POSITION AND COMPETENCY PROFILE PCP No.

_________ Revision Code: 00

Department of Education
Postion Title Teacher I Salary Grade 11
Parenthetical Title
Office Unit Effectivity Date
Reports to Principal/ School Heads Page/s
Position Supervised
JOB SUMMARY

QUALIFICATION STANDARDS
A. CSC Prescribed Qualifications
Education Bachelor of Secondary Education/Mathematics
Experience 5yrs & 2 mos.
Eligibility LET
Trainings None required
B. Preferred Qualifications
Education BSE/BSEEd/College Graduate with education units (18-21), MA units 18 units
Experience
Eligibility PBET/LET Passers
Trainings In-Service training/RPMS ENHANCEMENT
 Individual Performance Commitment and Review Form

Name of Employee: JANICE A. HUGO Name of Rater: BELEN S. CASAS

Position: TEACHER I Position: SCHOOL PRINCIPAL
Review Period: Mar-18 Date of Review:
Bureau/Center/Servic
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING TO BE FILLED DURING EVALUATIO

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Result

Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T Ave.

Basic Education 1. Teaching- 1.1 Prepared daily June 2017- 20% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding
Services Learning lesson plans / Daily Apr. 2018 • 95% - 100% of all lesson logs had all the • 95%-100%of the students got quarterly • 95% - 100% of all lesson logs were
Process (40%) Logs of activities complete parts (Objectives, Content, grade of 75% and above submitted for checking before the checking
including appropriate Learning Resources, Procedures, schedule to the school head
adequate and updated Remarks & Reflections)
instructional materials
in Science within the 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory
rating period. (Note: •85% - 94% of all lesson logs had all the • 85%-94%of the students got quarterly • 85% - 94% of all lesson logs were
applicable for 2 years complete parts (Objectives, Content, grade of 75% and above submitted for checking before the checking
and below teaching Learning Resources, Procedures, schedule to the school head
experience and for Remarks & Reflections)
those teachers who are
3 yrs and above 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory
teaching experience • 75%-84% of all lesson logs had all the • 75%-84%of the students got quarterly • 75% - 84% of all lesson logs were
opted to prepare LPs) complete parts (Objectives, Content, grade of 75% and above submitted for checking before the checking
Learning Resources, Procedures, schedule to the school head
Remarks & Reflections)
2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory
• 51%-74% of all lesson logs had all the • 51%-74%of the students got quarterly • 51% - 74% of all lesson logs were
complete parts (Objectives, Content, grade of 75% and above submitted for checking before the checking
Learning Resources, Procedures, schedule to the school head
Remarks & Reflections)

1 - Poor 1 - Poor 1 - Poor

#RSH#
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Result
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T Ave.

• 50% and below of all lesson logs had all • 50% and below of the students got • 50% and below of all lesson logs were
the complete parts (Objectives, Content, quarterly grade of 75% and above submitted for checking before the checking
Learning Resources, Procedures, schedule to the school head
Remarks & Reflections)

1.2 Prepared TOS in June 2017- 10% 5 - Outstanding 5-Outstanding 5-Outstanding

Science 9 during Apr. 2018 * prepared 95% - 100% of the TOS during 95% - 100% of the TOS validated by the Submitted on or before the deadline
quarterly exams to quarterly exams in a year round school head
provide standard and
valid questionnaire to 4- Very Satisfactorily 4-Very satisfactory 4- (Very Satisfactory)
students in measuring * prepared 85% - 94% of the TOS during 85%-94% of the TOS validated by the Submitted one day after the deadline
their academic quarterly exams in a year round school head
performance.
3-Satisfactorily 3-Satisfactorily 3-Satisfactorily
prepared 75% -84% of the TOS during Submitted two days after the deadline
qaurterly exams in a year round 75%-84% of the TOS validated by the
school head
2-Unsatisfactorily 2-Unsatisfactorily 2 - Unsatisfactorily
prepared 51% - 74% of the TOS during 51% -74% of the TOS validated by the Submitted three days after the deadline
quarterly exams in a year round school head
1-Poor 1-Poor 1-Poor
prepared 50% and below of the TOS in a Submitted a week after the deadline
year round 50% and below of the TOS validated by
the school head
1.3 Monitored students' June 2017- 10% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding
daily attendance to Mar. 2018 95%-100% of student's attendance 95%-100% of the students promoted • Report of progress of pupils were given to
ensure 100% promotion completely monitored and evaluated with parents within 15 working days after the
rate the following evidences: (SF 2, attendance submission of grades from subject teachers
notebook, weekly attendance sheet)

