13.10.

2019 Communications From Elsewhere

Communications From Elsewhere

Home of RJL20

Neocultural materialism, feminism and

structuralist presemantic theory

Henry N. K. Tilton

Department of Future Studies, Miskatonic University,

Arkham, Mass.

1. Gibson and neocultural materialism

If one examines capitalist narrative, one is faced with a choice: either

reject Batailleist `powerful communication’ or conclude that sexuality has
intrinsic meaning, given that neotextual structuralist theory is invalid. In a
sense, Sontag promotes the use of capitalist narrative to read class. Marx’s
analysis of the subcultural paradigm of narrative suggests that culture is part
of the economy of consciousness.

The characteristic theme of the works of Gibson is not theory, as

Batailleist `powerful communication’ suggests, but pretheory. Therefore, if
capitalist narrative holds, we have to choose between neocultural materialism
www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/ 1/4
13.10.2019 Communications From Elsewhere

and capitalist objectivism. Sartre suggests the use of capitalist narrative to

attack hierarchy.

It could be said that Dahmus[1] implies that we have to

choose between neocultural materialism and neotextual deappropriation.
Cultural
predialectic theory holds that discourse is created by communication, but only
if culture is distinct from narrativity; otherwise, we can assume that sexual
identity, perhaps surprisingly, has objective value.

But an abundance of discourses concerning the bridge between class and truth
may be discovered. The subject is contextualised into a capitalist narrative
that includes narrativity as a paradox.

Therefore, the de ning characteristic, and subsequent meaninglessness, of

Batailleist `powerful communication’ prevalent in Gibson’s Neuromancer
emerges again in Count Zero, although in a more patriarchialist sense.
Marx promotes the use of neocultural materialism to analyse and modify sexual
identity.

2. Batailleist `powerful communication’ and neosemiotic

desituationism

“Class is used in the service of the status quo,” says Debord. But if
neocultural materialism holds, the works of Gibson are an example of
self-su cient nihilism. The subject is interpolated into a neosemiotic
desituationism that includes truth as a whole.

The main theme of la Fournier’s[2] model of neocultural

materialism is a subtextual paradox. Therefore, Lacan suggests the use of
patriarchial libertarianism to deconstruct hierarchy. Bataille uses the term
‘neocultural materialism’ to denote the role of the reader as artist.

If one examines Batailleist `powerful communication’, one is faced with a

choice: either accept neosemiotic desituationism or conclude that narrative is
a product of the masses, given that Lyotard’s analysis of Batailleist `powerful

www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/ 2/4
13.10.2019 Communications From Elsewhere

communication’ is valid. It could be said that a number of sublimations

concerning neosemiotic desituationism exist. The subject is contextualised into
a neocultural paradigm of reality that includes sexuality as a reality.

However, in Pattern Recognition, Gibson a rms neocultural

materialism; in Idoru he examines textual preconstructivist theory.
Humphrey[3] implies that we have to choose between
neosemiotic desituationism and capitalist discourse.

But many narratives concerning the common ground between society and class
may be found. If neopatriarchial semanticist theory holds, we have to choose
between Batailleist `powerful communication’ and the postmodern paradigm of
reality.

In a sense, the premise of neosemiotic desituationism holds that government

is capable of deconstruction. The destruction/creation distinction depicted in
Smith’s Clerks is also evident in Dogma.

Therefore, Tilton[4] suggests that we have to choose

between Batailleist `powerful communication’ and Baudrillardist hyperreality.
Sartre promotes the use of neocultural materialism to analyse society.

Thus, neosemiotic desituationism states that culture serves to exploit

minorities. If neocultural materialism holds, we have to choose between
Batailleist `powerful communication’ and the neocultural paradigm of discourse.

1. Dahmus, S. C. H. (1975) The

Vermillion Sky: Neocultural materialism and Batailleist `powerful
communication’. Cambridge University Press

2. la Fournier, Z. ed. (1992) Batailleist `powerful

communication’ and neocultural materialism. Oxford University Press

3. Humphrey, H. K. (1984) The Context of Economy:

Neocultural materialism in the works of Smith. University of Georgia
Press
www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/ 3/4
13.10.2019 Communications From Elsewhere

4. Tilton, C. P. R. ed. (1977) Neocultural materialism and

Batailleist `powerful communication’. Cambridge University Press

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly
generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow
this link.
If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for
a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada
Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and
modi ed very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out
there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 21,958,901 essays since

25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University

Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of
Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks“.

More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text A air, where
NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was
accepted by a cultural criticism publication.

Communications From Elsewhere / Proudly powered by WordPress

loading

www.elsewhere.org/journal/pomo/ 4/4