Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Asset Liability Management in Banks 1
Asset Liability Management in Banks 1
1. Introduction 1
2. Earlier Phase
4. Pricing
6. ALM Models
7. ALM Organisation
8. ALM Process
9. Scope of ALM
14. Conclusion
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 2
15. Bibliography
Index
INTRODUCTION
In banking, asset and liability management (often abbreviated ALM) is the practice of
Managing risks that arise due to mismatches between the assets and liabilities
(debts and assets) of the bank. This can also be seen in insurance.
Banks face several risks such as the liquidity risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and
Operational risk. Asset liability management (ALM) is a strategic management tool to
manage interest rate risk and liquidity risk faced by banks, other financial services
companies and corporations.
Banks manage the risks of asset liability mismatch by matching the assets and
liabilities according to the maturity pattern or the matching of the duration, by
hedging and by securitization. Much of the techniques for hedging stem from the
delta hedging concepts introduced in the Black–Scholes model and in the work of
Robert C. Merton and Robert A. Jarrow. The early origins of asset and liability
management date to the high interest rate periods of 1975-6 and the late 1970s and
early 1980s in the United States. Van Deventer, Imai and Mesler (2004), chapter 2,
outline this history in detail.
Modern risk management now takes place from an integrated approach to enterprise
risk management that reflects the fact that interest rate risk, credit risk, market risk,
and liquidity risk are all interrelated. The Jarrow-Turnbull model is an example of a
risk management methodology that integrates default and random interest rates. The
earliest work in this regard was done by Robert C. Merton. Increasing integrated risk
management is done on a full mark to market basis rather than the accounting basis
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 3
that was at the heart of the first interest rate sensivity gap and duration calculations.
Asset Liability Management (ALM) defines management of all assets and liabilities
(both off and on balance sheet items) of a bank. It requires assessment of various
types of risks and altering the asset liability portfolio to manage risk. Till the early
1990s, the RBI did the realbanking business and commercial banks were mere
executors of what RBI decided. But now, BIS is standardizing the practices of banks
across the globe and India is part of this process. The success of ALM, Risk
Management and Basel Accord introduced by BIS depends on the efficiency of the
management of assets and liabilities. Hence these days without proper management
of assets and liabilities, the survival is at stake. A bank’s liabilities include deposits,
borrowings and capital. On the other side of the balance sheets are assets which are
loans of various types which banks make to the customer for various purposes. To
view the two sides of banks’ balance sheet as completely integrated units has an
intuitive appeal. But the nature, profitability and risk of constituents of both sides
should be similar. The structure of banks’ balance sheet has direct implications on
profitability of banks especially in terms of Net Interest Margin (NIM). So it is
absolute necessary to maintain compatible asset-liability structure to maintain
liquidity, improve profitability and manage risk under acceptable limits.
• Annual profit planning and controls which focus on slightly longer term goals and
look at a detailed financial plan over the course of a fiscal or calendar year.
• Strategic planning which focuses on the long run financial and non financial
aspects of a bank’s performance.
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 4
EARLIER PHASE
In the 1940s and the 1950s, there was an abundance of funds in banks in the form of
demand and savings deposits. Because of the low cost of deposits, banks had to
develop mechanisms by which they could make efficient use of these funds. Hence,
the focus then was mainly on asset management. But as the availability of low cost
funds started to decline, liability management became the focus of bank
management efforts.
The ALM, historically, has evolved from the early practice of managing liquidity on
the bank’s asset side, to a later shift to the liability side and termed liability
management, to a still later realization of using both the assets as well as the
liabilities side of the balance sheet to achieve optimum resources management, i.e.,
an integrated approach. Prior to deregulation, bank funds were
obtained from relatively stable demand deposits and from small time deposits.
Interest rate ceiling limited the extent to which banks could compete for funds.
Opening more branches in order to attract fresh deposits. As a result, most sources
of funds were core deposits which were quite impervious to interest rate movements
in this environment bank fund management concentrate on the control of assets.
he bank’s ability to grow will be hampered if they do not have access to the funds
required to create assets. They have freedom to obtain funds by borrowing from both
the domestic and international markets. As they tap different source of funds, there is
an increased need for liability management and it becomes an important part of their
financial management. With liability management, banks now have two sources of
funds – core deposits and purchased funds – with quite different characteristics. For
core deposits, the volume of funds is relatively insensitive to changes in interest rate
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 5
levels.. However core deposits have the disadvantage of not being overly responsive
to management needs for expansion. If a bank experiences sizeable increase in loan
demand, it cannot expect the core deposits to increase proportionately. For
purchased funds, however, the bank can obtain all the funds
that it wants if it is willing to pay the market determined price. Unlike core deposits
where the bank determines the price, the interest rates on purchased funds are set
in the national money market. The bank can be thought of as a price taker in the
purchased funds market whereas in the core deposit market it can be viewed as a
price setter. The purchased funds give complete flexibility in terms of the volumes
and timing of the availability of funds. management, the core deposits offer the
advantage of stability.
However core deposits have the disadvantage of not being overly responsive to
management needs for expansion. If a bank experiences sizeable increase in loan
demand, it cannot expect the core deposits to increase proportionately. For
purchased funds, however, the bank can obtain all the funds that it wants if it is
willing to pay the market determined price. Unlike core deposits where the bank
determines the price, the interest rates on purchased funds are set in the national
money market.
MODERN PERSPECTIVE
The recent volatility of interest rates broadened to include the issue of credit risk and
market risk and to ensure that their risk management capabilities are commensurate
with the risk of their business. The induction of credit risk into the issue of
determining adequacy of bank capital further enlarged the scope of ALM.
In other words, this also implies that managements are now expected to target
required profit levels and ensure minimization of risks to acceptable levels, to retain
the interest of the investing community. In today’s competitive environment, if the
organization has to remain in the business, costing and product pricing policies have
to be suitably structured. Thus, with the changing requirement, there is a need for
not only managing the net interest margin of the organization but at the same time
ensuring that liquidity is managed, how much liquid the organization has to be
definitely, worked out on the basis of scenario analysis, but the knowledge to
management, adopt the new system and organizational changes that are called for it
to manage, have to be defined. Thus, the concept of ALM is much wider and is of
greater significance
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 6
This assets and liabilities of a Bank are divided into various sub heads. For the
purpose of the study, the assets were regrouped under six major heads and the
liabilities were regrouped under four major heads as shown in table below. This
classification is guided by prior information on the liquidity-return profile of assets
and the maturity-cost profile of liabilities. The reclassified assets and liabilities
covered in the study exclude ‘other assets’ on the asset side and ‘other liabilities’ on
the liabilities side. This is necessary to deal with the problem of singularity – a
situation that produces perfect correlation within sets and makes correlation between
sets meaningless.
