Angeles University Foundation

Angeles City, Philippines

AY. 2019-2020

Does time management affect academic performance in programming

Jonathan niel Galura banawis

James dela cruz
Edrian millare

Submitted to:
Engr. Ireneo Herrera
Professor

Date:
October 1, 2019
 Rationale of the Study
The objective of the survey is to estimate and quantify how the students time management
affect academic performance in programming. The results will determine if it does or doesn’t
imply that the commuting time is important or not. All the students within the same school
live at a similar distance, so maybe the differences in commuting time are big enough or not
to generate an important impact in their available time to study or do recreational activities.

Procedure
The students will conduct a survey based Does time management affect academic
performance in programming, By designating their travel time

a.) Designating their number of hours on how they study in programming

 Calculation and Analysis

trisha 172674856 1hr 85

justine 192527783 3hrs 90
kenneth 192760671 30mins 96
ETHAN 175467765 2hrs 90
tan 190204357 2hrs 78
ikia 192135865 2hrs 90
miguel 190546577 5hrs 74
william 182232518 1hr 85
marin 170241320 non 90
james 190845751 0 71
Dian pangilinan 190533506 2 85
dian pangilinan 90533506 1hr 87
antoine louis 191770813 30mins 85
francis ivan 191139349 2hrs 80
louie capistrano 191355411 1hr 86
andrew joshua 192609848 1hr 92
john 192564277 3hrs 80
rina 190205778 30mins 89
luiz 191012653 1hr 87
John Denver 192134754 30 mins 83
tayson, janry 192754529 2 hrs 91
mica cortez 192320466 1 hr and 30 mins 89
Micaella De Jesus 192754439 1 hr 85
Peter Dela Cruz 193644429 2 hrs 89
Michael Serrano 18754528 1 hr 82
Antonio Dagnalan 193755539 1 hr and 20 mins 83
Aira Briones 193755628 1 hr 83
John Gamboa 195774327 20 mins 75
Keanna Fernando 192244325 1 hr 86
Zehrei Verj D. Morales 182436776 3 hrs 89
Rivera, Christopher Josh
C. 182596456 2 hrs 85
16-0686-765 160686765 1 hr 87
Kenan Kerl T. Punsalang 120083975 2 hrs 87
Kathleen Arceo 90991215 30 mins 82
Chezka Balagtas 160643607 30 mins 81
Mari Bucud 190911849 1 hr 86
Astlee Agustin 170516475 1 hr 84
Mitchelle Burla 191027410 1 hr 84
Erika Canasa 190963312 30 mins 78
1hr 95
Vitug, Kim Rio M 192555145 2 hours 80
 ∑𝑥= 1652 r = 0.0157

∑𝑦 = 3236 𝑟 2 = 0.00024649

∑𝑥 2 = 2729104

∑𝑦 2 = 10471696

∑𝑥𝑦 =5054632

Pearson Correlation

Formula:

𝑁∑𝑥𝑦−∑𝑥∑𝑦
r=
√[𝑁∑𝑥 2 −(∑𝑥)2 ][𝑁∑𝑦 2 −(∑𝑦)2

40(5054632)−(1652)(3236)
r=
√[(40)(2729104)−(10471696)2 ][40(10471696)−(3236)2

r = 0.0157
Interpretation = slight correlation
Linear Regression

∑𝒚 ∑𝒙²−∑𝒙∑𝒙𝒚 𝑵∑𝒙𝒚−∑𝒙∑𝒚
a= 𝑵 ∑ 𝒙²−(∑𝒙)²
b=
𝑵∑𝒙𝟐 −(∑𝒙)²

(3236)(2729104)−(1652)(5054632)
a=
40(2729104)(1652)2

a = 0.0000016
40(5054632)−(1652)(3236)
b=
40(2729104)−(1652)2

b = 1.8492x
y = 0.0000016 + 1.8492x
 Travel time and GWA
96

94

92

90

88

86

84

82

80

78
0 5 10 15 20 25 30

The plots are scattered randomly therefore there is no correlation.

Conclusion
– Our result doesn’t imply that the commuting time is not important at all, they rather say that the
commuting time is not important within every school. All the students within the same school live at
a similar distance, so maybe the differences in commuting time are not big enough
Documention