MULAO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

119231
Mulao, Compostela, Cebu

SCHOOL
IMPROVEMENT
PLAN
School Year 2019-2022

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.
CHAPTER 1. Department of Education’s Vision,
Mission, and Core Values
Vision -------------------------------------------- 1
Mission -------------------------------------------- 1
Core Values -------------------------------------------- 1
SPT Timetable -------------------------------------------- 2
SPT Roles & Responsibilities -------------------------------------------- 2
CHAPTER 2. School’s Current Situation
School’s Geography ------------------------------------------- 3
Learning Materials ------------------------------------------- 3
Learners’ Health and Safety ------------------------------------------- 4
Learners’ Quality of Education ------------------------------------------ 4-5
Priority Improvement Areas ------------------------------------------ 6
Root Causes ------------------------------------------ 6-7
General Objectives ------------------------------------------ 6
Planning Worksheet ------------------------------------------ 8

CHAPTER 3. Plan
Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix ------------------------------------------ 9-11
Annual Implementation Plan ------------------------------------------ 12-11

CHAPTER 4. Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring and Evaluation ----------------------------------------- 11-12

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
 ACRONYMS

SIP -School Improvement Plan

E-SIP -Enhanced – School Improvement Plan
DepEd -Department of Education
MOOE -Maintenance and other Operating Expenses
NAT -National Achievement Test
KSA -Knowledge Skills and Attitudes
AIP -Annual Improvement Plan
RBEC -Revised Basic Education Curriculum
ORV -Oral Reading Verification
Phil-IRI -Philippine Informal Reading
MPS - Mean Percentage Score
LAC -Learning Action Cell
IM’s -Instructional Materials
NGO -Non Government Organization
PIA -Priority Improvement Areas
SRA -School Reading Area
LR -Learning Resources
LRMDS -Learning Resource Management and Development System
SPG -Supreme Pupil Government
PTA -Parents & Teachers Association
MES -Mulao Elementary School
M&E -Monitoring and Evaluation
SBM -School-Based Management
DRRM -Disaster Risk Reduction Management
SMART -Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Reliable, Time-Bound

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
 List of Tables and Illustrations

Page No.
Table 1 SPT Roles and Responsibilities ----------- 2
C
H
Table 2 SPT Timetable ----------- 2
A
Table 3 School Awards and Recognition ----------- 4
P
Table 4 Priority Improvement Areas ----------- 5 T
Table 5 General Objectives ----------- 6 E
Table 6 Solutions ----------- 6 R
Table 7 Planning worksheet ----------- 8
Table 8 Paka-on para Malambuon ---------- 9 1
Table 9 Oplan Dagdag NAT ---------- 9-10
Table 10 SRA-School Reading Area ---------- 10
Table 11 Project VEP ---------- 10
Table 12 Bato Patungon Aron Palibot Lig-on ---------- 11
Table 13 Pananum sa Pligrong Palibot ---------- 11
Table 14 Annual Implementation Plan ---------- 12-13
Table 9 Project Monitoring Report Form ----------- 14

Illustration 1 Root Cause 1 (Why-why Diagram) ----------- 6

Illustration 2 Root Cause 2 (Problem Tree) ----------- 7
Illustration 3 Root Cause 3 (Fish Bone) ----------- 7
Illustration 4 Root Cause 4 (Why-why Diagram) ----------- 7

CHAPTER 1
School Improvement Planiiiiii
14
Department of Education Mission, Vision,
and Core Values Statement