4- Very Satisfactorily 4- Very Satisfactorily 4 - Very Satisfactory

95%-100% of student's attendance 85%-94% of the students promoted • Report of progress of pupils were given to
completely monitored and evaluated with parents within 20 working days after the
the following evidences: (SF 2, attendance submission of grades from subject teachers
notebook, weekly attendance sheet)

#RSH#

Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA
QUALITY
3-Satisfactorily 3-Satisfactorily
95%-100% of student's attendance
completely monitored and evaluated with
the following evidences: (SF 2, attendance
notebook, weekly attendance sheet)
2-Unsatisfactorily
95%-100% of student's attendance
completely monitored and evaluated with
the following evidences: (SF 2, attendance
notebook, weekly attendance sheet)
1-Poor
95%-100% of student's attendance
completely monitored and evaluated with promoted
the following evidences: (SF 2, attendance
notebook, weekly attendance sheet)
#RSH#
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
EFFICIENCY
75%-84% of the students promoted
2-Unsatisfactorily
51%-74% of the students promoted
1-Poor
50% and below of the students
Actual Result
TIMELINESS Q E T Ave.
3 - Satisfactory
• Report of progress of pupils were given to
parents within 25 working days after the
submission of grades from subject teachers
2 - Unsatisfactory
• Report of progress of pupils were given to
parents within 30 working days after the
submission of grades from subject teachers
1 - Poor
• Report of progress of pupils were given to
parents within 35 or later working days after
the submission of grades from subject
teachers
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Result
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T Ave.

2. 2.1 Monitored and June 2017- 10% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding

Pupils/Student evaluated pupils/
Outcomes (30%) students’ progress
Mar. 2018 95% - 100% of the students got the • Report of progress of pupils were given to
• Prepared and presented all of the passing grade in all subjects parents within 15 working days after the
following with complete record:class submission of grades from subject teachers
record, periodic exam corrected test
papers, periodic exam TOS, periodic
exam item analysis

4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory

Prepared and presented 3 of the following 85%-94% of the students got a passing • Report of progress of pupils were given to
with complete record: class record, grade in all subjects parents within 20 working days after the
periodic exam corrected test papers, submission of grades from subject teachers
periodic exam TOS, and item analysis

3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory

Prepared and presented 2 of the following 75%-84% of the students got a passing • Report of progress of pupils were given to
with complete record: class record, grade in all subjects parents within 25 working days after the
periodic exam corrected test papers, submission of grades from subject teachers
periodic exam TOS, and item analysis

2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory

Prepared and presented 1 of the following 51%-74% of the students got a passing • Report of progress of pupils were given to
with complete record: class record, grade in all subjects parents within 30 working days after the
periodic exam corrected test papers, submission of grades from subject teachers
periodic exam TOS, and item analysis

1 - Poor 1 - Poor 1 - Poor

Not conducted even one summative test 50% and below of the students got a • Report of progress of pupils were given to
in a grading period passing grade in all subjects parents within 35 or later working days after
the submission of grades from subject
teachers

#RSH#
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Result
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T Ave.

