 12 where the
rapid consumption of M>lOOO amu species ends. Furthermore, with
soot nucleation defined as the appearance of 1.5 nm diameter (M =
2000 amu) particles, only about 0.02 of the final cumulative num-
ber of nuclei have been formed at 18 mm 29 • Therefore, in the
acetylene flame, most of the soot particles first become observable
downstream of the zone of rapid consumption of the heavy species
that distinguish the sooting condition, and almost all of the final
soot mass is formed downstream of this zone, while the concentrations
of heavy hydrocarbons and C2H2 continue to decrease. The above
difference notwithstanding, a common feature of the acetylene and
benzene flames is the emergence during the rapid consumption of high-
mass material of the heavy species that grow to become the first
observable soot particles.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
REFERENCES
DISCUSSION
You point out that there is not much difference in the flame
structure when going from non-sooting to sooting flames. How then
do you account for the fact that the critical concentration at
which soot is formed occurs at a very distinct equivalence ratio
and is very reproducible from one laboratory to the next? Does
this not indicate that a critical change is occurring in chemistry
of the system similar to what occurs at an explosion limit?
Howard
Howard
In the rich benzene flame (¢ = 1.8) we looked for CH, CH2, and
C2H but were unable to find either of these species. Considering
the detectability limits of the instrument, these species apparently
were not present at the following or higher mole fractions: CH and
CH 2 , 10-5 ; C2H, 5 x 10-6 • The limits stated here are conservatively
high since radicals such as C6H3 and C2H3 were measured at these or
lower mole fractions. Although our work in rich acetylene flames
is incomplete, we have detected CH 2 but not measured its concentra-
tion and we have found C2H to be absent at the above stated detection
limit.
Howard
Howard
Howard
Howard
Howard
Howard
INTRODUCTION
95
96 J. D. BITTNER ET AL.
This paper reports such a study. Mole fraction and flux profiles
of stable and free radical species in a benzene-oxygen-argon flame
near the sooting limit are presented, and the production of Cl - C5
hydrocarbons from the aromatic ring and the role of the aromatic
ring in PAH and soot formation are discussed.
EXPERIMENTAL
PA Di ,mix
Fi = Xi RT (v - --x;:- (Eq.l)
CHEMISTRY OF INTERMEDIATE SPECIES 97
ELECTRON
MULTIPLIER
QUADRUPOLE MASS
FILTER - 41NCH
DIFFUSION
--+ PUMP
J.-----+- SKIMMER
1
6 INCH
DIFFUSION
PUMP
- PREMIXED GASES
0.5 (Al
CO
z
0
00.3
<{
0:: Ar
LL
w O. 2
...J
0
~ H2
0.1
,... 1800
Q 8 1600 ~_
x
w
z 14000::
0 ::l
I-
U
I 200~
<{ 0::
0:: I OOO~
LL
W 800~
...J I-
0
~ 600
400
023 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14
TIME, ms
1- Xi
D. . (Eq.2)
~,ml.X n X.
L: ...::J...
j=l Dij
j~l
(O.lmm) between 1 and l6mm above the burner. The argon and other
mole fraction profiles were calculated from the signal ratio profiles,
calibration factors, and an argon balance. These mole fraction pro-
files were further smoothed and differentiated by a simplified least
squares procedure 30 ,3l.
0.5
(A)
0.4
X
z
0
0.3
t-
u
<1:
0:: Ar
LL
W
x-
-.J
0
L 0.1
3.6
3.0 -
I
H20 X 2
~
I
III 2,4
'"'E
u 1.8
'0
E 1.2
en -
0
)( 0.6
X
::>
...J
t... 0
-0.6
2 4 6 8 10 12 14
DISTANCE FROM BURNER Z. mm
o 2 3 4 5 6
TIME ,ms
Figure 3. Mole fractions (A) and molar fluxes (B) of major stable
species vs. distance from burner in a near-sooting
(0 = 1.8) benzene (13.5% m%) - oxygen (56.5 m%) - argon
(30.0 m%) flame. Cold gas velocity = 0.5 m/s.
Pressure = 2.67 kPa (20 torr).
102 J. D. BITTNER ET AL.
10
'I 6
III
'"'E
u
4
0
E
"-
0
- 2
)(
X
::> 0
....J
u...
-2
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
DISTANCE F"ROM BURNER Z, m rn
'Ill
6
'"'E
u C3H3 x3 ~
0 4 C 3 H4 X 3
E
"0 .
>< 2
X
~
....J
L...
0
-2
16
DISTANCE tROM BURNER Z,mm
Figure 5. Molar fluxes of C3H4. C3H3. CH4 and CH3 vs. distance
from burner in a near-sooting (0 = 1.8) benzene
(13.5 m%) - oxygen (56.5 m%) - argon (30.0 m%) flame.
Cold gas velocity = 0.5 m/s. Pressure = 2.67 kPa
(20 torr).
104 J. D. BITTNER ET AL.
which could produce C2H2 prior to CO, cannot account for the observed
rate of benzene decay.
+0
CHEMISTRY OF INTERMEDIATE SPECIES 105
Analysis of the mole fraction d&ta for this flame led to the
initial conjecture 21 that benzene destruction was initiated by
reaction with 0 atoms. Because the O-atom signal was obscured by
CH4 in this rich flame, it was not possible to confirm this hyppthesis.
However, the flux profiles for C6H6 and C2H2 indicate that the
reaction of OH (rather than 0) with benzene may be the primary
source of C6H60. If it is accepted, as postulated above, that the
near-zero C2H2 flux between 6 and 7.5 mm is due to a very low C2H2
production rate and a near-zero consumption rate (rather than a
delicate balance between high production and consumption rates),
then a considerable fraction (22 mol %) of the benzene is consumed
in a region (6 - 7.5mm) where little or no C2H2 is being consumed.
Thus, kOH+C6H6'XC6H6 » kOH+C2H2'XC2H2 or kO+C6H6.XC6H6 »
kO+C H .X C H kO+C H = 5.2 x 10 13 exp(-1860!T) cm 3 mol- l s-l 47.
2 2 2 2· 2 2 48
kOH+C2 H = 1.3 + 0.3 x 10 12 cm 3 mol- l s-l Low temperature studies
(298 - ~62K)49,50 of the 0 + C6H~ reaction are in excellent agree-
ment and give kO+C6 H = 1.1 x 10 3 exp(-2060/T) cm 3 mol- l s-l.
Studies of the OH + B6H6 reaction 51 ,52 indicate that below 300K OH
addition to the ring is the major channel. Between 300 and 500K
both addition and abstraction occur simultaneously. A kinetic isotope
effect indicated that abstraction is the major channel above 500K
with kOH+C6 H6 = 1.4 x 10 13 exp(-2260/T) cm 3 mol- l s-l (500<T<1000K)52
Extrapolatlng the benzene rate coefficients to flame temperatures,
k OH +C H -XC6H !k OH +C H .X C H = 6.3 and 2.1, and kO+C B -XC H !
kO C ~ ~Xc H 6= 0.472a~d 0?14, at 6 and 7.5mm. respec£l~elY? 6Thus
on~ ~i~ht 6o~clude that OH abstraction for form phenyl radical is
the main channel for benzene consumption.
However, two other observations do not support this picture.
Firstly, if OH + C6H6 is assumed to be the primary reaction for
benzene consumption, the present flame data do not yield reasonable
Arrhenius parameters. A mean value of kOH+C nH6 = 6 x 10 13 cm 3
mol- l s-l could account for benzene decay beEween 7 and 9mm. !his
is over 15 times greater than the extrapolation of the value of
Tully et al. 52 to flame temperatures. Secondly, if most of the
benzene reacts via H-abstraction, reactions destroying phenyl radical
must be rapid enough to explain its low mole fraction (maximum =
8 x 10- 5 at 8.2mm). As indicated above and discussed in detail else-
where 20 , the unimolecular decomposition of phenyl radical is too
slow to account for its low mole fraction. For the reaction of
phenyl with 02, OH or 0 to account for the observations, rate co-
efficients equal to or greater than the collision frequency would
be required. Thus, H-atom abstraction by OH is only a minor path
for benzene destruction.
(Rxn.3)
Similar relationships exist for the fluxes of C3H3 and C3H4, and
CH3 and CH4. The C3H4 flux (Figure 5) remains positive and maximizes
closer to the burner than the C3H3 flux, which indicates net con-
sumption of C3H3 at distances less than 7.2mm. The sum of the C3H3
and C3H4 fluxes (Figure 6) shows that the negative C3H3 flux is
nearly offset by the positive C3H4 flux prior to 7.5mm. This
suggests that C3H4 is formed from C3H3 that has diffused from the
108 J. D. BITTNER ET AL.
10
2C)
8
C2 H 2 +2C 4 H2 +
'II)
'"'E 6
u
(5
4 (C 3 H3 +C3 H4 )x20 ---..:.
E
\D
0....
2
x
X
::>
-oJ
L... 0
-2
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
DISTANCE FROM BURNER Z, mm
region of net C3H3 production (z> 7.2mm). The CH3 and CH4 flux
profiles (Figure 5) also indicate that the stable CH4 is formed from
the CH3 radical as it diffuses towards the burner. The net con-
sumption of CH3 and CH4 between 3 and 6mm (Figure 6), indicated by
the negative flux with a negative slope, may be due to reaction of
CH3 to form many of the methyl substituted aromatics observed in
the flame or it may be caused by uncertainties in diffusion co-
efficients and alignment of temperature and mole fraction profiles.
5
(A)
z
~ 3 MASS 29
u x 100
«
E2
w
-I
o
~I
6
(B)
ro 5
0
)(
4
z
Q
I-
U 3
« C4 H3 x 16
a:
I.J...
w 2
-I
0
~
16
a 2 3 4 5 6
TIME I ms
Figure 7. Mole fractions of Cl and C2 (A) and C4 (B) species vs.
distance from burner in a benzene (13.5 m%) - oxygen
(56.5 m%) - argon (30.0 m%) flame. Cold gas velocity
= 0.5 m/s. Pressure = 2.67 kPa (20 torr).
CHEMISTRY OF INTERMEDIATE SPECIES 111
1.5
(A)
<t
0
©© '10HS
C9 H S
©O
3@Jg
)(
z 1.0
Q CI2 HS )(
I-
U
<[
0:: C10H6)( 3
LL
wO.5
-.J
0
:2
@-@
1.5
•• (8)
C I3 H 1O
It'l
0
@JQJ
©&
)(10
z·
Q
I-
~
U
<[
0:: CI4HS
LL CI4 H 1O
~
wO.5
-.J
0
:2 00 CI6 H 1O
2 16
0 2 3 4 5 6
TIME I ms
10°.-------------------------------,
--1
<I
Z
(,!)
(/)
W -3
2: 10
tt
--1
W
a:: \4> = 1.8
1M >700
/~
@-= 00
104 Ca Ha Styrene
~ Cyclapent [b,c] acena phthy lene
116 Cg Ha Indene
©D
178 C14 HIO Anthracene
@rOO
Ethynyltoluene
cgQ
CH3"@-=
Phenanthrene
00
128 CIOHa Naphthalene ©I§:@-CH 3
00
Acenaphthalene
~
226 ClaHlo Benzo [ghiJfluor-
166 CI3 HIO Fluorene
@QQ) anthene 00
Methylacenaphthalene 00-
o CH 3
Cyclopenta[cd]pyrene ~
00;,
Phenalene
00
228 Cla HI2 Chrysene
~
00
168 CI3 HI2 Methylbiphenyl
@-@CH 3
Benz[ajanthracene J
CHEMISTRY OF INTERMEDIATE SPECIES 115
0.5 ~--~----~~--r---~----~--~----~
cp = 1.8, 2.0
to. • C2 H2
o • 02
15 20 35
BLUE ORANGE
DISTANCE FROM BURNER, mm
© +
320
~Ho
Rxn.298 -I
-107 kJ mol
(Rxn.4)
118 J. D. BITTNER ET AL.
~
(. \
~/
~ .... 208
(D)
©"
0 + 218
H 106 (Rxn.5)
+
~
..
I' \
!....= MO Rxn. 298
\..