Sharing about the Department of Education’s Vision, Mission and Core values helps to set
priorities, allocate resources, and ensure that everyone is working towards common goals and
objectives. That is why, for it to be effective, there must be clear discussions amongst the School
Planning Team. The School Planning Team were so interactive during the discussions and
everyone shared the thought of their mind during the meeting.
“It’s our guiding rule and the end goal of our day to day routines and the fulfillment of being
professional pedagogical stewards.” as Mr. Toñacao, the Principal, started the discussion of the
DepEd’s Vision, Mission and Core Values. He even continued saying that Teachers are molders
of the youth who shall also be the nation builders, thus, teachers need to teach not only the
academics but the realities of life too, upholding to the highest, the morality and the dignity of it.
Mr. Cinferd Bugtai, the PTA president, even stated that “…kinahanglan gayud sa mga
ginikanan ang pag support sa mga kabatan sa eskwelahan kay nato bayang mga ginikanan nag
sugod ang pag amuma ug disiplina nila…” Support is indeed very much needed from parents.
We all know that learning starts from home. Mr. Cinferd even added “…Ako personally, mosaad
gyud ko nga supportahan nako ang eskwelahan sa pagtuman sa Vision, Mission ug Core Values
sa eskwelahan”.
Mrs. Mary Jane P. Orilla, the Faculty President, emphasized during the discussion that
Schools and learning environment must be designed for learners to be able to develop and hone
talents and abilities that can help them become productive citizens instead of becoming one of
the country’s liabilities. As missionaries of pupils learning, teachers need to be fully equipped with
the things needed to be able to produce well – rounded, individuals.
On the other hand, the Barangay Captain, in the person of Hon. Asterio Tanjay highlighted
their responsibilities as Protector of the Barangay especially to the schoolchildren. Barangay
Officials, according to Hon. Tanjay, are held directly liable for every mismanaged learner and
constituents who become society’s juvenile delinquencies. Thus, promotion and protection of
students’ welfare must be the utmost concern of everyone being part of the School Planning
Team.
Moreover, during the discussion, the SPG President, Niña Emily Gibson, promised to be an
example to her classmates and schoolmates in fulfilling the dream of DepEd to the learners. She
said “… sa akong pagka-estudyante, akong paninguhaon nga makatabang ko sa eskwelahan,
labi na sa pagtuman sa Vision, Mission ug Core values pina-agi sa pagsunod, ug dili
pagsupakpak sa mga katuyu-an sa eskwelahan aron molambo ming mga estudyante.” Upon
hearing this, the School Planning Team come up with a commitment in supporting, helping and
upholding the Department of Education’s Vision, Mission and Core Values.
The school in its desire to imbibe the values that have been slowly deteriorating in the
present times, made it a point to include in the School Improvement Plan the development of the
core values that school children must learn and inculcate. For there is a need for us to produce
learners whose values and competencies will enable them to become worthy contributors in nation
building and will have significant participation to global environment rehabilitation through a strong
and unified belief in One Supreme Being and Protector .

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
 SCHOOL PLANNING TEAM ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Name Designation Role and Responsibilities
C
IRENEO C. TOÑACAO Principal Chairperson
H
MARY JANE P. ORILLA Faculty President Reviewing Pupils’ Data
CINFERD M. BUGTAI PTA President Hold PTA Meetings
A
NIÑA EMILY GIBSON SPG President Assist the Pupils P
ASTERIO TANJAY Barangay Captain Conduct Barangay Meetings T
Table 1 E
R
SPT Timetable
Activities Schedule
Preparatory Activities 2
1. Calling for a General Assembly January 2019
2. Forming a School Planning TEAM February 2019
3. Secure the CBMS from the LGU
4. Organize Data using the school-community
Data Template
PHASE 1: ASSESS
Conduct Focus Group Discussion and survey February 2019
General PTA Meeting
PHASE 2: PLAN
Write the SIP March 16-21, 2019
Brainstorm interventions with the SPT. March 25, 2019
PHASE 3: ACT
Start pilot test
Discuss preparations for roll out
Table 2