2.2 Conducted June 2017- 10% 5 - Outstanding 5-Outstanding 5-Outstanding

remediation to improve Mar. 2018 • Remediation is offered to 95% - 100% of 95% -100% of non readers improved
performance indicators slow learners
of students from June
to March 2018.
4 - Very Satisfactory
• Remediation is offered to 85% to 94%
slow learners
3 - Satisfactory
• Remediation is offered to 70-84% who
need it
their performance at the end of the
school year
4-Very satisfactory
85%-94% of non-readers improved their
performance at the end of the school Had accurate, complete and comprehensive
year
3 - Satisfactorily
70%-84% of non-readers improved their
performance at the end of the school
year
Had accurate, complete and comprehensive
records of student's progress during the
First Quarter
4-Very Satisfactorily
records of student's progress during the
Second Quarter
3-Satisfactorily
Had accurate, complete and comprehensive
records of student's progress during the
Third Quarter

2 - Unsatisfactory 2-Unsatisfactorily 2 -Unsatisfactorily

• Remediation is offered to 51%-74% who 51%-74% of non-readers improved their Had accurate, complete and comprehensive
need it performance at the end of the school records of student's progress during the
year fourth Quarter
1 - Poor 1-Poor 1-Poor
• Remediation is offered to 54% and below 50% and below of non-readers improved Had accurate, complete and comprehensive
who need it their performance at the end of the records of student's progress after the fourth
school year Quarter
2.3 Conducted home June 2017- 10% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding
visitation to students Mar. 2018
who are at risk of visited 95%-100% of the students who are 95% -100% of the students in a class Conduct home visitation 4 times every
dropping out and at risk of dropping out. promoted quarter
students with problem 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory
regarding academic
performance. visited 85% - 94% of students who are at 85-94% of the students in a class Conduct home visitation 3 times every
risk of dropping out promoted quarter
3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory
visited 75% - 84% of students who are at 75% - 84% of the students in a class Conduct home visitation 2 times every
risk of dropping out promoted quarter
#RSH#
 dropping out and
students with problem
regarding academic
performance.
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Result
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T Ave.

2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory

visited 51% - 74% of students who are at 51%-74% of the students in a class
risk of dropping out promoted Conduct home visitation once every quarter
1 - Poor 1 - Poor 1 - Poor
Conduct home visitation once a year
visited 50% and below of students who 50% and below of the students in a
are at risk of dropping out class promoted
3. Community 3.1 Conducted June 2017- 5% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding
Involvement HomeRoom PTA Mar. 2018 Conducted 5 Parents Meeting in a year 95% - 100% Attendance / Participation
(15%) meeting every quarter 95%-100% of the expected meetings are
to feedback the parents conducted on time
and guardians 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory
regarding student's Conducted 4 Parents Meeting in a year 85%-95% Attendance / Participation 85%-94% of the expected meetings are
performance and conducted on time
school plans and
development to 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory
maintain good relations Conducted 3 Parents Meeting in a year 75% - 84% Attendance / Participation 75%-84% of the expected meetings are
towards stakeholders. conducted on time
2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory
Conducted 2 Parents Meeting in a year 51% - 74% of planned meetings 51%-75% of the expected meetings are
conducted with minimal results conducted on time
1 - Poor 1 - Poor 1 - Poor
Conducted once to two times Parents 50% and below of the planned meetings
50% and below of the expected meetings
Meeting in a year conducted with no result
are conducted on time
3.2 Visited at least 5 June 2017- 5% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 4 4 4 4
parents of students Mar. 2018 Conduct home visitation 4 times every
needing academic Visited 5 parents of identified slow 95% -100% accomplishment of set quarter
monitoring/follow-up learners quarterly with set of agreements visits with successful intervention/s
quarterly. duly signed by the parents implemented
4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory
Conduct home visitation 3 times every
Visited 4 parents of identified slow 85% - 94% accomplishment of visits
quarter
learners quarterly with set of agreements with partial success in implementation of
duly signed by the parents interventions
3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory

#RSH#
 needing academic
monitoring/follow-up
quarterly.

PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Result

Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T Ave.