~ / (Rxn.7)
-I -39 kJ mol-I
~Hof298 83 kJ mol 362 :t 5 405 ~ 21
©
~Hf298 188 kJ mol
+
-I
227
©.
370
~HO Rxn. 298
-45 kJ mol-I
(Rxn.lO)
6: + H
218
150 (Rxn. II)
@fH
,~
283
-+
~ + H -87, 108
(Rxn.12)
~ ~llH°Rxn.298
456 558 -226 kJ mol-I
(Rxn.13)
~
~ ~-I +
~Ho f298 558 kJ mol
(Rxn.15)
120 J. D. BITTNER ET AL.
~
Q.~ ~
/-,
(; "• \
"-
•
H
~
J
9"
rW
c=) c=) v+
394
H -132,77
218
(Rxn.16)
535
SUMMARY
hydrogen rapidly via reactions with Hand H2' The more hydrogenated
species present closer to the burner may be formed from less hydro-
genated species as they diffuse from near the end of the primary
reaction towards the burner~
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
REFERENCES
DISCUSSION
H. Gg. Wagner
JUrgen Warnatz
INTRODUCTION
127
128 J. WARNATZ
I __- L_ _
~L- __ ~ __ ~_
20 30 40 50
max. x [%]
0.3
0.2
0.1
[C 2 H2 ] '" ¢n
max
with n = 3 in Fig. la and with n 4 in Fig. lb.
RADICAL CHEMISTRY IN SOOTING FLAMES 129
Alkane
Al kyl
+M 1 -Alk.n.
smaller Alkyl
,,
v
etc.
+M 1 -Alkon.
(H 4 C2H6
"1]'~
CH 3 ~
]'H,O,OH
-0
• C2HS -------.. CH 3 CHO
-H,O,OH
-------+ CH 3CO
-M
------~ CH 3
- CH 3
]'0 -H ll-M,02
-O,OH
(H 2O C2H4 - CH 3 ,CH ZO,CHO
]'H,O,OH l-H
CHO CZH3
j-M,OZ,H
'Hll'H'~ -OH -H
CO CZH2 CHzCO • CH 3
] ·c J.OH
~H
CH • CH 2 (HzO, CHO
1.00, j'00,
CO CO
Fig. 2(b). Mechanism of the high temperature oxidation of CH 3 and
C2 HS
log ~
-0.2 o +0.2
0 2 4 6
0.3
0.2
-·. . -·-- ·-H Z
0.1 ~o-O-o-o- H20
z/cm
o 2 4 6
100 x
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
o 2 4
100 x
0.1 ~aH2,
z/cm
o 2 4 6
Fig. 4. Mole fracti on profil es in a weakly sootin g burne r-stab
ilized
CZHZ-OZ flame at P = Z6 mbar,C /O= 0.95,v =50 cm/s . 6
u
RADICAL CHEMISTRY IN SOOTING FLAMES 133
co
(above 1600 K)
- CHCO + H
CHiCO + H
(above 1600 K)
-
(above 1600 K)
-
The reaction of °atoms with C2H2 mainly leads to CO and CH27 ,
but there is evidence of a second channe1 8 , leading to CHCO and H
atoms (~25% at 2000 K). Since there is complete lack of knowledge
on subsequent reactions of CHCO, this minor channel shall not be
taken into account in the flame simulation presented below.
9
The reaction of OH with acetylene leads to CH2CO and H atoms ;
besides at high temperature a channel with large activation energy
seems to become important 10 , forming C2H and H20.
o co
CH2 C2H2 - ~+ H
-
+
CH z + H [8J + H2
CH + CzHz - ~
C3H3 + H ~ IC3Hd
In addition, this study leads to the formulation of a second path
leading to C3H3 via CH.
Consumption of C3~4_
products
The reactions of propyne ~nd allene with H atoms have been studied
by Wagner and Zellner13 ,1 and by Whytock and coworkers. 15 The
primary reaction leads to the addition product C3H5, which then can
decompose to form CH3 and C2H2, or add a further H atom to form
C3 H6·
The reaction of propyne with 0 atoms has been investigated by
Herbrechtsmeier and Wagner l6 and by Arrington and Cox. 17 It leads
to CO and CH 3CH, which then can form ethylene by a pressure-
dependent isomerization reaction.
[zH z
[zH z
+
+
M
H
-- ~
~
+
+
H
H7
+ M 448 kJ/mol
88 kJ/mol
- H
-
[z H + (z Hz 1(4 Hzl +
(z H (4 Hz \ (6 Hz! + H
-
+
-
(z Hz + (z Hz +
[4 H3 + M 1[4 HZ! + H + M
Consumption of C4~2-
-
--
H + (4 HZ (4 H3
H + (4 H3 (4 H 4 •
(4H4 • M (4 H4 M
-
+ +
(4 H4 • (zH z + (zH z
136 J. WARNATZ
o + co
a( A.j;l with
A az
Here temperature T and mass fractions wi of species i are the depen-
dent variables, time t and the cartesian space coordinate z are the
independent variables. These equations contain a convection term
including the total mass flux 9v, a diffusion term including the
diffusion flux ji, and a chemical reaction term including the rate
of formation rio The correction factor A takes into account the in-
creasing area ratio in a stabilized flat flame. 23 Details are given
elsewhere .4,23,24 The temperature profile has been estimated from
temperature measurements in similar flames. 6,25
The results of this flame simulation are given in Fig. 5. For com-
parison the experimental values are given once more. Fig. Sa shows
the profiles of the reactants and major products. There is agreement
of experiments and calculations with one exception: The H2 and H20
profiles show discrepancies which cannot be definitely explained.
These discrepancies may result partly from the fact that exact mass
spectrometric calibration of these species is extremely difficult.
Furthermore, they may be partly due to uncertainties of the tempe-
rature profile which influences the water gas equilibrium including
H2 and H20. A further explanation of this deviation may be that the
rate constant used for OH + C4H2 is too small. This is supported by
the discrepancy of measured OH mole fraction (5.10- 4 25 ) and its
calculated value (1.8.10- 3 ).
x x
x x
0.3 0.3 Oz
0.2 0.2 H2O
0.1 Hz
0-00-..0---0- HzO 0.1
z/cm z/cm
0 2 4 6 0 2 4
100 x 100 x
0.8
('0 0.8
0.6
0.4 I
0
o \\
0
\0
" - - . . 0 _ 0 _ 0 -0 . (4Hz
0.6
0.4
K z/cm z/cm
0 2 4 6 0 2 4
Fig. 5b. Experimental and calculated mole fraction profiles of
C3H4 and C4H2 in a weakly sooting burner-stabilized
C2H2-02 flame (see Fig. 4.).
CONCLUSIONS
M
log-- SOOT
g/mol
6
5
Alkanes
Alkenes
4
Polycycli c
3 Aromatics
Polyocetylenes
2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The author is grateful to Prof. Dr. K.H. Homann and Prof. Dr.
H.Gg. Wagner for their sustained interest in this work and many
helpful discussions. The financial support of the Deutsche Forschungs-
gemeinschaft and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie is gratefully
acknowledged.
REFERENCES
DISCUSSION
Warnatz
Warnatz
°
3) H2 0 is mainly formed by OH + RH - > H20 + R, OH + OH - >
H20 + and OH + H2 ---> H20 + H. These reactions are well
known, and should not lead to incorrect predictions.
Warnatz
Wamatz
Warnatz
Wamatz
INTRODUCTION
145
146 G. PRADO ET AL.
I
As will be discussed in another contribution to this Workshop,
there is much yet to be learned on the details of surface growth
kinetics. It suffices here to note that surface growth does not
alter the particle number density but does lead to an increase in
soot volume fraction.
d In d = ~ d In f - ~ d In N
3 v 3
In the strictest sense, the transition from particle inception
to particle growth is probably not a sharp one. Moreover the limit
between inception and growth is depending upon the resolution of
the method used to observe nuclei and to measure their site. The
growth of very large molecules by addition of smaller hydrocarbons
is obviously not far removed from the addition of similar species
to "particles". Similarly, large molecules can react among them-
selves in the same way as particles coagulate. However, in both
premixed 2-4 and laminar diffusion flames~-7 the zones of particle
nucleation and of particle growth do appear to be spatially distinct.
New particle formation is restricted to a narrow region very near
the main reaction zone where temperatures and radical and primary
ion concentrations are.highest. Although very many (N ~ 10 18 m- 3)
are formed initially (N 'V\02I m-3 sec-I), they are very small
(d 'V 1.5 nm) at their inception and represent a very light soot
loading (fv 'V 10-9 ). Except under weakly sooting conditions (e.g.
a premixed flame operating near the sooting limit), this initial
volume fraction is negligible compared with that contributed by
surface growth which occurs over extended periods as the gases
move away from the primary reaction zone, even into relatively
cool, unreactive regions. Therefore, we shall not attempt to define
the limit between molecule and particle any more precisely than to
accept, for example, the appearance of continuous yellow emission
as signalling the occurrence of particles.
aM ~ Ma
(I)
As s h own · ·
1n preV10US papers 11,13,14 t h e 1n
. fl uence 0freS1
' d ence
time on the mass balance of carbonaceous material in the system,
as well as observations of intermediate species by electron micro-
scopy, lead to the conclusion that, at relatively low temperature
(1383 K), the precursors of soot particles are viscous droplets
of tars.
Benzene
Volume .25 .5 2 4 6 8 10
Fraction
Soot
Volume 222
.94 3.02 12.2 31.4 70.0 147 172
Fraction
(10 7 x fv)
D (nm) 25.8 37.8 52.4 71.7 91.4 100.5 132.3 138.5
10- 10 x N
(cm- 3) .48 .51 .78 .79 .83 .87 .72 .72
Influence of temperature
FREE-MOLECULE COAGULATION
dN
N - N
dt u c
where.
Nu the rate of nucleation, defined for practical purpose
as the rate of appearance of the smallest observab Ie
particles (2 nm)
N the coagulation rate.
c
dN
- k(D) N2 (2)
cit
where the rate ccnstant k depend~ on the particle diameter D, or
equivalently, on the mean volume v. For particles small compared
with gas mean free path (Knudsen number> 10), Brownian motion,
and k, are described in terms of free molecule theory; for soot
particles in a typical flame environment this requires that
d < 60 nm. For such a system in which uncharged spherical particles
co~lesce on every collision, this leads to a coagulation rate of :
SOOT PARTICLE NUCLEATION AND AGGLOMERATION .151
(3)
(5)
where
Dg(nm)
60
fv
1011
10-7
40
1010
10-8
20
H. A. B. (mm)
o
HAB. (mm)
2000
10·
1900
g
....
1800
1700
~--~------~----~----~1~
15
H.A.B. (mm)
Fig. 3. Soot volume fraction (f v ' filled symbols) and temperature
(T, open symbols) as a function of height above burner
(H.A.B., mm). Propane/oxygen flame. Cold gas velocity =
5.5 cm/s. Fuel equivalence ratio = 2.2 (.), 2.5 ( .. ),
2.9 (e).
o
H.A.B. (mm)
Table 4. Geometric mean diameter (D, nm) and number density (N, 1010cm- 3)
of soot particles measured by electron microscopy and by in-situ
optical techniques. Propane/oxygen flame. Cold gas velocity = 5.5 em/sec.
Fuel equivalence I
ratio 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.9 2.9 2.9 I
I
Heigh t above
burner (rrnn) 4 10 16 4 10 16 4 10 16
In-situ D 7.7 12.9 17.2 20.0 40. I 48.8 24.7 63. I 67. I
optical
N 10.2 4.7 2.2 6.5 1.6 1.3 8.6 1.5 1.5
techniques
- --------- --- _._-_.-
G)
""0
:lJ
~
o
o
m
--I
~
r
SOOT PARTICLE NUCLEATION AND AGGLOMERATION 157
2000
1900
1800~
1700
10- 8 1600
'~----~5--------~'0~------~'5~--~~
v2
- x H.A.B. (mm)
v
Effect of temperature
Dg.nm
80
\' 60
'.\. .. \ ~
~ 40
• P"-....