CHAPTER 2
ASSESS
2.a School’s Current Situation

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
Geography
Mulao Elementary School is located fourteen (14) kilometers away from the town
proper of Compostela and two (2) kilometers away from provincial road. It can be reached
through any means of transportation.
Based on the School Site Development Plan, it has an area of 11, 585 square meters
which is owned by the municipality of Compostela to serve as the venue for the teaching
learning process. However, the school’s location is in inclined area wherein it is prone to
landslide. As a matter of fact, some of the areas started to landslide especially during rainy
season.
Mulao Elementary School is a complete elementary school with a total enrolment of 276
pupils, 13 regular permanent teachers and a school head offering complete basic education
curriculum, the K to 12.
With the aim of improving its access, quality and governance, the school continues to
upgrade and equip its teachers with technical teaching skills and strategies in order to meet the
needs of the 21st century learners. As it further aims for qualitative educational services, the
school maintains its strong partnerships or linkages with numerous internal and external
stakeholders utilizing approaches or methodologies in order to achieve success in all school
operations. The school has been taking bolder steps unifying and initiating school projects and
programs which are aligned with the Department of Education’s mission and vision.
Learners’ Materials

Textbooks

In totality, the graph shows that books in Mulao Elementary School are not sufficient to the
pupils. In Kindergarten, they only have very few books because they focus more on the domains
and in Skills. In Grade 1, 2 and 3, though they must use MTB as prescribed in the curriculum, they
still have English books but still not enough. However, in Grade 4, all textbooks in the five major
subjects have only 50 to 60 % supplies. Science in particular is not visible in Grade 1 and 2 because
Science is not part of their curriculum. In similar cases, Science textbooks in the higher level is also
insufficient. However, Grade 6 in particular has no textbook in Science, English and other subjects.

School Awards and Recognition

Title of Award Award Giving Level Category of Awardee
Body (International, (Student, Teacher,
National, Region, School Head, School)
Division or School

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
 level)

“Our Compostela Program” 1 st place for 2017 Municipality of District School

and 2018 out of 16 schools. Compostela
Table Tennis Champion for both Boys and DepEd District Student/School/Teacher
Girls Category
Table Tennis Champion Boys Category and DepEd Division Student/School/Teacher
2 nd Place in Girls Category
Badminton Champion – Girls Category. DepEd District Student/School/Teacher

Badminton 3 rd Placer – Doubles Girls DepEd Division Student/School/Teacher

Our Cebu Awardee DepEd Division Student/Teacher/School
Table 3
The data shows the different awards received by Mulao Elementary School from the different
contest in the different level ranging from district to division level from each identified award giving
body. It can be understood that this school is a Sports-minded school specifically in Table Tennis
and Badminton. Teachers are also recognized for they are the one who trained the pupils. The
awards received by the school and the student, student/teacher were indeed one of the
achievements that our school cherished.
We are now challenged that in the coming years, we will definitely improve our awards with
the expertise of the teachers and support of the Parents and Stakeholders.
3
2.5
2
1.5
SEVERELY WASTED WASTED
1
0.5
0
Health and Nutritional Status

The graph shows the Health and Nutritional Status of Mulao Elementary School wherein the
Kindergarten, Grade 1, 2, 5 and 6 have poor nutritional status at a rate of 8 to 13 percent
compared to other levels. The condition attributed to the poor financial income of the parents of the
pupils who were not able to supply the right amount of nutritional food to their children. Other than
this, it is also considered that ages of the pupils do not conform to their current grade level.
Moreover, sleeping habits and proper food intake are not being properly observed at home. Hence,
parents and pupils also must do their part in addressing the poor nutritional status of the pupils
aside from the School-Based Feeding Program funded by the DepEd and the Applied Nutrition
being practiced weekly by grade levels.
National Achievement Test

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
 NAT Result 2017
50
40
30
20
Gra de 6
10
0
In the year 2017 we’ve got very low MPS
with only 38% compared to previous years because we lack learning materials and review materials.
Teachers also are bombarded with plenty of reports that obviate them to teach all the competencies.
Literacy Level
35
30
25 FRUSTRATION
INSTRUCTIONAL
20
INDEPENDENT
15
10
5
0

In English, the rate of Frustration Level is very high. However, most of the pupils’ reading
skill belongs to instructional and independent except for Grade 6. As shown in the graph, the
number of pupils in Frustration level is very alarming.