Bank’s Liabilities:
o Capital
Bank’s Assets:
ALM policy should establish portfolio limits on the mix of balance sheet liabilities
such as deposits and other types of funding, as a percentage of total assets,
considering the differential costs and volatility of these types of funds. Similarly,
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 7
prudent portfolio limits on the mix of balance sheet assets (e.g. loans by credit
category, financial instruments, etc.) should be set by policy considering differential
levels of risk and return. his recommended practice may not be practical for smaller,
less complex credit unions which have a limited membership base, a simple balance
sheet without much product diversification (e.g. savings and personal loans) or which
do not have sufficient financial resources to effectively promote diversification. If this
is the case, ALM policy should state that an appropriate mix of deposits and other
liabilities will be maintained to reflect member expectations and to correlate (by term
and pricing) to the mix of assets held. The mix of assets (loans, investments) return
should be guided by annual planning targets, lending license constraints and
regulatory restrictions on investments.
The management in the bank would like to ensure that beyond the capital planning
and ALM teams, the stakeholders in each line of business are able to appreciate the
cost of capital required for respective lines of business and how it is impacting the
bottom-line ultimately.
Oracle Financial Services Balance Sheet Planning solution helps fulfill the need for
extending ALM income forecasts and Balance Sheet projections into enterprise
planning activities, thereby rendering a consistent picture of forecasts across the
institution. The integration of planning solutions with the risk and performance
management framework is a major milestone in this direction.
Some banks had the traditional deposit base and were also capable of achieving
substantial growth rates in deposits by active deposit mobilization drive using their
extensive branch network. For such banks the major concern was how to expand the
assets securely and profitably. Credit was thus the major key decision area and the
investment activity was based on maintaining a statutory liquidity ratio or as a
function of liquidity management. The management strategy in such banks was thus
more biased towards asset management. this Section provides direction on setting
policy constraints on the size and types of loans and investments so as to make the
best use of available funds maximize financial margin while maintaining an
appropriate level of safety. The assets of a credit union can be
classified into two broad categories: earning assets and non-earning assets. ALM
policy should promote the maximization of earning assets which reward the credit
union for its operating risks. Earning assets are those assets which generate direct
revenues for the credit union.
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 8
Some banks on the other hand were unable to achieve retail deposit growth rates
since they did not have a wide branch network. But these banks possessed superior
asset management skills and hence could fund assets by relying on the wholesale
markets using Call money, CD’s Bill Rediscounting etc. Deregulation of interest rates
coupled with reforms in the money market introduced by the reserve bank provided
these banks with the opportunity to compete with funds from the wholesale market
using the pricing strategy to achieve the desired volume, mix and cost. So under the
Liability management approach, banks primarily sought to achieve maturities and
volumes of funds by flexibly changing their bid rates for funds.
OBJECTIVES:
When a bank needs funds to cover deposit withdrawals or ton expand its loans to
acquire other assets, it can obtain the needed funds in two ways. One way of
acquiring funds is to liquidate some of the short term assets that the bank holds in
units liquidity account for this purpose. A bank can also obtain funds by acquiring
additional liabilities i.e. by buying the funds it needs.
Basically, liability management seeks to control the sources of funds that a bank can
obtain quickly and in large amounts, unlike demand and savings deposits, which
cannot be increased to any great degree over a short time period. Depending on
cost and availability, a bank will use a variety of liability management instruments to
obtain the liquidity needed for daily cash management, for loan expansion, and for
other earnings opportunities. Liability management provides a bank with an
alternative to asset liquidation to obtain needed funds, and the bank chooses
between these alternatives based on the relative costs and risks involved.
For example: depending on a bank’s size and on market conditions, a bank in need
of liquidity may chose to borrow government funds or issue CD’s rather than sell T
bills or other liquid assets.
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 9
both assets and liability management strategies has the option of using cash inflows
to obtain more short term liquid assets or to repay outstanding liabilities, depending
on which option provides the best combination of earnings and safety.
Liability management also provides a bank with the means of funding long term
growth. It does so by enabling a bank to expand its loans ad other assets by
managing its liabilities so that a certain volume of its liabilities remains
outstanding at all times so that it can build up on its deposit levels and thereby
expand the level of its loans. This approach of funding is normally followed within a
context of a long term upswing in the economy in which the borrowers seek more
loans for business expansion and depositors place their funds in negotiable time
certificates to earn competitive rates. In such cases, bank management must have a
clear idea of the level of outstanding liabilities that it can count on holding through
tight money periods by offering competitive rates.
Another benefit of liability management is that it allows banks to invest greater
percentage of its available funds in its securities that provide less liquidity but offer
higher earnings, this is possible because the bank’s liquidity account doesn’t have to
bear the full burden of the bank’s liquidity needs. A bank that has the option of
obtaining liquidity through its liabilities has an opportunity to increase profitability
because it can reduce the amount of short term assets it holds for liquidity purposes
and place those funds into longer term securities that offer less liquidity but offer
higher earnings.
Although the use of liability management along with asset management allows a
bank the least costly method of obtaining liquidity from a wider range of funding
options, but the added options that liability management provides also require
greater complexity in planning and executing funds management strategies. This is
so since banks can obtain money market deposits and liabilities only by paying
market rates and the behaviour of financial markets cannot be predicted with
complete accuracy.
Another risk involved is that of issuing long term fixed rate CD’s at the peak of the
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 10
business cycle. This results in more costly CD’s in the future with a fall in the interest
rates. In fact if short term assets are funded by long term liabilities and rates
subsequently decline, a bank may find that it is paying more for funds than it can
earn on those funds.
Another risk that relates to the changing market conditions is the stability of the
bank’s sources of borrowed or purchased funds. While large money center banks
are usually able to obtain funds under tight money conditions if they are willing to pay
market rates, smaller banks may find it impossible to compete for funds when prices
are high. The risk that a funding house may prove unreliable is also a real problem
for smaller banks that move outside their trading areas or that undertake funding by
means of liability instruments with which they are not completely familiar. Such banks
face the very real possibility that their sources of funds may disappear just when they
are most needed. The basic benefits of liability management lie in the options it
provides a bank in obtaining a least costly method of funding given the bank’s
particular needs and the existing conditions of the financial markets. The risk
involved in liability management basically results from too much reliance on the use
of purchased funds without recognizing the impact that changing market
conditions or other unanticipated changes can have on the bank’s ability to secure
funds when the money is scarce.
ADVANTAGES
ALM ensures that a company’s capital and assets are used in the most efficient
way.
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 11
DISADVANTAGES
ALM is only as good as the people on the ALM committee and the operational
procedures that they follow.
ALM can prove costly in terms of both the time required of employees and the
investment required in management tools such as IT and techniques such as
hedging.
he credit union will manage its asset cash flows in relation to its liability cash flows
in a manner that contributes adequately to earnings and limits the risk to the financial
margin.
