Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Greeks in Toronto Constructing A Greek Identity
The Greeks in Toronto Constructing A Greek Identity
Tara Azizi
214620892
HIST 3356
BOOK REVIEW FOR THE GREEKS IN TORONTO 2
‘Grafos’ study aimed to create a better understanding of Greek identity within the City of
Toronto’ (Grafos, 2001, p. 2). Greek identity has been formed for two different reasons in
Toronto. ‘The Greek Kinoitis and Greektown on the Danforth Business Improvement Area
(BIA) were both studied to investigate identity and its meaning’ (Grafos, 2001, p. 2). In his
research, Grafos mainly focused on Danforth Avenue. In order to study the Greeks in Toronto
thoroughly, a Census-based analysis was carried out to enhance our comprehension of their
spatial and socio-economic characteristics (Grafos, 2001, p. 2). The Kinoitis was able to form a
Greek identity publicized to its people through the formation of institutions (internal creation).
Alternatively, the business elites on Danforth Avenue have attempted to form a Greek identity to
market and advertise itself to the citizens of Toronto over-all (external creation). ‘Therefore,
internal and external creations have shaped two different meanings of “Greekness” and “Greek
The purpose of the book was to study the Greek community of Canada since they have
not been extensively studied, although they have lived in Canada for many years. The focus of
Grafos’ research was the Greek identity which has been formed in Toronto, specifically Danforth
Avenue, because people in Toronto have linked it with “Greek” and “Greekness” (Grafos, 2001,
p. 11). Grafos studied the formation of the Danforth to discover if his cognitive image of Greek
identity matches the images that are created on the Danforth (Grafos, 2001, p. 20).
Grafos’ thesis was organized into five chapters. The first chapter was the introduction and
stated the purpose, methods of research, as well as the Greek population of Toronto and Canada.
The second chapter was a Census-based analysis of the Greeks in Toronto. The second chapter
had two goals. The first goal was to discuss the spatial distribution of Greeks in Toronto at
BOOK REVIEW FOR THE GREEKS IN TORONTO 3
different points in time after World War II. The second goal was to examine the socio-economic
characteristics of the Greek population in Toronto. The third chapter was a review of the
literature, which was categorized into themes (primordial, instrumentalist, constructionist) which
were associated with ethnicity and identity. Existing literature was categorized into four thematic
topics (historical narrative, assimilationist, church based and language). The fourth chapter
explained the empirical findings of the research. The various concepts and theories of ethnic
identity formation and creation were examined in regards to Danforth Avenue and the Greek
Kinoitis as well as visual images such as writing, flags and symbols. The fifth chapter concluded
‘Grafos’ study aimed to create a better understanding of Greek identity within the City of
Toronto’ (Grafos, 2001, p. 2). The first part of the thesis was that Greek identity has been formed
by Greek Kinoitis and Danforth Avenue for two different reasons. Thus, internal and external
creations of Greek identity have shaped two different meanings of “Greekness” and “Greek
identity” in Toronto. “One meaning of ‘Greekness’ and ‘Greek Identity’ is from the business
interests on Danforth Avenue” (Grafos, 2001, p. 89). Danforth Avenue has been associated with
“Greek”, especially with the use of many visual images throughout the area. This image was
made by the business elites on Danforth Avenue, but it did not originate from the Kinoitis. The
images formed on the Danforth were derived from ancient elements of the Greek culture because
people have a basic understanding of what these ancient images symbolize, such as a statue of
Alexander the Great, the Greek flag, or the use of Greek writing on store windows and street
signs (Grafos, 2001, p. 90). The second meaning of “Greek identity” stems from the Kinoitis of
Toronto. ‘The root for identity originally was being of Greek descent, characterized by language,
BOOK REVIEW FOR THE GREEKS IN TORONTO 4
religion and customs that were different from the people in the new country of settlement
(Canada)’ (Grafos, 2001, p. 90). The Kinoitis visual images are centered around history which
‘Grafos’ study employed two methods in order to examine initial underlying questions
and answer the overriding topic of Greek identity’ (Grafos, 2001, p. 19). The first method was
quantitative. Data from Statistics Canada was used with the intent of gaining a better
understanding of the Green community. The quantitative data was collected for an analysis of the
spatial distribution of the Greek population residing in Toronto. Also, it was collected for an
analysis of the socio-economic characteristics of the Greek population. The analysis discussed
characteristics, the possible exclusivity of Danforth, and Greeks as an ethnic group. The second
method used was qualitative to answer the rest of the research questions. The remaining
questions addressed Greek symbols and their creation, symbolism, the role of the Greek
community in the development of the Danforth and how a Greek identity has been formed in
Toronto. In particular, interviews with informed individuals were used to retrieve information to
understand the actions and intentions of Greek people and the community. “The interviews were
conducted with representatives from three different groups: The Greek Community of
Metropolitan Toronto (Kinoitis), Greektown on the Danforth Business Improvement Area and
Grafos’ book was written in expository style. In this study, there were many strengths
with the use of expository writing. Grafos did an exceptional job in educating and informing the
reader through the use of facts and statistical data. His facts were derived from research and
BOOK REVIEW FOR THE GREEKS IN TORONTO 5
reliable sources, which provided the reader with comprehensive knowledge on Greek identity.