3.3 Participated and June 2016-
supported atleast 5 Mar. 2017
local activities in the
community to maintain
strong relationships
with the community and
stakeholders. (Civic
parade, clean-up drive,
tree planting activities,
fiesta and others)
Visited 3 parents of identified slow 75% - 84%% accomplishment of visits Conduct home visitation 2 times every
learners quarterly with set of agreements with suggested planned interventions quarter
duly signed by the parents
2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory
Visited 2 parents of identified slow 51% - 74% accomplishments of visits Conduct home visitation once every quarter
learners quarterly with set of agreements with planned interventions
duly signed by the parents
1 - Poor 1 - Poor 1 - Poor
Visited 1 parents of identified slow 50% and below accomplishments with Conduct home visitation once a year
learners quarterly with set of agreements no interventions
duly signed by the parents
5% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding
Participated 5 or more local activities • Organized/Initiated/Served as • Report of participation was submitted to
Facilitator/Resource the school head within 5 working days from
Person/Coordinator/Chairman the date of the project/event/activity
4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory
Participated 4 local activities • Served as steering committee • Report of participation was submitted to
member the school head within 10 working days from
the date of the project/event/activity

3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory

participated 3 local activities • Served as staff • Report of participation was submitted to
the school head within 15 working days from
the date of the project/event/activity

2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory

participated 2 local activities • Attended/Participated any local • Report of participation was submitted to
activities the school head within 20 working days
from the date of the project/event/activity

1 - Poor 1 - Poor 1 - Poor

participated 1 local activity only • Did not attend/initiate/ participate in • Report of participation was submitted to
co-curricular/ local activities the school head within 25 working days or
later from the date of the
project/event/activity

4. Professional 4.1 Attended atleast 2 June 2017- 5% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding

#RSH# Growth and trainings, seminars, Mar. 2018
Development workshops and
(15%) conferences to
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Result
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T Ave.
4. Professional 4.1 Attended atleast 2 June 2017- 5%
Growth and trainings, seminars, Mar. 2018 Attended 5 or more trainings/seminars • Attended • Done attending
Development workshops and and workshops a year round seminars/trainings/workshops in national seminars/trainings/workshops in school,
(15%) conferences to level and international level district, division, regional and national level
enhance teaching within 4 months before the end of the school
performance and year
professional growth.
4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory
Attended 4 trainings/seminars and • Attended • Done attending
workshops a year round seminars/trainings/workshops in regional seminars/trainings/workshops in school,
& division level district, division, regional and national level
within 3 months before the end of the school
year

3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory

4.2 June 2017-
Initiated/Participated at Mar. 2018
least 5 and above in
co-curricular/school
activities from June to
March 2017
Attended 3 trainings/seminars and • Attended • Done attending
workshops a year round seminars/trainings/workshops in district seminars/trainings/workshops in school,
level district, division, regional and national level
within 2 months before the end of the school
year
2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory
Attended 2 trainings/seminars and • Attended • Done attending
workshops a year round seminars/trainings/workshops in school seminars/trainings/workshops in school,
level district, division, regional and national level
1 - Poor within
1 - Poor1 month before the end of the school
1 - Poor year
Attended 1 training/seminar and • Never attended any • Never attended
workshops a year round seminars/trainings/workshops seminars/trainings/workshops in school,
district, division, regional and national level
within the end of the school year
5% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding
• Attended/initiated/ participated in 5 or • Organized/Initiated/Served as • Report of participation was submitted to
more co-curricular/ school activities Facilitator/Resource the school head within 5 working days from
Person/Coordinator/Chairman the date of the project/event/activity
4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory

#RSH#
 4.2 June 2017- 5%
Initiated/Participated at Mar. 2018 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Result
least 5 and above in Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES
co-curricular/school TIMELINE
per KRA
activities from June to QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T Ave.
March 2017
• Attended/initiated/ participated in 4 co- • Served as steering committee • Report of participation was submitted to
curricular/ school activities member the school head within 10 working days from
the date of the project/event/activity
3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory
• Attended/initiated/ participated in 3 co- • Served as staff • Report of participation was submitted to
curricular/ school activities the school head within 15 working days from
the date of the project/event/activity