Product terms, pricing and balance sheet mix must balance members’ product
demands with the need to protect the equity of the credit union.
Financial derivatives instruments must only be used to limit interest rate risk and
must never be used for speculative or investment purposes.
PRICING
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 12
ALM policy specifies that the pricing of all loans and deposits offered should be
established so that overall, a net contribution to earnings is provided. In order to
ensure that deposit and lending rates are sufficiently responsive, policy may
delegate to management the authority to set interest rates without board approval
but in accordance with pre-established criteria as described below:
Rates offered on deposits should be tied to external benchmarks in the local market
and should generally approximate the average of these market indicators (for
example, the bank rate or the prime rate). Policy should allow management flexibility
to negotiate more favorable rates within a prescribed range to maintain key deposit
accounts. In order to protect financial margin, credit unions should avoid engaging in
price wars with competitor financial institutions including other credit unions. Pricing
strategies of competitor institutions will reflect the need for funds in these
organizations. Liquidity requirements of the competitor institution may differ vastly
from the credit union's needs; therefore, caution should be exercised when setting
rates.
It is recommended that loans be priced at market rates and subject to interest rate
rebates only at the end of the year, if sufficient earnings and reserves are available.
The interest rates offered on loans should reflect an adequate margin above the
rates on deposits being used to fund loans, in order to cover all operating expenses
and capital requirements. Loan pricing can also be used to balance minor gap
mismatches. Where funding from deposits is high for a particular term of loan, the
price for these loans could be made more attractive than terms whose funding
sources are scarce. For larger gap mismatches, however, a derivative instrument
may be a more practical option. Loan pricing is crucial for establishing a successful
lending program. In order to establish fair interest rates for both the borrower and
the credit union, the following factors should be considered:
Cost of funds and the spread required for financing the loan.
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 13
Credit risk of the loan (e.g. loan purpose, size and security).
Length of loan amortization period (generally, the longer the period, the higher the
rate).
When issuing capital shares, discretionary dividend rates should be subject to ALM
policy criteria approved by the board. Dividend rates should be set with due regards
to the average cost of alternative funds such as deposits, other classes of shares
and borrowings. When stock dividends are offered as an alternative to cash
dividends, the future costs of increased fixed dividends should be analyzed for
ongoing affordability, before stock dividends are declared.
Term Deposits:
It is recommended that the board establish maximum term limits on term deposits.
Operational procedures can describe the availability of alternative term deposits and
correlate differential pricing for these products within this limit. he board may want to
set a general five year maximum term on deposits in policy, and require that any
products with terms greater than five years require special board approval.
Term Loans:
It is recommended that the board establish maximum term limits on term loans.
Operational procedures can describe the availability of alternative term loans and
correlate differential pricing for these products within this limit. he board may want to
set a general five year maximum term on loans in policy, and require that any
products with terms greater than five years require special board approval.
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 14
Operational Procedures:
he criteria for offering term loans of varying length can be specified in operational
procedures. Operational procedures can require that loan terms be set to similar
lengths as the life of the security (e.g. large loans secured by higher valued assets
would normally have longer terms to maturity). Due to the higher repayment and
security risks of longer term loans, and the usually limited consumer demand for
term deposits in excess of five years, it is recommended that generally, term loans
be offered with five year maximum maturities.For increased competitiveness,
however, loan maturities in excess of five years may occasionally be sanctioned up
to a prescribed policy limit or approved by the board on an exception basis.
Mortgage terms of seven to ten years have become more commonplace in the
market but generally should only be offered by credit unions if arrangements are in
place to manage the gap between five year funding deposits and those longer term
mortgages. Credit unions should consult with their league for appropriate strategies
prior to offering extended term mortgages. term loans should be substantially
matched by contractual maturity dates against non-callable term deposits. For
mortgages with terms exceeding one year, selective prepayment penalties should be
established by operational policy.
ALM STRATEGY
As interest rated in both the liability and the asset side were deregulated, interest
rates in various market segments such as call money, CD’s and the retail deposit
rates turned outdo be variable over a period of time due to competition and the need
to keep the bank interest rates in alignment with market rates. Consequently the
need to adopt a comprehensive Asset- liability strategy emerged, the key objectives
of which were as under.
he volume, mix and cost/return of both liabilities and assets need to be planned
and monitored in order to achieve the bank’s short and long term goals.
Suitable pricing mechanism covering all products like credit, payments, and
custodial financial advisory services should be put in place to cover all costs and
risks.
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 15
Gap Management: his focuses on identifying and matching rate sensitive assets
and liabilities to achieve maximum profits over the course of interest rate cycles A
bank will price the loan even taking the liquidity risk. Incorporating the default
probabilities helps the bank to price the loan appropriately in line with its risk profile.
Hence bank would also look at the impact of such a loan on its liquidity along with
the credit risk and not in isolation. The bank would now have flexibility in accepting
and rejecting the loan only after having considered all parameters. It will provide the
necessary direction to the bank in structuring the loan in such a way, that liquidity
profile of the bank is improved. If the liquidity profile of the portfolio is improved the
loan can be priced favorably for the borrower. This model helps us to identify those
loans that contribute to the ROA and Roe of the bank. This puts the bank on the road
to SHAREHOLDER VALUE CREATION. By identifying the acceptable risk limits, the
bank achieves greater stability thus ensuring higher returns for the shareholders.
While a similar system might already be in use in several competitive banks in one
form or the other, other banks that do not employ such a system in totality might find
it useful to adopt the integrated ALM approach which has been presented as a
conceptual argument
ALM MODELS
Analytical models are very important for ALM analysis and scientific decision-
making. The basic models are:
5. Stochastic
Programming Model : Any of these models is being used by banks through their
Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO). The Executive Director and other
vital departments’ heads head ALCO in banks. There are minimum four members
and maximum eight members. It is responsible for Responsible for Setting business
policies and strategies, Pricing assets and liabilities, Measuring risk, Periodic review,
Discussing new products and Reporting. Gap analysis model: Measures the
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 16
NIIi= R i (GAPi)
While NII is the net interest income, R refers to the interest rates impacting assets
and liabilities in the relevant maturity bucket and GAP refers to the differences
between the book value of the rate sensitive assets and the rate sensitive liabilities.
Thus when there is a change in the interest rate, one can easily identify the impact of
the change on the net interest income of the bank. Interest rate changes have a
market value effect. The basic weakness with this model is that this method takes
into account only the book value of assets and liabilities and hence ignores their
market value. This method therefore is only a partial measure of the true interest rate
exposure of a bank.
FUTURE GAPS:
It is possible that the simulation model due to the nature of massive paper outputs
may prevent us from seeing wood for the tree. In such a situation, it is extremely
important to combine technical expertise with an understanding of issues in the
organization. There are certain requirements for a simulation model to succeed.