0> • •~ 20
CC/ ••••• ~
CA /
: • •
c o . •
16 0
o 5 10 15
v2
y x H. A.B. (mm)
REFERENCES
DISCUSSION
Prado
Does not the fact that pyrolytic systems form soot lend support
to "nucleation" rather than to campeti tion of formation and oxidation
processes? Thus, I would support the view that there is a barrier.
Prado
You point out that the nucleation step can be ignored or simply
treated as a boundary condition because 'most of the soot mass results
from surface growth. Is nucleation also unimportant in determining
the critical concentration at which soot occurs?
Prado
Prado
George W. Smi th
Physics Department
General Motors Research Laboratories
Warren, MI 48090-9055
INTRODUCTION
163
164 G. W . SMITH
...----i-- SPHERULE
"
- 30 nm
n
o (3)
n
1 + 4kT n t/3).J
o
166 G. W. SMITH
DISCUSSION
decrease takes only about 0.05 ms. At the end of this time spherule
identity has become established, and further coagulation is chain-
forming. A simple kinetic calculation suggests that gas-phase
precursor molecules will not become depleted until a few tenths of a
ms after nucleation, so that surface growth by condensation of
precursors proceeds during coalescent coagulation and c~n7inues
well into the chain-forming stage. There is some evidence' that
non-sticking collisions occur toward the end of soot formation in
lower pressure systems, and this may take place for diesel soot as
well. At any rate, 1000-fold coagulation occurs for diesel soot
within 1-2 ms after local nucleation. At the end of this time soot
formation is essentially complete, and cooling occurs due to
cylinder expansion.
REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
171
172 H. G. WAGNER
the variation of particle number and mean diameter. These two quan-
tities are, at least in p~inciple, well defined. They also have to
deal with the total mass of soot and its growth. This quantity needs,
as we will see, a definition and it will be much easier to give
"rate constants" than to describe details of the growth process.
They and others observed that the deposition of soot at the wall
takes place already at lower temperatures than the formation of
particles in the gas phase.
df = N d v + v d N 1)
v
k / ;1/6 ~ 5/2 -1
cm s
co
for un seeded flames.
df /dt N(dv/dt - f k ) 2)
v v co
Here, the second term corrects for that part of particle volume
growth which is due to coagulation.
dv N- 1 df 3)
v
4)
176 H. G. WAGNER
This expression shows nicely the two factors which contribute to the
particle growth in the later phase of the soot formation process:
coagulation and surface growth.
F L .N.F.
111
3f
v
! r
R = L r.N.
1 1
df!dt 5)
For continuum conditions (see e.g. 7 or 8), when the mean free
path is smaller than the particle size, the processes are diffusion
controlled and instead of F the quantity R has to be used 7 ,8. If not
the transport to and from the particles is rate determining, but the
surface reaction, then it is again the active surface which has to
be used instead of R.
6)
For systems where the influence of the C/O ratio on the amount
of soot produced in a flat flame has been measured 6 ,10,23-25, the
value of fro increased strongly with the surplus hydrocarbon
fm _ (C/O - (C/O)limit)n. For C2H4 the n value is close to 3,for
C6H6 even larger 25 . This increase of soot mass with increasing C/O
ratio leads (mostly) to an increase in the mean particle diameter,
while the "final" N seems to vary very little.
178 H. G. WAGNER
Gas analysis in the burned gases shows that besides the water-
gas components and the soot particles there are various hydrocarbons
present. The total amount of these hydrocarbons is normally larger
than that of soot. For the standard C2H2-02low pressure flame the
hydrocarbon mass in the burned gas (9 cm above the burner) increases
more than 20 times stronger with increasing C/O ratio than the amount
of soot. For low pressure benzene/oxygen flames (~ 2000 K) the amount
of soot formed increases stronger with increasing C/O ratio than for
C2H2 flames, but the increase of the mass of hydrocarbons is still
much faster than that of soot 23 . Measurements in atmospheric C2H4-
air flames show that 4 cm above the burner the mass of C2 hydro-
carbons is at least 10 times larger than the soot mass (near C/Ocrit
Data of D'Alessio also indicate relatively high hydrocarbon concen-
trations in the burned gas besides soot in methane-oxygen flames 26 .
C2H4 - "air"
dfv
xN 2 /x0 2 = 2.9
dt
5 t:;. C/O = 0.735
• C/O = 0.722
o C/O = 0.696
+ C/O = 0.668
o 10 20 30 t [ms] 40
( 1 - f /f ) 7)
v M
It is obvious that this expression does not hold for very short and
for very long times but it represents that part of the process fair-
ly well in which most of the soot mass appears in particles.
The fact that k values from different sources and for different
flames are rather similar may be partly due to the fact that flame
conditions, especially if optical methods shall be used for the
measurements can only be varied over a relatively small rang. Values
extracted from the measurements of Prado et al. 20 which cover a
rather large range of C/O seem to indicate that k increases slightly
with increasing C/O ratio.
If, for metal additives however, the rate of soot mass formation
dfv/dt is evaluated from the measured fv curves in the way described
above, the variations in the k values obtained are small and lie
within the limit of experimental error: the change of soot mass is
represented by f M. For gaseous additives like S02' S03' NH3' H2,etc.
the situation is very similar 25 . Changes in the amount of soot
finally formed do not appear as changes of the k values.
the C/O yalue at the limit of soot formation increases with in-
creasing temperature 28 ,29.
Time Scale
The amount of soot formed not to far away from the limits of
soot formation of the corresponding flame is about 10- 7 g/cm 3 , this
means 5 10 15 C atoms· cm- 3 are present as soot. A characteristic
time for the soot formation process in premixed flames derived
from df/dt is around 10 ms(k- 1 ). The particle number variation can,
as mentioned already, be well described by a simple coagulation model
(except at the very beginning of the process). Both processes,
dN/dt and dfv/dt are closely interlinked in flames and proceed on
182 H. G. WAGNER
about the same time scale. The time necessary for the formation of
the first Observable soot particles within and after the main oxi-
dation zone of the flame is definitely shorter. The amount of soot
present at the place in the flame where the first particles can be
located by light scattering seems to vary somewhat. In C2H4 -air
flames it is around 15% for N ~ 10 12 cm- 1 . Bockhorn 32 reporEs even
lower values for fv of about 5%. With increasing temperature that
percentage seems to increase.
For the mass growth of soot particles the surface area or the
diameter of the soot particles might be an important quantity.
F/l0~:'
0.5 x C2H4 -air C/O= 0.76
0.4
0.3
0.2
0-
3C 6Hs-air
C/0=0.74
CIO :0.74
C/O: 0.78
---1~ x
0.1
F/5 ~ ~ t
5 10 15 20 25 30 t ems]
---
,
. - -.-
60 0 C6HS -air CIO : 0.74
"-
50
• - ...... - CSHS -air CIO: 0.78
D
40
1) values are reduced
30 by Q factor 10
20
10
10 20 t Ems]
:>:.
o
-,...
t::
lit
0.5
(/)
Z
w 1.0
l-
z I
1.5 I
0
w , I z
0: I o
Ui
W
2.0 I
....
I- (/)
ex I 90 ~
u
(/)
I (/)
z
2.5 ex
Q:
I-
100
:.e
0
•
o 2 3
TIME ,ms
SHOCK FRONT
ARRIVAL
The pressure range, a few bars, is the same for both sources. The
time is laboratory time, for real time the values have to be multi-
plied by approximately 3.5.
T ems]
0.5
Indene
0.1
Cyclohexadiene
0.05 Cyclohexene
In flat flames and in shock waves the time axis can easily be
realized, the systems are pretty close to one-dimensional systems.
In diffusion flames the situation is not as simple because the stream
tubes do not follow straight lines. It is therefore necessary to
188 H.G.WAGNER
III 160
Ec:
"II)
60- 120-
ffi
£Oi 0
8O"S!
~
1100
1XXl 0 0
30 50 70 90 TIC
HEIGHT 1"",1
DISCUSSION
df / dt = k ( f - f )n
v' M v
with the three parameters f , n and k. In flames the values of n = 1
fit best, k is around 100 vs -l (see Fig. 2) and f correlates
directly with the maximum amount of soot measured ~ithin the experi-
mental field of view. For the shock wave pyrolysis data, the
approximation by this expression sometimes seems to be not as good.
Here the values for the parameter k range up to above 1000 s-l and
n ~ 1 gave sometimes better fits. These expressions give some
information, how the mass growth process could happen, it seems to
be more informative, however, to compare some models with this
interpolation.
region to free molecular flow. The upper bound for the kM values
should therefore be definitely below kMO = 1.5 105 s-l(for m = 300,
kM _m- O. S).
The rate expression for this simple model has the same form as
the interpolation formula if the mass added to the particles (fM-f v )
is identified with S, the gas phase concentration of species that
can add to the particles. (In reality S should be higher.) A com-
parison of properly calculated kM values (for reasonable molar masses
m of adding molecules) with those k values in Fig. 2 shows a rather
large difference, even when an accomodation coefficient of 0.1 is
used and isothermal reevaporation of the same species is considered.
This could be used as an argument against normal vapour condensation.
The fact, that the measured k values are always below the theoreti-
cal upper bounds given here, gives a certain confidence in the ex-
perimental results.
With this simple growth model one should expect a certain de-
dependence of k (kM - For R) on experimental parameters like C/O. This
has not been found within the limits of experimental error, while
the fits for fM and n in the interpolation formula (which considers
only the particles) work rather well.
The growth rate of soot mass decreases towards the hot gas,
even though there is a comparatively high concentration of hydro-
carbon molecules left. This has been partly attributed to a reduced
surface activity of the particles, and various observations do indi-
cate that tempering or ageing of soot particles at high temperatures
may strongly influence their properties. It has also been observed,
however, that at different C/O ratios the sizes of the elementary
soot spheres are different and the times, when the growth rate be-
~omes very low,are also different. fM and the mean particle volume
v increase strongly with increasing C/O ratio. In the same way the
amount of material available, which can readily add to the particles
may increase with increasing C/O ratio.
df~dt = ken) fM
-1/ 2 (f
M
_f)3/2
v
·
For s h ort t1mes . h t n-1 appears on t h e r1g
t, a f actor W1t . h t S1. d e.
'(The coagulation rate constant is assumed to be independent of the
particle size, n is the number of elementary units in the smallest
particle which can be seen). This rate law does not fit the
flame data, it may well be, however, that a certain variation in
the single rate constants could bring the exponent towards one.
REFERENCES
1. B.S. Haynes, H.Gg. Wagner, Progress in Energy and Comb. Sciences,
to be published;
H. Gg. Wagner, Seventeenth Symposium (International) on
Combustion, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, p. 3-19
(1979).
MASS GROWTH OF SOOT 193
DISCUSSION
Wagner
For the high pressure experiments, which are far away from
the transition to free molecular flow, particle size measurements
are not available. If one takes the data obtained by Geck, the
diffusion controlled coagulation rate, and assumes that more than
50% of the initial hydrocarbon is converted into soot, one can
calculate a growth rate of particle size. The dependence of the
rate on particle size does not seem to follow that expected from
theory. A definite statement, however, cannot be made.
Wagner
H. F. Calcote
INTRODUCTION
197
198 H.F.CALCOTE
BASIC PREMISE
IONS>300
c
..:
z
!AI
I 10-10
:)
U
z
2
2 3 4 ~ 6 7
DISTANCE, em
c
.,:
Z
1&1
II:: 10-10
II::
~
U
Z
0
10-11
DISTANCE, em
Fig. 2 Ion profiles in a sooting flame. Acetylene-oxygen, ~ 2.7,
P = 2.0 kPa, T = 2170 K (Ref. 4).
NONSOOTING SOOTING
•
4(
..:
z
I&J
'I:
:a::
3 10-10
z
o
~
4(
I&J
0..
'.
10- 12 L..----J._.......L.._...J....._J.........o~~.......L.._ _J
e-
PRIMARY \~;~O'''N' "ON
FLAME'
IONS
LARGE INCIPIENT
AROMATIC --_.II'~ SOOT \ U R F A C E
NEUTRAL ~ IONS NUCLEATION PARTICLES GROWTH
..