Number of Learners by Literacy Level in Filipino 2019-2020

INDEPENDENT INSTRUCTIONAL FRUSTRATION
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0

For the Filipino subject, Frustration Level is very high especially in Grade 3 and 6. All grade
levels has a very high number of Instructional Readers while there are only very few Independent
Readers.
With these situations, we can clearly infer that MES has many things to work on especially
the Literacy of Pupils, Health and the Safety. There are factors that affect these gaps though
projects have been implemented. However, it is not enough because it still needs further action to
eliminate those gaps.
2.b Priority Improvement Areas

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
 Importance Strategic

Magnitude

Feasibility
Urgency

Average
Improvement Areas Interpretation

Poor Health and Nutrition 5 5 5 4 4.75 Very High Priority

Poor Reading Skill and 4 5 5 5 4.75 Very High Priority

Comprehension
Non-Compliant in the Child-Friendly 3 5 5 4 4.25 High Priority
School (Physical)
Low NAT MPS 4 5 5 5 4.75 Very High Priority
Table 4
The table shows that Health and Nutrition, Reading Skill and Comprehension and Literacy
Rate has the interpretation of Very High Priority while Safety lies in High Priority. Therefore, these
Improvement areas need to be addressed right away.

2.c General Objectives

PIAs: Objectives:
Poor Health and Nutrition To decrease the number of severely wasted pupils from
3% to 0% in 3 years.
Poor Reading Skill and To decrease the frustration level from 28% to 0% in 3
Comprehension years.
Non-Compliant in the Child-Friendly To ensure 100% safety in school in 3 years.
School (Physical)
Low NAT MPS in all subjects To increase the MPS in NAT from 38% to 75% in 3 years.

Table 5

In this table, you can clearly observe that the objectives are SMART and responsive to the
PIAs.
Priority Improvement Areas Solutions:
Poor Health and Nutrition 1. Intensify Feeding Program from Gulayan sa
Paaralan.
2. Tap potential stakeholders to fund the feeding
program.
Poor Reading Skill and Comprehension 1. SRA-School Reading Area in every Classroom
2. Take Home Activities
3. Production of Reading tools
Non-Compliant in the Child-Friendly School 1. Riprapping of areas prone to landslide
(Physical) 2. Tree Planting Activities
3. Tagbo
Low NAT MPS in all subjects 1. Print some Reviewers from the LRMDS, Internet
and other reliable sites
2. Proper scheduling of school activities
3. Intense Review to Grade 6 Pupils
4. Identify the least-learned competencies in all

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
 subjects and focus on those.
Table 6
2.d Root Causes

Problem Statement: 10 out of 276 pupils are severely wasted in the current year

Why is it that the Why is it the Mother is

Why is it that the food
number of severely Why do they have low Why is it that only the taking good care of the
is insufficient in their
wasted pupils income? Father is working? children?
family?
increase?

Because they have Because they have low Because only the Father is Because the Mother is taking Because they have large
insufficient food in the number of children
income in the family working in the family good care of the children
family
Illustration 1
Problem Statement: NAT MPS is 38%, which is below Standard from 75%
Grade 6 NAT Scores were
at 38%, lower that Division
Target of 75%

Teaching and learning Learning materials do Equipment do not Teaching pedagogies

engagement is not not meet the standard meet the standard and strategies not
engaging and curriculum and ratio curriculum and ratio effective
facilitative

Teachers are Insufficient PCs Teaching

engaged to many IMs insufficient Methods not
activities and consistent
reports
Content No internet
Student-teacher outdated connection
Teachers lack
interaction is training
disturbed
Projectors
are
Review lessons Assessment
are limited or feedback
not given