These pertain to accuracy of data and reliability of the assumptions made. In other
words, one should be in a position to look at alternatives pertaining to prices, growth
rates, reinvestments, etc., under various interest rate scenarios.
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 17
Duration model:
DP p = D ( dR /1+R)
he above equation describes the percentage fall in price of the bond for a given
increase in the required interest rates or yields. The larger the value of the duration,
the more sensitive is the price of that asset or liability to changes in interest rates. As
per the above equation, the bank will be immunized from interest rate risk if the
duration gap between assets and the liabilities is zero. The duration model has one
important benefit. It uses the market value of assets and liabilities.
Value at Risk:
Refers to the maximum expected loss that a bank can suffer over a target horizon,
given a certain confidence interval. It enables the calculation of market risk of a
portfolio for which no historical data exists. It enables one to calculate the net worth
of the organization at any particular point of time so that it is possible to focus on
long-term risk implications of decisions that have already been taken or that are
going to be taken. It is used extensively for measuring the market risk of a portfolio of
assets and/or liabilities.
Simulation:
for example: What if: the. Absolute level of interest rates shift. There are nonparallel
yield curve changes
Bad debt and prepayment levels change in different interest rate scenarios
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 18
There are changes in the funding mix. for e.g.: an increasing reliance on short term
funds for balance sheet growth. This dynamic capability adds value to the traditional
methods and improves the information available to management in terms of:
ALM Organization
T he Board of Directors would have the overall responsibility for the ALM & risk
management and should lay down the tolerance limits for liquidity and interest rate
risk in line with the organization’s philosophy. However, the Asset Liability Committee
(ALCO) is responsible for deciding on the business strategies consistent with the laid
down policies and for operating them. Typically, ALCO consists of the senior
management, including the Chief Executive. Needless to say ALCO has to be
supported by an efficient analytics providing detailed analysis, forecasts, scenario
analysis and recommendation for action. ALCO not only makes business decisions,
but also monitors their implementation and their impact. Further, it also takes action
and initiates changes in response to the market dynamics. ALCO Support Group will
provide the data analysis, forecasts and scenario analysis for ALCO. In addition to
monitoring the risk levels of the bank, the ALCO should review the results of and
progress in implementation of the decisions made in the previous meetings. The
ALCO would also articulate the current interest rate view of the bank and base its
decisions for future business strategy on this view. In respect of the funding policy,
for instance, its responsibility would be to decide on source and mix of liabilities or
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 19
sale of assets. Towards this end, it will have to develop a view on future direction of
interest rate movements and decide on a funding mix between fixed vs. floating rate
funds, wholesale vs. retail deposits, money market vs. capital market funding,
domestic vs. foreign currency funding, etc. Individual banks will have to decide the
frequency for holding their ALCO meetings.
COMPOSITION OF ALCO
he size (number of members) of ALCO would depend on the size of each institution,
business mix and organizational complexity or ensure commitment of the
Management, the CEO/CMD or ED should head the Committee. The Chiefs of
Investment, Credit, Funds Management / Treasury (forex and domestic),
International Banking and Economic Research can be members of the Committee. In
addition the Head of the Information Technology Division should also be an invitee
for building up of MIS and related computerization. Some banks may even have sub-
committees.
COMMITTEE OF DIRECTORS
Banks should also constitute a professional Managerial and Supervisory Committee
consisting of three to four directors which will oversee the implementation of the
system and review its functioning periodically. The content of d asset liability
management includes:
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 20
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 21
GOAL OF COMMITTEE
Management of assets and liability incorporates interest rate risk and liquidity
considerations into a bank's operating model. From a regulatory perspective, one of
the ALCO's goals is to ensure adequate liquidity while managing the bank's spread
between the interest income and interest expense. Investments and operational risk
are also major considerations. A sound practice is to conduct ALCO meetings at
least quarterly to review the bank's level of exposure to changing interest rates and
to determine management's degree of compliance with internal policies and
quantitative parameters, such as limits and ratios. ALCO responsibilities include
managing market risk tolerances, establishing appropriate MIS, reviewing and
approving the liquidity and funds management policy at least annually, approving a
contingency funding plan, and reviewing immediate funding needs and sources-
possibly engaging an independent third party to validate the assumptions and data
contained in internally or externally prepared management reports.
ALM PROCESS
The ALM process rests on three pillars:
ALM organization
ALM process
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 22
Credit unions have many financial goals; however, two are basic to their survival:
first, earn net income and second, remain solvent, or able to meet demands for cash
(such as payment of operating expenses). Earnings allow a credit union’s capital to
increase, which is necessary for growth. Credit union managers must focus on
asset-liability management because fluctuating interest rates, intense competition,
consolidation, and member demands for better, more efficient, more convenient
products can reduce earnings and, therefore, capital. A credit union must manage its
cash flowing into and out of its assets and liabilities and the interest rates related to
its financial products. Understanding the characteristics of cash flow is necessary to
adequately measure interest- rate risk and stay solvent.
It is recommended that the credit union measure the performance and risk level of
the credit union’s asset/liability management activities, and report these findings to
the board.
Risk Measurement:
The following are minimum risk and performance measures of ALM, required by
sound business and financial practices:
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 23
The credit union must also meet ALM measurement requirements set out in the Act
and Regulations. The credit union may track any other measures of the loan
portfolio as it sees fit. these measurements should be compared to financial targets
in the annual business plan and the budget, so that management can determine
whether the credit union is meeting its goals. Management can also assess whether
there are material variances from the plan which need to be addressed.
Sections 7401 to 7405 provide techniques for measuring and monitoring the
adequacy of the credit union's ALM activities.
Board Reports
The above measurements should be reported to the board of directors, so that the
board can also monitor ALM activities and ensure adherence to regulatory
requirements and to the annual business plan. Material variances from plan, and
their causes, as well as management's plan to correct the variance should also be
included in the report. Management should also provide the board with a summary
on compliance with ALM policy and relevant regulatory requirements.
The credit score is the result of the credit appraisal process. It is at this stage that
the credit risk is quantified in terms of default probabilities. The interest rate score
reflects the spread earned by the corporate bank over and above the transfer price.
The liquidity score reflects the impact of the proposal on the liquidity profile of the
bank. Every bank would have certain target Gaps. Every proposal either takes the
bank away from the target Gap or brings it closer to the same. This score reflects the
impact of the proposal on the Gap profile of the bank. The score also is a reflection
of the cost of funding the liquidity mismatch that it might create. This looks at the
possibility of a credit default. This kind of arrangement, however, demands, diligent
monitoring of the asset to keep the bank updated with its liquidity profile.
Asset Evaluation:
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 24
Once the three performance scores are available, the entire evaluation of the asset
can be condensed to a one-page report. Here the performance measures are graded
on a scale of 1-5. The weighted average of these scores will give us the
COMPOSITE SCORE of the loan, the weights being assigned on the basis of the
relative strategic importance of each of these three parameters specific to the bank.