FLAME'
SPECIES
SMALL
e-
PARTICLES
(1)
(3)
(4)
There are, in fact, a large number of routes from CHO+ through other
ion molecule reactions to CsHs+. In rich hydrocarbon flames, CsHs+
IONIC MECHANISMS OF SOOT FORMATION 203
(5)
C2 H2 CsHs +
+ C4 H2 CSH3+ + C2 H2
C3H3 + =
C4 H2 C7HS+
C2 H2 C7HS+
CSH3+ + C4 H2 C7 H3+ + C2 H2
C4 H2 CgHs+
C2 H2 = C7H7+
CsHs+ + C4 H2 C7HS + + C2 H2
C4 H2 C9 H7+
C2 H2 C9 H7+
C7Hs + + C4 H2 CgHs+ + C2 H2
C4 H2 C11 H7 +
C2 H2 CgHg+
C7H7+ + C4 H2 C9 H7+ + C2 H2
C4 H2 C11H9 +
C2 H2 CllH g+
C9 H7 T + C4 H2 Cl l H7+ + C2 H2
C4 H2 C13 Hg+
etc.
IONIC MECHANISMS OF SOOT FORMATION 205
>
<U 8.0
...i
c
zt=
w
7.0 PLANAR DISC
~
o
CL
8.0
Z
o
t=
c 5.0
~ GRAPHITE----~~::::::=.::::::==~
Q
4.0
1.0 2.0 5.0 10.0 20.0
PLANAR PARTICLE DIAMETER, nm
Fig. 5 Ionization potentials of soot particles.
This question arises for two reasons: (1) the available ion concen-
tration data are not definitive and (2) the argument has not been
thoroughly analyzed. Several measurements of ionization in sooting
flames have been reported but, unfortunately, these have not always
been performed under comparable experimental conditions with those
for soot concentrations. Some data for a well-studied premixed flame
are shown in Fig. 6. The flame is an acetylene-oxygen flame at an
equivalence ratio ¢ = 3.0, a pressure of 2.7 kPa, and an unburned
linear gas feed velocity of 50 cm s-1, except as noted. The curve
entitled "soot" is a combination of data obtained by Bonne et al. 7 and
Wersborg et a1. 6 The data marked "charged soot" are from Prado and
Howard. 8 The curve marked "Yeung '73,,6,8 was obtained using a molec-
ular beam sampling system similar to those used in molecular beam
mass spectrometer sampling of flames with the ions collected by a
Faraday cage. The curve marked "Homann '79" was obtained by a simi-
lar technique. 9 The probe curve is a recently obtained set of data
from AeroChem 10 obtained by a Langmuir probe technique using the
continuum electrostatic probe theory of Clements and Smy1l which in
the past has given very reliable absolute ion concentrations. in non-
sooting flames. In obtaining this curve we have used the molecular
weight increase through the flame measured by Homann. 9 The close
206 H. F. CALCOTE
., I
E
U
.1010
>
t-
e;;
Z
W
Q
II:
~ 1011
~
j
Z
1c1
o 1 2 3 • 5 8 7
DISTANCE ABOVE BURNER, em
Fig. 6 Number density of ions, soot, and charged soot particle pro-
files. Acetylene-oxygen, ~ = 3.0, P = 2.7 kPa, u = 50 cm S-l,
(except where noted). Soot from Wersborg et al. 6 and Bonne
et al. 7 ; charged soot particles from Prado and Howard B ; Yeung
'73 represents a molecular beam total ion sampling 6 ,8 for u =
38 cm s-l; Homann '79 is a similar type measurement 9 for ~ =
2.9, 44 cm s-l; the probe curve represents total ion concen-
tration measured by Gill et al. 10 with a Langmuir probe,
agreement between the AeroChem probe data and the molecular beam data
of Homann are encouraging. Certainly it remains an important task to
identify the absolute concentration of individual ions and small
charged particles as a function of position in the flames and equiva-
lence ratio.
12.-----~----r_----r_----~----~--~
~ 10-·
~
..
~10
..
Z
W
cr:: '0 ~
~cr:: 8 ~
cr::
..
:l w
(J
~ 10- 11
W
A.
&II 4 .... 1400 ~
w
10 0 ~
10
cr::
L
2
~ 10- 11 1200
2
1 2 3 5 8
AXIAL DISTANCE. em
For this reaction we will assume, for the sake of argument, an ion
concentration of C3H3+ of lOB ions cm- 3 which is conservatively low
compared with the values reported, for example, in Fig. 6. The rate
coefficient k has recently been measured by Ausloos and Lias 12 to be
10- 9 cm 3 S-1 and the temperature coefficient was estimated to be
208
H. F. CALCOTE
This overestimates the number of steps but ignores some loss of ions
through ion-recombination reactions. If we assume the rate coeffi-
cient for each step is the same as that for Reaction (6), then the
total time required for the 10 3 steps will be approximately 6 x
10- 5 s. This is a short time on the time scale of the flame and is
consistent with the observation that very large ions are observed
early in the flame front.
k nd 2 _ ( e2 )
(10)
--4- c e S 1 - CkT
e
6. Ion-molecule equilibria.
K
N+
P
N
N
e G
(2TI m~kT)'" exp
(
- ~)
kT
(11)
p h2
p+ + M + P + ~ (12)
~ 11
>-
I-
~u.. 10
C
o
e
Z
oIt
9
:U° 0
Q.
8
°
0.2 0.4 2 4 6 10 20 40
DIAMETER,nm
Fig. 8 Effect of particle diameter on proton affinity. (Ref. 14).
p+ + MH -+ PH + W- (14 )
t:.H! kJ
MH -+ M + H 420
M -+ M+ + e 680
p+ + e- -+ P -440
P + H -+ PH -420
MH + p+ -+ W- + PH 240
212 H. F. CALCOTE
l'lH, kJ mol- 1
C3H'7 + C1oH2 -+ C 1 3Hg + + e- -370 (15)
mH+ + M -+
+- m + MH+ (20)
-+
+- + (22)
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The work reported herein was partially supported by the Air Force
Office of Scientific Research (AFSC) under Contract F49620-81-C-0030
and the National Bureau of Standards Center for Fire Research under
Contract NB80NADA1038. The United States Government is authorized to
reproduce and distribute reprints for governmental purposes notwith-
standing any copyright notation hereon. The author is also indebted
to his colleagues, especially Drs. D.B. Olson, R.J. Gill, and W.
Felder for many helpful discussions and criticisms on the manuscript.
REFERENCES
10. R.J. Gill, D.B. Olson, and H.F. Calcote, work in progress.
11. R.M. Clements and P.R. Smy, Ion Current from a Collision-
Dominated Flowing Plasma to a Cylindrical Electrode Surrounded
by a Thin Sheath, J. ~. Phys. 41:3745 (1970).
12. K.C. Smyth, S.G. Lias~ and P. Ausloos, Can C3H3+ be an Important
Soot Precursor?, to be presented at Eastern States Combustion
Symposium, Pittsburgh (1981).
13. K.H. Homann and H.Gg. Wagner, Some New Aspects of the Mechanism
of Carbon Formation in Premixed Flames, in: "Eleventh Sympo-
sium (International) on Combustion," TheCombustion Institute,
Pittsburgh (1967).
14. H.F. Calcote, Ionic Mechanisms of Soot Formation in Flames,
Progr. Energy Combust. Sci., in preparation.
15. B.L. Wersborg, J.B. Howard, and G.C. Williams, Physical Mecha-
nisms in Carbon Formation in Flames, in: "Fourteenth Sympo-
sium (International) on Combustion," The Combustion Institute,
Pittsburgh (1973).
16. M. Meot-Ner (Mautner), Ion Thermochemistry of Low-Volatility
Compounds in the Gas Phase. 3. Polycyclic Aromatics: Ioniza-
tion Energies, Proton and Hydrogen Affinities. Extrapolation
to Graphite, ~. Phys. Chem. 84:2716 (1980).
17. H.M. Rosenstock, K. Draxl, B.W. Steiner, and J.T. Herron, Ener-
getics of Gaseous Ions, ~. Phys. Chern. Ref. Data 6:Suppl. 1
(1977) .
DISCUSSION
Calcote
INTRODUCTION
EXPERIMENTAL METHOD
6
Teflon
Atomizer
~(~
1~·t. ~,.r---
.........
Unburned
93% • Gas Mixture
Pump-
c:::s ," 15V----
mm ~___ _.
,,
~~ L: _~.
] '"
d
1 Diffusion
Pump
Fig. 1. Burner, atomizer and mass analyzer for the study of heavy
ions in sooting low-pressure flames
space in the tip of the cone. It is placed where the beam has already
reached its free molecular flow region. An energy separation of
the charged particles is obtained by applying a.repelling voltage
AU to the second grid. This leaves through only those particles for
which 1/2 mv2~ q AU, where m, v, and q are mass, velocity and charge
of the particle, respectively.
This mass separator which naturally does not have the resolving
power of a conventional mass spectrometer is especially suited for
particles of masses between 500 and 5.10 4 mass units. The "spectrum"
220 K. H. HOMANN AND E. STROFER
RESULTS
4 fulNerv:y-
Rel.Units
Soot Ions
Ll U (A -+ 0)
max
19 6U
max
where p and p are the pressures in the vacuum chamber and in the
flame, ~espectively. A is the orifice area and b is a proportional-
ity factor characterizing the loss of translational energy in the
direction of the beam axis. That this factor is little dependent on
the particle mass m suggests that it is proportional to the geo-
metric cross section of the large particle, 0p' and inversely pro-
portional to its kinetic energy when the part1cle ?as reached its
terminal velocity v p,co :
b ex 1 2
m v
2 p,CO
3 m
and
"2d~
p
b a:
m
a:
1
m-,f v
-2
2 p,co
d m v
p,oo
20 4
10
5
2
1~~--~~--~--~~--~~--~--~
o. 01
_ _ _ _ _ _-L'_ _ _ _ _ _
0.5_ _ _ _ _ _Orifice
_
Area/mm2
o to
~' ~'
2.0 Py110-3mbar
b increases for masses below about 1000 u. That means that the part
of the differential energy spectrum corresponding to smaller mass
particles is shifted more strongly to smaller repeller voltag~ than
that of larger mass particles (u ~ 1000).
Until the end of the oxidation zone mainly ions with masses
~300 relative mass units (u) are detected. These ions are formed
in the oxidation zone by chemi-ionization. They have also been ana-
lyzed by conventional mass spectrometryl0. Their number density de-
creases rapidly at larger heights. At 15 mm a broad shoulder appears
in the mass spectrum which is due to larger particles. The mass
distribution of these newly formed soot ions first is rather asym-
metrical with a steep increase at masses around 500 u and a long
smoothly sloping extension to about 5000. This asymmetry is still
obvious at 17 mm. The heavier charged particles increase strongly
in number density up to 20 mm. The strongest increase is found for
particles of masses between about 10 3 and 3.10 3u. The shoulder now
has developed into a second strong maximum in the spectrum. With
increasing height the distribution broadens while the maximum is
shifted to higher masses. A mass of 104u corresponds to the limit
size of particles that have been found by electron microscopy3,11
224 K. H. HOMANN AND E. STROFER
Fre~~y_
Rel.Units (zHz Flame
13
60 Rep. Potential IV
2 4 6
Fig. 4. Mass distribution of positive ions in a sooting C2 H2-02
flame. C/O = 1.12, p 27 mbar, Vo = 42 cm s-l
Fig. 5 shows the differential kinetic energy (or mass) spectra for
negatively charged particles fn;ym different heights in the same flame.
£.!:.t.Quemy_
10
Rel. Units
8 (zH z Flame
2 13
4
10
3
2
5
10 20 30 40
Height above the byrner
mm
Fig. 6. Profiles of positive and negative ionization.
(Same flame as in Fig. 4. )
226 K. H. HOMANN AND E. STROFER
.lli!1I&NY_
Rel. Units
Freg~_
15 mm above the burner 40 ReI. Units
20
500
8 .
