Professional Documents
Culture Documents
White Qin - G7u1 Summative Task 19 20
White Qin - G7u1 Summative Task 19 20
White Qin - G7u1 Summative Task 19 20
Task: You will write four separate TEPAC paragraphs on different topics for this
assessment. The first three paragraphs have an assigned topic, and the fourth one you
may choose the topic you want to write about. Each paragraph should be around 250
words. You will have class time on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday next
week to complete this task.
● Be sure to use specific examples and quotations from the novel as evidence in
your answer.
● After you finish ALL of your writing, please answer the following questions:
○ Which paragraph do you think shows your best Analyzing?
■
○ Which paragraph do you think shows your best Organizing?
■
○ Which paragraph do you think shows your best Using Language?
■
Paragraph #1
Explain the ways that Chiko and Tu Reh are similar or different. You may consider their
personalities, their family or social surroundings, or the events that happen to each of
them in the book. Use examples from the novel to support your ideas.
Although Chiko and Tu Reh are friends and have some similarities, they’re actually quite
different from each other. Chiko, who grew up in a pretty decent family, has been “Taken” by
the soldiers of Myanmar. He then started military training in the camp where they use the gym
of the Karenni as their barrack. On the other hand, Tu Reh grew up in a refugee camp and
never really left camp. Chiko is “too thin”(18) and “wants to be a teacher”(15). While Tu Reh
is buffed and doesn’t know what he’s doing with his life yet. Chiko’s mom wants him to be “a
healer” while Tu Reh’s father wants him to “Join his next mission”(139), which is basically
like being a soldier. Basically, this is saying that they’re quite different like all humans are.
This won't stop them from being friends. Basically, Chiko is more of the nerdy type of person
while Tu Reh is more of the ruff one. Chiko is more knowledgable and more open to society
while Tu Reh’s life is like being in a prison! Trapped in camp! Even their parents are very
different! One wants to let her son to be a skillful doctor while the other one wants his son to
be a soldier who might lose his life in the first mission! This suggests that they’re actually
quite different. The evidence is significant because it proofs that the difference between these
two is quite large. We can interpret this to mean that the two have significantly different
backgrounds and have different personal interests. In summary, they’re pretty different from
each other in almost every angle you looked at it, but that doesn’t stop their incredible
friendship!
Paragraph #2
Two different groups/people can understand reality differently. Look, every human being
is different from each other! People’s understanding of society can vary due to their personal
background, their education, their family and so on and so for. For example, in Mitali
Perkins’s Bamboo People, Chiko has met so many people and has made so many friends along
his adventure. And yet, all of them seem different. One is a “Street boy” and another one who
saved his life yet “hates Burmese” so much that he’s dehumanizing everyone that’s Burmese!
That’s how the Karenni understand reality! Same with the Burmese, they dehumanize the
Karenni as well! Basically, this is saying that what you’ve experienced, what you’ve been
through, and what you’d been taught at, can affect the angle you see things. And yet, it’s
impossible to change other’s perspectives to be the same as yours. From this, we can infer that
everyone is different and has their own perspective of seeing things. It also suggests that we
shouldn’t judge a person by how they see things and that we should respect different voices. In
summary, everyone’s different and that we should respect the diversity of reality.
Paragraph #3
Explain how the two sides in the conflict between the Karenni and the Burmese Army
have been shown so far in Bamboo People. What message or theme do you think Mitali
Perkins might be trying to show about the conflict?
So far, in Bamboo People, Mitali Perkins is trying to show us that Myanmar is not in a
good state right now. She uses a teenage boy as an example to show the reader that the same
thing can happen to them, which makes the reader’s interest in the conflict and the book
higher. Overall, in Bamboo People, the reader will already know a little bit about the conflict
between the Burmese and the Karenni. The author, Mitali Perkins, keep giving the reader hints
while he/she is reading. But things start to get intense when Chiko replaced Tai and went to the
mission. The author then introduce a new character with a completely different background to
the reader. Which is Tu Reh, the boy who grew up in a Karenni refugee camp. And we get to
know a little more about what the Karenni’s perspective of the Burmese. We now know that
the Burmese “Burn down their village” and that almost everyone there hates Burmese. They
think all Burmese will “Destroy our people”(151) and just hate them down their veins. The
same goes for the Burmese, the captain brainwashed all the soldiers who were kidnaped to the
camp. He even tells soldiers that the Karennis “Only cares about their own needs”(92). This is
saying that the author is trying to keep us entertained as possible as well as giving us
information. This also is saying that the conflict between the Burmese and the Karenni won’t
stop in a while. From this, we can infer that the author is trying to keep us entertained as
possible and feed us with a lot of information. We can also interpret this to mean that the
conflict between Burmese and Karenni is causing a lot of lives lost, harms and so on. The
Karenni need to live in a camp, while the Burmese are dragging young boys to go to military
training. I think Mitali Perkins's message to us is that different people can have a different
thought and we should just leave them alone and let it be the way it is. In summary, the
conflict between Burmese and Karenni is a serious problem and Mitali Perkins wrote this book
Criteria A - Analyzing
i. identify and comment upon significant aspects of texts
ii. identify and comment upon the creator’s choices
iii. justify opinions and ideas, using examples, explanations and terminology
iv. identify similarities and differences in features within the text.
Criteria B - Organizing
i. employ organizational structures that serve the context and intention
ii. organize opinions and ideas in a logical manner
iii. use referencing and formatting tools to create a presentation style suitable to the
context and intention.