Higher the composite score better is the chance of the loan being accepted The
calculation of the composite score has certain underlying requirements: Every bank
should have a minimum composite score based on its risk appetite. E g., if we fix a
minimum composite score of 2, then any loan with a score below 2 should be
rejected, no questions asked.
A bank might have a minimum composite score of two, but care should be taken to
see to it that most of the loans in the portfolio do not fall very close to the minimum
composite score as this would worsen its risk profile. Weights should be assigned to
the different performance scores based on the bank’s future strategies and the
current balance sheet status. E.g., a bank with heavy focus on the control of already
high NPAs should give higher weights to credit performance score.
SCOPE OF ALM
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 25
The guidelines given in this note mainly address Liquidity and Interest Rate risks.
The guidelines specify the use of a maturity ladder up to 8 time buckets and
calculation of cumulative surplus or deficit of funds at selected maturity dates is
adopted as a standard tool. The formats of statement of structural liquidity are given
by the Reserve Bank of India. Detailed guidance also is given for the classification of
the assets & liabilities in each time bucket. For instance, the trading book securities
are to be shown less than one day to 30 days, over 1 month & up to 2 months, etc.,
time buckets on the basis of defeasance periods. Guidelines also provide a format
for estimating short-term dynamic liquidity in a time horizon spanning one day to six
months. This tool is to be used for estimating short-term liquidity profiles on the basis
of business projections and other commitments. The gap i.e., the difference between
rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities is to be used as a measure of
interest rate sensitivity.
Measuring and managing liquidity needs are vital activities of commercial banks. By
assuring a bank's ability to meet its liabilities as they become due, liquidity
management can reduce the probability of an adverse situation developing. The
importance of liquidity transcends individual institutions, as liquidity shortfall in one
institution can have repercussions on the entire system. Bank management should
measure not only the liquidity positions of banks on an ongoing basis but also
examine how liquidity requirements are likely to evolve under crisis scenarios.
Experience shows that assets commonly considered as liquid like Government
securities and other money market instruments could also become illiquid when the
market and players are unidirectional. Therefore liquidity has to be tracked through
maturity or cash flow mismatches. For measuring and managing net funding
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 26
1 to 14 days
15 to 28 days
Over 5 years
Within each time bucket there could be mismatches depending on cash inflows and
outflows. While the mismatches up to one year would be relevant since these
provide early warning signals of impending liquidity problems, the main focus should
be on the short-term mismatches viz., 1-14 days and 15-28 days. Banks, however,
are expected to monitor their cumulative mismatches (running total) across all time
buckets by establishing internal prudential limits with the approval of the Board /
Management Committee. The mismatch during 1-14 days and 15-28 days should not
in any case exceed 20% of the cash outflows in each time bucket. If a bank in view
of its asset -liability profile needs higher tolerance level, it could operate with higher
limit sanctioned by its Board / Management Committee giving reasons on the need
for such higher limit. A copy of the note approved by Board / Management
Committee may be forwarded to the Department of Banking Supervision, RBI. The
discretion to allow a higher tolerance level is intended for a temporary period, till the
system stabilizes and the bank is able to restructure its asset -liability pattern. he
Statement of Structural Liquidity may be prepared by placing all cash inflows and
outflows in the maturity ladder according to the expected timing of cash flows. A
maturing liability will be a cash outflow while a maturing asset will be a cash inflow. It
would be necessary to take into account the rupee inflows and outflows on account
of forex operations including the readily available forex resources ( FCNR (B) funds,
etc) which can be deployed for augmenting rupee resources. While determining the
likely cash inflows / outflows, banks have to make a number of assumptions
according to their asset - liability profiles. For instance, Indian banks with large
branch network can (on the stability of their deposit base as most deposits are
renewed) afford to have larger tolerance levels in mismatches if their term deposit
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 27
base is quite high. While determining the tolerance levels the banks may take into
account all relevant factors based on their asset-liability base, nature of business,
future strategy etc. The RBI is interested in ensuring that the tolerance levels are
determined keeping all necessary factors in view and further refined with experience
gained in Liquidity Management.
In order to enable the banks to monitor their short-term liquidity on a dynamic basis
over a time horizon spanning from 1-90 days, banks may estimate their short-term
liquidity profiles
Scenario Analysis:
Liquidity analysis scenarios are generated. A typical measure would involve worst
case (MCO analysis), best case and likely. (This may be used to commit money in
money markets). These scenarios are scrutinized and their impact approved by
ALCO as a matter of routine. All analysis referred to above provide measures
enabled by these scenarios. Many banks, as a matter of routine, create scenarios
on top of native cash flows. They alter nature of native cash flows based on their
prior knowledge. Derived cash flows are indeed scenarios that have been pre-
defined. Recent volatility in the wholesale funding markets has served to highlight
the importance of sound liquidity risk management practices and reinforce the lesson
that those banks with well- developed risk management functions are better
positioned to respond to new funding challenges. The banking industry has
developed many innovative solutions in response to these challenges, some of
which are presented here. Because banks vary widely in their funding needs, the
composition of their funding, the competitive environment in which they operate, and
their appetite for risk, there is no one set of universally applicable methods for
managing liquidity risk.
Strategic Direction
Bank management, generally through ALCO, must articulate the overall strategic
direction of the bank’s funding strategy by determining what mix of assets and
liabilities will be utilized to maintain liquidity. This strategy should address the
inherent liquidity risks, which are generated by the institution’s core businesses. For
instance, if the bank has major positions in global capital markets, then liquidity
should be managed to lessen the impact of sudden changes in global markets. Or if
the bank funds commercial loans with core deposits, then liquidity should be
managed to reduce the impact of a decline in asset quality or a runoff of core
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 28
Integration
Measurement Systems
Most banking experts agree that maintaining an appropriate system of metrics is the
linchpin upon which the liquidity risk management framework rests. If they are to
successfully manage their liquidity position, management needs a set of metrics with
position limits and benchmarks to quickly ascertain the bank’s true liquidity position,
ascertain trends as they develop, and provide the basis for projecting possible
funding scenarios rapidly and accurately. In addition, the bank should establish
appropriate benchmarks and limits for each liquidity measure. The varied funding
needs of institutions preclude the use of one universal set of metrics. As a result,
banks frequently use a combination of stock and flow liquidity measures or have
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 29
gone to exclusive reliance on models. Stock measures look at the dollar levels of
either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet to determine whether or not these
levels are adequate to meet projected needs. Flow measures use cash inflows and
outflows to determine a net cash position and any resultant surplus or deficit levels of
funding. Models are built utilizing hypothetical scenarios to develop measures,
benchmarks, and limits. Balance-sheet-based measures are generally best suited to
smaller institutions which fund their business lines, generally loans, with core
deposits. These banks generally develop their measurement system and their
corresponding benchmarks and limits based on either selected peer group analysis
or on studies of historical liquidity needs over time. In addition, most of these banks
utilize flow measures to determine their net cash position. While this combination
works well for smaller banks, regional and global institutions that have significant
trading operations and are heavily reliant on purchased funding find that stock and
flow measures are no longer adequate to meet their needs. As a result, these banks
have either developed or have purchased model-based measurement systems to
assist them in liquidity measurement.