Illustration 2

Problem Statement: 28% of the Pupils belongs to Frustration Level

Procedures People 73 out of 276 pupils
No follow – up from teachers Pupils are not focused belongs to frustration
level
Teachers are busy with reports Pupils are exposed to gadgets

Plenty of Activities Parents do not have follow-up

Outdated software No reading area

Insufficient supply of computers

Lack of IMs

Lack of projectors Not enough reading tools

Equipment Materials

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
Illustration 3

Problem Statement: 30% out of 100% area of school is prone to landslide

Why is it that Why is it that

Why is it that
the school is the school is Why is it there is
the school is in
not 100% prone to no other place?
inclined area?
safe? landslide?

Because there is no other Because the school lot is

Because the school is Because the school is
place only donated
prone to landslide located in an inclined area

Illustration 4
2.e Planning Worksheet
PRIORITY TIME FRAME
GENERAL OBJECTIVE/S ROOT CAUSE/S
IMPROVEMENT AREAS Year 1 – Year 3

To decrease the number of severely January 1, 2019-

wasted pupils from 3% - 2% in Year 1 January 1, 2020
Jobless parents
Poor Health and To decrease the number of severely January 1, 2020-
Low income
Nutrition wasted pupils from 2% - 1% in Year 2 January 1, 2021
Served innutritious food
To decrease the number of severely January 1, 2021-
wasted pupils from 1% - 0% in Year 3 January 1, 2022
To decrease the Frustration level from Lack of learning materials August 2019-
28% - 21% in Year 1 March 2020
Teachers lack follow-up
Poor Reading Skill and To decrease the Frustration level from August 2020-
21% - 10% in Year 2 Pupils are not focused due to
Comprehension March 2021
gadgets
To decrease the Frustration level from No reading area in the August 2021-
10% - 0% in Year 3 classroom March 2022

To ensure 100% safety in School from January 1, 2019 –

70% - 80% in Year 1 January 1, 2020
Non-Compliant in the Inclined location of the school
To ensure 100% safety in School from January 1, 2020 –
Child-Friendly School Soil in school is prone to
80% - 90% in Year 2 January 1, 2021
(Physical) erosion
To ensure 100% safety in School from January 1, 2021-
90% - 100% in Year 3 January 1, 2022
Teaching and learning
To increase the MPS in NAT from 38% -
engagement is not engaging March 2020
51% in Year 1
and facilitative

Learning materials do not

To increase the MPS in NAT from 51% -
Low NAT MPS in all meet the standard curriculum March 2021
63% in Year 2
subjects and ratio

Equipment do not meet the

To increase the MPS in NAT from 63% - standard curriculum and ratio
75% in Year 3 March 2022
Teaching pedagogies and
strategies not effective

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
 Table 7
In the planning worksheet, we can clearly see the target as to when we can implement and
achieve the objectives. It is also very clear in the planning worksheet the root causes in each PIA.
C
H
A
CHAPTER 3
P
Plan
After an intensive review and careful study of the data gathered, the school planning team T
identified these areas to be included in the PIA’s namely: Low NAT MPS, Poor Reading E
Comprehension, Non-Readers, Poor Nutritional Status of some pupils, Insufficient Learning R
Resources and areas that are prne to landslide. The result proves the need to upgrade and come
up with more innovative ways to improve these key result areas in basic education: access, quality
and good governance .With this in mind and in accordance with DepEd Vision and Mission one 3
school targets for this school year 2019-2022 the following:
 Increase NAT MPS from 38%-75% in 3 years.
 Acquire learning materials, reading tools and equipment
 Decrease the number of Non- Readers every school year from 2019-2021.
 Decrease the number of Severely wasted pupils from 3% to 0% in 3 years
 Riprapping of areas that are prone to landslide by 100%

