Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Women Heath
Women Heath
Women Heath
to Maternal Exertion
Marshall W. Carpenter, MD; Stanley P. Sady, PhD; Bente Hoegsberg, MD; Mina A. Sady, MA; Barbara Haydon, BSN;
Eileen M. Cullinane, MS; Donald R. Coustan, MD; Paul D. Thompson, MD
Doppler monitoring of fetal heart rates during maternal exertion has suggested ments and distribution of brochures.
that fetal bradycardia occurs frequently during vigorous exercise, causing Women were excluded from the study if
concern for fetal safety. Doppler determination of fetal heart rate during vigorous they gave a history of medical problems
maternal effort is difficult. To avoid motion artifact, we observed fetal heart rate (such as asthma) or previous abnormal
using two-dimensional ultrasound and determined the incidence of fetal brady- pregnancies (such as preterm labor)
cardia in 45 pregnant women (age, 29.0\m=+-\3.7years [mean \m=+-\SD]; gestational that might compromise their ability to
age, 25.2 \m=+-\3.0 weeks) during 85 submaximal and 79 maximal cycle ergometer
complete the exercise test sessions. All
tests. Average fetal heart rate did not change during exercise. A single episode subjects provided written informed
consent following an orientation visit to
of fetal bradycardia (heart rate <110 beats per minute for \m=ge\10s) occurred the exerciselaboratory. The protocol
during submaximal exertion during a maternal vasovagal episode. Sixteen was approved by the institutional re¬
episodes of fetal bradycardia were noted within three minutes after cessation of view boards of all participating in¬
exercise, 15 of which followed maximal maternal effort. We conclude that brief stitutions.
submaximal maternal exercise up to approximately 70% of maximal aerobic Procedure
power (maternal heart rate \m=le\148beats per minute) does not affect fetal heart
rate. In contrast to submaximal maternal exertion, maximal exertion is common- Subjects were studied twice on sepa¬
ly followed by fetal bradycardia. This may indicate inadequate fetal gas ratedays, using an identical protocol
each time. Exercise tests were per¬
exchange. formed on an electrically braked cycle
(JAMA 1988;259:3006-3009) ergometer (Collins Pedal Mate, Brain-
tree, Mass). At each exercise test ses¬
sion, resting measurements were ob¬
VIGOROUS exertion in pregnant ewes rate decelerations are associated with
tained with subjects seated on the
reduces uterine blood flow and fetal ar¬ fetal hypoxia, such results raise concern ergometer for ten minutes (Fig 1). Sub¬
terial oxygen tension1,2 and may produce about fetal safety during vigorous exer¬ jects then cycled at 0, 30, and 60 W for
six minutes at each work load to obtain
significant fetal hypoxia. Recent human cise. Doppler measurement of fetal
submaximal exercise measurements.
studies using Doppler monitors to esti¬ heart rates during exercise is difficult,
mate fetal heart rate have reported pro¬
This was followed by five minutes of
however, because of artifact associated cool-down cycling against minimal re¬
longed fetal bradycardia even during with maternal motion.8'9 Consequently,
sistance and ten minutes of rest. The
low-intensity maternal exercise.3"5 Oth¬ we used two-dimensional ultrasonic im¬
maximal exercise session started with
ers have noted increased fetal heart rate aging to record the fetal heart rate re¬
immediately following cycling6 and run¬ sponse to maternal exercise. Our pur¬ approximately 60 W of resistance and
consisted of two-minute stages of incre¬
ning7 exercise. Since episodic fetal heart pose was to determine the effect of mental exertion until subjects were un¬
submaximal and maximal maternal ex¬
ertion on fetal heart rate and the inci¬ able or unwilling to exercise further.
From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, dence of fetal bradycardia. Subjects continued to cycle for five min¬
utes against minimal resistance. They
Women and Infants Hospital (Drs Carpenter, Hoegs-
berg, and Coustan and Ms Haydon), and the Depart- METHODS then assumed a semirecumbent position
ment of Medicine, Miriam Hospital (Drs Sady and for an additional seven minutes of ultra¬
Thompson and Mss Sady and Cullinane), Brown Uni- Subjects sound observation followed by a non-
versity Program in Medicine, Providence, RI.