Currency Risk:
Floating exchange rate arrangement has brought in its wake pronounced volatility
adding a new dimension to the risk profile of banks' balance sheets. The increased
capital flows across free economies following deregulation have contributed to
increase in the volume of transactions. Large cross border flows together with the
volatility has rendered the banks' balance sheets vulnerable to exchange rate
movements. Dealing in different currencies brings opportunities as also risks. If the
liabilities in one currency exceed the level of assets in the same currency, then the
currency mismatch can add value or erode value depending upon the currency
movements. The simplest way to avoid currency risk is to ensure that mismatches, if
any, are reduced to zero or near zero. Banks undertake operations in foreign
exchange like accepting deposits, making loans and advances and quoting prices for
foreign exchange transactions. Irrespective of the strategies adopted, it may not be
possible to eliminate currency mismatches altogether. Besides, some of the
institutions may take proprietary trading positions as a conscious business strategy.
Managing Currency Risk is one more dimension of Asset- Liability Management.
Mismatched currency position besides exposing the balance sheet to movements in
exchange rate also exposes it to country risk and settlement risk. Ever since the RBI
(Exchange Control Department) introduced the concept of end of the day near
square position in 1978, banks have been setting up overnight limits and selectively
undertaking active day time trading. Following the introduction of "Guidelines for
Internal Control over Foreign Exchange Business" in 1981, maturity mismatches
(gaps) are also subject to control. Following the recommendations of Expert Group
on Foreign Exchange Markets in India (Sodhani Committee) the calculation of
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 30
exchange position has been redefined and banks have been given the discretion to
set up overnight limits linked to maintenance of additional Tier I capital to the extent
of 5 per cent of open position limit. Presently, the banks are also free to set gap limits
with RBI's approval but are required to adopt Value at Risk (VaR) approach to
measure the risk associated with forward exposures. Thus the open position limits
together with the gap limits form the risk management approach to forex operations.
For monitoring such risks banks should follow the instructions contained in Circular
A.D (M. A. Series) No.52 dated December 27, 1997 issued by the Exchange Control
Department.
For purposes of determining interest rate sensitivity, both books may be mapped to
zero coupon bonds, preserving market risk. Combined book represents a reasonable
estimate of bank’s interest rate risk profile. The application of techniques like
modified or dollar duration gap and convexity gap analysis to such a profile will
enable risk measurement of interest rate sensitivity.
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 31
I) up to 1 month
viii) Non-sensitive
Therefore, the banking industry in India has substantially more issues associated
with interest rate risk, which is due to circumstances outside its control. This poses
extra challenges to the banking sector and to that extent; they have to adopt
innovative and sophisticated techniques to meet some of these challenges. There
are certain measures available to measure interest rate risk. These include:
Maturity: Since it takes into account only the timing of the final principal payment,
maturity is considered as an approximate measure of risk and in a sense does not
quantify risk. Longer maturity bonds are generally subject to more interest rate risk
than shorter maturity bonds.
Duration: Is the weighted average time of all cash flows, with weights being the
present values of cash flows. Duration can again be used to determine the sensitivity
of prices to changes in interest rates. It represents the percentage change in value in
response to changes in interest rates.
Dollar duration: Represents the actual dollar change in the market value of a
holding of the bond in response to a percentage change in rates.
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 32
liquidity ratio norms and to that extent they were acquiring government securities and
holding it till maturity. But in the changed situation, namely moving away from
administered interest rate structure to market determined rates, it becomes important
for banks to equip themselves with some of these techniques, in order to immunize
banks against interest rate risk.
Credit Derivatives:
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 33
Certain products like savings bank have no contracted maturity terms. Therefore,
there is conceptual difficulty in mapping them into zero coupon bonds as the timing
of the occurrence of such cash flows is not known. They are generally split into two
or more parts based on their behavior. These parts are volatile and core. Core is
expected to be with the bank and will mature in later time buckets. Volatile portion is
typically assigned to the first bucket.
Savings bank and current account are examples form the banking book of
probabilistic cash flow behavior. Probability is deliberate in derivative class of
instruments. Thus, complex and sophisticated models are required to map derivative
type of instruments into the cash flow model.
Bank uses these instruments to hedge positions. To offer a customer a long position
in US Dollar at a certain rate, bank has to hedge by taking a corresponding short
position. Thus, regardless of US Dollar rate changes, bank is fully protected, offering
customer protection as well. Thus, options, futures and derivatives may be used to
take positions, apart from hedging. Basel II norms specify different treatments for the
derivatives.
ALM policy is drafted and updated by bank’s ALCO. ALM policy requires that board
of directors, Asset Liability committee follow a formal procedure. ALM Policy covers
bank’s position on all risks – credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk etc. Banking keeps
changing and in times will change even further. Thus, ALM policies need to change
with the changes in the market on a continuous basis. This ensures that practices
are current, though business itself does not change. In India, for example, for a large
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 34
number of years, it was liability creation that was the prime driver. Once bank
gathered enough funds, the banks would look at multiple asset creation avenues.
However, of late, it is the asset creation that drives the liability growth.
Product:
Both assets and liabilities are considered products and operational parameters
defined for both. For example, deposits may have various characteristics and
structures for interest rates. Even plain vanilla deposits need to be priced and priced
by timeframe. Competition may introduce new products based on their ALM
positions. The policy defines products that the bank may deal in – both on assets
and liabilities.
Complexities are introduced by options – both explicit and embedded. Savings bank
and cash credit is a classic case of embedded options. Thus, ALCO needs to
understand impact of probabilistic cash flows before approving such products.
Before being offered, product creation needs to go through a proper introduction and
approval mechanisms through Risk Management and ALCO. Thus, policy should
address parameters that should never be crossed.
Structural Liquidity:
Structural liquidity is critical for an institution. Therefore, policies must be laid out for
measurement and implementation of liquidity controls in any financial institution.
Individuals practice structural liquidity measurement and control for personal
portfolios. Hence, these are even more vital for a financial organization.
Gap Measurement:
time buckets are defined as bands. 1-14 days, 15-days to 1 month, 1 month to 2
months etc. is an example. This organization is termed a maturity bucket scheme. All
cash flows are mapped to corresponding buckets. Thus, entire portfolio of cash flows
is now reduced to a bucket representation, thus making it easier to analyze. Since
all products are mapped, assets represent all inflows and liabilities represent all
outflows. Thus gaps in each time bucket are analyzed. Regulators specify use of
percentage of tolerance for gaps. Practical bankers use an absolute amount. us, as
long as gap remains within tolerance, then it is deemed zero. Thus, the statement in
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 35
the beginning that zero gap is impractical and not desired either. Bank’s funding or
lending gaps may be very deliberate.