Project Work Plan and Budget Matrix

Project Title: PAKA-ON PARA MALAMBUON

Problem Statement: 10 out of 276 pupils are severely wasted in the current year
Project Objective Statement: to decrease the number of severely wasted pupils from 3% to 0%
in 3 years
Root Cause: Malnutrition, jobless parents, served innutritious food

Date of Person Budget

Activity Output Budget
Implementation Responsible Source

Gulayan sa
Conduct feeding June 2019 –
Teachers, Parents Paaralan
program from Gulayan Pupils are being fed March 2022 P24,000.00
of the beneficiaries Fund
sa Paaralan (once a week)
PTA Fund

Tap NGOs and other

Collected the solicited June 2019-March
stakeholders by giving Teachers P500.00 PTA FUND
amount 2022
solicitation letters
January 2020
Assessing Pupils Normal Nutritional
January 2021 Teachers P750.00 MOOE
weight and height status
January 2022
Table 8
Project Title: OPLAN DAGDAG NAT
Problem Statement: NAT-MPS is below 75%
Project Objective Statement: to increase NAT-MPS from 38% to 75% in 3 years
Root Cause: lack learning materials, overlapping of activities

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
 Date of
Person
Activity Output Implementatio Budget Budget Source
Responsible
n

Print some Reviewers from the

LRMDS, Internet and other Printed Materials June 2019 Teachers P10,000.00 MOOE
reliable sites

Approved School
Proper scheduling of school School Head,
Calendar of June 2019 P200.00 MOOE
activities Teachers
Activities

Intense Review to Grade 6 Increased NAT Teachers,

March 2020 P1000.00 MOOE
Pupils MPS Pupils
Identify the least-learned Identified Least-
June 2019 Teachers P250.00 MOOE
competencies in all subjects learned skills
Table 9

Project Title: SRA-School Reading Area in every Classroom

Problem Statement: Poor Reading Skills and Comprehension of learners
Project Objective Statement: to decrease the frustration level from 28% to 0% in 3 years
Root Cause: lack of interest, lack of learning materials, poor strategy

Budget
Activity Output Date of Implementation Person Responsible Budget
Source

Conduct Inventory
List of books existing
of IMs needed in March 2019 Teachers P2000.00 MOOE
and needed
teaching
Plan and conduct
IMs making Well-trained Teachers July 2019 Speakers, Teachers P1,500.00 MOOE
seminar
Relevant reading tools
Production of IMs in a fully furnished July 2019 Teachers P 5,000.00 MOOE
SRA
Take Home
Activities to pupils Log book of utilization June 2019-March 22 Teachers and pupils P 2,500.00 MOOE
from SRA
Table 10

Project Title: PROJECT VEP- Vocabulary Enrichment Program

Problem Statement: Poor Reading Skills and Comprehension of learners
Project Objective Statement: to decrease the frustration level from 28% to 0% in 3 years
Root Cause: lack of interest, lack of learning materials, poor strategy

Budget
Activity Output Date of Implementation Person Responsible Budget
Source

Conduct ORV and

Consolidated Result August 2019 Teachers and Pupils P500.00 MOOE
PHIL-IRI

Gather the names

of syllabic and List of Pupils August 2019 Teachers P250.00 MOOE
non-readers
Peer Tutoring Checklist Of June 2019 – March 2022 Teachers P1000.00 MOOE
Using Flash Vocabulary Words

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
 Cards
Develop
List of Activities and Teachers, Concerned
Vocabulary
Accomplishment June 2019 – March 2022 Pupils and Little P2500.00 MOOE
Enrichment
reports teachers
Program
Table 11

Project Title: BATO PATUNGON ARON PALIBOT LIG-ON

Problem Statement: 30% of the area in school is prone to landslide
Project Objective Statement: to ensure 100% safety in school in 3 years
Root Cause: Inclined location of the school

Budget
Activity Output Date of Implementation Person Responsible Budget
Source

Identified Potential
Tap Stakeholders July 2019 Teachers P250.00 MOOE
Stakeholders