2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory

• Attended/initiated/ participated in 1-2 co- • Attended/Participated • Report of participation was submitted to
curricular/ school activities the school head within 20 working days
from the date of the project/event/activity
1 - Poor 1 - Poor 1 - Poor
• Never attended/initiated/ participated in • Did not attend/initiate/ participate in • Report of participation was submitted to
co-curricular/ school activities co-curricular/ school activities the school head within 25 working days or
later from the date of the
project/event/activity
4.3 Submitted require June 2017- 5% 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding 5 - Outstanding
reports on time Mar. 2018 All the require reports submitted like the All the require reports submitted like the • 95% - 100% of all the required reports
following: SF 2, SF1, FORM 138, Form following: SF 2, SF1, FORM 138, Form were submitted for checking before the
137, Form 48, Narative Report, Form 86, 137, Form 48, Narative Report, Form 86, checking schedule to the school head
SF 5 SF 5
4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory 4 - Very Satisfactory
One of the required reports submitted is One of the required reports submitted is • 85% - 94% of all the required reports were
missing. missing. submitted for checking before the checking
schedule to the school head

3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory 3 - Satisfactory

2 out of the required reports submitted is 2 out of the required reports submitted is • 75% - 84% of all the required reports were
missing. missing. submitted for checking before the checking
schedule to the school head

2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory 2 - Unsatisfactory

3of the required reports submitted is 3of the required reports submitted is • 51% - 74% of all the required reports were
lacking. lacking. submitted for checking before the checking
schedule to the school head

#RSH#
 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Actual Result
Weight
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
per KRA
QUALITY EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS Q E T Ave.

1 - Poor 1 - Poor 1 - Poor

• 50% and below of all the required reports
4-5 of the required reports submitted is 4-5 of the required reports submitted is were submitted for checking before the
lacking lacking checking schedule to the school head
* To get the score, the rating is multiplied by the weight assigned

Ratee: Approving Officer:

JANICE A. HUGO BELEN S. CASAS
Teacher SCHOOL PRINCIPAL

#RSH#
EVALUATION

Rating SCORE*

#RSH#
 Rating SCORE*

#RSH#
 Rating SCORE*

#RSH#
 Rating SCORE*

#RSH#
 Rating SCORE*

#RSH#
 Rating SCORE*

0.2

#RSH#
 Rating SCORE*

#RSH#
 Rating SCORE*

#RSH#
 Rating SCORE*

#RSH#
 Rating SCORE*

CASAS
RINCIPAL

#RSH#

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management
1 Sets personal goals and direction, needs and development.
Undertakes personal actions and behaviors that are clear and
2 4
purposive and takes into account personal goals and values
congruent to that of the organization.
Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by
3
higher goals
Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through gantt charts, checklists,
4 4
etc.) to achieve goals.
5 Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others
Professionalism and Ethics
Demonstrates the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of
Conduct and Ethical Standards for public officials and employee (RA
1 6713).
Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into
2 4
account the impact of his/her actions and decisions.
Maintains professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of
3
attendance and punctuality, good grooming and communication.
4 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs.
Acts with a sense pf urgency and responsibility to meet the
5 organization's needs, improves systems and help others improve
their effectiveness.
Result Focus
Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the
1 Fosters new ideas, processes, and suggests bettter ways to do things (cost
time.
Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work
2
methods by placing organizational needs before personal needs.
Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to
standard operating procedures correctly and consistently. Able to
3 produce very satisfactoy quality of work in terms of
usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision
required.
Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste
4 or inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting
goals set.
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to
5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates;
COMPETENCIES
improve performance. Examples may include doing something better,
faster, at alower cost, more efficiently; or improving quality, costumer
satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal.
4
Teamwork
4 1 4
Willingly does his/her share of responsibilty.
2 Promotes collaboration and removes barriers to teamwork and goal
4 accomplishment across the organization 4 4
3
4
Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
4 4 4
Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5
Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across
4
organizations to accomplish organizational goals and objectives.
Service Orientation
1
Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
4 4
2
Takes personal responsibilty for dealing with and/or correcting costumer 3.8
4 service issues and concerns 4
3 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women
4 empowerment. 4
4
Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates & strategies
4 based on DepEd strategies and directions. 4
5
Develops and adopts service improvement programs through simplified
procedures that will further enhance service delivery.
4 3
Innovation
1 Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions.
4 and/or operational efficiency). 4
2 Demonstrates an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously focuses on
4 improving personal productivity to create higher value and results. 4
3
Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original
4 4
ideas or solutions.
4 4
4
Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit and
organization.
4 4
5 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilties. Demonstrates resourcefulness and the
4 ability to succeed with minimal resources. 4
1 - Rarely demonstrates
DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form -Teachers
 CORE SKILLS Computer / ICT Skills
Oral Communication Prepares basic compositions ( e.g., letters, reports, spreadsheets and
1 graphic presentations using Word Processing and Excel. 4
Identifies different computer parts, turns the computer on/off, and work on
1 Follows instructions accurately. 4.2 a given task with acceptable speed and accuracy and connects computer 4
4 2 peripherals ( e.g., printers, modems, multi-media projectors, etc.) 4
2 Expresses self clearly, fluently and articulately. 4 3 Prepares simple presentations using Powerpoint. 4
Utilizes technologies to : access information to enhance professional
3 Uses appropriate medium for the message. productivity, assists in conducting research and communicate through local
4 4 and global professional networks. 4
4 Recommends appropriate and updated technology to enhance productivity
Adjust communication style to others. 4 5 and professional practice. 4
5 Guides discussions between and among peers to meet an objective. 5
Written Communication 4
Knows the different written business communication formats used in
1 the DepEd. 4
Writes routine correspondence/communications, narrative and
descriptive report based on ready available information data with 4.2
2 minimal spelling or grammatical error/s (e.g. Memos, minutes, etc.) 4 OVERALL COMPETENCY RATINGS
Secures information from required references (i.e., Directories,
3 schedules, notices, instructions) for specific purposes. 4 CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 4.02
Self-edits words, numbers, phonetic notation and content, if
4 necessary. 5
Demonstrates clarity, fluency, impact, conciseness, and effectiveness
5 in his/her written communications. 4 OVERALL RATING 4.02

5 - Role Model; 4 - Consistently demonstrates; 3 - Most of the time demonstrates; 2 - Sometimes demonstrates; 1 - Rarely demonstrates

Note: These ratings can be used for the developmental plans of the employee.

DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form - For Teachers

 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating

Accomplishments of KRAs and Objectives

4.17
Employee-Superior Agreement
The signatures below confirm that the employee and his/her superior have agreed to the contents of the performance as captured in this form.

Name of Employee: LYN J. ESPINOSA Name of Superior: DESIDERIO A. LOGDONIO

Signature: Signature:
Date: Date:

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs (Recommended Developmental Timeline Resources Needed
Intervention)

1. Prepared daily lesson log

with five parts and had partial Teaching methods and strategies elicited 51% to 79% Teachers should conduct at least three
description on what to do. interaction from the class. classroom-based action plan. S.Y. 2018 - 2019 Action Plan
2. 80% - 95% of students were Prepare the Instructional Materials suited for
guided in the observation of each subject to attain 100% interaction from
classroom rules and guidelines. Must conduct Action Research the students. S.Y. 2018 - 2019 Instructional Materials (IM's)

3. Students' portfolio contents, 80% of the students got an MPS of 75% and Prepare various tools for class remediation
85% - 99% is accomplished. above (CNR) in every unmaterred competency. S.Y. 2018 - 2019 Various Assessment

LYN J. ESPINOSA JUNELLY G. ARCITE DESIDERIO A. LOGDONIO

Ratee Rater Approving Officer

DEPED RPMS form - DEPED form -For Teacher |