1000
12 Rep.Potential4U/Y 4 8 12 Rep.Potential~UIV
1sOo Hol.HaSSig·mol-' L......-~~500~~~~1OOO.J-~~-1500"""'--'MO'-I.-M-=as'-s-=/g"-m-=o-I-·'
Freguen(L
Ret. Units
50 5
40
30
,, 3
\
\
20 I /-'~I ~H6.(/O"0.82 2
I II - - - -
I \\
I , \
,
10 1,\072 \ \
I
I
\- - - \
\
\
, \.
20 40 60 80 Rep. Potentiol6UI V
5 10 Mol. Moss 1103 g mor'
20
Number densi ty_
109 cm-3
2200 2200
10
~ C2 H2 • (/0=13
2000
1800 10
T 2000
1800
8
6 e
4
2
EE>
Height above the burner Imm
10 20 30 40 SO 10 20 30 40 SO
C
±,o e . A • f
Number Denslty_
10 9 (m-3
C2 H2 /0 2 = 1.26 + H2O + H20 + CsCl
20 2 2
,
"-
~ fh
10
I ,
10 20 30 10 20 30 10 20 30
Height above the burner Imm
Fig. 10. Influence of water and 2·10- 4mCsCl solution on the ioni-
zation profiles of a sooting acetylene flame.
C2H2/02 = 1.26, P = 40 mbar, Vo = 25 cm s-l (seeded
flame 30 cm s-l).
Fre~uemy_
Rel. Units
20mm 25 mm
2
o 2'10"
Mol. Mass I 9 mol-'
Frequency.
ReI. Units
1.0
0.6
10-3 m Cs CI
0.2·
- - - 0.1 m Cs CI
2 4 6 8
Frelluency_
Ret. Units
20 20 20
15 mm 20mm 25mm
above the burner
+O.lm [s[l
8 1'/
xl, l
I
8 8
I ,10
10 10 10
\
\
+ [scl \+ IS (l + (sa
~o
• !
Of the alkali salts other than CsCl the compounds KCl, KN0 3 ,
KiC03' NaCl, NaOH, NaZC03, Na ZW04 and LiCl were tested and also the
earth alkaline salts: BaCl Z' SrClZ, and CaClZ' All these salts have
in principle the same effect on the soot ions as has CsCl . The anion
is iImIlaterial. To obtain the same quantitative reduction of positive
and gain of negative ions, however, the concentrations of the salt
solution had to be increased in correlation with the ionization po-
tential of the metal component if this was high~r than that of po-
tassium. Fig. 14 shows a plot of the logarithm of the concentrations
of alkali and a1ka11ne earth halide solutions that have the same
effect as a Z'10- 4m CsCl solution versus the ionization potential.
The alkali metals can be connected by a curve showing a sudden change
in slope between 4.5 and 5 eV. Two straight lines drawn through the
point of Cs and K and through Na and Li intersect at about 4.8 eV.
The alkaline earth metals do not fall onto the same curve.
234 K. H. HOMANN AND E. STROFER
(oncentration /
of Solution
moll-1
;:
/:
(s K / :
-0 -~ ...
./
-.;-'
1~'---~---'--~---L.--~--'--
3 4 5 6
Ionization PotentialleV
Fig. 14. Correlation between concentrations of salt solutions of
equal efficiency and the ionization potential of the
metal.
DISCUSSION
\ T 2100
4
\ 2000
\ ....--exp
1900
3 \
\ cu lc.
~
2 \
\
:1 \
/1 "-
"-
"
I
10 20 30 40
Height ubove the burner/mm
REFERENCES
11. B.L. Wersborg, J.B. Howard and G.C. Williams, 14th Symp.(Inter-
nat.) on Combustion, p.929, The Combustion Institute,Pittsburgh
(1973)
12. B.L. Wersborg, A.C. Yeung and J.B. Howard, 15th Symp.(Internat.)
on Combustion, p. 1439, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh
(1975)
13. G. Sticha, Dissertation, Technische Hochschule Darmstadt (1977)
14. W. Morgeneyer, Dissertation, Univ.Gottingen (1968)
15. J.B. Anderson and J.B. Fenn, 4th Symp.on Rarefied Gas Dynamics
(J.H. Leeuw ed.) Vol. II, p.311, Academic Press New York(1966)
16. K.C. Salooja, Combustion Institute Europ.Symp. p.400, Academic
Press, London (1873)
17. E. Bartholome and H. Sachse, Z.Elektrochem.angew.phys.Chem.
53: 326(1949)
18. B.S. Haynes, H.Jander and H.Gg. Wagner, 17th Symp.(Internat.)
on Combustion, p. 1365, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh
(1979)
19. D.R.Hardesty and F.J. Weinberg, 14th Symp. (Internat.) on Com-
bustion, p.907, The Combustion Institut~, Pittsburgh(1973)
20. J.B. Howard, 12th Symp.(Internat.) on Combustion, p.877, The
Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh (1969)
21. K.H. Homann and H.Gg. Wagner, 11th Symp.(Internat.) on Com-
bustion, p.371, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh (1967)
DISCUSSION
Homann
Homann
+ +
Soot + Me -+ Soot + Me very fast
M
Me
+
+ e -+ Me k "v 10-9 cm3s -I
Soot
+
+ e -+ Soot k 'V 10- 5 cm3s -I
Homann
2. Rate data for the formation of metal ions when CsCl is added
to a sooting flame will be published in a forthcoming paper. The
242 K. H. HOMANN AND E. STROFER
Felix J. Weinberg
I~perial :'ollege
London SW I
England
INTRODUCTION
EFFECT OF AC FIELDS
However, not all the effects observed are due to ions. The
mass of soot collected, for example, is quite different for a DC
field and one oscillating at 50 Hz. Yet it is clear from Fig.l
that, to an ion, the two are similar since its amplitude of
oscillation at 50 Hz is at least one order of magnitude greater
than the distance to the nearest electrode. Accordingly the mass
of soot carried by the products is determined by electrical inter-
actions with the particles. As would be expected this effect
disappears at the high frequencies.
e
~ 105
~
:';:
i:i. mean free
e
-0( 107
particle
diam
10 2 10 4 10 6
Frequency (H z)
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
REFERENCES
A + O2 + A + 2CO
B + O2 + A + 2CO
A + B (thermal rearrangement)
2.5 [M.F.]
1.5
\
',,-
0.5
:ot'
3 5 7 9 1.1 h (em)
D
D D
• •
10-' f- xX'WC
x
xx.
+.....+
+
+
+
++
J h (mm'
10- 2 I I I
0 1 2 3 4 5 I
i~koo.
)(~jc#b~ o~ 6
00. 0·0 • •
• •
V b:
+
V 0 XV
D V
V6V V 6V V
6 D
•
+
D D i
t;.
++ D 6
10-1L-____~
D D h (mm) I
I ____~t ______~
I _____ L I
I _ _ _ _ _ _~----~
o 1 2 3 4 5 6
Fig. 6. Collision efficiency YOH versus height above burner h
for different fueld equivalence ratios: + 0.85, X 0.95,
01.05, • I . 10, 0 1.15, 6. 1.15 (+ CH4), V 1.15 (+ CH4
+ C02). 21
The values of y02 (Figure 5)21 are increasing over two orders
of magnitude from the leanest to the richest flame: the values
obtained for the two leanest flames are not unrealistic but the
high values of y02 in rich flames indicated that 02 acting alone
could not account for the observed burnout rates. On the contrary,
yOH (Figure 6)21 variation with equivalence ratio and position in
flame is fairly small; the average value is close to 0.28 when
calculated on the basis of an optical diameter. The authors are
brought to the reasonable conclusion that OH radicals are the main
oxidizing agent while molecular oxygen can be neglected except for
fuel lean conditions.
al
x
I
x
.!x.~
Xx
"
1l.1l.1l.1l.1l.1l.1l. A
H 0--6 X b. X A
o 2 3 4 5 6
Fig. 7. Profiles of number concentration N for fuel equivalence
ratio of 0.95 (x) and 1.15 (+ CH4) (~) versus height
above burner h. 21
N =~
b La
268 J.-B. DONNET AND J. LAHAYE
o
where La (in A) is the length of coherence of the graphitic struc-
ture in the direction parallel to graphitic planes.
o
For commercial furnace black La lies between 12 and 20 A 25
and therefore Nb goes from 0.33 to 0.20.
REFERENCES
DISCUSSION
Donnet
°
1600-1700 K. Certainly, we have evidence from an X-photoelectron
spectroscopy study of 02 and on the basal plane of single crystal
graphite that surface oxides have been des orbed (> 99%) by 1Z00 K
so that this process cannot be the main reason for the 1700 K
maximum.
Donnet
P. Cadman
° °
Studies at Aberystwyth using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
on the rate of attack of 0z and on the basal planes of single
graphite has suggested that atoms can pullout carbon atoms from
the basal plane at relatively low temperatures. This then creates
defects which can then expand and act like the prismatic edge,
Donnet
Donnet
The organized carbon layers are more easily built when the
curvature radius of the particle is high. For structural reasons
large particles are expected to have higher density than small
ones. This is experimentally verified.
Donnet
It is, indeed, another way of answering Prof. Homann's question.
Anyway, I do not like much the concept of microcrystals whatever
the temperature of carbon formation. It was convenient some 15
years ago but, as suggested by X-ray analysis, and demonstrated by
phase contrast electron microscopy, it is not relevant to carbon
black crystalline structure.
Donnet
Yes.
AEROTHERMOCHEMISTRY OF DIFFUSION FLAMES
Marce 1 Barrere
INTRODUCTION
273
274 M. BARRERE
·06
·01
(}s a
EQUIVALENCE RATIO
- gas fuel and gas oxidiser: parallel flow with plane or cylindrical
symmetry, laminar or turbulent; applications: torchs, combustors,
etc .•.
- liquid fuel and gas oxidiser: plane and spherical symmetry,
combustion of drops and spray; applications: combustors, reactors,
fires, etc ...
- solid fuel and gas oxidiser: plane, cylindrical, spherical
symmetry; applications: combustion of plastics, coal, hybrid
propuls ion, etc ...
- solid fuel and liquid oxidiser: cylindrical symmetry; applications:
hybrid propulsion, etc •..
- solid fuel and solid oxidiser: complex geometry; applications:
solid propellant propulsion, etc •..
..
OXIDIZER
•
l Exi t Impervious
Boundary Bo unda ry
-J__ __ ______ )
I I
CYlindrica l A~
Pyrex Shield -............
I so-
he r ma I
Silicone Oi l ~ro R Burner
Liqu i d Seal ~ ~
Pl atel
~~~~~~~~~mn~~
Perforated _
Brass Burner
Plate
_ ;'''!!! !I :: ~ ::, : ; : ' ",~ ~ ! ~~
. ttt tt ttt
Ai r Fue l Air
ro
~ R
40 Mesh
Stainless Steel ~
Screens
THEORET ICAL BURNER
Concentric ~
Brass Cy l inoers
Stainless
Steel Woo l
It'
Ar
In l et
Fuel
Inlet
Mass balance
Species balance
pu - - + pv--
aYi aYi
= k1 - a k
(y .g) + w. ~
ax ax y ay
Momentum balance
au au 1 a k
pu - + pv - = k - (y 'T)
ax ay y ay
T is the component of the viscosity tensor; here again, we admit
a component along y, in a direction of strong gradient.
Energy balance
ah ah 1 a k i=N
pu-
ax + pv ay = -::"K
y ay y q - I h~
~
w. ~
i=1
T
q corresponds to the heat flux, h f Cp dT is the sensitive
To
o
enthalpy, h. the heat of formation of species i, w. the production
o f spec~es ~.
.~. ~
F + SO + (I + S)P
278 M. BARRERE
A BURNED o
Fig. 4. Definition of the composition.
F'U.;)
a b
with u Ax and ~ = Byx The concentration profile outside
the fl~me is given by:
AEROTHERMOCHEMISTRY OF DIFFUSION FLAMES 279
F' (0 1 - th2~
2 Sc
'IT (0 (1 - tg .;)
(~)
1 - 'If U~f)
and
Y 1 _ 'IT ( ~)
o n( ~f)
This is the classical method to approach this problem but
there exist others. Mitchel1 2, for instance, utilizes a finite
element numerical method: the hypotheses are as follows. The
chemistry is still as simple and the production of each species
w w wp
F' o' is related by stoichiometry:
W
= -2=
S 1 + S
+ (4 - 2i - a)H 2
V'(Gv + T ) + ~ 0
- - r -r dr
and
N
D.~ ,me 1 Cp.(2T'~i)= - L h~ w.