During a period of climbing interest rates, a credit union which is funding its long
term loans with short term deposits (negative gap) will experience rising financing
costs as its deposits float at increasingly high rates. In order reduce this exposure,
the following procedures may be applied to shorten the term of assets and lengthen
the term of liabilities:
Price products so that favorable rates encourage shorter maturities for loans and
longer maturities for deposits. Unfavorable rates should be used to discourage
loan/deposit terms that will enlarge the negative gap.
Where pricing policy will not stem demand for longer term, fixed rate assets,
restrict the availability of fixed rate loans.
Change portfolio mix in favor of variable rate loans. Promote variable rate
consumer loans over fixed rate mortgages. Consumer or commercial loans earn a
higher yield and can be matched against variable rate deposits.
Where new business is not available to correct the gap position, encourage the
conversion of maturities in the existing portfolio. Allow members to negotiate in mid-
term an extended maturity for fixed rate deposits, or convert closed fixed rate loans
to open loans to encourage prepayment.
Consider selling a portion of the fixed rate mortgage portfolio to other industry
players. Such an arrangement allows ongoing member contact, the correction of an
unfavorable mismatch and the option to earn a return for continuing service.
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 36
Price products to dampen demand for variable rate loans and fixed rate term
deposits.
where pricing does not stem demand, restrict funds available for variable rate
loans.
Invest excess liquidity of the investment portfolio into longer term vehicles.
This is another measurement for structural liquidity. The last bucket is closed first
using market interest rate for that bucket. Some implementations divide all buckets
to months internally and calculate cost to close at month level. Cost to close of the
last bucket is them taken as an outflow in the previous bucket and that closed and so
on all the way till the first bucket is closed. That gives the total cost to close gap. the
other way is to simply calculate cost to close gap for each bucket based on interest
rate and assuming that all cash flows occur at the gap median. tolerance to limits of
cost to close is defined as a measure of structural liquidity risk and this is used for
control.
IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES
Policy:
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 37
Understanding of complexities:
Many people in a bank need to understand risk measurements and risk mitigation
procedures. Measurement of risk is a fairly simple phenomenon and does go on
regardless. Formalization of understanding, especially at a top level, will be helpful
as it would help in decision –making.
Data may not be available at all times in requisite format. It must be remembered
that many data items are assumptions and gaps must be measured in perspective.
There was a case of a manual branch of a bank that was closed for 6 months in a
year due to inclement weather and was largely inaccessible. As data may not be
obtained from this branch for 6 months, appropriate assumptions have to be made in
any event. The argument is that for all other purposes, assumptions are being made.
Sensible options need to be chosen and manual branch without computer was an
example. However, in modern banking, it is mapping of models to zero coupon
bonds that are an issue. Once again, arguments are that this should exist within the
bank.
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 38
Unrealistic goals:
An ALCO secretary was seen desperately trying to tweak with parameters to ‘show’
less gaps in liquidity reports. A zero gap is not practical. Returns are expected for
taking risks. Banks assume market and credit risk and hence they make returns.
ALCO’s job is to correctly determine positions and put in place appropriate remedial
measures using appropriate risks. It is not to show things as good when they are not.
In any event, market risks and credit risks are not the only causes for failure, as
evidenced by failures in the last decade.
Many of the new private sector banks and some of the non-banking financial
companies have gone in for complete computerization of their branch network and
have also integrated their treasury, forex, and lending segments. The information
technology initiatives of these institutions provide significant advantage to them in
asset-liability management since it facilitates faster flow of information, which is
accurate and reliable. The electronic fund transfer system as well as demat holding
of securities also significantly alters mechanisms of implementing asset-liability
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 39
Estimating the main sources of funds like core deposits, certificates of deposits,
and call borrowings.
Reducing the gap between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities, given
a certain level of risk.
Information is the key to the ALM process. Considering the large network of
branches and the lack of an adequate system to collect information required for ALM
which analyses information on the basis of residual maturity and behavioral pattern it
will take time for banks in the present state to get the requisite information. The
problem of ALM needs to be addressed by following an ABC approach i.e. analyzing
the behaviour of asset and liability products in the top branches accounting for
significant business and then making rational assumptions about the way in which
assets and liabilities would behave in other branches. In respect of foreign
exchange, investment portfolio and money market operations, in view of the
centralized nature of the functions, it would be much easier to collect reliable
information
Over the last few years the Indian financial markets have witnessed wide ranging
changes at fast pace. Intense competition for business involving both the assets and
liabilities, together with increasing volatility in the domestic interest rates as well as
foreign exchange rates, has brought pressure on the management of banks to
maintain a good balance among spreads, profitability and long-term viability. These
pressures call for structured and comprehensive measures and not just ad hoc
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 40
PRIVATE BANKING
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 41
According to the authors of the study, Noël Amenc, Lionel Martellini and Volker
Ziemann, asset-liability management represents a genuine means of adding value to
private banking that has not been sufficiently explored to date. Within the framework
of private financial management offerings, personal wealth managers tend to confine
their clients to mandates that are only differentiated through their level of volatility,
without the client’s personal wealth constraints and objectives being genuinely taken
into account in order to determine the overall strategic asset allocation. In that sense,
private wealth management is not sufficiently different from the management of a
diversified or profiled mutual fund.
In the end, it is not so much the short-term risk represented by the volatility of the
assets that is the determining element in taking an individual’s risk aversion into
account, but the probability or the expectation of the individual’s long-term financial
objectives not being achieved.
Taking these elements into account leads to asset allocations that are very different
from the allocation provided by an optimization carried out in a static mean-variance
or mean-VaR framework, as performed by the vast majority of private wealth
managers.
ALM is a risk management tool that helps a bank's management take investment /
disinvestment decisions, maintain the required statutory liquidity ratio (SLR), credit
reserve ratio (CRR) and other ratios as per Reserve Bank of India (RBI) guidelines. It
generates the SLP / IRS / MAP / SIR reports and supports risk management
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 42
modules like graphical analysis, data analysis and interest rate simulation. Basically,
the Asset Liability Management System consists of seven modules:
Administration:
the administration module lets the administrator conduct various user activities as
well as some distinct functions. The administrator can add a new user, modify or
delete an existing user or lock / unlock a user. Various categories linked with a group
of users can be set. This module sets up user-level permissions to access different
options from the ALM system, depending on the category of the user.
Registration:
this module handles registration of the bank and its branches into the ALM system.
Before extracting data from any branch, it is necessary to register the branch. The
bank / branch ID and address are also updated in the database during registration.