Teachers, School
Assess the Identified hazard DRRM Coordinator
July 2019 P250.00 MOOE
school’s area areas Student-led Watching
Team
Make budget Approved budget
proposals and proposals and August 2019 Principal, Teachers P250.00 MOOE
program of works program of works
Make a report to
be submitted to Received Copy of School DRRM
August 2019 P250.00 MOOE
BDRRM and reports Coordinator
MDRRM
Give solicitation
Collected Amount August 2019 Teachers P250.00 MOOE
letters
November 2019
Purchase the January 2020 MOOE &
Purchased Materials Teachers P60,000.00
Materials January 2021 PTA FUND
January 2022
November 2019
Riprapped areas January 2020 MOOE &
TAGBO Teachers and Parents P3,000.00
prone to landslide January 2021 PTA FUND
January 2022
Table 12

Project Title: PANANUM SA PILIGRONG PALIBOT

Problem Statement: 30% of the area in school is prone to landslide
Project Objective Statement: to ensure 100% safety in school in 3 years
Root Cause: Inclined location of the school

Budget
Activity Output Date of Implementation Person Responsible Budget
Source

Identify areas to June 2019-March 2022 Teachers, pupils and

Identified areas P100.00 MOOE
be planted (every Month) parents

Planted trees
June 2019-March 2022 Teachers, pupils and
Tree Planting Attendance P500.00 MOOE
(every Month) parents
Documentation

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
 Monitoring of Attendance and July 2019-March 2022 Teachers, pupils and MOOE &
P500.00
trees planted documentation (every Month) parents NGP Fund

Applying of Applied fertilizers to Teachers, pupils and MOOE &

July 2019-March 2022 P2000.00
Fertilizers trees planted parents NGP Fund

Table 13

Geared towards the attainment of these targets, Mulao Elementary School offers a program of
studies that is based in the provision of the Philippine Constitution sanctioned by the DepEd. As an
agent of change we commit ourselves to contribute to nation- building and transformation.
Our hopefulness is anchored on the planning worksheet of the School Improvement Plan. We
straongly believe that if we do our part as educators, give more attention to the different priorities,
quality education will be achieved.

Annual Implementation Plan – Year 1

School
Project Output for the Person/s Schedule/ Budget per Budget
Improvement Activities
Objective year Responsible Venue Activity Source
Project Title
Paka-on Para To decrease Pupils are being Conduct Teachers, June 2019 – P200 per Gulayan sa
Malambuon the number of fed with feeding Parents of the March 2020 feeding Paaralan
severely nutritious food. Program from beneficiaries (once a Fund/ PTA
wasted pupils Gulayan sa week) / MES Fund
from 3% to 0% Paaralan
in 3 years. Collected the Tap NGOs and Teachers June 2019 – P 100.00 MOOE
solicited other March 2020
amount stakeholders (once a
week) / MES
Normal Assessing Teachers and October 2019 P 100.00 MOOE
Nutritional Pupils Height pupils and January
Status and Weight 2020/ MES
OPLAN DAG- To increase Printed Print some Teachers June 2019 and P1000.00 MOOE
DAG NAT NAT-MPS from Materials/ Reviewers November
38% to 75% in Reviewers from LRMDS, 2019
3 years Internet and
other reliable
sites.
Approved Proper School Head June 2019 P200.00 MOOE
School Scheduling of and Teachers
Calendar of School
Activities Activities
Increased NAT Intense Teachers and January to P500.00 MOOE
MPS Review to pupils March 2020
Grade 6 Pupils
SRA – School To decrease List of books Conduct Teachers June 2019 P200.00 MOOE
Reading Area the frustration existing and inventory of
in every level from 28% needed IMs needed in
Classroom to 0% in 3 teaching
years Well-trained Plan and Speakers, June 2019 P500.00 MOOE
teachers Conduct IMs teachers August 2019
making during November
LAC session 2019
January 2019
March 2019
Relevant Production of Teachers July 2019 P2000.00 MOOE
reading tools in IMs
a fully furnished
SRA
Log book of Take home Teachers and June 2019 – P500.00 MOOE
utilization activities for pupils March 2020
pupils from
SRA
Project VEP – To decrease Consolidated Conduct ORV/ Teachers and August 2019 P500.00 MOOE