~ ~ ~
L=1 L=1
31jJ
rGr - a; , rGz
o
eo
70 ......... 220 1
"'
1 Luminous flame surface
60 1 Q) 210
L
~lo~______~~~L~um~t~n~ou~s__
fl~a~m~e~s~u~rf~a~ce____~ ::J" 200
011 1 +- 190
E 180
Q) 170
D-
E 160
Q) 150
f--
c
U 110
Q) 100
o U1
"'- 90
+-
(1J
E
U RO
L ~ 70
+-
c >-60
~ I -{!--o-_ cd +- 10
c ., U 40
8 J
.oCJ-{)_ .... - "
H2 ',1\ o JO
(]) 20
I 1_,,_~_~~~::,,_"_"_"_1- > 10
0.10.] 0.50.7 0.9 l.1 1,31.5 1.7 0,10.3 0.50.7 0.91.1 1.31.5 1.7
Distance from Symmetric Axis (cm) Distance from Symmetric Axis (cm)
Fig. 5. Concentration, temperature, and velocity profiles establish-
ed 2.4 cm above the burner plate. Solid lines denote
theoretical profiles. Dashed lines denote curve drawn
through dat~ points. (.Ar; ACH 4 ,OCO; OC0 2 ;OH 2 ;eH 20;
+N 2 , 6° 2 ),
7.0r---r---r-.,..-~---'--r---r---r---'
6.0
t~\ -(PREDICTED)STOICHIO-
I METRIC OXYGEN
COEFFICIENT = 2.0
I \
I \
q --(pREDICTED)STOICHIO-
E
5.0
f METRIC OXYGEN
\ COEFFICI ENT = 1.76
~ I
w \
u
<{ b q OEDGE OF LUMINOUS
u.
a: I FLAME SURFACE (EXP)
I
::l
(/) 4.0 I \ DEDGE OF BLUE
,
a: REACTION ZONE (EXP)
w
z
,b 0\
a: I -
::l
I
,,F
'"w q
> 3.0
0
I
'"
<{
I
I-
J: 0
S? 10
w
J: I I
2.0 I
C'O 0
[ 0 0
1.0
0 0
0 0 0
·1.5 ·1.0 ·0.5 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0
DISTANCE FROM SYMMETRIC AXIS (em)
2
Fig. 6. Flame profile and height of the flame .
11 I I
10 ~
• Experi menta 1 Data -
9 __
-
.-...,
o
::. 8 r -
-
.-
c Complete Combustion: ~~
~ 6 ~ Stoichiometric Oxygen / " ..... -
:::: Coefficient = 2.0
.
./_""
.....
d' . . .,
~
: 5r ~~/
g' 4 r Partial Combustion: -
~ .. Stoichiometric Oxygen
~ ........ Coefficient = 1.76
It! 3 r " -
~.
~
-
-
I J I I
30 40 50 60
Fuel Nozzle Reynolds Number
"."""""~ ~'
0.35
2000
N2
N2
0.30 .8 1800
06 0'1 6 'I 6 0
'I CH 4
.7
o U g 1600
0.25 .6
\~
z
.5 O~ 00
1400
0 ~
;::
u
«
0.20
4~ IU
a:
...
a: .3 °2 ~ 1200
...«:>
;s\
IU
...J a:
0 IU
0 0.15 N2 CH 4 02 TEMPERATURE Q.
:!; <> Z" 1.2 em 1000 :!;
...
w
" C 0
Y
(, Z" 2.4 em
0.10 800
\
600
0.05 <>
\
-0
-<) 400
~0'2 10. 1 10 1 10 2
u
-I c
D Sl]"""
c c
Radi us (em)
2.54 0.0
30
0.2
0.05
0.005 0.10
0.01
'"
x
ex:
u
ttl
3:
....,
~
0.50 ~
>,
Vl
Flame Tip
5.8 em
t t t t t t t t
Air Fuel
1500
1200
/
/
T'('K)
/
qoo
bOO /
/ \
300
/ \
-2 0 2 4-
'j' (mm)
+heory
eXl>er"lment
0·20
~
0·15
0·10
0·05
A + 0 + P
with a production:
2 TA
WA = - kAP YAY o exp(- 1f)
20
60
15
OJ
..J
o '"
~ 10 t
Q
0,
en
oQ.
~
o
u
2
DISTANCE SURFACE
N
u
= 2 [I + f (R , P ) ]
e r
where the Reynolds number ~s relative to the drop and P r
is the Prandtl number.
w. =!y.*w
J J
the sign + corresponding to the products formed and the sign -
to the reactants.
AEROTHERMOCHEMISTRY OF DIFFUSION FLAMES 289
T * - Cp
1 '" h O
j j
•
Wj
T = T
s
being the temperature on the drop surface and the fuel mass mF
flow rate, ~1 the heat necessary to vaporize the liquid fuel,
with:
xR
F
s
= ___
4Tr)..r
Cp
~ CpT*
In I + - -
L'll
t
T
00
- T
T
S
*
The fuel evolution is:
T =T
f
- I + Yo * L'll]
[ T*(·Y * ) - (T f - T s ) - -Cp
~[fD.FCP
exp - - ( -1 - -)
4'JT rf
I
r
J- \
I
F
and
Y
o
K 8A
= PI Cp
This law, as shown on Figure 14, 1S rather well verified
experimentally
,:,~
1.6
::! 1.2
u SIZE
0 SYMBOL FUEL
~ '" DECYL ALCOHOL ~
....
~
0.8
Q .. METHANOL ....
M 0 N-HEXADECANE
'"
0
w
a: 2.8
<I
• N-PENTANE
Y,.O.227
~
0 00000
'" 2.4 000
a:
'".... 000
w 2.0
::! •• 00
<I
0 • •• 0
0
00
""~--~
1.6
1.2
SIZE
0.8
0 '.
0.8 I
1.0 I
1.2 I
1.4 1.6
TIME (.)
Fig. 14. Drop diame ter variati.on during burning in a comb us tion
gas environment; V = 0.625 m/s. T = 2530 K.
AEROTHERMOCHEMISTRY OF DIFFUSION FLAMES 291
Dn = nno - Kt
with n ~ 2, n = 2 when diffusion is the principal phenomenon and
n = 1 if the action of chemistry is predominant (for instance
combustion of a drop of monopropellant).
2
(r f - r )
s ~
Diff - Diff
~
I I
I
I
I
I
~
T
YF ~>
~
LAMINAR I ~R~ENT
II
I
to +ts
1
u =""t Ju(t) dt
s
t
o
u' = u(t) - u
LDV
Hot
Wire
o 30 60
msec
E(N)
u,2 = 1
00
E(N) dN
R(T)
uet) u(t
u,2
I- T)
-;2
u
fo
Nmax
E(N) cos 2nNTdN
2u ,2 -2
u
10'---~--~----'---~--~--~---AAI
40
N2 - ~
" )0
~
H,
0,
20
10
u • 0'10-'
.; B • u'
E • y'
2000
N,' ~
0-
'"
1500
1000
500
(pv)f
A B
o 0
..... ...... .
. ... -.....
10'
E
u
o .0·
• •
..
o •
o •
•
•
•
•
L=30 mm
L=60
L=90
L=160
... o
•
•
•
L=lOmm
L=20
L=30
L=60
10' o '" 16' •
o
L=90
L=160
00
1~~2------~------~----~~----~2 164L-------~------~------~----~
~ ~ ~ ~ m 16 2 10' 10· 10' 102
(a) em- 1 (b) em'
w= K(T) Y.Y.
~ J
i i '1'
from the same function P:
<D~.~'"'Ld l:J
• ,~
...••....•••. ~
U · .'
®
,PICIL
~ V\
.~~
Ib) .ETS
IALSO WAKES /IW
BCl.NlARY LAYERS)
L& '
PICI
~~~~
(!)
These few examples show that the problem gets more complicated
when the number of variables increases, in particular when we
introduce the chemical variables, which should be reduced as far
as possible.
F + SO + (S + 1) P
AEROTHERMOCHEMISTRY OF DIFFUSION FLAMES 299
Wp
----
1 + 5
SY
13 Op Y +---...E..-
0 5 + 1
t;5
Yp (5 + I)YF1~
~ - ~5
i3 Fo ~ 0 ~ ~ ~5 YF YF1 i3 Fo ' Y 0 0
1- ~
5
300 M. BARRERE
I - I;
(S + I) YFI I;S I - I;
S
f ~s
COHERENT STRUCTURE
-
OXIDIZER
-
t:'UEL-
_ _--!c:~
OXIDIZER
L
Fig. 21. Detached diffusion flame.
AEROTHERMOCHEMISTRY OF DIFFUSION FLAMES 303
o 2 3
rID rID
f Ko = ar P n
exp(-br)
" /\(~~-
I'-<
\ ';'"
Y, I /
'(~~
j / ~T ~DARY
I / . . . ENTRANED GAS
'~COLD CORE
riO riO
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
309
310 J. M. BEER ET AL.
,I \ \
-··-'2.57
z
Q / \ ---11.89
~
oc(
0:
15 / .. -..... \ -·_·,Q82
7.15
~
- - - - - 6.36
/ \. \
Z
II
W
U 10
z
\.\
II /.-.. .,. \.
-
0
u
~
0
0
VI
5
V·,--,'-.'-._._
, . -. .-::::
..
0
// ' .......... _----
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
DISTANCE FROM BURNER TIP (CM)
w 12
0:
~ (0) Mom<2ntum (b) Combustion
::J 10 1000gm-- Arr °'0
0: 1500gm--- 110'1,--
w 8 140'1,---
Q.
'"2<t 6
0: 4
1.9
::J 2
---'
2 0
o 2 4 6 8 o 2 4 6 8
SLOT NUMBERS SLOT NUMBERS
125 275 425 125 275 425
DISTANCE FROM DISTANCE FROM
BURNERS CMS BURNERS CMS
w 12
0: (c)Combust,on FU<210il
r- IO x
::J Air T<2mp. \ Rot<2
-1
0:
8 l00'C- < /'44 kghr
w 650'C--- 1 -1
Q.
,_1_114 kg hr
I.X
6
'"2 \ \
I x-98 kg hr
-1
<t
0:
~
4
\\
--'
::!
2 0
2
0 2 4 6 8 o 2
"
'>I',
4 6 8
SLOT NUMBERS SLOT NUMBERS
125 275425 125 275 425
DISTANCE FROM DISTANCE FROM
BURNERS CMS BURNERS CMS
For jet flames the development of which are not solely dominated
by the jet momentum at source, the soot formation near the burner
depends upon additional parameters such as fuel atomization qualitY1
the spatial distribution of the spray and the near-field flow pat~
tern; the latter refers to coherent structures of flow such as wakes
of bluff body flame holders, or toroidal recirculation zones produced
by swirling jet flow. II
~
z 1.2
~
(/)
z 1.0
o
u
« 0.8
x
o
w 0.6
-- -- -- -- -- MR =0.8
-- ---- --
~
It:
oLL 0.4
-"--"-- "--"--"-- .. - M.R'=0.9
-
~ 0.2
O~ __ ~ __ ~ __- L__
----_
- --
~____~__~__- L_ _~_ _ _ _~_ _~_ _- L__~__~
MR=10
.
Experimental apparatus
Measurements
Sampling
ForcCPd
Droft
rans
ECONOARY AIR
Combustion --r---179··
Analytical procedure
Combustion air:
NUMBERS MARKING
4 PROFILES REFER
TO AXIAL DISTANCE
0:: IN METERS
W
I- 4 SRC 1I Haavy
w
~
0::
U IJ.J
I-
III W
3
J
U ~
0:: U
w III
a.. J
~ U
<t: 0::
0:: W 2
(!) a..
z ~
(!)