Rule guide:
the rule guide is one of the most important modules in the system. Only the
administrator has privileges to access this module for setting the various parameters
of the ALM system. Data processing can be carried out only after all the required
parameters have been set. he various functions performed by the module are:
Enable / disable account heads: The user can enable or disable asset or liability
account heads in the system.
Account head maintenance: The user can add, modify or delete account heads
with the help of this function.
Percentage settings: Percentages can be defined to identify the 'bucket' for all
those account heads that are of a percentage type (for example, 30 per cent in the
first bucket, 50 per cent in the second bucket and 20 per cent in the third bucket).
Bucket codes maintenance: The user can set various buckets for various
reports. In case the buckets defined by the RBI for SLP, IRS, MAP or SIR change,
this function can be used. For example, bucket codes defined by RBI for SLP are:
o 1 to 14 days
o 15 to 28 days
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 43
o Over 5 years
Settings of account heads to appear in a report: The user can select the
account heads which should appear in a report, with the help of this function. RBI
code mapping: This function lets the user map ALM account codes with the RBI
account codes.
Client code mapping: This function lets the user map ALM account codes with the
client account codes.
Data process: This module allows the user to upload the data into the system
manually or through a flat file for:
O Trial balance
o Residual accounts
o Parameterized accounts
o Bucket-wise accounts
the user can set the 'as on date' and copy the data for one particular branch from the
previous 'as on date' to the next 'as on date' with the help of this module.
Bucket codes maintenance: The user can set various buckets for various reports.
In case the buckets defined by the RBI for SLP, IRS, MAP or SIR change, this
function can be used. For example, bucket codes defined by RBI for SLP are:
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 44
o 1 to 14 days
o 15 to 28 days
o Over 5 years
Data analysis: Data analysis projects the balance of any account head for any
future date by three different methods — linear, polynomial and exponential —
provided the historical data for two, three or more previous 'as on dates' is available
with the system. The projected balances could be of any account head or any time
bucket of an account head for the structural liquidity profile report. This is also known
as forecasting.
ASSET-LIABILITY MISMATCH
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 45
Russian rubles would have a significant currency mismatch: if the value of the ruble
were to fall dramatically, the bank would lose money. In extreme cases, such
movements in the value of the assets and liabilities could lead to bankruptcy, liquidity
problems and wealth transfer. As another example, a bank could have substantial
long-term assets (such as fixed-rate mortgages) but short-term liabilities, such as
deposits.
On the other hand, 'controlled' mismatch, such as between short-term deposits and
somewhat longer-term, higher-interest loans to customers is central to many
financial institutions' business model. Asset–liability mismatches can be controlled,
mitigated or hedged.
With the onset of liberalization, Indian banks are now more exposed to uncertainty
and to global competition. This makes it imperative to have proper asset-liability
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 46
management system in place. The following points bring out the reasons as to why
asset-liability management is necessary in the Indian context.
2. Several banks have inadequate and inefficient management system that have to
be altered so as to ensure that the banks are sufficiently liquid.
4. As the focus on the net interest margin has increased over the years, there is an
increasing possibility that the risk arising out of exposure to interest rate volatility will
be built into the capital adequacy norms specified by the regulatory authorities. This,
in turn, will require efficient asset-liability management practices.
Changes in the availability of computers and the vast increase in their calculation
power have led to ongoing refinements in the way risk is measured and managed.
The biggest open issues on the risk measurement side are about the modeling of
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 47
behavior-either the clients’ or the banks’. The following are three key topics where
the results can significantly affect the risk measure ad where quantification is still
difficult.
(a) Prepayment: Much work has been done to describe the prepayment of
mortgages. here is a wide range of methodologies in use, all the strength and
shortcoming and all demonstrating room for improvement.
(b) Average life of non-maturity deposits: Again, a lot of work has been done to try to
describe the balance behavior of savings and checking accounts. While there are
several distinct methodologies, no clear favorite emerges. There is no definitive
answer as to the average life of a deposit.
(c) Pricing strategies: The rates that banks pay on retail products still move at the
discretion of the banks and in response to the factors other than moves in market
rates. On the risk management side, understanding and quantifying performance
remains an open issue. Funds transfer pricing systems allow some quantification of
return from the interest rate but are not designed to describe how good that
performance was. he next step in performance measurement will be to attempt to
quantify returns in terms of the amount of risk taken. The ideas are out there, in
various approaches to risk-adjusted performance measurement systems, but they
are still implemented by a minority of institutions.
All of these issues are about refinements to the basic approaches of asset-liability
management. They do not represent radical departures from the basic frameworks of
risk-measurement and risk-management. The process of asset-liability management
will continue to refine itself, but the framework is not going to change without a big
push from somewhere else.
The Asset Liability Management function's main challenge lies in measuring the
sensitivity of risk exposures to any change in one or more factors, and quantifying
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 48
the impact of "unexpected" movements in one or more factors. Other key challenges
include:
Capturing the quality, valuation and risk-based performance of the balance sheet;
Modelling the potential growth and evolution of the balance sheet in response to
business development strategies, customer behavior, competitors and other external
factors.
Asset Liability Management is a broad field with various specialties. Our services
range from setting up the entire Asset Liability Management process to providing
support in specific areas such as:
Defining and developing Asset Liability Management models to calculate the risk
and return impact of new products or new markets, or measure the impact of new
regulations;
Building an integrated modelling process that captures credit, market, and liquidity
risk implications on earnings, value and the overall balance sheet condition;
Reviewing and building behavioural models and implementation for cards, deposits
or overall business areas – this includes supporting statistical studies and analysis;
CONCLUSION
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 49
The success of ALM, Risk Management and Basel Accord introduced by BIS
depends on the efficiency of the management of assets and liabilities. Hence these
days without proper management of assets and liabilities, the survival is at stake. A
bank’s liabilities include deposits, borrowings and capital. On the other side of the
balance sheets are assets which are loans of various types which banks make tithe
customer for various purposes. To view the two sides of banks’ balance sheet as
completely integrated units has an intuitive appeal. But the nature, profitability and
risk of constituents of both sides should be similar. The structure of banks’. Balance
sheet has direct implications on profitability of banks especially in terms of Net
Interest Margin (NIM). So it is absolute necessary to maintain compatible asset-
liability structure to maintain liquidity, improve profitability and manage risk under
acceptable limits.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 50
http://rbidocs.rbi.org.in/rdocs/PressRelease/PDFs/3204.pdf
http://www.cab.org.in/Lists/Knowledge%20Bank/Attachments/106/Assel__liability
http://www.google.co.in/url?
sa=t&rct=j&q=asset+liability+management&source=web&cd
http://www.frsglobal.com/solutions/solutionsalm.html
http://www.riskglossary.com/link/asset_liability_management.htm
INDEX
K C College
Asset liability management in banks 51
K C College