Reprint requests to Women and Infants Hospital, 101 Pregnant women were recruited into stress test. This latter test documents
Dudley St, Providence, RI 02905 (Dr Carpenter). the study through television announce- fetal heart rate acceleration in response
Fetal cardiac activity was continu¬ (Table 1). Three of the first sessions and 179 ± 9 beats per minute, respectively).
ously monitored and videotaped during three of the second sessions included This confirms that exercise effort was
exercise and rest periods using a linear only the submaximal portion of the pro¬ maximal or near maximal.
array two-dimensional ultrasound sys¬ tocol. Five subjects did not attempt a There were no significant differences
tem (Toshiba SLA-77A, Nasu, Japan). second exercise session: one because of in mean fetal heart rates between the
Videotapes were subsequently re¬ uterine contractions, one because of preexercise period and subsequent ex¬
viewed in entirety by an experienced exercise-associated hypotension, and ercise and rest periods (Table 2). Com-
References
1. Lotgering FK, Gilbert RD, Longo LD: Exercise rate reactivity before and after maternal jogging 13. Hohimer AR, Smith OA: Decreased renal
responses in pregnant sheep: Blood gases, tem- during the third trimester. Am J Obstet Gynecol blood flow in the baboon during mild dynamic leg
peratures, and fetal cardiovascular system. J Appl 1982;545-547. exercise. Am J Physiol 1979;236:H141-H150.
Physiol 1983;55:842-850. 8. Paolone AM, Shangold M: Artifact in the record- 14. Horvath SM: Review of energetics and blood
2. Clapp JF: Acute exercise stress in the pregnant ing of fetal heart rates during maternal exercise. J flow in exercise. Diabetes 1979;28(suppl 1):33-38.
ewe. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;136:489-494. Appl Physiol 1987;62:848-849. 15. Rowell LB: Human cardiovascular adjust-
3. Artal R, Romem Y, Paul RH, et al: Fetal brady- 9. O'Neill ME, Cooper KA, Hunyor SN, et al: ments to exercise and thermal stress. Physiol Rev
cardia induced by maternal exercise. Lancet 'Pseudo' fetal bradycardia during maternal exer- 1974;54:75-119.
1984;2:258-260. cise. J Appl Physiol 1987;62:849-850. 16. Morris N, Osborn SB, Wright HP, et al: Effec-
4. Jovanovic L, Kessler A, Peterson CM: Human 10. Keegan KA, Paul RH: Antepartum fetal heart tive uterine blood-flow during exercise in normal
maternal and fetal response to graded exercise. J rate testing: IV. The nonstress test as a primary and pre-eclamptic pregnancies. Lancet 1956;2:481\x=req-\
Appl Physiol 1985;58:1719-1722. approach. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;136:75-80. 484.
5. Artal R, Rutherford S, Romem Y, et al: Fetal 11. Wilmore JH, Costill DL: A semiautomated sys- 17. Morton MJ, Paul MS, Campos GR, et al: Exer-
heart rate responses to maternal exercise. Am J tems approach to the assessment of oxygen uptake cise dynamics in late gestation:Effects of physical
Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:729-733. during exercise. J Appl Physiol 1974;36:618-620. training. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;152:91-97.
6. Collings C, Curet LB: Fetal heart rate response 12. Taylor HL, Buskirk E, Henschel A: Maximal 18. Walker AM, Cannata JP, Dowling MH, et al:
to maternal exercise. Am J Obstet Gynecol oxygen uptake as an objective measure of cardio- Age-dependent pattern of autonomic heart rate
1985;151:498-501. respiratory performance. J Appl Physiol 1955;8: control during hypoxia in fetal and newborn lambs.
7. Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC, Widmer K: Fetal heart 73-80. Biol Neonate 1979;35:198-208.