U
Z Z
0
U 0
I- Z
0 0
0 U
en
0 t::. 1.07,
I-
0 , x
~it
0.5 1.0 1.5 0
2.0 en
AXIAL DISTANCE FROM NOZZLE It 0 1,,]7
IN METER o 2.28
in the stage flame are about twice as high as in the single stage
flames. Time average measurements of 02 concentrations in the fuel
rich zone begin to show a rise approximately 1 meter upstream of the
secondary air injection point as a result of some backmixing of the
secondary air; at a distance of 0.6 meters upstream of the secondary
air injection point the 02 concentration is 0.5%. This follows the
initial entrainment of the burner air into the jet and explains the
observed decay of soot concentration in the fuel rich zone of the
flame.
Downstream of the secondary air jets the soot concentration
decay rapidly to a level close to that in the unstaged flame of
SOOT FORMATION AND BURN-OUT 319
1.0
NUMBERS MARKING PROFILES
REFER TO AXIAL STATIONS
.
u (X/D) IN THE JET.
z 0.8
o
u
I-
o
o
C/)
0.6
o
W
N .........--1.0
..J
0.4
<t:
:2
a::
o 0.2
z
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
NORMALIZED RADIAL DISTANCE R/X
0:
W SRC II HEAVY
I- 8
w
}:
V
iil
:J
V 6
0:
+
W
Q.
+
I/)
}:
4
«
0:
19 -·UNSTAGED
z
V 2
+~
z
oV
~
8
I/)
o +
o 1 2 2.59 3
AXIAL DISTANCE IN METERS
Fig. 8. Effect of air staging upon soot concentration along the
flame axis (SRC II heavy distillate).
320 J. M. BEER ET AL.
about .02 - .05 g/Nm 3 . The high velocity transverse secondary air
jets are designed to entrain the total amount of the fuel rich
pyrolysis products before reaching the axis of the furnace. The
soot burns in these secondary air jets to a low level of concen-
tration. It is thought that the emission of low concentrations of
soot can be attributed to the same mechanism of excessively stretched
flamelets in the high shear region of the jet as mentioned earlier.
r<)
10 -
I I
01 MW
-
E
6. 2 MW
E FU<21 L<2on
OJ
z
011-
H o -
«
~
o
0::
~
Z
W o
U
z
o
U
0.1 f- I -
I
..... I 6.
o o
o
lJ) I ! I
3 5
DISTANCE FROM BURNER NOZZLE(m)
Samples were collected from the flame and analyzed for PAR con-
centration. The majority of PAR compounds in the samples have been
individually identified and quantified using capillary gas chroma-
tography. Concentration of PAR compounds was also determined in
the SRCII fuels. The detailed data of fuel and sample analyses
have been reported elsewhere. 14 Because of the limited scope
of this paper the discussion is restricted to a few of the compounds
which dominate the concentration distribution or are of interest
because of their known biological activity.
400 40
'"
0
0
--<
,
co 3,0 n
""
co
~
z
~
z
PYRE NE ,.
:xJ
--<
0
>- 2.0 ~
«
'" FLUORANTH E NE
'"3:
~
0
U
3:
w
,
I NAPHTHALENE 1,0
g:
Fig. 10. PAR and soot concentration along axial distance of the
flame (SRC II heavy distillate).
322 J. M. BEER ET AL.
also shown to illustrate the point that the PAH compounds maY well
be considered to be soot precursors. Close to the burner - X/D
< 5 - the mixture is strongly fuel rich and pyrolysis of the fuel
produces high concentrations of PAH. As soon as soot begins to
form the PAH concentration reduces to a low level and then continues
to decay further but at a slower rate. Figure 11 illustrates the
burn-out of PAH and soot for axial distances X/D > 5. I t is thought~
that while the four and five ring compounds are relatively stable
their survival in low concentrations along the flame is not due to
chemical kinetic limitation but is caused by unmixedness due to the
extinction of reaction in stretched f1amelets emanating !:roIU the
turbulent flame brush. The effect of staging of the combus·tion air
upon the axial concentration distributions of pyrene and naphthalene
is shown in Fig. 12. Both PAH compounds have significantly higher
peak concentrations in the fuel rich zone of the staged than in the
unstaged flame, the ratio of concentrations being especially high
for the pyrosynthetized napthalene. It is interesting to note tbat
the decay of the PAH concentrations along the axis occurs in the
fuel rich stage similarly to that in the unstaged flame. As there
is little or no oxygen in this region (¢ ;= 1. 3), the fast decay of
PAH and the increase in soot concentration (Fig. 13) lend further
support to the suggestion that the PAH is consumed by the soot
formation process leaving only the most stable 3-5 ring compounds.
Some other PAH compounds, not present in the fuel are formed in
this rich flame zone. For the case of air staging when the zone
of fuel rich composition (¢ 6 1.3) extends to a distance of X/D ~ 20
PYRENE
'7::E
V>
0
~'" 4
0
-<
n
z 0
0 :z
;:: ~
c( :z
'"t- -<
~
15
u -<
:z:
0
NAPHTHALENE 0
:z
u
~
~
:I:
2 FLUORANTH ENE 3
3
0
w
15
x/o
Fig. 11. PAH and soot concentrations in the burn-out region
(SRC II heavy distillate).
SOOT FORMATION AND BURN-OUT 323
6CXl - ~---Pyrene
M
, (staged)
~
<!>
~
z
~
l-
\ - - + - - - nap hth al e ne
e(
or
I-
z:
UJ
(st aged)
U
z:
0
u
:c
e(
c..
2 \---\rk---- PY r en e
o
o 2 3
AXIAL DISTANCE IN METER
Fig. 12. PAR concentration along axial distance for staged and
unstaged combustion (SRC II heavy distillate).
8·0
OJ>
~I--I--PYRENE 0
0
-<
0.0 n
0
:z
~
:z
z: -<
o
'"
»
-<
~
I- ~-~-FLUORANTHENE 4.0 0
:z
15
u ;;:;
z:
o ~--~~NAPHTHALENE '""',
u
:c w
~
2.0
o 0.0
o 10
AXIAL DISTANCE FROM NOZZLE X/D
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Institute under which the SRCII fuels where made available. Special
thanks are due to Dr. W. C. Rovesti of EPRI for valuable discussions
on the characteristics of SRCII fuels. The valuable assistance was
given by the technical team of the MIT Combustion Research Facility,
Mr. Rolf Steendal, Mr. Don Bash and Mr. Joseph Gartland, graduate
students Mr. Calvin Galbriel and Mr. Vince Paul, and undergraduate
students Miss Tina Bahadori and Miss Hou Yee.
THEORETICAL MODELS FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF LIGHT SCATTERING
INTRODUCTION
327
328 A. D' ALESSIO ET AL.
The other two elements F34 and F44 are determined from the measure-
ments of the U and V vectors of the scattered light when the
incident light is completely circularly polarized (U = 0 and
o
V 1)· in this case
o '
C
scatt
4'Tf PVV(8) (6)
where i~ and Pvv are the adimensional scattering and phase functions.
.~.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
-------
- - - - -----
--------- -
....... .......
............ , ........ '" ...... 0.· ....................•...•...................
..:
. _.-'-'-
I'
1
,/.,.... --- ......
,- - ..... ...... - - - - - - -
/ . ". :-. :-: :-:-:-:~.;:. ;:-:...:. : ,:.~;. =:--'.~..-,-.-.-.-.-::"::''::':.~:~
~ ....... .....
,,' " . ... '" ' .. ;-;
I
/
I
1.60 1 methll 0
naphtalin
o
1 dlphenil athen
n o11soproPil
naphtalin
A =550 -650 nm
6 dlvlnll benzol
T~ 15-20OC
1.55 6tetralin
6 62.4.5 trlmetllstyrol
athil
styrol
. ....
I
C
1.~ •
.. C 'C....
II I
"C'c+c-
I
1.45
•••• • • • •
••
••
• •• I I I
-C-C-c-
1.40
L
• I I I
•
1.35
5 10 15 20 25
carbon atoms
Fig. 3. Real component of refractive index n for different liquid
hydrocarbons as function of the number of carbon atoms.
LIGHT SCATTERING BY PARTICLES IN COMBUSTION SYSTEMS 333
RAYLEIGH SCATTERING
I m~ II
A2 6
C (8) = - - a
VV 4n2 m + 2
(7)
2 cos e
2
+ cos 8
334 A. D' ALESSIO ET AL.
(8)
C
abs
).,2( 1
=- 31
I
m2
m
- I
2 + 2
I (9)
1T m
-j -
1T
{31
a m
I
m
m2 - J
2
+ 2
I 2
+-
3 .61 :: : ~I} (10)
...
Cl~~l
cm 2 .,-1
" ,
,/" ---- .......
,,
Y.
'. ..... .... .... .... ....
.,01
-
/ ..... ....... .-.-.~
.. .............~.-.
f·
-.
-""""'-':, ..
................ "': .....
I0I1=-_ _ ____:':::------:':------'------:-~---___:':.,-------:-'lIiI4
200 258 310 A. nm 258 311 A.nm 358
2 JI(CX' sin 8)
PVV(8) = 2·cx ( II)
sin 8
101~-'~--'-'----------------~R=-a-Y-O-p-t~i~c-s----m--=-1~.5~0~-----',-----.
~, i
-::::, ~ ,'pill
'::: ~," , 1 ' \ Vi /,
" "' \ I}
, ' 2
,
,~
pOI \.
'\
\
/
v
'\ \
\1
\ \
pOI
HH
10-4L-~-,__.--.__.-.--.__,L~-.__.--.-,,-.--.~,-,-~
o 30 60 90 120 150 e- 180
Rainbow Position
2 internal reflection
60 80 120 140
m2 .-------------------------------------------,,----,
10
10
,,
,,
\,
ex -17
,, ---1!l:. t5
, , - 1!l • 1.51-0.561
\,
,,
,
,
,, ,
,\
~ .
,," ,,
"
\
\
,,
\ -' \\
,,
( \
,,
\
\
"'; ! \., -
t\, ,:
\,
,
,,,
~
10 ,
,
\ It,
\ ,/ \ !
\ /;:
~/".J \!
.,
\'
10 "
o 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
10 .,
,, ,,
::
\ t-
I ,i\ ,t'J \ ,,, ,,,
il;"\ ," ,1\
t, : f \! \: \
.
, I
: \
:' \ i '\ i \! \j
I
f, \: \ ,: \,
____I I,\ I
i '\ It " \ ,
'\:' \' \ \: , \ ""
10
If ,
v , , ,I, ,"" , ,:
\i
" '.j "
\
\, Ii \ ,:,
I
, I
,,:' ,, ,,,
I'
,, , ,
"III' !, ,:
10-1
"•, ""
",
"
d ·17
---- 1!l=t5
10-2
- m" t57-056j
2 / p p
.; VV· HH
PHH + PVV
J~---------------------------------,
0/.4
--m ..1.5
-m-t57-0.561
///
"
,,.
/
,,
r,
. ,,
,1/
" '\'
\
,,
/ "
/ '
10
.! \\
,
\
~~---------------------------------.
t
t\
," ,
, I
, I
10
.
,! \,,
,, ,,
, I
/", i \
// "'" "i \
to .,--_-"'-=--.."'------J' \',..................,.1' \
\
\, ,
'v'
0(",4
1~ ----m= 1.5
- m= 1.57-0.56i
1~~---r----~--~----~--_,----~--~----~--~----~
0.0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160{}'180
Figs. 11-12. Angular patterns of scattering function i~ and
y iH/i~ polarization ratio for a size parameter
a 4 and for refractive indices m = 1.5 and
m I.57-0.56i.
LIGHT SCATTERING BY PARTICLES IN COMBUSTION SYSTEMS 345
and found that the scattering in the side and backward regions
is more isotropically distributed than it is expected from a Fresnel
analysis showing an enhancement near 180 0 •
N TI D3 Nd TI Dd3
X s s+ (I-X) (13)
6 6
with
( 14)
348 A. 0' ALESSIO ET AL.
CONCLUSIONS
x·OA
10
1D
10"'"
10-2
10
o 80 120
REFERENCES
DISCUSSION
D' Alessio
INTRODUCTION
355
356 A. D' ALESSIO ET AL.
scattering
volume
polarizer
L'lV = :! D2 . Ws . S1 (I)
4 L
s;-
1
L'ln -_ :! D2
4 ;r1 (2)
I L
ln o(x=O) Jk t (x) dx (5)
I(x=L) o ex
Q = N • C (6)
Table I.