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
Vocabulary the frustration result PHIL-IRI pupils
Enrichment level from 28% List of pupils Gather the Teachers August 2019 P250.00 MOOE
Program to 0% in 3 names of
years Syllabic and
non-readers
Checklist of Peer Tutoring Teachers June 2019- P500.00 MOOE
vocabulary using March 2020
words flashcards
List of activities Develop Teachers, June 2019- P750.00 MOOE
and Vocabulary concerned March 2020
accomplishmen Enrichment pupils and little
t reports Program teachers
Bato Patungon To ensure Identified Assess Teachers, July 2019 P250.00 MOOE
Aron Palibot 100% safety in hazard areas School’s Area school DRRM
Lig-on school for 3 Coordinator,
years. Student-led
watching team
Identified Tap potential Teachers July 2019 P250.00 MOOE
potential Stakeholders
stakeholders
Approved Make budget Teachers, August 2019 P250.00 MOOE
budget Proposals and School Head
proposals and program of
program of works
works
Received copy Make a report School DRRM August 2019 P500.00 MOOE
of reports to BDRRM and Coordinator
MDRRM
Collected Give Teachers August 2019 – P250.00 MOOE
amount solicitation October 2019
letters
Purchased Purchase the Teachers November P30,000.00 PTA Fund and
materials Materials 2019 MOOE
Riprapped TAGBO Teachers and November P1,000.00 MOOE and
areas prone to Parents 2019 PTA Fund
landslide
Pananum sa To ensure Identified areas Identify areas Tecahers, June 2019- P100.00 MOOE
Piligrong 100% safety in to be planted pupils and March 2020
Palibot school for 3 parents
years. Planted trees, Tree Planting Tecahers, June 2019- P500.00 MOOE
attendance and Activity pupils and March 2020
documentation parents
Attendance and Monitoring of Tecahers, June 2019- P500.00 MOOE & NGP
documentation trees planted pupils and March 2020 Fund
parents
Applied Applying of Tecahers, June 2019- P800.00 MOOE & NGP
fertilizers fertilizers pupils and March 2020 Fund
parents
Table 14

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
 C
H
A
P
T
CHAPTER 4 E
MONITORING AND EVALUATION R
Among the more complicated tasks in our endeavor of empowering our school as agent of
change and a laboratory of life, is the monitoring and evaluating of the progress and goals we have
set and envisioned in our School Improvement Plan .This is where good feedback is shared and 4
strength and weaknesses are identified .Therefore targets should be carefully and thoughtfully
organized.
Below are some of our targets for monitoring and evaluation yearly.

Project Monitoring Report Form

Scheduled Dates of Monitoring

Mid-year: _______________ Year-end: _____2022

Signature
Accomplishm Reccomenda
Date Issues/ of SPT and
Project Objectives ents/ tions/
Name of Project of Problems/ Project
and Targets Status Action
Monitoring Challenges Team
to Date Points
Leader
PAKA-ON PARA MALAMBUON To decrease the June 2019 –
number of severely March 2022
wasted pupils from (once a
3% to 0% in 3 years week)
OPLAN DAGDAG To June
Increase 2019 -
NAT-MPS March
From 38% to 75% in 2022
3 years
SRA- To decrease the June 2019 –
School frustration level from March 2019
Reading Area in every 28% to 0% in 3
classroom years.
BATO PATUNGON ARON To ensure 100% Year 1 –
PALBOT LIG-ON safety in school in 3 50%
years
Year 2 –
25%

Year 3 - 25%
Table 15

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14
 MESSAGE

School Improvement Planiiiiii

14