The historical narrative gave the reader background information to understand the context better.
In Grafos’ argument, the concepts were clearly stated but lacked a concise definition and
explanation. There were several terms used throughout the article but the limited explanations
left the reader with a vague idea of what the terms mean in relation to each other. A thorough
explanation of the term, its origin, and its significance would enhance the reader’s understanding
even further. For example, the definition of Kinoitis was short and vague. Grafos failed to
mention the origin of the term or the historical context. Also, Grafos did not clearly state the
of Greek identity.
In the study’s methodology, there were weaknesses regarding the use of Census material.
There were limitations and lack of consistency in the use of Census material. ‘Between 1951 and
1996, Statistics Canada used several variables at different points in time to identify cultural
differences in Canada’s population, which are religion, language and ethnic origin’ (Grafos,
2001, p. 22). Grafos saw religion as the most useful variable since most people of Greek descent
are Greek Orthodox. However, it is problematic to use this variable to estimate the number of
Greeks presented in the society. The shift in their spatial patterns was undetectable for every
Census year since they were only obtainable for 1951, 1961, and 1971. This is problematic
because many ethnic groups may be affiliated with the Eastern Orthodox faith (for instance:
Ukrainians, Russians, Macedonians Bulgarians, Serbians and Romanians) (Grafos, 2001, p. 24).
In 1991, this discrepancy was heightened when the Census grouped religion into Protestants,
Catholics and Other. Lastly, in 1996 religion was permanently removed from the Census.
BOOK REVIEW FOR THE GREEKS IN TORONTO 6
Kitroeff’s “The Greeks in Egypt,” examines the Greek settlement in 19th century Egypt.
Also, they maintained their ethnic character through several factors; “a growth of the Greek
entity through mass immigration, the concentration of the population in urban centres, as well as
the differences in language and religion which set the Greeks culturally apart from all other
ethnic groups” (Kitroeff, 1989, p. 11). These factors are similar to those examined in Grafos’
book which looked at the concentration of the Greek community on Danforth Avenue. Also,
Grafos explored how language and religion helped Greeks preserve their ethnic character.
Cairo and Port Said’ (Kitroeff, 1989, p. 18). They ranged from daily newspapers to specially
designed magazines. The daily newspapers addressed social issues and questions related to the
community, homeland as well as the country of settlement. Similarly, Grafos studied the
reproduction of ethnic identity of the Greeks living in Toronto through the use of visual images
For this course, Grafos’ book is useful because it examined ethnicity and the formation of
ethnic identities through cultural factors. Learning about “Greekness” and “Greek identity” will
have a positive impact on people because it will inform them about how people difference as
well as how they are communicated. This book is useful for my degree in human resources
management because it teaches me the significance of learning about ethnic groups and their
identity. As a result of exploring ethnicity in this book, I have gained more knowledge in how
ethnicity is formed, what it means to ethnic groups and how it is represented. For my education,
it is useful to learn about different ethnic groups since it will help me improve my interpersonal
References
Kitroeff, A. (1989). Greek ethnicity, community and classes in Egypt. In The Greeks in Egypt,