N N C C Q Qmax
min max min max min
PAR
fluorescence - 10 15 10-25 10- 19 10- 15 10- 8
A = 514.5 nm 8.1.. = til.. = 8.1.. = liA =
1.. 0 = 555 nm 0.3 nm 0.3 nm 0.3 nm 0.3 nm
Raman
N2 , °2' CH 4 - 10 19 10- 31 10- 30 - 10- 11
c
-- c:o
-+-
OX
----
ccxx:
O~-2~OOO~----~3VOOO~------4~OOO~-----'5000~~----6~OO~O~
(Al-
Fig. 2. Molar extinction coefficient as function of wavelength
for linear polycyclic aromati c hydrocarbons. 13
4n £ooQ{ . 6A dA/6A
(7)
kabs
362 A. 0' ALESSIO ET AL.
f -2 -I
where QA is the monochromatic fluorescence coefficient (cm sr )
and 6A is the instrumental bandwidth; the integral is extended
to the whole band and the 4~ factor takes into account the iso~
tropic nature of the emission.
max
Wsr- 1
~K
~~K : ~,:
~3
Back,round Signal 0
P=R 6.VelRission
P=Q /IV,,,,, I, •n
/lV= 10-' Cll 3 /lV= 10-lcml
NdY.AG
10 3
.HI NI rr Ion oAu~,
~ .111
OAr 101 oliF ~I
"HI C~
• Ar F
and thus eliminating a great part of the flicker noise in the flame
background. I t is normally obtained with a lock-in amplifier,
which is able to improve the signal-to-noise ratio more than four
orders of magnitude. 23 Therefore, it is possible to extract signals
of intensity much lower than the flame intensity background, with
acceptable signal to noise ratio, when the measurement time is
long enough.
o
>
..
C3
cno
.. -10
Ao" 514,5 nm
R 1,27
nitrogen diluted flame
l1i 0!:---"-~-'--;i;2~~-4;----"""":6"""'~-;;-8--7-10
Z.mm
~ 700 ....-tJ--"
~ O~....e
z~ /.2--"
0;500
II _/~
0
Q.
o from scatter ina m.asurement
E
! 00 t:.. Irom thermocouple m•••.
.-._.-.
.....-.-
-8
10
':;; • Qu 4A ,l.555.0nm
:10· .! /
'E ,
j
: 6A'
> -10 •
-11
•
100~----~5------~1~0------~15'---~
Z,mm
.,
C
C
60
'"
C
.,.,
L
..
.,
u
..,.,
.
N 20
L
a
0..
c
::::l 0 L-..---''------'_----'_----'-_--'-_---'-_---'-_~
200 300 400 500 600
Wavelength [nmJ
. 16 ....-----r--...,...--.,.-----r--...,.....---,
CH4/02 Flame (R-I.27 Z-6mm)
.. Experimental Extinction
• Theoretlc.l Mle Ext. (D-20 nm)
.12 o PAH Computed AbsorptIon
~
E
u
"
+'
c
OJ
.08
.-
u
.....
.....
OJ
0
U
c
.04
0
+'
U
.-
C
+'
X
W 0
~
200 300 400 500
Wavelength [nm]
101r-_ _- r____~--_,----_r~--r---_,
,...,
E
u
" 10"
.C
II
Nitrogen Dllulted
D 205nm
n ....
514.5nm
......
U l>.
II
o
U
.c
o
.
u
c
~ lerL-_ _~____-L____~____L-__~____~
5 10 15
Height above the Burner z[mm]
~IOo
-.""
lit
odilfusion flame
'"E
~
co
""
.
..... 60
.
...""
lit
~
co
~4o
20
). =514.5nml
I
"
II
'-.
-.- burning spr., z=40mm
z=100
'E.
"t,4
1.2
.8
.4
~.8
0
-
CS)
-;.6
en
-
0 ,
"-
~.4 -
.,
\,
CS) ,,
en
..,,
0
;E.2 I- ,
,..,
II .",
0 I I "I~-~ "-~1"-"-"-"1"-"
.
'"
~15 I-
u
"-
::: 10 I-
CS)
.*
~
CS)
en
5 _
~
0 0
0 40 80 120 160 200
Height above the Burner z[mmJ
REFERENCES
DISCUSSION
BROADENING SPECTROSCOPY
INTRODUCTION
379
380 M. E. WEILL ET AL.
( 3)
THE STATUS OF THE ART IN SOOTS DIAGNOSIS 381
CONTROL VOLUME
LASER
COLLECTING DlAPHRAGM01
IMAGING DIAPHRAGM D2
~-y RECORDER!-
'V 2
S(2TIV) 2 a J I~(T) I cos2TIVT·dT (4)
0
E I E. exp i
J
[k. r.
l J ,i
( t) - w0 tJ (5)
j=l
k. k . - k .. ( 6)
1 S,l 1,1
such as:
41TSin(~)/A. ( 7)
From relations (1) and (5), and assuming that the motion of
the jth scattering center is not correlated with the motion of
the kth particle (j F k), ~ (T) reads * :
N
R(T)=exp(-iw T) L <E.(O)E.(T)exphk.(r . . (T)-r . . (O))}> (8)
-E 0 . 1 J J 1 J,l J ,1
J=
E.(r . . ) =E·A(r . . ) ( 9)
J J,l J,l
".
E.(O) E.(T) stands forE.(r . . (0)) E.(r . . (T))
J J J J ,1 J J,l
THE STATUS OF THE ART IN SOOTS DIAGNOSIS 383
N
R (T)=exp (-iw T)
Eo. 1 J,1
I
E 2«A(r . . (O».A(r . . (O)+lil, .. (T)+\>' . . T)
J,1 J,1 J,1
J=
(13)
A (r . . ) = Ao exp
J,1
(-r~J,1. / (4 cr 2» ( 15)
384 M. E. WEILL ET AL.
where 40 is the diameter at 1/e 2-intensity of the laser beam (at the
waist) .
where C1 contains terms which do not matter for our purpose and
where we have assumed that D T « 2 a 2 (an inequality checked in
realistic situations).
2 k~ D
1
(19)
S (27fV) = C2 J exp
o
(-TIT )2
v
exp (-TIT d) cos 2 7f V T d T (20)
EXPERIMENTS
Spectra processing
mV
0.96
o.ao Z:2cm
0.64
OAB
Q32
0.16
l---r_-:===;::::::::;;:::::::;;'kHz
o 10 1 20 25
-4 10-4
Tv=810 Td. 1.6
Z=2cm
it EXPERIMENTAL POINTS
as _ VOIGT FITTING
kHz
5 10 15 20 25
0-t--.--,--.--...---_
o 5 10 15 20 25 f kHz
that means :
cS V = (22)
L
8V L ,H Z
1200
1000
800
600
•
400
200
8v
g
= IT/
1
(21TCJ) (23)
t5Vg,H z
5000
4000
3000 •
2000
1000
10 20 30 40 50 60 VernIs
Soots results
d{nm)
<D.O·ALESSIO R.2.54 V.'Z4cmls
170 (2) AG. PRADOJ.LAHAYE R.2.54 V.7.4cmls
@ • S.H.O R.2.65 V.6.2cm/s
150
50
Zcm)
Q,5 1.5 2
Fig. 9. Soot diameters versus z.
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
DISCUSSION
Gouesbet
ON PARTICULATE DIAGNOSIS
INTRODUcrION
395
396 G. GOUESBET AND G. GREHAN
(QES) -THEORY
Generali ties
z
p
p
~----t----Y
iv) Turbidity
When the light propagates through a length L of a medium
398 G. GOUESBET AND G. GREHAN
v) Pressure of radiation
It will not be discussed here.
00
2n + 1
L -:----:--:- g {a IT (cose) + b T (cose)}
n(n + 1) n n n n n
(2)
n=l
00
2n + 1
L ~----~ g
n(n+ 1) n
{a T (cose) + b IT (cose)}
nn nn
( 3)
n=l
Basic papers are from Lorenz 14, 15 , Mie 16 and Debye. 17 The
plane wave being a special axisymmetric light profile, the LMT will
be here deduced from the GLMT. For an incident plane wave, the co-
efficient gn became all equal to 1,9,10 so that Relations (2) and
(3) are readily specified for the LMT.
(6)
IS/
d=8 fm,.,l=514,5nm,rr=48,85
m=1,4·0,1 i
BACKWARD
~ 0 -2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 FORWARD
(i) The first one concerns the case of small particles (a and lsi
small) considered without change of concepts, that means we just
deduce new formulae from the LMT with the aid of mathematical
approximations. The basic idea is then to compute the series Sl and
S2 as sums of a few terms and write the involved functions as limi-
ted expansions. The scattering coefficient al is then found to be 4:
2
2 , (m - 2 ) ",3 (7 )
a 1 = -3 1 2 u-
rn + 2
4 6 2
16 7T 2r
P 1m2 - 1 [cos 2 8 cos 2 4>'+ sin 2 4> ]
Idiff r2 ;\4 m + 2 I (8)
From (4) and (5) the efficiency factors Qsca and Qext read
respectively 6al*al/a2 and 6 Re (al) /a 2 that means, for transpa-
rent particles (m = n)
2 _ 1 2 4
n ) a -10 (9)
2
n + 2
(10)
DIAGNOSIS
Generalities
DlAMETER.25.o,um 1091S/
15 A. 514,5nrn m=1,5-0Pi
_GEO. OPTICS
.MlETHEORY
10
o 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 (J0
10
024 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 eO
Fig. 4. Comparison geometrical optics/LMT for a 'random' -
spherical particl'e.
IOext -(Oext)11 %
Oext
100
L>m.1,5-0,5i
• m. 2,5-o,5i
50 +m.3,5-O,5i
*m.4,5-0,5i
0,5 1,0
Thus, except for very small soots, the question must be asked
whether the LM-Theory should not be used. Computer programs as
efficient as SUPERMIDI are not required to the purpose since (i)
we are here concerned with small particles and (ii) the knowledge
of Qext is basically sufficient to interpret extinction measurements.
Lorenz-Mie theory has been used (for instance) by Bonczyk52 , who
Chippett and Gray 53 who calculated the extinction cross-sections
of soot agglomerates, or by Roessler and Faxvog 54 then 55, who
concluded that 'a simple model of acetylene smoke in which the
particles are simulated by small unagglomerated carbon spheres is
inadequate to explain the observed optical properties in both the
visible and infrared regions', or by Lowes and Newall 56 to discuss
emissivities of soot clouds, a choice which again does not pretend
to exhaustivity.
T
2
•• ••
0,5 ••
•
O~ •
0,05 •
0,5 234 A,um
" d~,2,um
.d~,4,llm
od-O,6um
• d~,8f.1m
" d=1,O,llm
• d=1,2,ll m
7 od=1,4,ll m
Al1llIitude V
'bx.
tinet
To reach the more precise aim just above pointed out, another
way of research is under investigation in Rouen, based on the follow-
ing ideas :
THE QUASI-ELASTIC SCATTERING OF LIGHT 409
ii) Use (for instance) a 'green' laser optical probe for sizing
and a 'blue' optical probe for LDA, that means do not try to
achieve the simultaneous measurements on a given Doppler burst,
but use two different spatially superimposed optical probes to
separately achieve sizing and velocimetry when the particle
crosses simultaneously the two probes.
REFERENCES
INTRODUCTION
413
414 SYNTHESIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE WORK
The proble~.
Recommandations
The problem
The objectives
b) Predict PAH and soot emissions from the flame for the
effects of fluid dynamic and thermal input parameters (including
fuel type).
Research needs
A) Chemical kinetics
E) Soot burn-out
F) Optical diagnostics
Soot
Complex flames
Advanced diagnostics
GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS
427
428 INDEX